Is there a cuda miner for computer 2.0 graphic cards? (I'm using gt540m, and current cudaminer says 250Mhs 
but no shares accepted)
but no shares accepted)add -l 256
There's no option on windows cudaminer like that. what else could it be?
Topic: Vertcoin - 1 | ASIC - 0 | Lyra2RE | Decentralised | GPU Mineable | Open Source - page 124. (Read 415431 times)
December 22, 2014, 01:22:00 PM
add -l 256
There's no option on windows cudaminer like that. what else could it be?
December 22, 2014, 01:17:23 PM
Is there a cuda miner for computer 2.0 graphic cards? (I'm using gt540m, and current cudaminer says 250Mhs but no shares accepted)
but no shares accepted)add -l 256
December 22, 2014, 01:15:11 PM
Is there a cuda miner for computer 2.0 graphic cards? (I'm using gt540m, and current cudaminer says 250Mhs but no shares accepted)
but no shares accepted)
December 22, 2014, 01:14:22 PM
Quote
1. PR Campaign
2. Hyper-Adaptive Block Confirmation (HABC)
3. Final discussion on subsidy reduction
4. Final discussion on increasing block maturity time
2. Hyper-Adaptive Block Confirmation (HABC)
3. Final discussion on subsidy reduction
4. Final discussion on increasing block maturity time
In my opinion, this is the wrong order, and it should be exactly reversed. I don't think it makes sense to try an launch a PR campaign, while promising a new feature and leaving some very critical issues (altering coin emission primarily and block maturity secondarily) to be determined at some later date. It's like, "hey guys, check out this awesome coin that we're gonna try and add a cool new feature to, and we may or may not change some critical details about the coin as well." I think the block maturity and coin emission issues should definitely be put to bed before any PR campaign, and ideally any awesome new features should be added before spending a bunch of money trying to market vertcoin. Just my two mVTC.
It's in this order primarily because we don't want to have to change the subsidy or block maturity time ideally. Thus we will only need to continue with these points if the PR campaign fails to solve the lack of investment we are seeing. HABC will take some time to implement and test fully, and we don't want Vertcoin to have no PR for that long.
Why would someone want to invest in something that can't commit to a defined schedule for coin emission? I'm not in favor of changing the subsidy either, but I think keeping it on the table amounts to uncertainty in the coin's future, and that uncertainty makes it more difficult for anyone to have confidence in vert.
December 22, 2014, 12:56:05 PM
what's up with that price? for the moment basement, without asic and fly like an airplane hit :/
gpu miner facts #1 A gpu miner can't hold a coin for more than 10minutes without trying to dump it in a exchange gpu miner facts #2: a gpu miner miner wants always to sell his coin first, no matter what
gpu miner facts #3: Sell panic is the normal state of mind of gpu miners, because they always thinks other gpu miner will try to sell first and lower than them... and actually that's what they do
gpu miner facts #4: gpu miners love to complain about how unprofitable a coin is, that's why they don't care about keeping a coin profitable
(better than Chuck Norris facts, Gpu miner facts)
December 20, 2014, 09:30:28 PM
committed, I changed the integer type for the target and forgot about it... sorry about that.
should work now
here the windows binaries with latest version: http://ge.tt/5zIW3972/v/0?c
should work now
here the windows binaries with latest version: http://ge.tt/5zIW3972/v/0?c
It's faster 875 vs 1000 but I get a lot of rejects (Hash above traget)
However what is strange is that on the pool I tried (verter and supernova), I didn't see that at all.
share above target are not submitted (or are not counted as rejected)
Hm strange I have the same hash above target issue, and adding "--difficulty-multiplier" : "2" to the sgminer.conf file does not help for me. I am surely missing something here, but can't figure out what exactly...
Fail.
"difficulty-multiplier" : "2"
December 22, 2014, 12:53:48 PM
what's up with that price? for the moment basement, without asic and fly like an airplane hit :/
December 22, 2014, 12:51:18 PM
Is it possible for anyone to get ccminer (nvidia) working with current pull of p2pool?
It seems its just broken.
It seems its just broken.
What errors do you see?
December 20, 2014, 05:45:33 PM
BTW - anyone interesting check out my BTCtalk footer.
Oh boy could I have some fun with that.
Well I do have the option to say "no" if its something thats a very bad idea... otherwise, its a bit of fun (for now). And who knows.
I was thinking NSFW, not illegal
In some countries, they'll kill you for being gay, too! I meant semi-civilized ones
Well, before you burn, maybe PM me here and let me know what you have in mind?
If I decide to do it, I will.
December 22, 2014, 12:48:59 PM
Quote
1. PR Campaign
2. Hyper-Adaptive Block Confirmation (HABC)
3. Final discussion on subsidy reduction
4. Final discussion on increasing block maturity time
2. Hyper-Adaptive Block Confirmation (HABC)
3. Final discussion on subsidy reduction
4. Final discussion on increasing block maturity time
In my opinion, this is the wrong order, and it should be exactly reversed. I don't think it makes sense to try an launch a PR campaign, while promising a new feature and leaving some very critical issues (altering coin emission primarily and block maturity secondarily) to be determined at some later date. It's like, "hey guys, check out this awesome coin that we're gonna try and add a cool new feature to, and we may or may not change some critical details about the coin as well." I think the block maturity and coin emission issues should definitely be put to bed before any PR campaign, and ideally any awesome new features should be added before spending a bunch of money trying to market vertcoin. Just my two mVTC.
It's in this order primarily because we don't want to have to change the subsidy or block maturity time ideally. Thus we will only need to continue with these points if the PR campaign fails to solve the lack of investment we are seeing. HABC will take some time to implement and test fully, and we don't want Vertcoin to have no PR for that long.
December 22, 2014, 12:02:39 PM
Quote
1. PR Campaign
2. Hyper-Adaptive Block Confirmation (HABC)
3. Final discussion on subsidy reduction
4. Final discussion on increasing block maturity time
2. Hyper-Adaptive Block Confirmation (HABC)
3. Final discussion on subsidy reduction
4. Final discussion on increasing block maturity time
In my opinion, this is the wrong order, and it should be exactly reversed. I don't think it makes sense to try an launch a PR campaign, while promising a new feature and leaving some very critical issues (altering coin emission primarily and block maturity secondarily) to be determined at some later date. It's like, "hey guys, check out this awesome coin that we're gonna try and add a cool new feature to, and we may or may not change some critical details about the coin as well." I think the block maturity and coin emission issues should definitely be put to bed before any PR campaign, and ideally any awesome new features should be added before spending a bunch of money trying to market vertcoin. Just my two mVTC.
December 20, 2014, 04:30:37 PM
please stick to intricacies of parametrization of cgminer and ccminer cycys for lyra2 and deep elaborations of subtleties of hashing rounds and their asic resistence 
I understand your sentence until before cycys... Same here.
December 22, 2014, 11:28:04 AM
December 22, 2014, 11:01:38 AM
Is it possible for anyone to get ccminer (nvidia) working with current pull of p2pool?
It seems its just broken.
It seems its just broken.
What errors do you see?
December 22, 2014, 10:56:05 AM
Is it possible for anyone to get ccminer (nvidia) working with current pull of p2pool?
It seems its just broken.
It seems its just broken.
December 22, 2014, 10:34:03 AM
Dumping is not the main problem. The problem is that there is absolutely no buy support and no liquidity. If the coin would be (was, were?) interesting for investors, this little dumpig wouldn't harm the price.
Sorry, this if sentences are a problem for germans
.
with kind regards,
randywald
Sorry, this if sentences are a problem for germans
.with kind regards,
randywald
December 20, 2014, 04:06:35 PM
BTW - anyone interesting check out my BTCtalk footer.
Oh boy could I have some fun with that.
Well I do have the option to say "no" if its something thats a very bad idea... otherwise, its a bit of fun (for now). And who knows.
I was thinking NSFW, not illegal
In some countries, they'll kill you for being gay, too! I meant semi-civilized ones
December 22, 2014, 10:03:19 AM
who is still dumping?
Weak hands. For sale are not so many orders.
December 22, 2014, 08:12:42 AM
Oй 6лять, тpи кocapя бaкcoв пpoeбaл нa этy xyйню. Haxyй тaк жить, пoцaны.
дык пepeд xapдфopкoм нaxyй cкинyл нa пaмпe.y пocoнoв peaльнo мoзгoв нe xвaтaeт зaнятьcя инфляциoннoй пpoблeмoй.
cцyкo, бyдyт дo пocлeднeгo кpичaть, чтo этo нax нe нaдo, пoкa фce фпecдy нe зaглoxнeт.
eдинcтвeннoe paдyeт, чтo ниxpeнa нe вкидывaл в этo дeлo ни цeнтa. тoлькo мaйнил, xoтя вpeмeни eй yдeлил нe мaлo.
a тaк пиздeц мoнeткe. пo цeнe yжe к пepy пpиближaeтcя.
December 22, 2014, 06:59:22 AM
Oй 6лять, тpи кocapя бaкcoв пpoeбaл нa этy xyйню. Haxyй тaк жить, пoцaны.
Jump to: