Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion - page 32952.

barbs

hero member

Activity: 854

Merit: 1000

Quote from: Frozenlock on July 12, 2013, 01:51:19 AM

Quote from: vokain on July 12, 2013, 01:47:43 AM

that was my beef against him, since he is a face of this community and represents us. there should be a neutrality rule on part of the staff, especially in the speculation forum. he is a long term bull though.

Did he ever say Bitcoin was doomed to fail? No.
Did he ever say the blockchain is going to be bloated and unusable? No.
What about the ease of use? The market share?

No, really, not a single drop of FUD.

He criticised the price, which has nothing to do with the usefulness of Bitcoin.
Bitcoin could work just as well even if it was $1 per unit.

ahh yes frozenwrong. sup.

Frozenlock

sr. member

Activity: 434

Merit: 250

Quote from: vokain on July 12, 2013, 01:47:43 AM

that was my beef against him, since he is a face of this community and represents us. there should be a neutrality rule on part of the staff, especially in the speculation forum. he is a long term bull though.

Did he ever say Bitcoin was doomed to fail? No.
Did he ever say the blockchain is going to be bloated and unusable? No.
What about the ease of use? The market share?

No, really, not a single drop of FUD.

He criticised the price, which has nothing to do with the usefulness of Bitcoin.
Bitcoin could work just as well even if it was $1 per unit.

barbs

hero member

Activity: 854

Merit: 1000

haha why didn't i rebuy at 65.5

Why.

I still havent bought in. QQ

Rampion

legendary

Activity: 1148

Merit: 1018

Quote from: vokain on July 12, 2013, 01:47:43 AM

Quote from: ShroomsKit on July 12, 2013, 01:45:10 AM

Quote from: byronbb on July 12, 2013, 01:41:35 AM

Quote from: ShroomsKit on July 12, 2013, 01:40:13 AM

Quote from: N12 on July 11, 2013, 09:07:49 PM

That "prediction" was already invalidated briefly after it was made I remember. I should probably modify it to "No more sustained triple digits in 2013" whereas sustained could refer to either time (maybe 2 weeks?) or volume. I honestly don't see us trading above 100 for anything more than a spike.

Triple digits is a thing of the past.

You just don't give up do you?

He has a bear avatar, it's his identity.

Nothing wrong with being a bear. A moderator who constantly spreads total BS and fud based on nothing, yes that's wrong.
He already looks like a damn joker now but he apparently doesn't care.
He just ignores it and keeps on spreading his fud.

that was my beef against him, since he is a face of this community and represents us. there should be a neutrality rule on part of the staff, especially in the speculation forum. he is a long term bull though.

Long term bull = "Neutral"?

Huh

bangersdad

full member

Activity: 227

Merit: 100

Jaroslaw where are you? oh i forgot you dumped all your coins @ $70.

Rampion

legendary

Activity: 1148

Merit: 1018

Quote from: ShroomsKit on July 12, 2013, 01:37:46 AM

Quote from: Nemesis on July 12, 2013, 12:04:48 AM

Where is Rampion? I want that kid to sell low and buy high again....

That clown is awefully quiet lately.
I would too if i looked that stupid and most likely in his case lost a shitload of money waiting for 50 to hit.

I would suggest to him leaving his current username and starting a new one because he really is the joke of this thread.

Poor guy.

So arrogant and yet so wrong.

He and our clown moderator Blitz ofcourse.

LOL, you guys are hilarious. Shroomsy, care to explain how you lose money by selling most of your coins at $129 when they are traded at $99 now? If I buy in now I would have 30% more coins I had before selling, plus I made some small profit buying at $68 and selling at $78 (yup, didn't expect such a big bounce).

BTW Shroomsy... Do you still think that a deep crash (because going from $266 to $65 is quite a crash) "hurts the coin" or did you finally realized that's nonsense?

vokain

legendary

Activity: 1834

Merit: 1019

Quote from: ShroomsKit on July 12, 2013, 01:45:10 AM

Quote from: byronbb on July 12, 2013, 01:41:35 AM

Quote from: ShroomsKit on July 12, 2013, 01:40:13 AM

Quote from: N12 on July 11, 2013, 09:07:49 PM

That "prediction" was already invalidated briefly after it was made I remember. I should probably modify it to "No more sustained triple digits in 2013" whereas sustained could refer to either time (maybe 2 weeks?) or volume. I honestly don't see us trading above 100 for anything more than a spike.

Triple digits is a thing of the past.

You just don't give up do you?

He has a bear avatar, it's his identity.

Nothing wrong with being a bear. A moderator who constantly spreads total BS and fud based on nothing, yes that's wrong.
He already looks like a damn joker now but he apparently doesn't care.
He just ignores it and keeps on spreading his fud.

that was my beef against him, since he is a face of this community and represents us. there should be a neutrality rule on part of the staff, especially in the speculation forum. he is a long term bull though.

Frozenlock

sr. member

Activity: 434

Merit: 250

Quote from: ShroomsKit on July 12, 2013, 01:37:46 AM

Quote from: Nemesis on July 12, 2013, 12:04:48 AM

Where is Rampion? I want that kid to sell low and buy high again....

That clown is awefully quiet lately.
I would too if i looked that stupid and most likely in his case lost a shitload of money waiting for 50 to hit.

I would suggest to him leaving his current username and starting a new one because he really is the joke of this thread.

Poor guy.

So arrogant and yet so wrong.

He and our clown moderator Blitz ofcourse.

Quoted for future reference.

Who knows, you might be right. Roll Eyes

ShroomsKit

hero member

Activity: 672

Merit: 500

Quote from: byronbb on July 12, 2013, 01:41:35 AM

Quote from: ShroomsKit on July 12, 2013, 01:40:13 AM

Quote from: N12 on July 11, 2013, 09:07:49 PM

That "prediction" was already invalidated briefly after it was made I remember. I should probably modify it to "No more sustained triple digits in 2013" whereas sustained could refer to either time (maybe 2 weeks?) or volume. I honestly don't see us trading above 100 for anything more than a spike.

Triple digits is a thing of the past.

You just don't give up do you?

He has a bear avatar, it's his identity.

Nothing wrong with being a bear. A moderator who constantly spreads total BS and fud based on nothing, yes that's wrong.
He already looks like a damn joker now but he apparently doesn't care.
He just ignores it and keeps on spreading his fud.

And i wonder why. You can be a bear without making non stop ridiculous predictions you just pulled out of his ass.
He either has an hidden agenda or is just a dumb kid.

vokain

legendary

Activity: 1834

Merit: 1019

Quote from: lebing on July 12, 2013, 01:44:08 AM

People are seeming to think that we have already cleared our way out of the bear market - this is not the case.

We wont clear it until we get to at least 120... still quite some work to do before we can start dancing in the street.

bears you hear that? keep selling!

lebing

legendary

Activity: 1288

Merit: 1000

Enabling the maximal migration

People are seeming to think that we have already cleared our way out of the bear market - this is not the case.

We wont clear it until we get to at least 120... still quite some work to do before we can start dancing in the street.

byronbb

legendary

Activity: 1414

Merit: 1000

HODL OR DIE

Quote from: ShroomsKit on July 12, 2013, 01:40:13 AM

Quote from: N12 on July 11, 2013, 09:07:49 PM

That "prediction" was already invalidated briefly after it was made I remember. I should probably modify it to "No more sustained triple digits in 2013" whereas sustained could refer to either time (maybe 2 weeks?) or volume. I honestly don't see us trading above 100 for anything more than a spike.

Triple digits is a thing of the past.

You just don't give up do you?

He has a bear avatar, it's his identity.

ShroomsKit

hero member

Activity: 672

Merit: 500

Quote from: N12 on July 11, 2013, 09:07:49 PM

That "prediction" was already invalidated briefly after it was made I remember. I should probably modify it to "No more sustained triple digits in 2013" whereas sustained could refer to either time (maybe 2 weeks?) or volume. I honestly don't see us trading above 100 for anything more than a spike.

Triple digits is a thing of the past.

You just don't give up do you?

ShroomsKit

hero member

Activity: 672

Merit: 500

Quote from: Nemesis on July 12, 2013, 12:04:48 AM

Where is Rampion? I want that kid to sell low and buy high again....

That clown is awefully quiet lately.
I would too if i looked that stupid and most likely in his case lost a shitload of money waiting for 50 to hit.

I would suggest to him leaving his current username and starting a new one because he really is the joke of this thread.

Poor guy.

So arrogant and yet so wrong.

He and our clown moderator Blitz ofcourse.

vokain

legendary

Activity: 1834

Merit: 1019

Quote from: kickinyou on July 12, 2013, 01:35:01 AM

Quote from: wonkytonky on July 12, 2013, 01:26:26 AM

still not buying here since 68

neither do I, and I hope we make the right choice

...for me

kickinyou

member

Activity: 93

Merit: 10

Quote from: wonkytonky on July 12, 2013, 01:26:26 AM

still not buying here since 68

neither do I, and I hope we make the right choice

gandhibt

full member

Activity: 238

Merit: 100

If we brake 100 I might buy back in at slight loss, before that this is just bull trap and can be after that also, but then it's probably at least a very big bull trap.

wonkytonky

sr. member

Activity: 411

Merit: 250

still not buying here since 68

4mherewego

full member

Activity: 220

Merit: 100

solex

legendary

Activity: 1078

Merit: 1006

100 satoshis -> ISO code

5 min chart shows the pressure building again. $100 is toast soon...

Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion - page 32952. (Read 26609655 times)