Author

Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion - page 32695. (Read 26469677 times)

full member
Activity: 168
Merit: 100
Awkward:

Short-term (i.e, daily) Trend: Slightly Bullish
Mid-Term Trend (i.e, monthly): Very bearish
Long-Term Trend (i.e, Yearly): Very Bullish
full member
Activity: 173
Merit: 100
btcmy.net
seems bullish trend, time to load btc to gox site and make some money  Grin
hero member
Activity: 770
Merit: 501
perhaps again another off-topic post (1st beer Cheesy but no fishing this time),
it seemed to fit in the context:

one way for btc to become attractive for any big company is to get its own role as stable independent payment for all kinds of web -related services
(media, tipchar possibility for artists & kickstarter projects, shops for alternative lifestyle, fairtrade products Wink
...would be good to push it with the fairtrade argument to hop on the new greeny train (with solar mining of course Tongue)
...some nice ads
e.g.: "What currency costs more blood - btc or us$? you have the vote in your hand!"  
power to the people and so on like an extended arm of SR Cheesy  

At some point no big player could deny the sheer buying power it represents as a movement.

when amazon started their own coin for digital media i found the strategy really interesting to make a customer dependent
by luring him into a currency that can only be used to buy products by this specific company.
shortly after i heard rumors of apple planning also their own coin for itunes (patent for imoney  Roll Eyes)
(i think it was that article...not sure though where i read it: http://www.coindesk.com/apple-to-create-virtual-currency-imoney/)

it's like they give virtual value away (weighed up by what is the question? fiat? ipads?...yea now for sure but in 10-15 years?)
to buy a part of their own client base and this is much more cheaper than taking any credit from a bank or paying dividends to shareholders,
and they know it's their cash in the first place.
With the flip of a coin every single person could decide to which company they give their fiat...and get some goodies in return

i wrote that some time ago and my theory is perhaps a bit off but it's like switching the stock market around to the consumer side
and every company could in this way literally "buy" shares of the the mass purchasing power as long as they can bait with treats.

sure that could be one of many ways how cryptocurrencies will evolve but the more i think about the more it seems possible how economy could integrate that tool into society and its market.

best place for btc would be to really represent a backup like virtual gold...
but for that scenario 1st world would need a hell of a depression.
therefore the story could also begin in smaller countries with huge inflation.
...
who knows

btc will be used and formed by society and economy depending on their conditions during phases of history...
(=highrisk-investment during times of crisis?)

excuse me for the monologue...got bit philosophical again give me a hint if this theory is way off Smiley...time for a shandy

edit: thanks for
Quote
...overread that one

2nd edit: shit missed discussion by one page Tongue
legendary
Activity: 2097
Merit: 1070
It does look like the price is going up a bit.

Perhaps I'll have to wait for my $20 Bitcoins and ride the bumps in the road until this crash plays out in full.
full member
Activity: 462
Merit: 101
A Top Web 3 Gaming Layer2 Provider

by the way, boots are in "buy mode" again a bulls will soon be back at 80 Wall  Wink

sr. member
Activity: 434
Merit: 250
Any chance you can add some horns to your avatar now that you are the forum bull ? Cheesy

Lucif has been even more bullish than I am. (And right so far)

I'm still in bubble deflation mode; I think this is the suckers rally.

  Smiley
sr. member
Activity: 434
Merit: 250
As I said above, this is HUGE news, but just not yet. If they start using BTC there the floodgates could open up.

What is your update on our price? Think we break through 80, 85?...

I don't know.  Undecided

Looking attentively the reverse head and shoulders pattern however.
hero member
Activity: 798
Merit: 1000
Oh goody, how did I miss this?

http://kipochi.com/blog/kipochi-launches-first-bitcoin-wallet-in-africa-with-m-pesa-integration

Even the news will test the bears.  Wink

Any chance you can add some horns to your avatar now that you are the forum bull ? Cheesy
sr. member
Activity: 437
Merit: 250

I think BTC might be a complimentary currency (e.g. with M-Pesa http://memeburn.com/2013/07/kipochi-brings-bitcoin-to-africa-through-m-pesa/) and used in an app like Kipochi. I really think that is the biggest news we've seen for BTC in a while but most people don't see how big it can be. edit - let BTC be used on non smart phones with apps like Kipochi pretty much solves a lot of technological problems.

I do agree with you though in that the volatility is indeed a problem. We are very early in the game BUT at the same time I have a feeling the maturity of usefulness will be reached in ways many of us can't fathom. Remember, BTC is a Black Swan technology of sorts so it's growth will be likewise imo. Kipochi can very well be our first offspring...

Regarding your on topic point  Grin
We have moved from a low of $65 (which I almost felt like jumping into for the bounce but don't like entering at the bottoms of big red candles) to a high of 80.
Perhaps we consolidate a bit and then head back down. It seems like this move up was purely technical.

I do see more decent sized buys coming in but in large part the move was started by a huge buy of 4500. I don't like entering a rally based on a large player. Perhaps it is petering out.
I will see what we do around $85 if we get that high.

IAS

edit - Forgot your question. Yeah, I guess it would be "easier" and use global currencies but some governments won't allow that. I still go back to the complimentary thing. We don't need BTC to be adopted by mass amounts of people (% wise) to be successful (money wise). Think about just one small country using it, or just 1% of people in a few countries as a store of wealth - to move money - for online transactions, etc. That would be huge. Should BTC actually take off and be an internet currency "standard", another doozy.

+1

This news from Kapochi is fantastic, it's exactly what we need.
member
Activity: 93
Merit: 10
legendary
Activity: 1442
Merit: 1000
Antifragile
Oh goody, how did I miss this?

http://kipochi.com/blog/kipochi-launches-first-bitcoin-wallet-in-africa-with-m-pesa-integration

Even the news will test the bears.  Wink

As I said above, this is HUGE news, but just not yet. If they start using BTC there the floodgates could open up.

What is your update on our price? Think we break through 80, 85?...
sr. member
Activity: 434
Merit: 250
legendary
Activity: 2324
Merit: 1801
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
legendary
Activity: 1442
Merit: 1000
Antifragile

Tell that to people who's currency is more volatile than BTC. As well as more manipulated. See Argentina. Many of us feel BTC will first see adoption outside America, waaaay outside.

The volatility of BTC is in large part a function of the instability of the current economic system in shambles all over the world. If economies were solid then BTC would still be at $1.
It will take time to find a price. Perhaps it won't even be with BTC, or at least not BTC in its current state.


That sounds like a good assessment, but surely in 3rd world countries where it is less digitised bringing the digital age will have much more growing pains? Wouldn't they be easier just doing what Zimbabwe has done and use more global currencies?

Back on topic: Why hasn't this mini-rally been eaten by bears yet?

I think BTC might be a complimentary currency (e.g. with M-Pesa http://memeburn.com/2013/07/kipochi-brings-bitcoin-to-africa-through-m-pesa/) and used in an app like Kipochi. I really think that is the biggest news we've seen for BTC in a while but most people don't see how big it can be. edit - let BTC be used on non smart phones with apps like Kipochi pretty much solves a lot of technological problems.

I do agree with you though in that the volatility is indeed a problem. We are very early in the game BUT at the same time I have a feeling the maturity of usefulness will be reached in ways many of us can't fathom. Remember, BTC is a Black Swan technology of sorts so it's growth will be likewise imo. Kipochi can very well be our first offspring...

Regarding your on topic point  Grin
We have moved from a low of $65 (which I almost felt like jumping into for the bounce but don't like entering at the bottoms of big red candles) to a high of 80.
Perhaps we consolidate a bit and then head back down. It seems like this move up was purely technical.

I do see more decent sized buys coming in but in large part the move was started by a huge buy of 4500. I don't like entering a rally based on a large player. Perhaps it is petering out.
I will see what we do around $85 if we get that high.

IAS

edit - Forgot your question. Yeah, I guess it would be "easier" and use global currencies but some governments won't allow that. I still go back to the complimentary thing. We don't need BTC to be adopted by mass amounts of people (% wise) to be successful (money wise). Think about just one small country using it, or just 1% of people in a few countries as a store of wealth - to move money - for online transactions, etc. That would be huge. Should BTC actually take off and be an internet currency "standard", another doozy.
sr. member
Activity: 437
Merit: 250
Bitcoin = Currency??

 Grin

BitcoinDelusiontalk.com

I transact value with other people all over the world by transferring bitcoins.  If you think that's not a currency, then you are the delusional one.

I can trade my TV for something else on Craigslist or anywhere in the world.  Does that make my TV a currency?  

A TV has value because of non-monetary uses.  Bitcoin only has value because of monetary use.
Or what is your definition of a currency?

Gold has non-monetary uses and has been used as a barter of exchange for millennia Wink

It's tough to define, I'd say a widely/generally accepted payment = a currency. People call it cash of the internet so I guess that counts.


Tell that to people who's currency is more volatile than BTC. As well as more manipulated. See Argentina. Many of us feel BTC will first see adoption outside America, waaaay outside.

The volatility of BTC is in large part a function of the instability of the current economic system in shambles all over the world. If economies were solid then BTC would still be at $1.
It will take time to find a price. Perhaps it won't even be with BTC, or at least not BTC in its current state.


That sounds like a good assessment, but surely in 3rd world countries where it is less digitised bringing the digital age will have much more growing pains? Wouldn't they be easier just doing what Zimbabwe has done and use more global currencies?

I mean, we're talking about a country where 1/3rd of its population don't have access to the internet.

http://www.internetworldstats.com/sa/ar.htm


Back on topic: Why hasn't this mini-rally been eaten by bears yet?
legendary
Activity: 1442
Merit: 1000
Antifragile

In short because it's the most perfect form of money that has ever existed. Eventuslly mr. Market will recognise this and the market will reflect the true value.

Check out Erik Voorhees' articles if you like to reaf a clearly written explanation why Bitcoin is the best money thus far.

I agree, bitcoin is revolutionary. It IS the best form of money that has ever existed.

However, it is still in its infancy whatever way you look at it. For it to BE money it needs a stable price, who is going to trade with something with no fixed value or at least some what of a guarantee of your spending power down the line. The ONLY way to get round this is to stop all this crazy speculation that it's bigger than Jesus/the internet etc and actually use it as money.

Until it is actually used as money en masse all this volatility is just delaying it being mass adopted. Yes a bubble is great for bitcoin, for publicity and adoption, but it NEEDS to deflate and have steady growth in order to compete as money.

All this bullish sentiment that its value right now is in tripple digits or that it will some day be the global currency is irrelevant. Bitcoin needs to walk before it can run and with the only people jumping on the train are expecting it. The price ends up being 99% speculation and 1% asset, this only helps to stunt its growth as a viable currency.

I think you are mistakingly overvalueing the impact of price.

When people first criticize bitcoin, who actually understand it and don't scream ponzi, initially outline the fact that spending power is of utmost importance in a currency.

I don't want to be paid at the end of the month in something that can lose or gain a significant portion of wealth in a very short space of time.

Price would follow after mass adoption but why would the mass adopt a volatile currency?

Tell that to people who's currency is more volatile than BTC. As well as more manipulated. See Argentina. Many of us feel BTC will first see adoption outside America, waaaay outside.

The volatility of BTC is in large part a function of the instability of the current economic system in shambles all over the world. If economies were solid then BTC would still be at $1.
It will take time to find a price. Perhaps it won't even be with BTC, or at least not BTC in its current state.

sr. member
Activity: 434
Merit: 250
Just when we hit $66, reddit sentiment had finally changed to bearish.
Now there's more readers than there's been in days/weeks.

Everyone was waiting for $50 coins.

High volume on what might be a nice reverse head and shoulders.

This bounce is gonna be epic.  Grin
legendary
Activity: 1638
Merit: 1001
₪``Campaign Manager´´₪
Bitcoin = Currency??

 Grin

BitcoinDelusiontalk.com

I transact value with other people all over the world by transferring bitcoins.  If you think that's not a currency, then you are the delusional one.

I can trade my TV for something else on Craigslist or anywhere in the world.  Does that make my TV a currency? 

A TV has value because of non-monetary uses.  Bitcoin only has value because of monetary use.
Or what is your definition of a currency?
sr. member
Activity: 252
Merit: 250
Bitcoin = Currency??

 Grin

BitcoinDelusiontalk.com

I transact value with other people all over the world by transferring bitcoins.  If you think that's not a currency, then you are the delusional one.

I can trade my TV for something else on Craigslist or anywhere in the world.  Does that make my TV a currency? 
legendary
Activity: 1638
Merit: 1001
₪``Campaign Manager´´₪
So what, we have a huge market cap based around what? Its use to transfer wealth cheaply and quickly through the internet? Big companies are already heavily tied with the traditional banking system. They are not prone to change and they certainly wont for a 5 year old currency with an inflated market cap based on speculation. We need to build from the ground up. Let the companies see people wanting to spend bitcoins and they will follow. Trying to shortcut it is not helping adoption.

It's a pointless discussion anyway.  We'll just let reality play out.
Jump to: