Author

Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion - page 33345. (Read 26462970 times)

legendary
Activity: 1078
Merit: 1006
100 satoshis -> ISO code
Coinage Act of 1965, Section 102 states: “All coins and currencies of the United States (including Federal Reserve notes and circulating notes of Federal Reserve banks and national banking associations), regardless of when coined or issued, shall be legal tender for all debts, public and private, public charges, taxes, duties, and dues.” Only United States currencies (including Federal Reserve Notes) are currently legal tender in the US.

Keyword being LEGAL tender.  Thanks for that BTW.

"An astute reader may note that legal tender only concerns the repayment of debt, taxes, duties, and dues."
Citizens are free to use any currency for an unofficial transaction.

Not familiar with any laws (or how to read them lawyer speak) so might a dumb question...but does the USD being legal tender in the US mean that other currencies are illegal? Or the other currencies can still be be used but just not legally obliged to be accepted?

That's your answer. Legal tender only matters where the government or judicial system is involved.
So you can't pay taxes in bitcoins. But you can pay your neighbor bitcoins for some vegetables.
sr. member
Activity: 252
Merit: 250
@Coinseeker: Bitcoin can be compared to the "currencies" of barter clubs. There are barter organizations in many countries, including nearly all western ones. Another "currencies" that are similar are flight miles. There is nothing illegal with that, many multi-million-dollar companies use them.

I agree and that's where that grey area comes in.  But even flight miles are not the same as Bitcoin.  You can't exchange them for cash (to my knowledge) and are only available on products and services the airlines have paid for at discounted rates, to offer as incentives.  They pass these extra cost to their customers so really, it's just a brilliant marketing strategy and not an actual currency.  Bitcoin is a currency.  No question about it.
member
Activity: 65
Merit: 10
Not familiar with any laws (or how to read them lawyer speak) so might a dumb question...but does the USD being legal tender in the US mean that other currencies are illegal? Or the other currencies can still be be used but just not legally obliged to be accepted?
legendary
Activity: 2097
Merit: 1070
Put that way, that's a good point however that means you have to define BTC as an actual currency and using an alternate currency is against the law in the US.

This article discusses the issue and it seems it is not illegal for US citizens to accept a payment in foreign currency (since 1977).
http://money.stackexchange.com/questions/3582/are-there-any-countries-where-citizens-are-free-to-use-any-currency


Coinage Act of 1965, Section 102 states: “All coins and currencies of the United States (including Federal Reserve notes and circulating notes of Federal Reserve banks and national banking associations), regardless of when coined or issued, shall be legal tender for all debts, public and private, public charges, taxes, duties, and dues.” Only United States currencies (including Federal Reserve Notes) are currently legal tender in the US.

Keyword being LEGAL tender.  Thanks for that BTW.

Try and pay for your lunch with a $100 bill and see what happens.


Um...they'll give me some food and hand me back the change.   Huh   What am I missing?

You're missing all the signs that say no bills higher than $20 will be accepted.
legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 6249
Decentralization Maximalist
@Coinseeker: Bitcoin can be compared to the "currencies" of barter clubs. There are barter organizations in many countries, including nearly all western ones. Another "currencies" that are similar are flight miles. There is nothing illegal with that, many multi-million-dollar companies use them.
sr. member
Activity: 252
Merit: 250
Put that way, that's a good point however that means you have to define BTC as an actual currency and using an alternate currency is against the law in the US.

This article discusses the issue and it seems it is not illegal for US citizens to accept a payment in foreign currency (since 1977).
http://money.stackexchange.com/questions/3582/are-there-any-countries-where-citizens-are-free-to-use-any-currency


Coinage Act of 1965, Section 102 states: “All coins and currencies of the United States (including Federal Reserve notes and circulating notes of Federal Reserve banks and national banking associations), regardless of when coined or issued, shall be legal tender for all debts, public and private, public charges, taxes, duties, and dues.” Only United States currencies (including Federal Reserve Notes) are currently legal tender in the US.

Keyword being LEGAL tender.  Thanks for that BTW.

Try and pay for your lunch with a $100 bill and see what happens.


Um...they'll give me some food and hand me back the change.   Huh   What am I missing?
sr. member
Activity: 280
Merit: 250
Good morning! Hope you all grabbed some cheap coins yesterday  Grin

legendary
Activity: 2097
Merit: 1070
Put that way, that's a good point however that means you have to define BTC as an actual currency and using an alternate currency is against the law in the US.

