haircut is coming as recommended by IMF in their last PDF "Taxing Times" from October 13th
http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/fm/2013/02/pdf/fm1302.pdf(page 49 that by the way it's title is "Taxing our way out of - or into - trouble?")
Check in the next days in your bank, you might find similar news maybe?
I fail to infer any "recommendation" of a levy in that text. It looks like an objective and succint review of such a practice along the last 100 years or so. What's more, the last paragraph notes the haircut would be quite large, making a case
against it.
The report itself says:
"The sharp deterioration of the public finances in many countries has revived interest in a "capital levy"— a one-off tax on private wealth—as an exceptional measure to restore debt sustainability. The appeal is that such a tax, if it is implemented before avoidance is possible and there is a belief that it will never be repeated, does not distort behavior (and may be seen by some as fair). … The conditions for success are strong, but also need to be weighed against the risks of the alternatives, which include repudiating public debt or inflating it away. … The tax rates needed to bring down public debt to precrisis levels, moreover, are sizable: reducing debt ratios to end-2007 levels would require (for a sample of 15 euro area countries) a tax rate of about 10 percent on households with positive net wealth. (page 49)"
First, IMF economists know there are not enough rich people to fund today's governments even if 100 percent of the assets of the 1 percent were expropriated. That means that all households with positive net wealth—everyone with retirement savings or home equity—would have their assets plundered under the IMF's formulation.
Second, such a repudiation of private property will not pay off Western governments' debts or fund budgets going forward. It will merely "restore debt sustainability," allowing free-spending sovereigns to keep tapping the bond markets until the next crisis comes along—for which stronger measures will be required, of course.
Third, should politicians fail to muster the courage to engage in this kind of wholesale robbery, the only alternative scenario the IMF posits is public debt repudiation and hyperinflation. Structural reform proposals for the Ponzi-scheme entitlement programs that are bankrupting us are nowhere to be seen.
There are more references in the pdf. You can find them quite fast looking for levy or levies in the text. Maybe you are right and i did not capture the right image from the PDF, but consider the environment: Cyprus, Eslovenia Bank haircuts, Half of private pensions on Poland taken. Even the title of IMF PDF Report -> "Tax Times" does suggest they are going to tax and this is the time for taxes.