Topic: Up Like Trump - page 96. (Read 572791 times)

So far the Wikileaks released haven't been able to real harm Clinton. Her poll numbers are steady and rising even. Do you think they have an ace up their sleeve?

I mean that there are a mass of communications that have not been seen, they are the most damaging kinds (which is why they have been hidden) and it is almost certain that a variety of actors have control of them and will probably be releasing them strategically.

It should be noted that I have no particular insider information.  Just a better than average technical understanding of modern communications systems...and seemingly of more archaic human behavior patterns as well.  I've been anticipating the releases that we've seen to date and expect to see more.

I would also add that Wikileaks was singularly responsible for my being interested in Bitcoin at the time I was.  I've also made contributions to Wikileaks in the form of Bitcoin and consider it some of the best money I've ever spent due in part to the recent activity.  Two big thank-yous to Mr Assange.

What do you mean?

You ain't seen nothin' yet!

Are the emails still an issue at this point?

Another one for the taking.  I've not seen it yet.  This relates to the Judicial Watch FOIA e-mails showing gross influence peddling involving the Clinton Foundation
and HRC's state dept.

The establishment defense of Hillary is that the e-mails didn't involve Hillary herself;  only her immediate underlings including Mills and Abedin.  Of course this is ultra-lame and not even a vaguely intelligent Clinton sycophant would buy it, but there are plenty of really dumb folks in our idiocracy here.  The material is so incredibly damning that that is all they can come up with.  LOL!

The proper response is that the particular FOIA request related specifically to Abedin and etc, and the communications involving Clinton herself are still being hidden from the public.  It is almost certain that if/when Clinton's mails themselves are uncovered a lot more of the same can be expected.

several unrelated things.  First, a suggestions for the Trump campaign:

1)  Suggest that what Hillary was doing when she went into her cold chai spasm fit was making fun of those who are handicapped with neurological deficits.  And that it is repulsive especially in light of the many wounded warriors created by the wars that she and Obama have been starting and perpetuating.

The defenses available to Clinton are all bad and not very 'presidential':

 - The spastic movements were not meant to be funny.
 - The spastic movements were meant to be just dance movements.
 - The spastic movements were for real.
 - Trump did it to.

Getting Clinton's health into the news circulation is highly effective and I would argue perfectly fair in part because of the treatment of McCain at the hands of the Dems back in the day, and in part because the concerns are genuinely relevant and important.

---

2)  To those of use who have been paying attention it is pretty much beyond doubt that the handlers of Obama and Clinton really are the founders of so-called ISIS.  Trump could never have stated such 'conspiracy theories' earlier on.  He probably can do so now only because he knows that the proof is certain to be released.  He seems to be shaking the media tree in anticipation of this.  Just like Trump was rope-a-doped into taking a hit on the Khan thing, he now seems to be doing the same thing to the opposition with respect to ISIS.  It will be quite interesting to see how and if they take the bait.  Or if they can avoid it which will be even more interesting.

To people like myself, Trump's willingness to go down these paths goes a long way toward instilling trust.  I understand that there are limits to  where he can go and when, and to see him take these paths when strategically practical is quite confidence inspiring.

---

3)  Trump did take the bait and took a hit with the odious Kahn, but when the Mateen (Orlando shooting hoax father behind Hillary at a rally) thing occurred he did not.  What happened instead was that the Trump team put up the odious pervert Foley in exactly the same position behind trump.  The positioning and hat and etc are to suspicious for my tastes.  It almost has to be a setup, but why?

I suggest that Trump knows that Mateen will harm Clinton more than Foley will harm him.  The key is to get the media talking about things in certain circles, and giving them Foley to chew on was to much.  Furthermore, it is pretty much impossible to point it out without also mentioning Mateen.  And that they did.  Now, if/when proof of the construction and perpetuation of ISIS by the Obama team comes to the fore, the image of Mateen cheering and waving right behind Clinton will have already received broad public play.

At times we need fast governmental action. A dictator can do this best. But if the dictator goes too far, we don't need him. That is what the USA government was set up to be like.

The USA government was set up to be dictatorial when necessary, but absolutely free for all the people at the same time... if they like.

No, we don't need a dictator-like person.

That is what the Constitution and presidency are all about. They are all dictator oriented.

Sometimes we need a dictator-like person to firmly take control. The president is it.

Other times we need to get rid of a tyrant. That's what Congress is for.

In America, Canada, the United Kingdom, Australia, and others, the common law rules, so we can easily put down the government when the whole thing becomes tyrannical. Google for court cases where people sued government and won big chunks of money, to see the common law in action.

PHOTOS=> Hillary's Handler Carries DIAZEPAM Pen...







Read more at http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2016/08/oh-hillary-handler-carries-diazepam-pen-seizures/.

Things are going from bad to worse for Trump. http://www.nbcnews.com/politics/first-read/polls-clinton-ahead-trump-midwest-battlegrounds-n626541

It should be possible to look at these things rationally without the need for political propaganda coming in.

There's no reason to support a POTUS candidate with mental problems or physical ones that could seriously impair operations.

Her brain clot seizures don't give much confidence:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YMHOcmDVBP0

It's unnecessary.  People have been talking for a decade about issues with Hillary's health.  There is no need to exagerate or make things up.

You are partially right. There are two places you are not right in. One of them is that the media is lying. The media doesn't come right out and say that she is sick. They simply suggest that she might be, and that sometimes she looks like she is sick. Then it is up to you to decide.

Your other wrong thing is that you are doing just as the media is doing, but in reverse. You don't say she is NOT sick. You only talk about the media pushing something about her in ways that make it look like the media is lying, and the people have to decide for themselves.

However, when you study all about her historically, you can see that she is sick... sick in the head or worse.

Standard fare, and the Dems use it to the hilt when it serves them.  Remember all of the stuff about McCain with his phonebook sized medical records file and suspect mental health as a result of being a war captive?  Cheney and his heart issues?  Both individuals remain among the living today and well past the limits of the terms they sought.

I delighted in these sorts of things when I was more on the left wing camp mostly because they were effective but also, in part, because they represented some actual risks which should be taken into account.  Most politicians are largely meat puppets of the oligarchy, but even so the job is challenging enough that physical and mental liabilities can be a problem, and that is especially the case for those who may wish to take part in the oligarchic planing or challenge some of the movements they are instructed to perform.

Or, the more likely explanation, is that the right wing media are sleazy, lying, pathetic sacks of human excrement, making the whole thing up in desperation.  And the equally pathetic and desperate, drooling trump fanboys lap it up.

Right Wing Media and Blogs Push Misleading Photo as Evidence Hillary Clinton Is Sick