Topic: Wasabi Wallet - Open Source, Noncustodial Coinjoin Software - page 4. (Read 11758 times)
On chain fees are below the monthly median, it's a great time to coinjoin if you haven't taken the opportunity yet!
Freesabi now tracks paid coordinators as well, they have rebranded to "Liquisabi" https://x.com/LiquiSabi
Liquisabi now has a web interface for their coinjoin explorer with a live feed of new transactions and a 30 day history chart: https://liquisabi.com
If you are not buying any data can you confirm if you are selling or sharing or giving away any data from users that use your coordinator?
Users never offer any data to coordinators, my answer doesn't matter since users verify this for themselves.
Specifically, are you harvesting any data from users that use your coordinator or are you backing up any information from when users visit your site including any coinjoin information such as addresses, amounts, date/time or even IP addresses etc
Of course, the date/time and amounts of coinjoin transactions are completely public, everyone who has a Bitcoin node is backing up this information. However, users never reveal their xpub address thanks to Wasabi's use of block filters, and never reveal their IP address thanks to all communications being performed over Tor by default. Here is the traffic analyzation for all connections to my domain:
If you want to discuss Wasabi generally, reply here, but if you want to discuss my coordinator service specifically, please do so on its own thread: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/--5498549
If you are not buying any data can you confirm if you are selling or sharing or giving away any data from users that use your coordinator? Specifically, are you harvesting any data from users that use your coordinator or are you backing up any information from when users visit your site including any coinjoin information such as addresses, amounts, date/time or even IP addresses etc?
No, I'm not buying any data from anyone.
It seems Wasabi blog is broken again. This time i received message "SSL handshake failed Error code 525" from CloudFlare. I've tried few browser and even asked archive.org to make an archive on https://web.archive.org/web/20241107102003/https://blog.wasabiwallet.io/ with same message.
Thank you for reporting, I let the site maintainers know.
It seems Wasabi blog is broken again. This time i received message "SSL handshake failed Error code 525" from CloudFlare. I've tried few browser and even asked archive.org to make an archive on https://web.archive.org/web/20241107102003/https://blog.wasabiwallet.io/ with same message.
And it was debunked:
Keep going, I debunked the "debunking":
Since the coordinator code is all open source, you get to decide your own criteria yourself.
You seemed to have no problem back then and even now to the fact that zkSNACKs was using blockchain analysis without even explaining their process of implementation and what data was being retained by the third party analysis company.
Having said that, it raises a pertinent question. Are you making use of the same blockchain analysis for your Kruw coordinator as zkSNACKs did with their Wasabi Wallet?
Having said that, it raises a pertinent question. Are you making use of the same blockchain analysis for your Kruw coordinator as zkSNACKs did with their Wasabi Wallet?
No, I'm not buying any data from anyone.
You promoted and propagated the use of Wasabi Wallet while they updated their terms and conditions to include the use of at least one blockchain analysis company. Instead of jumping ship when they quietly slipped in the blockchain surveillance caveat, you stayed with the Contributor to Wasabi Wallet tag because you wanted to. Where were your morals and ethics when they would really have mattered? You did not take a stand against blockchain analysis at that time when it was important to demonstrate leadership therefore you have no right to attack others just because you think they did not take a stand.
I already addressed this:And it was debunked:
You are using the terms "partnership" and "cooperation" to describe a relationship between a customer and a business, which is misleading. There are companies whose business model involves aggregating reports of coins being stolen, and zkSNACKs buys those reports in order to avoid accepting those stolen coins. If zkSNACKs were to buy a McDonald's hamburger, that does not mean "zkSNACKs is partnering with McDonald's".
Wasabi or zkSNACKs aren't private customers, though. They are businesses using the services of other business entities (blockchain analysis) whose version of the truth and estimation affects their own operations. In other words, you accept the decision of the blockchain analysis company's views regarding the cleanliness of my UTXOs. My participation in your coinjoins depends on the truth the blockchain analysis firm serves to you. I call that a partnership and cooperation. You are free to use any other terms you like. How do you know stolen coins are getting rejected? You keep talking about open-source, where can we see these rules publicly?
According to whose criteria will certain UTXOs be added to whatever list is being used to determine naughtiness of coins?
Who made that list and in whose name? What entity or government agency is responsible to maintain it, make changes, and decide what's good and what's bad?
Who do I get in touch with if my UTXOs were rejected for reasons unknown to me?
Being in possession of stolen money or other means of payments doesn't necessarily make the owner a thief. You do understand that money and crypto circulate. As someone involved in the crypto business, you should know that those rules your blockchain partners present to you can't be applied to cash and fiat, otherwise a lot of it would have to be confiscated and taken out of circulation because many bills had contact or were used in illegal actions at one point in their past.
Having said that, it raises a pertinent question. Are you making use of the same blockchain analysis for your Kruw coordinator as zkSNACKs did with their Wasabi Wallet?
Bumping this thread and reminding everyone not to fail in their duty to judge scammers:
Quote from: Ayn Rand
The man who refuses to judge, who neither agrees nor disagrees, who declares that there are no absolutes and believes that he escapes responsibility, is the man responsible for all the blood that is now spilled in the world.
...
There are two sides to every issue: one side is right and the other is wrong, but the middle is always evil. The man who is wrong still retains some respect for truth, if only by accepting the responsibility of choice. But the man in the middle is the knave who blanks out the truth in order to pretend that no choice or values exist, who is willing to sit out the course of any battle, willing to cash in on the blood of the innocent or to crawl on his belly to the guilty, who dispenses justice by condemning both the robber and the robbed to jail, who solves conflicts by ordering the thinker and the fool to meet each other halfway.
...
There are two sides to every issue: one side is right and the other is wrong, but the middle is always evil. The man who is wrong still retains some respect for truth, if only by accepting the responsibility of choice. But the man in the middle is the knave who blanks out the truth in order to pretend that no choice or values exist, who is willing to sit out the course of any battle, willing to cash in on the blood of the innocent or to crawl on his belly to the guilty, who dispenses justice by condemning both the robber and the robbed to jail, who solves conflicts by ordering the thinker and the fool to meet each other halfway.
You promoted and propagated the use of Wasabi Wallet while they updated their terms and conditions to include the use of at least one blockchain analysis company. Instead of jumping ship when they quietly slipped in the blockchain surveillance caveat, you stayed with the Contributor to Wasabi Wallet tag because you wanted to. Where were your morals and ethics when they would really have mattered? You did not take a stand against blockchain analysis at that time when it was important to demonstrate leadership therefore you have no right to attack others just because you think they did not take a stand.
I already addressed this:
You are using the terms "partnership" and "cooperation" to describe a relationship between a customer and a business, which is misleading. There are companies whose business model involves aggregating reports of coins being stolen, and zkSNACKs buys those reports in order to avoid accepting those stolen coins. If zkSNACKs were to buy a McDonald's hamburger, that does not mean "zkSNACKs is partnering with McDonald's".
If you want to know what sort of cooperation and partnerships zkSNACKs is involved with, here's a short list:
- $2,500 monthly donation to the Tor project (https://zksnacks.com/)
- 1 BTC donation to the Human Rights Foundation Bitcoin Development Fund (https://www.coindesk.com/tech/2020/06/25/summer-2020-is-funding-season-for-open-source-bitcoin-development/)
- .86 BTC donation (along with Bull Bitcoin) to Bitcoin Knots developer Luke Dashjr (https://blog.wasabiwallet.io/bitcoin-knots-donation/)
- 1.11 BTC grant for privacy research on the Lightning Network (https://lightningprivacy.com)
- 3.4 million sats (so far) to the best bruteforcer in the community (https://www.huntingsats.com/)
- Sponsorships of Bitcoin educational podcasts such as What Bitcoin Did, Bitcoin Takeover, and What Is Money?
- Sponsorships of Bitcoin events such as BTCPrague, Bitcoin Amsterdam, Baltic Honeybadger (and others I'm sure I'm missing)
If you want to know what sort of cooperation and partnerships zkSNACKs is involved with, here's a short list:
- $2,500 monthly donation to the Tor project (https://zksnacks.com/)
- 1 BTC donation to the Human Rights Foundation Bitcoin Development Fund (https://www.coindesk.com/tech/2020/06/25/summer-2020-is-funding-season-for-open-source-bitcoin-development/)
- .86 BTC donation (along with Bull Bitcoin) to Bitcoin Knots developer Luke Dashjr (https://blog.wasabiwallet.io/bitcoin-knots-donation/)
- 1.11 BTC grant for privacy research on the Lightning Network (https://lightningprivacy.com)
- 3.4 million sats (so far) to the best bruteforcer in the community (https://www.huntingsats.com/)
- Sponsorships of Bitcoin educational podcasts such as What Bitcoin Did, Bitcoin Takeover, and What Is Money?
- Sponsorships of Bitcoin events such as BTCPrague, Bitcoin Amsterdam, Baltic Honeybadger (and others I'm sure I'm missing)
zkSNACKs made Wasabi completely open source software, so I insisted that anyone who opposed their blacklisting policy run their own coordinator and followed through by running my own:
Kruw from a few months ago would of called me a big time Scammer had I ran my own Uncensored Coordinator.
You're a liar. I couldn't have been more insistent that people run their own coordinators:
Since you already know you can run a Wasabi coinjoin coordinator and there's nothing zkSNACKs can do to stop you since they made their code open source, then why did you make this petition? Why aren't you just running your own Wasabi coinjoin coordinator instead?
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.62811294
Being open source means you can run your own coordinator.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.62823635
Why haven't you set up your own WabiSabi coinjoin coordinator yet?
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.62830686
Why would you participate in a petition to have open source privacy software removed from Bitcointalk since you can solve any problems of arbitrary censorship by running your own coordinator?
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.62835413
Copy and paste zkSNACKs' open source coordinator code. They literally did all the work for you, their business can be yours with CTRL + C, and instead, the losers on this thread are instructing people not to use Wasabi at all.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.62845744
I am not being rhetorical, stop dodging the question over and over and over: WHY DON'T YOU RUN YOUR OWN COORDINATOR?
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.63115339
Quote from: Kruw
You don't create coinjoins with yourself, other people can use your coordinator. People are not stuck using the zkSNACKs coordinator.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.63116005
You seem to have forgotten you promoted and propagated the use of Wasabi Wallet while they updated their terms and conditions to include the use of at least one blockchain analysis company. Instead of jumping ship when they quietly slipped in the blockchain surveillance caveat, you stayed with the Contributor to Wasabi Wallet tag because you wanted to.
Where were your morals and ethics when they would really have mattered? You did not take a stand against blockchain analysis at that time when it was important to demonstrate leadership therefore you have no right to attack others just because you think they did not take a stand.
Where were your morals and ethics when they would really have mattered? You did not take a stand against blockchain analysis at that time when it was important to demonstrate leadership therefore you have no right to attack others just because you think they did not take a stand.
I don't support blockchain analysis and never have. I acknowledge that blockchain analysis is extremely easy, hence, the necessity of privacy tools such as Wasabi Wallet.
Whether any other forum member or ex-member promoted a blockchain surveillance company (or partnered with them) is not really an issue in this thread. You are the OP that created this thread to promote Wasabi Wallet and you were promoting them while they were justifying using blockchain analysis.
I am surprised you forgot that it was you that was happy to partner with Wasabi Wallet and a blockchain analysis company in order for their users to have their transactions analysed (and literally surveilled).
Why did you promote and support blockchain analysis through Wasabi Wallet?
I am surprised you forgot that it was you that was happy to partner with Wasabi Wallet and a blockchain analysis company in order for their users to have their transactions analysed (and literally surveilled).
Why did you promote and support blockchain analysis through Wasabi Wallet?
I don't support blockchain analysis and never have. I acknowledge that blockchain analysis is extremely easy, hence, the necessity of privacy tools such as Wasabi Wallet.
Whether any other forum member or ex-member promoted a blockchain surveillance company (or partnered with them) is not really an issue in this thread. You are the OP that created this thread to promote Wasabi Wallet and you were promoting them while they were justifying using blockchain analysis.
I am surprised you forgot that it was you that was happy to partner with Wasabi Wallet and a blockchain analysis company in order for their users to have their transactions analysed (and literally surveilled).
Why did you promote and support blockchain analysis through Wasabi Wallet?
I am surprised you forgot that it was you that was happy to partner with Wasabi Wallet and a blockchain analysis company in order for their users to have their transactions analysed (and literally surveilled).
Why did you promote and support blockchain analysis through Wasabi Wallet?
I'm surprised you didn't notice that o_e_l_e_o partnered with a blockchain surveillance company:
You still did not prove your claim that o_e_l_e_o stole data of innocent people which I was asking you to,
Where is the proof?
Where is the proof?
As I said before, I posted all the proof in this thread, feel free to read it and reply directly there: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/re-farewell-5482198
I'm surprised you didn't notice that o_e_l_e_o partnered with a blockchain surveillance company:
You still did not prove your claim that o_e_l_e_o stole data of innocent people which I was asking you to,o_e_l_e_o's acts were inhumane, did you forget that he joined satoshi's forum to steal money and data of innocent people?
Where is the proof?
Point me to the part where you proved he stole data of people.
I'm surprised you didn't notice that o_e_l_e_o partnered with a blockchain surveillance company:
namely Leo who was among the top fighters if not the top fighter of Privacy that we had on Bitcoin Talk.
How can you say o_e_l_e_o was a "Top fighter if not the top fighter of privacy" when he was promoting Mixtum? If o_e_l_e_o was interested in privacy, he wouldn't be telling people to deposit their coins into a chain analysis service that runs a thorough background check on coins to determine whether or not they want to confiscate them:
Quote from: Mixtum
3. Quality scoring of incoming transactions
We run a thorough background check of incoming funds through a proprietary algorithm.
2.1. