Are the emails still an issue at this point?
You ain't seen nothin' yet!
What do you mean?
Topic: Up Like Trump - page 96. (Read 572883 times)
Are the emails still an issue at this point?
You ain't seen nothin' yet!
What do you mean?
Are the emails still an issue at this point?
You ain't seen nothin' yet!
Are the emails still an issue at this point?
Another one for the taking. I've not seen it yet. This relates to the Judicial Watch FOIA e-mails showing gross influence peddling involving the Clinton Foundation
and HRC's state dept.
The establishment defense of Hillary is that the e-mails didn't involve Hillary herself; only her immediate underlings including Mills and Abedin. Of course this is ultra-lame and not even a vaguely intelligent Clinton sycophant would buy it, but there are plenty of really dumb folks in our idiocracy here. The material is so incredibly damning that that is all they can come up with. LOL!
The proper response is that the particular FOIA request related specifically to Abedin and etc, and the communications involving Clinton herself are still being hidden from the public. It is almost certain that if/when Clinton's mails themselves are uncovered a lot more of the same can be expected.
several unrelated things. First, a suggestions for the Trump campaign:
1) Suggest that what Hillary was doing when she went into her cold chai spasm fit was making fun of those who are handicapped with neurological deficits. And that it is repulsive especially in light of the many wounded warriors created by the wars that she and Obama have been starting and perpetuating.
The defenses available to Clinton are all bad and not very 'presidential':
- The spastic movements were not meant to be funny.
- The spastic movements were meant to be just dance movements.
- The spastic movements were for real.
- Trump did it to.
Getting Clinton's health into the news circulation is highly effective and I would argue perfectly fair in part because of the treatment of McCain at the hands of the Dems back in the day, and in part because the concerns are genuinely relevant and important.
---
2) To those of use who have been paying attention it is pretty much beyond doubt that the handlers of Obama and Clinton really are the founders of so-called ISIS. Trump could never have stated such 'conspiracy theories' earlier on. He probably can do so now only because he knows that the proof is certain to be released. He seems to be shaking the media tree in anticipation of this. Just like Trump was rope-a-doped into taking a hit on the Khan thing, he now seems to be doing the same thing to the opposition with respect to ISIS. It will be quite interesting to see how and if they take the bait. Or if they can avoid it which will be even more interesting.
To people like myself, Trump's willingness to go down these paths goes a long way toward instilling trust. I understand that there are limits to where he can go and when, and to see him take these paths when strategically practical is quite confidence inspiring.
---
3) Trump did take the bait and took a hit with the odious Kahn, but when the Mateen (Orlando shooting hoax father behind Hillary at a rally) thing occurred he did not. What happened instead was that the Trump team put up the odious pervert Foley in exactly the same position behind trump. The positioning and hat and etc are to suspicious for my tastes. It almost has to be a setup, but why?
I suggest that Trump knows that Mateen will harm Clinton more than Foley will harm him. The key is to get the media talking about things in certain circles, and giving them Foley to chew on was to much. Furthermore, it is pretty much impossible to point it out without also mentioning Mateen. And that they did. Now, if/when proof of the construction and perpetuation of ISIS by the Obama team comes to the fore, the image of Mateen cheering and waving right behind Clinton will have already received broad public play.
1) Suggest that what Hillary was doing when she went into her cold chai spasm fit was making fun of those who are handicapped with neurological deficits. And that it is repulsive especially in light of the many wounded warriors created by the wars that she and Obama have been starting and perpetuating.
The defenses available to Clinton are all bad and not very 'presidential':
- The spastic movements were not meant to be funny.
- The spastic movements were meant to be just dance movements.
- The spastic movements were for real.
- Trump did it to.
Getting Clinton's health into the news circulation is highly effective and I would argue perfectly fair in part because of the treatment of McCain at the hands of the Dems back in the day, and in part because the concerns are genuinely relevant and important.
---
2) To those of use who have been paying attention it is pretty much beyond doubt that the handlers of Obama and Clinton really are the founders of so-called ISIS. Trump could never have stated such 'conspiracy theories' earlier on. He probably can do so now only because he knows that the proof is certain to be released. He seems to be shaking the media tree in anticipation of this. Just like Trump was rope-a-doped into taking a hit on the Khan thing, he now seems to be doing the same thing to the opposition with respect to ISIS. It will be quite interesting to see how and if they take the bait. Or if they can avoid it which will be even more interesting.
