Topic: Up Like Trump - page 97. (Read 572791 times)

The question of marketing freedom is important economically, but in this case I think there is an even more important question, which is: Can a smart businessman use his business experience and skills to be a good politician or the two areas are ( or should be ) completely different? Because if business skills help make good politics, Trump really has an advantage thanks to that.

This I do not believe.  If Trump is a fraud (which I consider to be very possible) that will achieve the effect you describe.  If not, the POTUS has vastly more power to impose his/her will now than only a few cycles ago.  Ironically, this divergence from 'tradition' here in the U.S. was probably greased along specifically by the globalist contingent of the proverbial PTB as a means of achieving 'efficiency.'  It would be great if it ended up biting them hard on the ass.  The simple possibility of this is worth supporting Trump for as far as I am concerned.

A frequently referenced video, shown below, alleging that Hillary may have seizure-like conditions emerged several weeks ago and has so far failed to lead to a conclusive explanation whether Hillary may have ongoing health problems and potential residual aftereffects from a blood clot in her brain sustained three years ago.

Recall in January 2013, CNN reported that then Secretary of State Clinton was treated with blood thinners at a New York hospital to help dissolve a blood clot in her head. Back then doctors were confident she would make a full recovery. Clinton was admitted to New York Presbyterian Hospital on Sunday due to the clot that was discovered during a follow-up exam related to a concussion she suffered this month, her spokesman, Philippe Reines, said. The clot was located in the vein between the brain and and the skull behind Clinton's right ear and did not result in any stroke or neurological damage, her doctors said in a statement.

Going further back, back in 2005, then Senator Hillary fainted during a speech in Buffalo, NY, where she received medical attention on site. "About five minutes into the speech, she said she was queasy," said Erie County Democratic Chairman Len Lenihan, who was at the Women's TAP fund-raiser at the private club. "Clinton left the podium and continued her talk sitting in a chair but eventually left the room, saying she needed a break, Lenihan said. She returned to the podium a short time later but fainted before resuming her speech. "It became clear she was faint. She was sort of brought down gracefully," he said.

If Trump refrains from churning out garbage talk once every two or three days, he will be able to beat Hitlery by a handy margin. He needs to realize that the mainstream media and the oligarchs are against him, and even minor mistakes can get overblown. He needs to think thrice before speaking about any issue in the public forums.

Having seen her poll numbers suddenly explode higher (and Trump's collapse) following Reuters' decision to tweak its polling methodology, it appears we just witnessed 'Peak Hillary' as Reuters reports Clinton's lead over Trump has tumbled back to just 3 points (the poll had a credibility interval of plus or minus 3 percentage points) meaning, as Reuters is forced to admit, that the results suggest the race is roughly even...

Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton's lead over Republican rival Donald Trump narrowed to less than 3 percentage points, according to a Reuters/Ipsos opinion poll released on Friday, down from nearly eight points on Monday.
 
About 42 percent of likely voters favored Clinton, to Trump's 39 percent, according to the July 31-Aug. 4 online poll of 1,154 likely voters. The poll had a credibility interval of plus or minus 3 percentage points, meaning that the results suggest the race is roughly even. Among registered voters over the same period, Clinton held a lead of five percentage points, down from eight percentage points on Monday, according to the poll.

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-36423319

vote trump please 


will it be like "The Interview" but just in Real Life?

CNN likely had an 11-year-old Donald Trump supporter on this morning to get him to turn on his candidate.

Instead, he provided some perspective many adults don't have.

Matthew Schricker appeared on the news channel on Friday and was asked about the impact Trump's language has on him.

"A lot has been made in this campaign of the language that is used, the name-calling that's been used, especially in the primary," the host said.

"As an 11-year-old watching it, what's your reaction?"

"I really think that listening to a few bad words coming out of Donald Trump is a lot better than people getting blown up by terrorists, people getting burned alive, people's heads being chopped off and people getting drowned," Schricker responded.

Artist Spencer Tunick is known for his startling images of the naked body, hitting the news earlier this month for his Sea of Hull project in which thousands of men and women stripped off and painted themselves blue.

Now just weeks later, his next installation saw a group of 130 women bare all on the eve of the Republican National Convention in Cleveland, Ohio.

Writing on his website, Mr Tunick said: "Republicans, Democrats and all other political parties were welcome to take part reflecting their anger through art against the hateful repressive rhetoric of many in the Republican Party towards women and minorities.

"Donald Trump and Mike Pence are giving many in America the belief that is OK to hate."

The question of marketing freedom is important economically, but in this case I think there is an even more important question, which is: Can a smart businessman use his business experience and skills to be a good politician or the two areas are ( or should be ) completely different? Because if business skills help make good politics, Trump really has an advantage thanks to that.

This is a bitcoin forum, most people on this forum don't consider the traditional markets free 

I find it beautiful how you place your trust in a fucking businessman. I mean it's not like you're country would be currently completely fucked by businessmen no?

And you actually support more economic deregulation? More freedom of market?
Don't you have the tiny little impression than the market is already far too free?

I find it beautiful how you place your trust in a fucking businessman. I mean it's not like you're country would be currently completely fucked by businessmen no?...

I find it beautiful how you place your trust in a fucking businessman. I mean it's not like you're country would be currently completely fucked by businessmen no?

And you actually support more economic deregulation? More freedom of market?
Don't you have the tiny little impression than the market is already far too free?