Topic: Updates from the COPA v Craig Wright trial - page 11. (Read 4044 times)

as expected.. nothing new. he done same tactic with ATO in 2014

heres my theory
Christen Ager-Hanssen invested into CSW scam over the years (financially or sweat equity of promised returns. and now wanted out). and CSW/CSW sponsors like Ayres said "if you act like a disgruntled employee and cause some social drama leaking things that will cause a media storm to get my name viral again, to make me news worthy and notable again ill pay you, and you can be made whole and exit with a golden handshake" (paid dupe)
as that too is not a new trick of CSW

Day five:

More of the same from Craig today as he has been playing more of the blame game and pleading the Shaggy Defence (it wasn't me) and everyone but him is responsible for the faked documents he has submitted in evidence of him being Satoshi. Today he claimed Christen Ager-Hanssen basically hacked into not only his computer to plant faked documents to frame him but that he also hacked his phone and had access to all his personal communications such as emails and whatsapp messages for months. Quite impressive to hack both devices of one of the world's most leading security experts and for Craig not to know he was being monitored for such a length of time.

Craig also got a telling off for reportedly speaking with Australian Financial Review during the trial. In fairness to him it did look like they ensnared him on his way out and spun a offhand comment into an entire article, that is if you believe Craig, which we all know the answer to that question but I'll give him the benefit of the doubt here.

There's a couple of Craig Wright bingo cards for anyone watching and wants to play along:

https://twitter.com/Twentynothing00/status/1755921531568296360


https://twitter.com/THBitcoinBuddha/status/1755909856093962444


If anyone wants a recap of the first few days of the trail the excellent Dr Bitcoin podcast has done an hour episode covering some of the juiciest bits and it's well worth a listen rather than just watching the stream or reading tweets etc: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dOnnlLm8_9c

Trial is adjourned until Monday. Will be back with updates then.


You can request a link to the stream but you need to give them your full name. Not sure why it isn't fully public but maybe they don't want people recording and sharing it en mass. It's not terribly exciting unless you enjoy listing to Craig waffle on about irrelevant bullshit. I'm sure it will get spicier once the expert witnesses are called.

If nothing else, this thread is certainly giving me some new names for my distrust list.  Maybe it's a good thing it's not a self-moderated topic.  The vermin seem more eager to out themselves this way.  Obvious BSV shills are obvious.

~LeezHamilton
~Cryptomultiplier
~HmmMAA

The COPA - v- Dr Craig Wright Litigation is a very high profile litigation in history.

Without an extra ordinary evidence Dr Craig Wright and his barrister will be embarrassed. No body knows what will happen next week. But I have got a Prophecy, which will be an extra ordinary twist.

Read my prophecy. Click the link bellow.

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/--5484503

Comment on my twist, bet on it, you might get 1.1 BTC as a bona fide gift from the twister Satoshi Nakamoto  

  

If someone had stolen Satoshi's keys, chances are he would try to liquidate his huge stash (1.100.000 BTC) either to become rich (in terms of USD/EUR) and/or to destroy BTC's reputation (with a sharp drop in fiat valuation).

Also, nobody has revealed Satoshi's identity so far, but HmmMAA claims it's a covert NSA/CIA conspiracy (they "know" who Satoshi is, but they just won't tell anyone, even though we know governments want to destroy BTC).

And yet, you're here to judge others and claim that you have some sort of "technical expertise".

Wanna tell us what's your expertise? What do you do for a living in the real world? (I don't want to reveal it for you)

 The UK Court should have allowed relaying the full livestream for media coverage. Why the court has taken such decision is confusing, may be not for others but is for myself.  Ultimately COPA will win the case.

not surprised at all, not first time he played this trick
knowing that millions of legal costs are at risk. i would not even be surprised if he paid off a loyal fan girl to play disgruntled to later say they messed with CSW files. again not first time he pays people to play act a bit of drama to push his agenda

 
 This is very simple, if is real Satoshi and started mining bitcoin since January 2009 and he is continuously mining Bitcoin then what are the odd ?  Why he is trying to become Japanese pseudonym ?  I gave him a pseudonym Professor Faustus.  or Dr Faustus in the Twitter. 

He should be happy with that pseudonym and conduct business to help the crypto community. Instead, he cited hate to the Satoshi Nakamoto when he first time created his internet blog back in 2016. I have not forgotten that.  This case is highly a orchestrated Bitcoin saga drama regarding a man's pseudonym  who created the Bitcoin Decentralised financial service industry. 

Satoshi is not hiding at all, he is watching and thinking what is his next  move. He is the chess master. If craig stop his crusade and become an ally top the bitcoin community then things will good for him and for every ones else.

He should be grateful to Satoshi Nakamoto who planned to invite him back in 2007 to work with Satoshi.

I fear that CSW somehow prepares himself for a next step. I don't know if that's possible, but maybe he just tries to find out all the "problems" his "doctored" "evidence" documents have so he can make better ones next time, under the next jurisdiction.
At least this is my conclusion from what I've read on the matter until now.

Day four

Day four has now concluded. As usual Craig has been blaming everyone but himself for the forgeries. He admitted today that several documents are in fact fraudulent, but passed the buck onto disgruntled ex-employees who are trying to make him look "incompetent". No Craig, you make yourself look incompetent. Not sure why he's using these documents as part of his defence but I guess he needs to backtrack once they get exposed as faked. They also went into the Tulip Trust nonsense and brought up his ATO tax issues.

Craig has also claimed the Kleiman court case where he was ordered to pay billions was one of the best things that happened to him as his outburst lead him to seek anger management. Craig will take very opportunity to grab some sympathy.

Also of note some BSV-tard shared a screenshot of holdnaut attending proceedings on twitter, thus being in contempt of court. The judge warned that access to the live stream may be cut if it happens again. Seems like it would be in the interest of BSV-ers to have the stream terminated so I'm not sure why one bad actor should penalise everyone else. Hopefully the person is prosecuted.


Another note: Craig has literally claimed to be one of the world's leading IT security experts, yet he's been hacked more times than I can count. Some of the excuses he comes up with to explain the hacks are also fanciful. See the Pineapple hack:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=10PAgBTPt60
https://mylegacykit.medium.com/will-craig-wrights-purchase-order-forgery-blow-up-the-pineapple-hack-lawsuit-8ae4da6fffdb
https://fullycrypto.com/craig-wright-ordered-to-pay-430000-in-pineapple-case


You can even read the ridiculous story on Coingeek:

https://coingeek.com/dr-craig-wright-stolen-bitcoin-heres-what-went-down/


The hacks are obviously convenient excuses to cover up lies he made up to cover up previous lies.

he wasnt a forensics expert
heck he cant even forge his own documents correctly so doesnt know much about forensics to cover his own lies
also when he created companies like "info defense"/"hotwire" he was not actually offering any real services. didnt even have a server farm of super computers, he was just creating shell companies scamming both the australian and american governments for R&D grants/tax rebates.. the american gov never gave him any money and his partner seen early the scam and stepped away. but he did manage to scam the australian government and got caught(and ran off)

..
added note of future prospects of CSW drama
CSW filed forged documents to australian gov over years and got caught.., however CSW and his then team then tried to suggest the documents he filed with australians gov were THEN edited where he blamed the australian government for falsifying/editing the documents..
so as i said in earlier post i expect him to later suggest he will say(probably, as its his style) that he had originals, but at filing someone else edited the files either an assistant of his at filing or the UK courts edited it at receipt and presented him at court with edited documents

I was neutral to Craig being Satoshi until he continually proves he's not time and time again. Currently there's zero verifiable evidence of Craig being Satoshi yet hundreds of documents proving he's a fraud. You seem to want me to remain neutral despite the overwhelming evidence that suggest otherwise. Should I remain neutral to Craig having a time machine to collect a notepad proven to be from the future?


His qualifications seem to either be non-existent or at best obtained via plagiarism, so therefore his qualifications are useless, not that qualifications mean anything anyway. The real Satoshi could be a high school drop out for all we know. Craig seems to get these qualifications purely as a way to bolster his credibility, when in fact they do the opposite when he's obtained them through fraud.


Shouldn't you be remaining neutral to Meta/Facebook's involvement. I'm sure Meta's involvement is financial to ensure bitcoin and blockchain tech remains free to use, but I don't care either way. I'm just glad someone with very deep pockets is involved so COPA can afford to keep Craig in court for as long as it takes.


Charles Sturt University has confirmed they never handed Craig a PHD:


I just wish COPA would pull out a laptop, sit it in front of Craig and tell him to code bitcoin from scratch and see what he comes up with. I'd be very surprised if he could come up with something even remotely feasible.

I don't think that Charles Sturt University was also a part of the conspiracy to let a guy who can't even code hello world be a lecturer of them on a class about supercomputers https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ybvQ1YwcF-0&list=PLGB2uErtks4o-fJdoe1ZX3HXl_A69Sbsv

I am not a uncivilised person, so I use word like of those politicians.  I am not a a fan of Craig Wright neither I hate him. I am here in this forum acting as a neutral person to gather information only.  

There are many instance where he lacks technical knowledge though. For example, proving he can code by copy-paste hello world[1]. And in his settlements offer, he even mistook name of full node software as name of crypotcurrency[2].


That's weird. I digged a bit and it's true until recently Meta was part of their platinum member[3]. But i disagree about your speculation since when COPA it's created, it state goal about shared patent for defensive purpose[4].

[1] https://web.archive.org/web/20181110091329/https://toshitimes.com/craig-wright-proves-he-can-code-by-copy-pasting-hello-world-program/
[2] https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.63565854
[3] https://web.archive.org/web/20231111171804/https://www.opencrypto.org/members/
[4] https://www.linux.com/news/getting-to-know-the-cryptocurrency-open-patent-alliance-copa/

@OP i think that you too biased to listen what he says . That's why you and others laughing with what he says . That's the reason most of the community thinks he's an incompetent liar . He might be a liar but he's not incompetent . As i said in an earlier post he is one of the people with the deeper knowledge about bitcoin . But no one wants  to hear what he says . Try to be unbiased and you will understand that he has right in many spots .
As you know his opponents ( AVP , Lopp etc ) were saying that he doesn't even have diplomas . Does he give you that impression ? Do you think he is/was a forensics expert? Do you think he lies about his contribution of CHFI book written in 2007 ? Did the lawyer question his diplomas ? Has he debunk the blacknet project that AVP says is imaginary ?
What i mean is that the guy is not someone incompetent as presented by his enemies . He is a knowledgeable guy in many fields . Is he a liar ? Well , that's what courts are for .

I agree that some times he moves in muddy waters , but that doesn't necessarily means he's lying . My knowledge is limited and that's why i wait for the outcome of the trial . There are some points though that he questions the expertise of the experts . Like how do you explain the part that copa lawyer says that whitepaper was written in open office and calls him a liar when he says it was written in latex while if you do a search for the term "transactions" in the online pdf version the word is highlighted also in pictures ? From what i know you can't do that with an image . That means copa's expert has made a mistake that whitepaper isn't written in latex . And if an expert has made such a serious error doesn't that question his expertise ? If you have any other explanation for this kindly let me know . Maybe i get it wrong .

@LeezHamilton You can send an email to have live access through a unique link , broadcasting isn't allowed , you will find the necessary info here https://www.judiciary.uk/judgments/crypto-open-patient-alliance-v-dr-craig-steven-wright-and-dr-wright-v-various/

Another thing i'd like to point is that meta/facebook was a part of copa . Did that sound right for you ? Was zuck/facebook interested for the good of bitcoin ? Jack/ex twitter too ? These two guys are the real form of "big brother" of the internet and suddenly decided to "help" bitcoin , hooray . At least zuck decided to move back 1 year before his platinum membership expires and leave copa . Strange coincidence .

i think the forensics of people that manufactured things like notepad saying that their product was not even available pre 2012 is proof even a judge can understand
other software engineers have said how certain fonts and certain software and cryptography versions were not around in the dates CSW suggests. even a judge can understand this.

the judge doesnt need to know the minutia of cryptography. but can find easy understanding if certain cryptographic versions/features did not exist to be used before they were invented

judges in ALL cases have to base it on the merit of evidence provided. which if shown as fraudulent then get thrown out as evidence
they dont assume emotions or personality or peoples thoughts as things to justify fraudulent documents should be treated as fact

(its why sexual crimes dont get convictions if there is no factual evidence(DNA/video/witness). they cant just base crimes on someones mental state)

previous cases CSW relied on "witnesses" (paid for buddies). but this case seems to want real original documents.. which CSW lacks

I think, if your legal team starts proceedings with explanations of their clients mental conditions, then you should understand the peculiar position that they are in.

Two of his Autism symptoms does make sense, namely taking longer to understand that he is not Satoshi Nakamoto and also thinking and doing the same thing over and over again. ( I know many people who has autism and I understand their struggles... and I see none of that in him)  Do they have medical proof of his diagnosis?

I just hope the Judge understand the technical aspects of the evidence and see right through all his lies.  

UK courts dont like camera/media in court.
also you have not researched CSW you just sound like a fan that has fallen for his BS already..  that wants him to be satoshi rather than realise that he never was
he is not smart. many people have revealed he uses assistants to ghost write his papers and 400 patents and crap he declares as is own work 2015+
he was not even buying bitcoin until 2013. and not involved before it. so try to learn he is a scammer and stop sounding like a fan

your words of "gentle and wise" and "looks too smart" shows you are an idiot fangirl of him. thus you fit into a new category of insane idiot

Well he look like too smart.


Is there a livestream Link of COPA trial  ?

Why some one cannot broadcast ?

What is the news today ?

I don't need hammer, I can pinpoint questions that
he won't be able to answer. well he is playing a good drama.
the news of Bitcoin is reaching to lots of people particularly the
Bankers and Politicians will know few thing about digital currency market.  


Hello franky1,

what do you exactly mean ?