To people like myself, Trump's willingness to go down these paths goes a long way toward instilling trust. I understand that there are limits to where he can go and when, and to see him take these paths when strategically practical is quite confidence inspiring.
---
3) Trump did take the bait and took a hit with the odious Kahn, but when the Mateen (Orlando shooting hoax father behind Hillary at a rally) thing occurred he did not. What happened instead was that the Trump team put up the odious pervert Foley in exactly the same position behind trump. The positioning and hat and etc are to suspicious for my tastes. It almost has to be a setup, but why?
I suggest that Trump knows that Mateen will harm Clinton more than Foley will harm him. The key is to get the media talking about things in certain circles, and giving them Foley to chew on was to much. Furthermore, it is pretty much impossible to point it out without also mentioning Mateen. And that they did. Now, if/when proof of the construction and perpetuation of ISIS by the Obama team comes to the fore, the image of Mateen cheering and waving right behind Clinton will have already received broad public play.
I do not like trump. He is a sexist racist and a possible dictator.
That is what the Constitution and presidency are all about. They are all dictator oriented.
Sometimes we need a dictator-like person to firmly take control. The president is it.
Other times we need to get rid of a tyrant. That's what Congress is for.
In America, Canada, the United Kingdom, Australia, and others, the common law rules, so we can easily put down the government when the whole thing becomes tyrannical. Google for court cases where people sued government and won big chunks of money, to see the common law in action.
No, we don't need a dictator-like person.
At times we need fast governmental action. A dictator can do this best. But if the dictator goes too far, we don't need him. That is what the USA government was set up to be like.
The USA government was set up to be dictatorial when necessary, but absolutely free for all the people at the same time... if they like.
I do not like trump. He is a sexist racist and a possible dictator.
That is what the Constitution and presidency are all about. They are all dictator oriented.
Sometimes we need a dictator-like person to firmly take control. The president is it.
Other times we need to get rid of a tyrant. That's what Congress is for.
In America, Canada, the United Kingdom, Australia, and others, the common law rules, so we can easily put down the government when the whole thing becomes tyrannical. Google for court cases where people sued government and won big chunks of money, to see the common law in action.
No, we don't need a dictator-like person.
I do not like trump. He is a sexist racist and a possible dictator.
That is what the Constitution and presidency are all about. They are all dictator oriented.
Sometimes we need a dictator-like person to firmly take control. The president is it.
Other times we need to get rid of a tyrant. That's what Congress is for.
In America, Canada, the United Kingdom, Australia, and others, the common law rules, so we can easily put down the government when the whole thing becomes tyrannical. Google for court cases where people sued government and won big chunks of money, to see the common law in action.
It should be possible to look at these things rationally without the need for political propaganda coming in.
There's no reason to support a POTUS candidate with mental problems or physical ones that could seriously impair operations.
PHOTOS=> Hillary's Handler Carries DIAZEPAM Pen...
Quote from: http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2016/08/oh-hillary-handler-carries-diazepam-pen-seizures/
In recent bizarre events on the campaign trail a strange man was noticed at Hillary Clinton's side.
The man is dressed like a secret service agent but his actions prove otherwise. In a recent campaign stop in a Union Hall in front of a sparse crowd, at about the time when some liberal protesters began to protest, Hillary Clinton suddenly froze. She looked dazed and lost. Seeing this, a group of men rushed to assist the candidate on the stage. One man however gently pats the candidate's back and then says, "Keep Talking."
An expert on Secret Service tactics told TGP Secret Service agents would not touch a candidate in the manner that this individual did and especially Hillary Clinton. It has been widely reported on Hillary's disdain for the agents who work to protect her. The man who touches Hillary may be a member of Hillary's close staff – but he is NOT a Secret Service agent.
The man is dressed like a secret service agent but his actions prove otherwise. In a recent campaign stop in a Union Hall in front of a sparse crowd, at about the time when some liberal protesters began to protest, Hillary Clinton suddenly froze. She looked dazed and lost. Seeing this, a group of men rushed to assist the candidate on the stage. One man however gently pats the candidate's back and then says, "Keep Talking."
An expert on Secret Service tactics told TGP Secret Service agents would not touch a candidate in the manner that this individual did and especially Hillary Clinton. It has been widely reported on Hillary's disdain for the agents who work to protect her. The man who touches Hillary may be a member of Hillary's close staff – but he is NOT a Secret Service agent.
Read more at http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2016/08/oh-hillary-handler-carries-diazepam-pen-seizures/.
Things are going from bad to worse for Trump. http://www.nbcnews.com/politics/first-read/polls-clinton-ahead-trump-midwest-battlegrounds-n626541
It should be possible to look at these things rationally without the need for political propaganda coming in.
There's no reason to support a POTUS candidate with mental problems or physical ones that could seriously impair operations.
Hitlery is mentally handicapped and that makes her ineligible to participate in the POTUS elections. If she is elected as the POTUS, her lesbian partner (Huma Abedin) will be the one who makes all the important decisions. And that is extremely dangerous, given Huma's ties to ISIS and the other hardline Islamist groups.
Or, the more likely explanation, is that the right wing media are sleazy, lying, pathetic sacks of human excrement, making the whole thing up in desperation. And the equally pathetic and desperate, drooling trump fanboys lap it up.
Right Wing Media and Blogs Push Misleading Photo as Evidence Hillary Clinton Is Sick
It's unnecessary. People have been talking for a decade about issues with Hillary's health. There is no need to exagerate or make things up.
Hitlery is mentally handicapped and that makes her ineligible to participate in the POTUS elections. If she is elected as the POTUS, her lesbian partner (Huma Abedin) will be the one who makes all the important decisions. And that is extremely dangerous, given Huma's ties to ISIS and the other hardline Islamist groups.
Or, the more likely explanation, is that the right wing media are sleazy, lying, pathetic sacks of human excrement, making the whole thing up in desperation. And the equally pathetic and desperate, drooling trump fanboys lap it up.
Right Wing Media and Blogs Push Misleading Photo as Evidence Hillary Clinton Is Sick
You are partially right. There are two places you are not right in. One of them is that the media is lying. The media doesn't come right out and say that she is sick. They simply suggest that she might be, and that sometimes she looks like she is sick. Then it is up to you to decide.
Your other wrong thing is that you are doing just as the media is doing, but in reverse. You don't say she is NOT sick. You only talk about the media pushing something about her in ways that make it look like the media is lying, and the people have to decide for themselves.
However, when you study all about her historically, you can see that she is sick... sick in the head or worse.
Hitlery is mentally handicapped and that makes her ineligible to participate in the POTUS elections. If she is elected as the POTUS, her lesbian partner (Huma Abedin) will be the one who makes all the important decisions. And that is extremely dangerous, given Huma's ties to ISIS and the other hardline Islamist groups.
Or, the more likely explanation, is that the right wing media are sleazy, lying, pathetic sacks of human excrement, making the whole thing up in desperation. And the equally pathetic and desperate, drooling trump fanboys lap it up.
Right Wing Media and Blogs Push Misleading Photo as Evidence Hillary Clinton Is Sick
Standard fare, and the Dems use it to the hilt when it serves them. Remember all of the stuff about McCain with his phonebook sized medical records file and suspect mental health as a result of being a war captive? Cheney and his heart issues? Both individuals remain among the living today and well past the limits of the terms they sought.
I delighted in these sorts of things when I was more on the left wing camp mostly because they were effective but also, in part, because they represented some actual risks which should be taken into account. Most politicians are largely meat puppets of the oligarchy, but even so the job is challenging enough that physical and mental liabilities can be a problem, and that is especially the case for those who may wish to take part in the oligarchic planing or challenge some of the movements they are instructed to perform.
Hitlery is mentally handicapped and that makes her ineligible to participate in the POTUS elections. If she is elected as the POTUS, her lesbian partner (Huma Abedin) will be the one who makes all the important decisions. And that is extremely dangerous, given Huma's ties to ISIS and the other hardline Islamist groups.
Or, the more likely explanation, is that the right wing media are sleazy, lying, pathetic sacks of human excrement, making the whole thing up in desperation. And the equally pathetic and desperate, drooling trump fanboys lap it up.
Right Wing Media and Blogs Push Misleading Photo as Evidence Hillary Clinton Is Sick
Is Something Wrong With Hillary:
Bizarre Behavior, Seizure Allegations...
Read more at http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-08-08/something-wrong-hillary-bizarre-behavior-seizure-allegations-raise-doubts-about-her-.
Bizarre Behavior, Seizure Allegations...
A frequently referenced video, shown below, alleging that Hillary may have seizure-like conditions emerged several weeks ago and has so far failed to lead to a conclusive explanation whether Hillary may have ongoing health problems and potential residual aftereffects from a blood clot in her brain sustained three years ago.
Recall in January 2013, CNN reported that then Secretary of State Clinton was treated with blood thinners at a New York hospital to help dissolve a blood clot in her head. Back then doctors were confident she would make a full recovery. Clinton was admitted to New York Presbyterian Hospital on Sunday due to the clot that was discovered during a follow-up exam related to a concussion she suffered this month, her spokesman, Philippe Reines, said. The clot was located in the vein between the brain and and the skull behind Clinton's right ear and did not result in any stroke or neurological damage, her doctors said in a statement.
Going further back, back in 2005, then Senator Hillary fainted during a speech in Buffalo, NY, where she received medical attention on site. "About five minutes into the speech, she said she was queasy," said Erie County Democratic Chairman Len Lenihan, who was at the Women's TAP fund-raiser at the private club. "Clinton left the podium and continued her talk sitting in a chair but eventually left the room, saying she needed a break, Lenihan said. She returned to the podium a short time later but fainted before resuming her speech. "It became clear she was faint. She was sort of brought down gracefully," he said.
Recall in January 2013, CNN reported that then Secretary of State Clinton was treated with blood thinners at a New York hospital to help dissolve a blood clot in her head. Back then doctors were confident she would make a full recovery. Clinton was admitted to New York Presbyterian Hospital on Sunday due to the clot that was discovered during a follow-up exam related to a concussion she suffered this month, her spokesman, Philippe Reines, said. The clot was located in the vein between the brain and and the skull behind Clinton's right ear and did not result in any stroke or neurological damage, her doctors said in a statement.
Going further back, back in 2005, then Senator Hillary fainted during a speech in Buffalo, NY, where she received medical attention on site. "About five minutes into the speech, she said she was queasy," said Erie County Democratic Chairman Len Lenihan, who was at the Women's TAP fund-raiser at the private club. "Clinton left the podium and continued her talk sitting in a chair but eventually left the room, saying she needed a break, Lenihan said. She returned to the podium a short time later but fainted before resuming her speech. "It became clear she was faint. She was sort of brought down gracefully," he said.
Read more at http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-08-08/something-wrong-hillary-bizarre-behavior-seizure-allegations-raise-doubts-about-her-.
Hitlery is mentally handicapped and that makes her ineligible to participate in the POTUS elections. If she is elected as the POTUS, her lesbian partner (Huma Abedin) will be the one who makes all the important decisions. And that is extremely dangerous, given Huma's ties to ISIS and the other hardline Islamist groups.
What's really happening is this. And it happens with movie stars all the time.
Stereotyping of a character produces effects in popular people through mental/spiritual community activity. In other words, the way people think about Hillary, coupled with what she thinks of herself, is probably wearing down her stamina to remain strong.
In movie stars, those who play the role of villains really well, are often hated by the movie-watching community. Often these stars go away never to be seen again. Once in a while, a star like this changes his/her stereotyping by starting to play hero roles.
In Hillary's case, the whole thing could be a ploy to get people to feel sorry for her. This might reverse the way she has been stereotyped in her Benghazi deleted emails dealings.
She is crafty and sly. You have to be if you are going to be president. Don't let her play on your emotions. She is like a wounded, cornered animal... even more dangerous than before, because she knows that her doom is imminent.
Is Something Wrong With Hillary:
Bizarre Behavior, Seizure Allegations...
Read more at http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-08-08/something-wrong-hillary-bizarre-behavior-seizure-allegations-raise-doubts-about-her-.
Bizarre Behavior, Seizure Allegations...
A frequently referenced video, shown below, alleging that Hillary may have seizure-like conditions emerged several weeks ago and has so far failed to lead to a conclusive explanation whether Hillary may have ongoing health problems and potential residual aftereffects from a blood clot in her brain sustained three years ago.
Recall in January 2013, CNN reported that then Secretary of State Clinton was treated with blood thinners at a New York hospital to help dissolve a blood clot in her head. Back then doctors were confident she would make a full recovery. Clinton was admitted to New York Presbyterian Hospital on Sunday due to the clot that was discovered during a follow-up exam related to a concussion she suffered this month, her spokesman, Philippe Reines, said. The clot was located in the vein between the brain and and the skull behind Clinton's right ear and did not result in any stroke or neurological damage, her doctors said in a statement.
Going further back, back in 2005, then Senator Hillary fainted during a speech in Buffalo, NY, where she received medical attention on site. "About five minutes into the speech, she said she was queasy," said Erie County Democratic Chairman Len Lenihan, who was at the Women's TAP fund-raiser at the private club. "Clinton left the podium and continued her talk sitting in a chair but eventually left the room, saying she needed a break, Lenihan said. She returned to the podium a short time later but fainted before resuming her speech. "It became clear she was faint. She was sort of brought down gracefully," he said.
Recall in January 2013, CNN reported that then Secretary of State Clinton was treated with blood thinners at a New York hospital to help dissolve a blood clot in her head. Back then doctors were confident she would make a full recovery. Clinton was admitted to New York Presbyterian Hospital on Sunday due to the clot that was discovered during a follow-up exam related to a concussion she suffered this month, her spokesman, Philippe Reines, said. The clot was located in the vein between the brain and and the skull behind Clinton's right ear and did not result in any stroke or neurological damage, her doctors said in a statement.
Going further back, back in 2005, then Senator Hillary fainted during a speech in Buffalo, NY, where she received medical attention on site. "About five minutes into the speech, she said she was queasy," said Erie County Democratic Chairman Len Lenihan, who was at the Women's TAP fund-raiser at the private club. "Clinton left the podium and continued her talk sitting in a chair but eventually left the room, saying she needed a break, Lenihan said. She returned to the podium a short time later but fainted before resuming her speech. "It became clear she was faint. She was sort of brought down gracefully," he said.
Read more at http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-08-08/something-wrong-hillary-bizarre-behavior-seizure-allegations-raise-doubts-about-her-.
Hitlery is mentally handicapped and that makes her ineligible to participate in the POTUS elections. If she is elected as the POTUS, her lesbian partner (Huma Abedin) will be the one who makes all the important decisions. And that is extremely dangerous, given Huma's ties to ISIS and the other hardline Islamist groups.
The question of marketing freedom is important economically, but in this case I think there is an even more important question, which is: Can a smart businessman use his business experience and skills to be a good politician or the two areas are ( or should be ) completely different? Because if business skills help make good politics, Trump really has an advantage thanks to that.
The military/industrial complex is loaded with business people making money at the expense of taxpayers. President Eisenhower, a military general in WW2, warned us about them in his farewell address as president - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CWiIYW_fBfY.
Contrary to what most people think, the Trump Wall is NOT a wall to keep Mexicans out and U.S. citizens in. Rather, if Trump becomes President, it's the impenetrable wall that he is going run into that will keep him from carrying out 99+% of the things that he talks about in his campaign.
This I do not believe. If Trump is a fraud (which I consider to be very possible) that will achieve the effect you describe. If not, the POTUS has vastly more power to impose his/her will now than only a few cycles ago. Ironically, this divergence from 'tradition' here in the U.S. was probably greased along specifically by the globalist contingent of the proverbial PTB as a means of achieving 'efficiency.' It would be great if it ended up biting them hard on the ass. The simple possibility of this is worth supporting Trump for as far as I am concerned.
If Trump isn't a fraud, that would show he is way to naive to do much of any of what he says.
Jump to: