Topic: Up Like Trump - page 162. (Read 572791 times)

I've said before that I would prefer, as fellow countrymen, many of the Mexican family people I know to many of the mentally and physically damaged, spoiled, lazy, indoctrinated, low-info losers who are native born.  As an example, note that Sanders acts like a magnet for such people.

Don't forget that people who accepted welfare of various types would probably not be allowed back in, or if they are, it would be at a lower priority.  I had thought that it was loony right-wing hyperbole that the Left was deliberately importing people who were prone to and encouraged to be dependent on the state in order to swell the ranks of Democrat voters and achieve other objectives (esp, Cloward and Piven.)  I now believe that that might be exactly what has been going on over the last 7 years.  My policy would be to reverse that.

I would feel somewhat sorry for the people who are used as pawns in the game and migrated back and forth, but they got some benefit for a while complements of my tax dollars already, and Mexico is not Hell.  If it is, they should go back and help make it better.

Edit: added link  Note: For a period of time I disregard Cloward & Piven for the sole reason that I first heard of it from the pie-hole of Glen Beck who I did and do detest.  'Agenda 21' similar.  Note to fellow 'reformed progressives' or those in the process:  A powerful strategy is to encourage or demand that people intellectually box themselves in and not explore ideas presented by those outside of a defined 'safe zone.'  Recognize and reject this for your own good and the good of society.  I think this is also the reason behind the increasingly powerful taboo against 'talking politics.'

CNBC's Steve Liesman Makes A "Discovery": Americans Are Increasingly ♥♥Enlighten ♥♥ And They Want Trump

CNBC's Steve Liesman Makes A "Discovery": Americans Are Increasingly Angry And They Want Trump

Submitted by Tyler Durden on 04/04/2016 22:32 -0400

Earlier today, CNBC's Steve Liesman made two very important, in fact "critical", if about one year overdue, discoveries.

The first one was that Americans are angry.

According to the CNBC All-America Survey, a majority of Americans are angry about both the political and the economic system.

Perhaps if CNBC had discovered this sooner, it would have figured out that the reason it no longer reports its ratings to Nielsen has something to do with its underlying "rosy" slant on things, one which perhaps brings out people's, well, anger. That and the occasional informercial for Ferrari and million dollar homes.

The second discovery is that angry Americans largely support Trump over Hillary, something we have discussed since last summer.

As Liesman puts it, nearly three-fourths of the public is angry or dissatisfied with the political system in Washington, compared with 56 percent who are angry or dissatisfied about the economy. This group favors Trump on the economy over Clinton 28 percent to 21 percent.

.....more

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-04-04/cnbcs-steve-liesman-makes-discovery-americans-are-increasingly-angry-and-they-want-t

Reading your post... it sounds more like you do not support deporting illegals at all... only in the case of them being criminals, which everyone can agree upon... nobody is arguing for illegals who are also criminals to stay here... those always get deported/extradited

If you support letting them stay when they have an anchor baby, or if they are benign, or if they have useful talents/skills... then you support letting them stay, not deporting them... hate to break it to ya

I am (and I am a Trump supporter.)  Even back when I was much more of a 'progressive', which was not that long ago, I was always uncomfortable with ILLEGAL immigration.  It was fairly obvious that at some point the chickens would come home to roost.  It was also obvious that one of the goals was to drive down labor costs and thus standards of living for citizens.

At the present time, I would favor inviting a fair number of ILLEGALS to stick around under the following conditions:

 - They queued up first in line (by being the first to 'turn themselves in' or enter through the metaphorical 'big beautiful gate' that Trump speaks of.)

 - They can satisfactorily document their history in their native country and it was benign.

 - Their stay in our country was at least neutral.  That is, they did not engage in significant criminal activity here or accept social services.

 - They could document their income earned while in the U.S. and agreed to pay any taxes owed on it over the course of the rest of their stay (which, I would hope, would include a process of naturalization in a lot of cases.)

  - If someone managed to pull off an anchor-baby, they get to stay.  As far as I'm concerned that would normally have taken some gumption which is correlated with being the type of people we need here.  And, of course, the kids are as American as I am.

I would also factor in whether they have special skills which would benefit the country.  The only thing which makes me uncomfortable about this is that it royally screws the parent country to suck out those who have skills or talent.

I broadened my thoughts to be beyond Mexico since I see no reason to limit it.  As for Mexico, they have one of the highest GINI coefficients on the planet.  I see no reason to help them control their own significant social and political problems by absorbing their unwanted.  In fact, I'd be amused to see those who were booted out of the country without an invite to return be given the tools to topple their own rotten government and try to re-build something they don't feel like running away from.

Just wondering, is anyone here openly supporting Trump's decision to deport Mexicans? If so, why? I am not trying to judge the views or demands. I would just like to understand them. Not fight them, just understand them. Please quote and respond to me with your views if you are indeed a Trump supporter.

He is a berniebot. What you are asking of him is beyond the 0.7Kb of codes of his throwaway purpose...

 

Yes, it is Jimmy doing the impersonation. Try listening more carefully.

You're dumb, that's definitely not Jimmy Kimmel's voice... is that Jimmy Kimmel's face doing the speaking as well?

It's clearly an impersonator, and it's certainly not Jimmy... wow... April Fool's

Trading market https://yobit.net/en/trade/TRUMP/BTC

Sell order
Price TRUMP BTC

0.00000701 1276.8243201 0.00895053
0.00000702 500.000000 0.00351000
0.00000703 1464.728173 0.01029703
0.00000704 1500.08749 0.01056061
0.00000705 1281.9805232 0.00903796
0.00000706 1990.00000 0.01404940


Buy order
Price TRUMP BTC

0.00000667 72663.48185768 0.48466542
0.00000665 2315.532694 0.01539829
0.00000661 3120.59224969 0.02062711
0.00000647 100.000000 0.00064700
0.00000645 83.93739651 0.00054139
0.00000640 1276.8243201 0.00817167


https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/president-trumpofficial-threadtrump-coinofficial-thread-1367265

Never heard of trumpcoin.

All right, all right. Brake the break... er... break the brake?     

trumpcoin will see a big pump. because trump will win the election in 2016.
make sure to load up now while the trumpcoin is still cheap. it may become the only accepted form of payment in the usa.

 

Even Trump needs a break now and again.     

What a classic TRUMP


 

Published on Apr 1, 2016

Trouble is, it becomes pretty clear half 'way through the clip that the voice is Jimmy Kimmel's.

Donald Trump's Huge Campaign Announcement

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VO-1ePYypdU