Vertcoin - 1 | ASIC - 0 | Lyra2RE | Decentralised | GPU Mineable | Open Source - page 70.

kenshirothefist

sr. member

Activity: 457

Merit: 273

Quote from: djm34 on August 12, 2015, 09:04:59 PM

To answer your question:
first I am the author of all those versions. metallicjames was rather a pre-release, and after that I decided to change the difficulty to 256, as it was allowing miners to get more shares. so apparently the other followed more the pre-release version that the "standard version".
also at that time, I was using verter, and this was the parameter which was giving good aggreement between the hashrate reported by the miner and the pool...

I can always change that setting for lyra2re (but technically it should have been 256)

OK, please post here once you'll release a new version with 128 diff for the original lyra (and possibly add the aforementioned aliases for lyra2 algos - similarly as badman74 did in his version for the original lyra2).

silencesilence

legendary

Activity: 1120

Merit: 1000

Quote from: hopefulsleuth on August 12, 2015, 09:05:31 PM

Private miners activated.. Undecided

WOW

Quote from: silencesilence on August 12, 2015, 11:04:32 AM

Quote from: silencesilence on August 11, 2015, 03:06:44 AM

Quote from: silencesilence on August 10, 2015, 01:43:45 PM

Vertcoin Difficulty Chart Wink

UP UP -> 148
http://www.coinwarz.com/cryptocurrency/coins/vertcoin

UP UP -> diff 192

UP UP -> Vertcoin Difficulty 248
UP UP -> Network Hashrate 7.88

UP UP -> Vertcoin Difficulty 327

ReiMomo

sr. member

Activity: 2366

Merit: 305

Duelbits - $100k Bonus/week

Don't forget to delete or rename the .bin files after .dlls are placed.

fraa

newbie

Activity: 7

Merit: 0

Hello, guys
I have this kind of problem
My rig with 1x Radeon 7950 and 2x 5870 worked fine with previous algorithms of Vertcoin and other coins.

After the recent algorithm switch 7950 keeps working, giving ~3.4 Mh and ~12.5 of WU (intensity 19, worksizes 32 - 256 all work)
Both 5870 give just HW errors and around 1.7 Mh of false hashrate, doing nothing.
I tried changing the intensity, worksizes, clock and memory speeds - nothing helps. Also put the --no-extranonce flag.

Pool: give-me-coins, --diffuculty-multiplier is set to 2
ATI (AMD) Driver 13.12. Also tried above mentioned DLLs from 14.4 in the miner folder.
sgminer taken from official website

Did anybody get the 5870 running?

trid

sr. member

Activity: 425

Merit: 250

Quote from: fredeq on August 11, 2015, 05:08:47 PM

750ti seems to be fine, now getting 11-13Mhash on verters.

You have 11-13 mh from one 750ti?

silencesilence

legendary

Activity: 1120

Merit: 1000

Quote from: pallas on August 13, 2015, 01:47:40 AM

Quote from: sammy007 on August 13, 2015, 12:06:53 AM

I think devs should communicate with craptsy, VTC locked there for several days.

It's working now.

cryptsy delayed update and dump delayed Grin

But now – Yes, see Vertcoin, the wallet is update

https://www.cryptsy.com/pages/status

pallas

legendary

Activity: 2716

Merit: 1094

Black Belt Developer

Quote from: sammy007 on August 13, 2015, 12:06:53 AM

I think devs should communicate with craptsy, VTC locked there for several days.

It's working now.

sammy007

legendary

Activity: 1904

Merit: 1003

I think devs should communicate with craptsy, VTC locked there for several days.

mrbodz

hero member

Activity: 800

Merit: 1000

Rent and Lease your Lyra2REv2 Rigs at betarigs.com

https://www.betarigs.com/list?miner_type=21

Ahmed Bodi
Betarigs Admin

hopefulsleuth

newbie

Activity: 1

Merit: 0

Private miners activated.. Undecided

djm34

legendary

Activity: 1400

Merit: 1050

Quote from: kenshirothefist on August 12, 2015, 04:02:42 PM

Hey, djm34,

May I ask you why did you change the diff adjustment from 128 to 256 in your miner for the original Lyra2RE algorithm?

algorithm.c

all other miners (official https://github.com/sgminer-dev/sgminer, badman74's https://github.com/badman74/sgminer, James Lovejoy https://github.com/metalicjames/sgminer-Lyra2RE, etc.):

Code:

{ "lyra2re", ALGO_LYRA2RE, "", 1, 128, 128, 0, 0, 0xFF, 0xFFFFULL, 0x0000ffffUL, 4, 2 * 8 * 4194304 , 0, lyra2re_regenhash, queue_lyra2RE_kernel, gen_hash, NULL},

your miner:

Code:

{ "Lyra2RE", ALGO_LYRA2RE, "", 1, 256, 256, 0, 0, 0xFF, 0xFFFFULL, 0x0000ffffUL, 4,2 * 8 * 4194304 , 0, lyra2reold_regenhash, queue_lyra2RE_kernel, gen_hash, NULL},

The issue is that obviously minority (or none) of the miners were using your sgminer version to mine the original Lyra2RE coins. Now since your version is popular, it won't work on existing Lyra2RE pools (without explicitly setting diff multiplier option, which is "deprecated" and hard to set if one is using configuration for multiple algorithms). Please correct your repo and set diff to 128 for the original Lyra2RE algo. It might also be wise for you to build new releases for the changes you recently added to your repo.

Another thing that would be good for you to add are aliases for algorithms (when using with -k or in config file) Lyra2RE == lyra2re, Lyre2REv2 = lyra2rev2 ...

Thanks and keep up the good work!

Kind regards,
kenshirothefist

To answer your question:
first I am the author of all those versions. metallicjames was rather a pre-release, and after that I decided to change the difficulty to 256, as it was allowing miners to get more shares. so apparently the other followed more the pre-release version that the "standard version".
also at that time, I was using verter, and this was the parameter which was giving good aggreement between the hashrate reported by the miner and the pool...

I can always change that setting for lyra2re (but technically it should have been 256)

ReiMomo

sr. member

Activity: 2366

Merit: 305

Duelbits - $100k Bonus/week

Quote from: ajw7989 on August 11, 2015, 09:27:07 AM

For anyone who wants an updated cpuminer since the last compiled version by the author does not support lyra2rev2 I compiled one yesterday.

https://mega.co.nz/#!eVZlgCDA!UiPBfUaeEEsKITPh2t2c_-4eBDNOB5noxgNNCYfD15Q

Virustotal 1/56 (bitcoin miner flag): https://www.virustotal.com/en/file/afc83ed72cc2a4b02424a91d41c0c8e170c345cd1d0513ef17a7d87adf3212cb/analysis/1439303005/

Lol I've just found a block on Aika pool with CPU Cheesy

kenshirothefist

sr. member

Activity: 457

Merit: 273

Hey, djm34,

May I ask you why did you change the diff adjustment from 128 to 256 in your miner for the original Lyra2RE algorithm?

algorithm.c

all other miners (official https://github.com/sgminer-dev/sgminer, badman74's https://github.com/badman74/sgminer, James Lovejoy https://github.com/metalicjames/sgminer-Lyra2RE, etc.):

Code:

{ "lyra2re", ALGO_LYRA2RE, "", 1, 128, 128, 0, 0, 0xFF, 0xFFFFULL, 0x0000ffffUL, 4, 2 * 8 * 4194304 , 0, lyra2re_regenhash, queue_lyra2RE_kernel, gen_hash, NULL},

your miner:

Code:

{ "Lyra2RE", ALGO_LYRA2RE, "", 1, 256, 256, 0, 0, 0xFF, 0xFFFFULL, 0x0000ffffUL, 4,2 * 8 * 4194304 , 0, lyra2reold_regenhash, queue_lyra2RE_kernel, gen_hash, NULL},

The issue is that obviously minority (or none) of the miners were using your sgminer version to mine the original Lyra2RE coins. Now since your version is popular, it won't work on existing Lyra2RE pools (without explicitly setting diff multiplier option, which is "deprecated" and hard to set if one is using configuration for multiple algorithms). Please correct your repo and set diff to 128 for the original Lyra2RE algo. It might also be wise for you to build new releases for the changes you recently added to your repo.

Another thing that would be good for you to add are aliases for algorithms (when using with -k or in config file) Lyra2RE == lyra2re, Lyre2REv2 = lyra2rev2 ...

Thanks and keep up the good work!

Kind regards,
kenshirothefist

djm34

legendary

Activity: 1400

Merit: 1050

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: TheCoinFinder on August 12, 2015, 12:09:28 PM

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: fredeq on August 11, 2015, 12:57:14 PM

Managed to run my 280x at 4,1 Mhash.

Pool reports way more than that though, between 6 and 8Mhash.
Anyone else got that too?

25MH/s overall in my test on Verters appears as 35MH/s with pretty high consistency.

Test hash of 31.5MH/s about, sent to Give-Me-Coins as a test (difficulty multiplier was, of course, adjusted) - they were dead on.

Yes, if you go back a few pages in this thread - you will see that I updated my pool to the presumably correct (based on hashrate) mask (7fff rather than ffff) - however people were then complaining of "invalid shares" - presumably the sgminer/ccminer's basic mask is below the default mask of the new algorithm and they need to be updated to avoid this issue.

Should be a single line edit in algorithm.c.

it is a single line to edit, just need that the main pool agree with each others (I don't change anything otherwise)
it was already a mess at the previous fork and the strange thing was that the miners in both case the miners were released before the pool Grin

Last time I changed several time the difficulty there was always a problem with a pool or another... so this time I won't do anything unless there is a consensus

TheCoinFinder

legendary

Activity: 938

Merit: 1001

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: fredeq on August 11, 2015, 12:57:14 PM

Managed to run my 280x at 4,1 Mhash.

Pool reports way more than that though, between 6 and 8Mhash.
Anyone else got that too?

25MH/s overall in my test on Verters appears as 35MH/s with pretty high consistency.

Test hash of 31.5MH/s about, sent to Give-Me-Coins as a test (difficulty multiplier was, of course, adjusted) - they were dead on.

Yes, if you go back a few pages in this thread - you will see that I updated my pool to the presumably correct (based on hashrate) mask (7fff rather than ffff) - however people were then complaining of "invalid shares" - presumably the sgminer/ccminer's basic mask is below the default mask of the new algorithm and they need to be updated to avoid this issue.

silencesilence

legendary

Activity: 1120

Merit: 1000

Quote from: silencesilence on August 11, 2015, 03:06:44 AM

Quote from: silencesilence on August 10, 2015, 01:43:45 PM

Vertcoin Difficulty Chart Wink

UP UP -> 148
http://www.coinwarz.com/cryptocurrency/coins/vertcoin

UP UP -> diff 192

UP UP -> Vertcoin Difficulty 248
UP UP -> Network Hashrate 7.88

nicehash

legendary

Activity: 885

Merit: 1006

NiceHash.com

We're pleased to announce the immediate availability for buying and selling hashing power based on Lyra2REv2 algorithm on NiceHash.com: https://www.nicehash.com/index.jsp?p=news&id=27

Kind regards,
NiceHash.com

jamesl22

sr. member

Activity: 392

Merit: 250

Quote from: zenrith on August 12, 2015, 06:43:27 AM

Question about p2pools..

I've never successfully been able to connect to any p2pool listed on the p2pool site. Yes, I connect to verters and coinotron with ease, but not p2pool.

I constantly get "no connection errors". Yes, I've used my wallet and pass x for miner, but no luck. I would rather bring my mining "power" over to the p2pool in order to help balance the coin.

Suggestions?

Try using the --no-extranonce flag with your miner.

zenrith

newbie

Activity: 32

Merit: 0

Question about p2pools..

I've never successfully been able to connect to any p2pool listed on the p2pool site. Yes, I connect to verters and coinotron with ease, but not p2pool.

I constantly get "no connection errors". Yes, I've used my wallet and pass x for miner, but no luck. I would rather bring my mining "power" over to the p2pool in order to help balance the coin.

Suggestions?

TheCoinFinder

legendary

Activity: 938

Merit: 1001

Quote from: ?? on ??

Correct - and this is where profit comes into play. Lyra2REv2 is now less profitable than it was. Something like XMR is likely to STAY profitable for me. Now, were I him, that shit would be important to me, because there's pretty much no absolute certainty on bot command & control... it's actually likely there will always be a few at least trying to mine Lyra on old orders, never having got new ones. I obviously wanna minimize this shit, so parking my ass on XMR begins to look better than VTC, who just changed the algo to fuck up my day.

Agreed. Its like updating your own car's security - sure, it can probably be hacked if its worth it - however its now more secure and not that much more valuable (or less valuable) than half of the other cars in the same car park - so why would you try to steal it, when you can steal something that is far easier and more valuable?

Topic: Vertcoin - 1 | ASIC - 0 | Lyra2RE | Decentralised | GPU Mineable | Open Source - page 70. (Read 415471 times)