Topic: Usagi: falsifying NAVs, manipulating share prices and misleading investors. - page 18. (Read 92656 times)

Sounds like the same song. That is an awesome song.

I'm not sure when it is from but someone just linked me and I almost died laughing.

Then you're negligent; you are on record issuing decisions that someone will or will not get a scammer tag where your sole concern is that there is no evidence of a victim or any financial damage. Yet here is a case where it is quite clear there is no financial damage and no victim, and you flatly refuse to issue a statement.

Maybe it is not your "job" to review the scam accusation forum, but you are certainly biased to the degree where the only logical conclusion is that you don't want to issue a statement because you know I'm not guilty and don't deserve a scammer tag, but you would rather see me burn. See, everyone knows you think I am a "scummy fuck" because of your out of place troll on the kongzi.ca thread. It is obvious that if you had any proof I was a scammer you would deliciously enjoy giving me the tag. Because you think I am a scummy fuck. So I conclude you are abusing your power as a moderator. That's not right.

Is it that song that was a big hit on parts of the Internet about 9 years ago?

So, what is your goal here? Why did you post that? What you want to prove?

This thread entered la-la land long ago. So I might as well ask..... what song?

Turns out there is a special song you need to sing to make usagi finally go away. XD

I just said I can't do that, only admins can. I'm not an admin. 


I'm not theymos, but no.

No, I'm not asking Theymos to do that. I am asking theymos to make a statement that it is not okay to viciously defame someone on these forums without evidence, then give deeplink, eskimobob, deprived and puppet scammer tags and a 3 week ban for what they did to me, and close this stinking shitball thread once and for all.

Repentance and others have copies of my contracts. Restoring posts is not relevant. Just ask them to post what they have if you really want to see the contracts. I don't mind. I didn't delete my posts to hide anything material related to the companies. However I feel it is important to note that in a case where all the links are provided to you, you seem to fail to be able to make a decision. So what use would the contracts be to you? Especially in a thread accusing me of manipulating NAV prices and misleading investors?

Look badbear, it's already been shown a dozen times there was no victim and no manipulation. Make a statement regarding the OP and lock the thread. if someone wants to accuse me of something else, let them make a detailed OP outlining what evidence they have. This shit where you and maged allow scam accusation threads to derail and then you make stupid, irresponsible comments is weak. Look at what augustacroppo was able to dig up: There is an obvious co-ordinated, concerted effort to defame me on these forums. If you are not a part of that then do your job as a moderator here. You have commented on quite a number of scam accusation threads here making decisions someone does or does not deserve a scammer tag. Letting this sit for 4 months while you troll my other threads (like calling me a scummy fuck in the kongzi thread -- WOW was that ever out of place and undeserved).... is irresponsible and really, negligent.

So, what are you going to do? Are you going to recover the deleted posts or not?

Maybe this matter should go before the MPEx Rota for resolution.

We had the majority of the fund in companies like that. 300 shares of BTC-MINING for example. -- which was like 13% of the fund. As long as the companies we invested in (like BITCOINRS and BAKEWELL for example) don't illegally decide not to pay us or honor the shares, the bitcoins and or shares will be fairly distributed to shareholders. And you have no reason to think they won't -- especially after what I have posted on this thread.

Some mining crashed. A competent manager would have seen the scam of mining bonds for what they were. Cognitive, Nasty,BTC-MINING and MOORE never crashed fwiw.



 

Shit or get off the pot. It speaks to competence as a money manager.

Do you agree that the terms of the contract were violated? If not, why not?

Where are the shareholders claiming the terms of that contract were violated?

BMF has fulfilled its contractual obligation to pay CPA for insurance.

This can be verified here: https://blockchain.info/address/1EGXZ8kPwEeomiepZwwZayZYdH5nQTkc1f

The terms of the contract state that CPA will pay the insured amount to 1N9xQivX5yEYXafjJfeQYtSiq1iT6h9sek

CPA should have paid, but has not.

That can be verified here: https://blockchain.info/address/1N9xQivX5yEYXafjJfeQYtSiq1iT6h9sek

The mere existence of the contract proves what exactly? Where are the shareholders claiming the terms of that contract were violated?

I ran a mining fund which was clearly advertised as such. If you invested in it, and mining crashed, don't blame the messenger.. but you are an idiot. Please look up the term 'sector fund' and stop making yourself look stupid.