It's abundantly clear to anyone with even a basic level of critical thinking that protecting victims from thieves trying to mix their coins is not the coordinator's responsibility.
I never claimed the coordinator has that "responsibility". My worldview is that victims are responsible for protecting themselves, any voluntary assistance given to victims by others falls in the category of "heroism".
Just because I don't believe in "an eye for an eye" doesn't mean I expect random entities to take on arbitrary roles, like this one.
So would you rather a coinjoin coordinator allow SBF's stolen coins to be anonymized or block SBF from anonymizing those coins? Analyze this scenario in a vacuum.
You and I both know that you're not interested in having a genuine conversation to uncover the truth. You just want to have the upper hand in the discussion and shut me down at the first opportunity.
If you feel this statement "shuts down" your argument, then I've thoroughly proven my point:
Hey BlackHatCoiner, my wallet is now a "mixing site" service, send me your coins and I won't charge you any fees.
Clearly you aren't willing to accept this "service" even though it's offered to you for free. That's because it's not a "service" at all, it's an obvious scam: I get your coins and you get no privacy.
As we covered before, even if someone made the foolish choice to use a custodian for this purpose, they would blend in with a larger pool of users by depositing into a custodian that offers an actual economic service like an exchange or a casino instead:
Which part of "it isn't designed to offer privacy" don't you understand? Of course and you can make an account anonymously, but that isn't my point. Your coins could be confiscated for either being "tainted", or your account could be terminated for using a "banned IP address". Can you gain privacy from such service? Perhaps. Is it suitable for that purpose? No.
The mixer you advertise is also not designed to offer privacy. How do you not understand that? Your mixer says it can confiscate your coins or terminate your account, so the only difference between using an exchange and using your mixer is that exchanges have a larger user base. It is not suitable for the purpose of gaining privacy.
The real question is why would you ever want to do that? The exchange isn't portraying itself as a mixer, and if you take the time to read their privacy policy, you'll quickly figure out that you have no privacy.
Did you take the time to read the privacy policy of the mixer you are using?
3. Quality scoring of incoming transactions
We run a thorough background check of incoming funds through a proprietary algorithm.
2.1. Privacy Policy
Please refer to our Privacy Policy to get an understanding of our confidentiality obligations. You consent to the collection and use of information as described in the Privacy Policy.
2.2 Suspension or termination of services
Mixtum reserves the right to suspend or terminate access to services at any time at its own discretion, with or without reasons, with or without notification assuming no responsibility whatsoever.
For example, services may be suspended or terminated due to the following reasons:
an actual or suspected violation of these Terms and Conditions;
use of the service in such a manner that is conducive to the legal liability of Mixtum or Service malfunction;
planned or unplanned maintenance, etc.
2.3 Unacceptable use
You agree that you personally will not commit, encourage or support the committal of:
use of any unauthorized means to access the Mixtum service or use of any automated process or service (for example, spider, crawler or periodic caching of information stored or generated Mixtum) except for the functions described in our API, as well as distribution of instructions, software or tools with this aim in view;
modification, change, distortion or any other interference in work of the Mixtum service;
disturbing or interference in operation of servers or networks used by Mixtum to deliver the Services;
disabling, overload or degradation of Mixtum performance (or any other network connected to the service);
use of the Mixtum service or website for any other purposes other than those specifically provided by these Terms and Privacy Policy;
any illegal or fraudulent activity, as well as use of this Service in order to legalize illegal income, financing of terrorism, participation in schemes of phishing, forgery or other such falsification or manipulation;
unauthorized spamming, pyramid schemes or any other activity duplicating unwanted messages should they be commercially oriented or of other nature.
2.4 Service updates
At any time and at its absolute discretion Mixtum can carry out unscheduled works related to the service modification, update and enhancement. We are liable to add or remove functions and cease activities of the service and website.
2.5 License and restrictions
Mixtum provides you with a personal nontransferable nonexclusive license to use the Service as it is stipulated for you by Mixtum. This license is provided under conditions and restricted to the provisions, stipulations and constraints stated in these Terms. Therewith, such license is intended for personal, noncommercial use. You may not copy, modify, create a derivative work of, decompile or otherwise attempt to extract the source code of the service or any part thereof, exclusive of data permitted by law, or expressly allowed by the Mixtum platform (use of templates, API, etc.). You may not reassign (or grant a sublicense of) your rights to use the service, or otherwise transfer any part of your rights in accordance with these Terms. These Rules do not provide you with any license or permission to copy, distribute, change or otherwise use any applications programming interface despite any provisions to the contrary. No property rights or ownership rights related to the Service are not granted to you according to these Terms. Mixtum reserves all rights that have not been expressly granted.
This is why you should absolutely not be recommending mixers to the OP as an alternative for exchanges. You are trading one trusted custodian for another without solving the issue of privacy.
