Author

Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion - page 16234. (Read 26610024 times)

legendary
Activity: 3374
Merit: 4738
diamond-handed zealot

I don't see it as a good alternative to ads. Malware is malware, plain and simple.

I agree almost nothing can be worse than annoying autoplaying flash videos with audio. It's one of the worst forms of malware.

I've tried to avoid autoplaying videos by not upgrading my flash player so that Firefox doesn't start it automatically and I have to manually allow it to start. This often helps but many ads still autostart.

Another annoyance is videos that re-position themselves on-screen when you mute the sound and scroll them out of sight.

I suppose advertising does serve a purpose in that it lets you know what products to boycott, but at times it gets so infuriating that I want to actively badmouth the products.

Does anyone know of a good ad blocker that targets this annoying malware?

Jimbo

ABP

NoScript

I have not seen an online ad in like 4 years man, do yourself a favor.
full member
Activity: 140
Merit: 100
Banks are fleeing catalonia. Today it has been Sabadell -moves HQ to Alicante-. Tomorrow Caixabank decides if it activates its contingency plan and moves to Baleares.

Maybe next week Cataluña leaves the EUR and adopt Bitcoin? Bullish! Smiley

Isn't Baleares filled with tourists and across the sea?  How are they going to serve the local clients from across the sea?

We are talking about the Headquarters. They have branch offices all over Spain.

It is just that they fear a bank run (CaixaBank has lost more than 4 billions in client deposits just in the past three days).

As soon as both banks announced they were about to decide the move they started a recovery.

Any Cataluña local affiliated banks?  It would be funny if there is a bank run when people don't know what currency they are going to use tomorrow (EUR or new ccy?), and Banco de España / ECB refuse to extend liquidity to regional banks.
legendary
Activity: 1862
Merit: 1530
Self made HODLER ✓
Banks are fleeing catalonia. Today it has been Sabadell -moves HQ to Alicante-. Tomorrow Caixabank decides if it activates its contingency plan and moves to Baleares.

Maybe next week Cataluña leaves the EUR and adopt Bitcoin? Bullish! Smiley

Isn't Baleares filled with tourists and across the sea?  How are they going to serve the local clients from across the sea?

We are talking about the Headquarters. They have branch offices all over Spain. I am sure branch offices in catalonia will stay, at least atm.

It is just that they fear a bank run (CaixaBank has lost more than 4 billions in client deposits just in the past three days).

As soon as both banks announced they were about to decide the move they started a recovery.
full member
Activity: 140
Merit: 100
Banks are fleeing catalonia. Today it has been Sabadell -moves HQ to Alicante-. Tomorrow Caixabank decides if it activates its contingency plan and moves to Baleares.

Maybe next week Cataluña leaves the EUR and adopt Bitcoin? Bullish! Smiley

Isn't Baleares filled with tourists and across the sea?  How are they going to serve the local clients from across the sea?
legendary
Activity: 1862
Merit: 1530
Self made HODLER ✓
Banks are fleeing catalonia. Today it has been Sabadell -moves HQ to Alicante-. Tomorrow Caixabank decides if it activates its contingency plan and moves to Baleares.

Maybe next week Cataluña leaves the EUR and adopt Bitcoin? Bullish! Smiley
member
Activity: 120
Merit: 10
Breaking News:

Even Cristiano Ronaldo is now mining crypto currencies !!!!

Just visit http://www.cristianoronaldo.com/ and pay attention to your cpu workload.




ROFL.

highly doubt Renaldeo (or wtf his name is) knows how to code miner infected web page script.
more than likely his  IT team stealing Monero (wild guess) cpu cycles  from the less than intelligent fan base .
sneaky little bastards! ..
 
hmmmm...    well goddamn thats ingenious! I gotta get me a website like that!

Just add adblocker.
member
Activity: 120
Merit: 10
Wow. This is a good problem. I sold at $4300 and plan to buy back at lower price but look. BTC is holding. Congrats to all of us.  Smiley

What you gonna do?

Better buy back in soon!