This article discusses the issue and it seems it is not illegal for US citizens to accept a payment in foreign currency (since 1977).
http://money.stackexchange.com/questions/3582/are-there-any-countries-where-citizens-are-free-to-use-any-currency


Coinage Act of 1965, Section 102 states: “All coins and currencies of the United States (including Federal Reserve notes and circulating notes of Federal Reserve banks and national banking associations), regardless of when coined or issued, shall be legal tender for all debts, public and private, public charges, taxes, duties, and dues.” Only United States currencies (including Federal Reserve Notes) are currently legal tender in the US.

Keyword being LEGAL tender.  Thanks for that BTW.

Try and pay for your lunch with a $100 bill and see what happens.
sr. member
Activity: 252
Merit: 250
Put that way, that's a good point however that means you have to define BTC as an actual currency and using an alternate currency is against the law in the US.

This article discusses the issue and it seems it is not illegal for US citizens to accept a payment in foreign currency (since 1977).
http://money.stackexchange.com/questions/3582/are-there-any-countries-where-citizens-are-free-to-use-any-currency


Coinage Act of 1965, Section 102 states: “All coins and currencies of the United States (including Federal Reserve notes and circulating notes of Federal Reserve banks and national banking associations), regardless of when coined or issued, shall be legal tender for all debts, public and private, public charges, taxes, duties, and dues.” Only United States currencies (including Federal Reserve Notes) are currently legal tender in the US.

Keyword being LEGAL tender.  Thanks for that BTW.
legendary
Activity: 2268
Merit: 1782
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
legendary
Activity: 1078
Merit: 1006
100 satoshis -> ISO code
Put that way, that's a good point however that means you have to define BTC as an actual currency and using an alternate currency is against the law in the US.

This article discusses the issue and it seems it is not illegal for US citizens to accept a payment in foreign currency (since 1977).
http://money.stackexchange.com/questions/3582/are-there-any-countries-where-citizens-are-free-to-use-any-currency
sr. member
Activity: 252
Merit: 250
Im not a law expert so grant me that.  But in most developed countries, sending anonymous payments to anonymous users, tax free, and/or using an alternate currency within those borders is absolutely a violation of law.  It is in the US for sure.

FinCEN just provided guidance stating that Bitcoins can be used to pay for purchases from merchants.  

This is irregardless of the merchant remaining anonymous and/or the customer operating anonymously.

So, anonymous payments to anonymous users is most certainly not something FinCEN has indicated that it has any problem with.   Now, of course, if that transaction incurs a tax obligation, simply because it was paid using Bitcoins does not remove any obligations, so taxes would still be do.  But that doesn't make using Bitcoin illegal.

Care to clarify your statement?  


If you're not paying taxes on those transactions, it's illegal.  That's cut and dry.  By US policy anyway.  I will confine my statements to the US for now.  Again, I think there is too much grey area and that's exactly why they are moving on this online tax bill.  Which only hits major retailers now but is just the platform to go after everyone else.
sr. member
Activity: 252
Merit: 250
As the US goes, so goes the rest of the world.

The rest of western world. Which is not "the world".

Bitcoin is in violation of the laws of nearly every country.  Now I

That's utter BS. Can you show me how is bitcoin violating the laws of Italy, Russia, China, Sweden, Iran, Japan... Just to have a few examples. Be concrete, if you are so sure.

And yes, in the US you have some negative precedent (the e-gold thing, liberty dollar, etc.) - but again, the US is not "the rest of the world".

This may very well have been overstated.  Just my understanding but certainly not fact as it relates to the countries listed.  Point taken.   Wink
legendary
Activity: 2506
Merit: 1010
Im not a law expert so grant me that.  But in most developed countries, sending anonymous payments to anonymous users, tax free, and/or using an alternate currency within those borders is absolutely a violation of law.  It is in the US for sure.

FinCEN just provided guidance stating that Bitcoins can be used to pay for purchases from merchants.  

This is irregardless of the merchant remaining anonymous and/or the customer operating anonymously.

So, anonymous payments to anonymous users is most certainly not something FinCEN has indicated that it has any problem with.   Now, of course, if that transaction incurs a tax obligation, simply because it was paid using Bitcoins does not remove any obligations, so taxes would still be do.  But that doesn't make using Bitcoin illegal.

Care to clarify your statement?  
sr. member
Activity: 252
Merit: 250
And no, Dwolla is not illegal, where as Bitcoin is in violation of the laws of nearly every country.

Bitcoin is not in violation of any laws in most countries. That is, as far as I know, it is perfectly legal to own, buy and sell Bitcoins in most of the world. Many things that can be, and are being, done with Bitcoins ARE in violation of laws, though.

Im not a law expert so grant me that.  But in most developed countries, sending anonymous payments to anonymous users, tax free, and/or using an alternate currency within those borders is absolutely a violation of law.  It is in the US for sure.

So you really do not understand how BTC works.

BTC is "pseudoanonymous" (not anonymous). Additionally, all the transactions are public. Legitimate business transactions can be very easily tracked, much easier than with cash.

And BTW: cash has very similar properties to BTC - and if you operate only in cash you can also be "tax free". Which obviously does not means that cash is illegal.

Put that way, that's a good point however that means you have to define BTC as an actual currency and using an alternate currency is against the law in the US.
legendary
Activity: 1148
Merit: 1018
And no, Dwolla is not illegal, where as Bitcoin is in violation of the laws of nearly every country.

Bitcoin is not in violation of any laws in most countries. That is, as far as I know, it is perfectly legal to own, buy and sell Bitcoins in most of the world. Many things that can be, and are being, done with Bitcoins ARE in violation of laws, though.

Im not a law expert so grant me that.  But in most developed countries, sending anonymous payments to anonymous users, tax free, and/or using an alternate currency within those borders is absolutely a violation of law.  It is in the US for sure.

So you really do not understand how BTC works.

BTC is "pseudoanonymous" (not anonymous). Additionally, all the transactions are public. Legitimate business transactions can be very easily tracked, much easier than with cash.

And BTW: cash has very similar properties to BTC - and if you operate only in cash you can also be "tax free". Which obviously does not means that cash is illegal.
legendary
Activity: 1148
Merit: 1018
As the US goes, so goes the rest of the world.

The rest of western world. Which is not "the world".

Bitcoin is in violation of the laws of nearly every country.  Now I

That's utter BS. Can you show me how is bitcoin violating the laws of Italy, Russia, China, Sweden, Iran, Japan... Just to have a few examples. Be concrete, if you are so sure.

And yes, in the US you have some negative precedent (the e-gold thing, liberty dollar, etc.) - but again, the US is not "the rest of the world".
sr. member
Activity: 252
Merit: 250
...where as Bitcoin is in violation of the laws of nearly every country.  ...

No way. You are spreading FUD.
There is a distinction which needs to be understood. Bitcoin is not a class A drug, or a bottle of your own moonshine whiskey. It is not in violation of laws. Some people who use it might trade illegal items (such as moonshine), but this is true of any medium of exchange. It is what people do with a currency such as evade taxes which can break laws, not the currency itself.

And no, Dwolla is not illegal, where as Bitcoin is in violation of the laws of nearly every country.

Bitcoin is not in violation of any laws in most countries. That is, as far as I know, it is perfectly legal to own, buy and sell Bitcoins in most of the world. Many things that can be, and are being, done with Bitcoins ARE in violation of laws, though.

Im not a law expert so grant me that.  But in most developed countries, sending anonymous payments to anonymous users, tax free, and/or using an alternate currency within those borders is absolutely a violation of law.  It is in the US for sure.

When you trade one good for another, by law you owe taxes on that transaction.  Even if I were to trade say $100 TV for a $100 car stereo on Craigslist, by law, I'm supposed to pay taxes on that transaction.  That's called tax evasion here in the US, if you don't pay.  That's a crime, thus against the law.

I think we have all this grey area because of the advent of the internet which is why it is no coincidence the online tax bill is making it swiftly through congress.  They are setting up their chess pieces.
legendary
Activity: 1078
Merit: 1006
100 satoshis -> ISO code
...where as Bitcoin is in violation of the laws of nearly every country.  ...

No way. You are spreading FUD.
There is a distinction which needs to be understood. Bitcoin is not a class A drug, or a bottle of your own moonshine whiskey. It is not in violation of laws. Some people who use it might trade illegal items (such as moonshine), but this is true of any medium of exchange. It is what people do with a currency such as evade taxes which can break laws, not the currency itself.
hero member
Activity: 501
Merit: 500
And no, Dwolla is not illegal, where as Bitcoin is in violation of the laws of nearly every country.

Bitcoin is not in violation of any laws in most countries. That is, as far as I know, it is perfectly legal to own, buy and sell Bitcoins in most of the world. Many things that can be, and are being, done with Bitcoins ARE in violation of laws, though.
Jump to: