Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion - page 18991.

JayJuanGee

legendary

Activity: 3920

Merit: 11299

Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"

Quote from: PoolMinor on March 28, 2016, 05:39:21 PM

Quote from: Divitiae miserae on March 28, 2016, 02:08:12 PM

Full astern!

Captain Obvious here again:
The price increase was due to one or more entities simply purchasing BTC, they were not pumping the price as we normally see, they were accumulating all in one go; The reason the price faltered afterward.

Yeah, right.... That's great logic, and this one entity chose to make such a purchase during a very low volume time in order that they wouldn't have to pay the same price for every single coin. Roll Eyes

Edit: Looks like Blunderer beat me to the punch on this theme..... funny that I may have been reading this thread so long that I am beginning to parrot some of the ideas of Lambie... Cry

blunderer

full member

Activity: 154

Merit: 100

Quote from: PoolMinor on March 28, 2016, 07:25:44 PM

... You still haven't discovered the underlying theme behind such a purposeful buy. ...

Quote from: PoolMinor on March 28, 2016, 05:39:21 PM

... they were [totally] not pumping the price [I'm super srs!]

PoolMinor

legendary

Activity: 1844

Merit: 1338

XXXVII Fnord is toast without bread

Quote from: blunderer on March 28, 2016, 06:58:55 PM

Sry. Didn't mean to spoil your "one or more entities ... accumulating all in one go" fantasy. Of course they're accumulating, Sweetness! They want your Beanies so hard, why, they don't even care about slippage

Still showing your less than stellar brain capacity and leading with your ignorance. You still haven't discovered the underlying theme behind such a purposeful buy. But you should probably go back to your other threads you seem to mindlessly attack.

blunderer

full member

Activity: 154

Merit: 100

Quote from: PoolMinor on March 28, 2016, 06:09:34 PM

Quote from: blunderer on March 28, 2016, 06:03:29 PM

Quote from: PoolMinor on March 28, 2016, 05:39:21 PM

...
Captain Obvious here again:
The price increase was due to one or more entities simply purchasing BTC, they were not pumping the price as we normally see, they were accumulating all in one go; The reason the price faltered afterward.

0hai. That entity "accumulat[ed] all in one go"? Wonder if it knows how stupid "accumulating all in one go" in an illiquid market is?

Think past the obvious.......Now that your head is clear, formulate a query that actually shows you took some time to think....

Sry. Didn't mean to spoil your "one or more entities ... accumulating all in one go" fantasy. Of course they're accumulating, Sweetness! They want your Beanies so hard, why, they don't even care about slippage

inca

legendary

Activity: 1176

Merit: 1000

Quote from: marcus_of_augustus on March 28, 2016, 06:14:50 PM

... you forgot the sad ether-pumpers who crawl out when it goes down too.

Because seeing the price rise from a single large order somehow confirms your point of view on the matter.

Hopefully we break upwards out of this enormous flag.

marcus_of_augustus

legendary

Activity: 3920

Merit: 2349

Eadem mutata resurgo

Quote from: Elwar on March 28, 2016, 04:15:51 PM

I see a trend here.

Price starts going up:
"Woo hoo! Moon gifs!"

Price starts to fall:
"Hi I'm a blocksizetard, here is my opinion on development issues"

... you forgot the sad ether-pumpers who crawl out when it goes down too.

PoolMinor

legendary

Activity: 1844

Merit: 1338

XXXVII Fnord is toast without bread

Quote from: blunderer on March 28, 2016, 06:03:29 PM

Quote from: PoolMinor on March 28, 2016, 05:39:21 PM

...
Captain Obvious here again:
The price increase was due to one or more entities simply purchasing BTC, they were not pumping the price as we normally see, they were accumulating all in one go; The reason the price faltered afterward.

0hai. That entity "accumulat[ed] all in one go"? Wonder if it knows how stupid "accumulating all in one go" in an illiquid market is?

Think past the obvious.......Now that your head is clear, formulate a query that actually shows you took some time to think....

blunderer

full member

Activity: 154

Merit: 100

Quote from: PoolMinor on March 28, 2016, 05:39:21 PM

...
Captain Obvious here again:
The price increase was due to one or more entities simply purchasing BTC, they were not pumping the price as we normally see, they were accumulating all in one go; The reason the price faltered afterward.

0hai. That entity "accumulat[ed] all in one go"? Wonder if it knows how stupid "accumulating all in one go" in an illiquid market is?

PoolMinor

legendary

Activity: 1844

Merit: 1338

XXXVII Fnord is toast without bread

Quote from: Divitiae miserae on March 28, 2016, 02:08:12 PM

Full astern!

Captain Obvious here again:
The price increase was due to one or more entities simply purchasing BTC, they were not pumping the price as we normally see, they were accumulating all in one go; The reason the price faltered afterward.

bargainbin

full member

Activity: 126

Merit: 100

Quote from: bargainbin on March 28, 2016, 04:39:51 PM

Quote from: Lauda on March 28, 2016, 03:29:20 PM

Quote from: Carlton Banks on March 28, 2016, 03:25:12 PM

Thank you Adam, you're the first Classic/2MB shill who has been polite enough to ask. Please leave.

Carlton, where have you been? Your direct approach was missing in some of these discussions (for a while).
Anyhow, you do make a point. The majority of the users do not like the people supporting controversial hard forks in addition to all of them being moved to the altcoin section. Things would be much more simpler if people like Veritas, Adam, etc. just left. Forums have been created to suit the needs of the people supporting such forks, they might as well use them.

Right on! We never liked him anyhow.

Bitcoin needs to shrink!

Elwar

legendary

Activity: 3598

Merit: 2386

Viva Ut Vivas

I see a trend here.

Price starts going up:
"Woo hoo! Moon gifs!"

Price starts to fall:
"Hi I'm a blocksizetard, here is my opinion on development issues"

Gyrsur

legendary

Activity: 2856

Merit: 1520

Bitcoin Legal Tender Countries: 2 of 206

Quote from: adamstgBit on March 28, 2016, 03:06:31 PM

kinda feels like the next 24 hours are citiral

next two weeks^TM are critical!

adamstgBit

legendary

Activity: 1904

Merit: 1037

Trusted Bitcoiner

kinda feels like the next 24 hours are citiral

Divitiae miserae

full member

Activity: 188

Merit: 100

Full astern!

Meuh6879

legendary

Activity: 1512

Merit: 1012

Quote from: adamstgBit on March 28, 2016, 11:47:11 AM

i have a 1GBps connection with unlimited bandwidth.

if we all hook on to my super fast internet we can scale bitcoin!

luckily, Bitcoin network ... use than a "unlimited" connexion.
Like power, hard drive and ... smart developpment.

bargainbin

full member

Activity: 126

Merit: 100

Quote from: hdbuck on March 28, 2016, 01:51:57 PM

Quote

"In short, it's a great investment"

~David Andolfatto, Vice-President Fed Bank of St-Louis

http://andolfatto.blogspot.fr/2016/03/is-bitcoin-safe-asset.html

And yet there are still those who refuse to believe that Bitcoin is a honeypot Roll Eyes

hdbuck

legendary

Activity: 1260

Merit: 1002

Quote

"This brings me to Bitcoin. I think that Bitcoin could be the world's next great safe asset. At least, it certainly seems to have all the properties that are desired in a safe asset. "

"This "Bitcoin as a large-value transfer system" does not destroy my thesis: Bitcoin can remain a desirable safe asset. "

"Once market penetration is complete, its return behavior is likely to mimic the return behavior of any other safe asset."

"Investors can expect to earn unusually high returns in a crisis event."

"In short, it's a great investment"

~David Andolfatto, Vice-President Fed Bank of St-Louis

http://andolfatto.blogspot.fr/2016/03/is-bitcoin-safe-asset.html

Divitiae miserae

full member

Activity: 188

Merit: 100

Meanwhile, in the world of the ineffable coin:

bargainbin

full member

Activity: 126

Merit: 100

Quote from: JayJuanGee on March 28, 2016, 01:09:41 PM

Quote from: bargainbin on March 28, 2016, 11:29:19 AM

Quote from: JayJuanGee on March 28, 2016, 11:24:43 AM

Quote from: bargainbin on March 28, 2016, 10:26:20 AM

Quote from: adamstgBit on March 28, 2016, 10:10:51 AM

...
bitcoin does scale!
...

Why price can't stay up on its own? Why it go all flaccid & droopy when pumping stops?
Huh

Bitcoin is hardly flaccid and droopy.

In early November 2015, we got a pump to $502... however, BTC prices have been largely between $360 and $460 thereafter. I would hardly call those price dynamics flaccid and droopy.. instead I would call that "in a pretty decent place."

Yeah, sure, BTC prices may go back into the $300s and maybe even there could be another attempt at going below $350... but it is seeming less and less likely and more and more difficult to bring bitcoin below those seemingly firm price points.. There have been attempts to bring BTC prices below $400 in the past month, and even that has been seemingly difficult.. I would hardly call that flaccid and droopy.

In other words,

It's flaccid alright.
Flaccid. Limp and droopy, like a postcoital D.

You can repeat your conclusion all that you like, but you have no analysis, logic or facts in order to attempt to describe or support how you arrived at such a wishful-thinking conclusion.

You can't deny it's flaccid tho. And also tiny.
Disappointingly small Sad

aztecminer

legendary

Activity: 1092

Merit: 1000

Quote from: JayJuanGee on March 28, 2016, 01:07:20 PM

Quote from: aztecminer on March 28, 2016, 11:28:20 AM

Quote from: JayJuanGee on March 28, 2016, 11:24:43 AM

Quote from: bargainbin on March 28, 2016, 10:26:20 AM

Quote from: adamstgBit on March 28, 2016, 10:10:51 AM

...
bitcoin does scale!
...

Why price can't stay up on its own? Why it go all flaccid & droopy when pumping stops?
Huh

Bitcoin is hardly flaccid and droopy.

In early November 2015, we got a pump to $502... however, BTC prices have been largely between $360 and $460 thereafter. I would hardly call those price dynamics flaccid and droopy.. instead I would call that "in a pretty decent place."

Yeah, sure, BTC prices may go back into the $300s and maybe even there could be another attempt at going below $350... but it is seeming less and less likely and more and more difficult to bring bitcoin below those seemingly firm price points.. There have been attempts to bring BTC prices below $400 in the past month, and even that has been seemingly difficult.. I would hardly call that flaccid and droopy.

In other words, BTC prices got pushed up to $502 and has stayed pretty resilient in the past about 5 months. Looking good.

Marshal's Auction Pump of 2015.....

Your lil theory about the feds wanting to pump bitcoin makes little to no sense.

Contrary to your assumptions, bitcoin remains decentralized, and therefore the feds consider it as something that they would like to keep down rather than to pump......

Accordingly, those people pumping bitcoin from the $250s to $502 were largely speculators, bulls and maybe even some bears who wanted to jump on the short term momentum train in order to be able to short at a higher price.... that group does not include fed bears because fed bears can print however the fuck much amount of money that they want, and they have NO incentive to attempt to make a few extra million off of the price difference in a marshall auction of less than 50k coins.

Snap out of your fantasy Mr. Aztec, and discontinue with your looney theories from Fantaztecminer.com

you think exactly what they want you to think.. i bet you think everything is just like on tv too don't you ??

Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion - page 18991. (Read 26608384 times)