I'll let it sit there for a while(a month) and if BTC goes parabolic i'll move it to tether-alts pair then go back to btc. 160btc is not big.

Buying back to btc is a no-go. Its a straight loss on you.
But still congrats to all. BTC support is slightly stronger this time. I assume not just one big buyer/dumper controlling the market. Maybe more like me, small in amount but several or more of active buyers/traders.

happy Hodling.  Grin
legendary
Activity: 1414
Merit: 1000
To split your coins
On BTC chain you have some coins in address (A), you send your coins to another address you own (B), and include a further special recipient address 3Bit1xA4apyzgmFNT2k8Pvnd6zb6TnwcTi  to whom you send a few satoshis. (You have to use send to many option in your wallet, to send them at once).
Any transactions that contain this special address will be ignored by 2X miners.
Once this is successful, you will have your BTC in an address(B) you own.

IIUC, I would not employ this mechanism for my coins. The part that I have underlined seems to require full faith in what the miners will do. You have no a priori method of knowing whether that address will 'be ignored' by any miner.


Yes, it's a policy, miners could ignore the policy and include the transaction.

No, this is not correct. Transactions to that address are will be considered invalid by 2x nodes & miners; A block containing them would be invalid and not be built upon.

Only by miners that agree to implement this, and do not renege. What guarantee do you have that this will be the case? For that matter, what guarantee do you have that someone does not know the private key corresponding to this address?

I'm just trying to point out that there is at least one alternative method that a transaction originator can use to split their coins, which does not suffer these drawbacks.

As I understand this. Block that contains transaction with recipient 3Bit1xA4apyzgmFNT2k8Pvnd6zb6TnwcTi is INVALID in Segwit2x and will be rejected. Segwit2x will not accept block that contains transaction using 3Bit1xA4apyzgmFNT2k8Pvnd6zb6TnwcTi
legendary
Activity: 3388
Merit: 3514
born once atheist
Breaking News:

Even Cristiano Ronaldo is now mining crypto currencies !!!!

Just visit http://www.cristianoronaldo.com/ and pay attention to your cpu workload.




ROFL.

highly doubt Renaldeo (or wtf his name is) knows how to code miner infected web page script.
more than likely his  IT team stealing Monero (wild guess) cpu cycles  from the less than intelligent fan base .
sneaky little bastards! ..
 
hmmmm...    well goddamn thats ingenious! I gotta get me a website like that!
full member
Activity: 137
Merit: 100
For your listening pleasure, Fuck World Trade!
BULLISH for BTC? Either way fuck you Trump



https://imgur.com/tL7Jzqj

hmm dont know how to show images here
legendary
Activity: 3080
Merit: 1688
lose: unfind ... loose: untight
To split your coins
On BTC chain you have some coins in address (A), you send your coins to another address you own (B), and include a further special recipient address 3Bit1xA4apyzgmFNT2k8Pvnd6zb6TnwcTi  to whom you send a few satoshis. (You have to use send to many option in your wallet, to send them at once).
Any transactions that contain this special address will be ignored by 2X miners.
Once this is successful, you will have your BTC in an address(B) you own.

IIUC, I would not employ this mechanism for my coins. The part that I have underlined seems to require full faith in what the miners will do. You have no a priori method of knowing whether that address will 'be ignored' by any miner.


Yes, it's a policy, miners could ignore the policy and include the transaction.

No, this is not correct. Transactions to that address are will be considered invalid by 2x nodes & miners; A block containing them would be invalid and not be built upon.

Only by miners that agree to implement this, and do not renege. What guarantee do you have that this will be the case? For that matter, what guarantee do you have that someone does not know the private key corresponding to this address?

I'm just trying to point out that there is at least one alternative method that a transaction originator can use to split their coins, which does not suffer these drawbacks.
member
Activity: 231
Merit: 43
To split your coins
On BTC chain you have some coins in address (A), you send your coins to another address you own (B), and include a further special recipient address 3Bit1xA4apyzgmFNT2k8Pvnd6zb6TnwcTi  to whom you send a few satoshis. (You have to use send to many option in your wallet, to send them at once).
Any transactions that contain this special address will be ignored by 2X miners.
Once this is successful, you will have your BTC in an address(B) you own.

IIUC, I would not employ this mechanism for my coins. The part that I have underlined seems to require full faith in what the miners will do. You have no a priori method of knowing whether that address will 'be ignored' by any miner.

Dude just feckin stop flailing about shilling for this utter crap of an altcoin.
Your one mad discredited dumped dev Garzik has already merged that spammy shit into your altcoin.
https://github.com/btc1/bitcoin/commit/a3c41256984bf11d95a560ae89c0fcbadfbe73dc#diff-4f6d60b6976522cec2974a0aea9a5ab3R801 ff
Keep up dunderbluss, you're way behind latest developments on your crapcoin.
Hey also guess what it ficks up lightning (if the channel doesn't enforce your famous facking blacklist).
https://0bin.net/paste/nQwqU76pQ3CW00ZV#TUB68SXcEn-fSIQAWkULnUEL0NaUK/5TzPrQWEFwWyg https://twitter.com/petertoddbtc/status/915945691997929472
You will lose people money, you and your cronies. What people actually in bitcoin call 'being a scammer'. Just focking stop.
hero member
Activity: 750
Merit: 601
To split your coins
On BTC chain you have some coins in address (A), you send your coins to another address you own (B), and include a further special recipient address 3Bit1xA4apyzgmFNT2k8Pvnd6zb6TnwcTi  to whom you send a few satoshis. (You have to use send to many option in your wallet, to send them at once).
Any transactions that contain this special address will be ignored by 2X miners.
Once this is successful, you will have your BTC in an address(B) you own.

IIUC, I would not employ this mechanism for my coins. The part that I have underlined seems to require full faith in what the miners will do. You have no a priori method of knowing whether that address will 'be ignored' by any miner.


Yes, it's a policy, miners could ignore the policy and include the transaction.

No, this is not correct. Transactions to that address are will be considered invalid by 2x nodes & miners; A block containing them would be invalid and not be built upon.


My mistake you are right.
legendary
Activity: 1891
Merit: 3096
All good things to those who wait
To split your coins
On BTC chain you have some coins in address (A), you send your coins to another address you own (B), and include a further special recipient address 3Bit1xA4apyzgmFNT2k8Pvnd6zb6TnwcTi  to whom you send a few satoshis. (You have to use send to many option in your wallet, to send them at once).
Any transactions that contain this special address will be ignored by 2X miners.
Once this is successful, you will have your BTC in an address(B) you own.

IIUC, I would not employ this mechanism for my coins. The part that I have underlined seems to require full faith in what the miners will do. You have no a priori method of knowing whether that address will 'be ignored' by any miner.


Yes, it's a policy, miners could ignore the policy and include the transaction.

No, this is not correct. Transactions to that address are will be considered invalid by 2x nodes & miners; A block containing them would be invalid and not be built upon.
legendary
Activity: 1512
Merit: 1012
And be prepared for this friday ... miners have ordered a stucked MEMpool (mud fees).

hero member
Activity: 750
Merit: 601
B2X Token trading is coming to bitfinex, soon we will know what the price is Smiley

https://www.bitfinex.com/trading/BT2BTC


More info
https://www.bitfinex.com/legal/cst
legendary
Activity: 1512
Merit: 1012
I suppose advertising does serve a purpose



Bitcoin don't have advertising.
Only a controlled supply.

And it's enough.
legendary
Activity: 3080
Merit: 1688
lose: unfind ... loose: untight
oh oh do tell how block increases helps on boarding the world? Would you mind doing a simple math on how big your blocks should be for every person in the world to do just one transaction on chain per day? I'll wait

About 25G.

Clearly that's way too big,

Today, clearly. At some point where we might actually achieve ubiquity? Probably not.

Quote
what's the solution, L2?

L2 is probably part of the solution. But there is no known L2 technology that can achieve this scale unless larger blocks is also part of the solution.
legendary
Activity: 2716
Merit: 13505
BTC + Crossfit, living life.
END list, good luck!

19/9 rayx12  Sad
24/9 kidbitter* Sad
25/9 binaryreign* Sad
26/9 player99 Sad
27/9 xhomerx10 Sad
28/9 khufuking Sad
29/9 jhayzxenon* Sad
30/9 yermom Sad
01/10 teamtarp* Sad
02/10 bitchick * Sad
03/10 ^BuTcH^ Sad
04/10 minermannc Sad
05/10 punisher1314* Sad
06/10 jimbo Toronto*
07/10 player514*
09/10 Oinas*
10/10 bikerlezno*     LAST WINNER
11/10 ted e. bare
12/10 harrymmmm*
13/10 cryptoqueeen*
14/10 bitcoinaire*
15/10 ludwigvon*
16/10 BitchicksHusband*
17/10 shroomskit_disgrace
18/10 dakustaking76
19/10 birobob*
20/10 leowonderful
21/10 paashaas
22/10 cmacwiz*
23/10 spaceman_spiff_original*
24/10 colonel panic
25/10 soullyG
26/10 weltmaster*
27/10 vroom
28/10 entons*
29/10 roombot*
30/10 notme*
31/10 twocorn
01/11 YamashitaRen
02/11 orpington
03/11 Haciendo*
04/11 lilloboy
05/11 jojo69*
06/11 d_eddie*
07/11 empowering*
08/11 northyplole*
09/11 podyx*
10/11 u9y42*
11/11 starving_marvin
12/11 sirazimuth*
13/11 dotto*
14/11 hazukison*
15/11 organic*
16/11 Heater*
17/11 foxygoxy*
18/11 600watt
19/11 arriemoller
20/11 drbrockcoin*
21/11 icygreen*
22/11 rakessh
23/11 erisdiscordia
24/11 oblox*
25/11 mfort312*
26/11 globbo*
27/11 lfc_bitcoin
28/11 conspirosphere.tk*
29/11 rjclarck2000
30/11 last of the v8s *
01/12 newworldcoiner*
02/12 souspeed*
03/12 jaapgvk
04/12 sgk*
05/12 fluidjax
07/12 free-bit.co.in
08/12 imbatman
09/12 yonton
10/12 fragout*
11/12 itod
12/12 lontonbit*
13/12 CistaCista
14/12 cAPSLOCK
15/12 philivey
16/12 marcus_of_augustus*
17/12 mattimann
18/12 coincube*
21/12 2dogs
24/12 bones261*
25/12 mndan
26/12 karatma1*
28/12 deathangel*
30/12 erre
31/12 elwar
01/01/2018 lewis pirenne*
02/01/2018 addressed*
03/01/2018 bathy
05/01/2018 bitcoin psycho
06/01/2018 chowhan
07/01/2018 fabiorem*
18/01/2018 raja_mbz*
22/01/2018 _javi_
26/01/2018 kurious*
28/01/2018 steelboy*
29/01/2018 alcohodl
01/02/2018 cristitcm
18/02/2018 in the silence
20/04/2018 fractal universe*
15/03/2018 Carl85
15/05/2018 oldtimegin*
15/06/2018 samson
16/08/2018 samarkand
hero member
Activity: 750
Merit: 601
To split your coins
On BTC chain you have some coins in address (A), you send your coins to another address you own (B), and include a further special recipient address 3Bit1xA4apyzgmFNT2k8Pvnd6zb6TnwcTi  to whom you send a few satoshis. (You have to use send to many option in your wallet, to send them at once).
Any transactions that contain this special address will be ignored by 2X miners.
Once this is successful, you will have your BTC in an address(B) you own.

IIUC, I would not employ this mechanism for my coins. The part that I have underlined seems to require full faith in what the miners will do. You have no a priori method of knowing whether that address will 'be ignored' by any miner.


Yes, it's a policy, miners could ignore the policy and include the transaction.
But if you are sending coins to your own addresses, and they break policy and include the transaction in a block, there is no harm done.
Jump to: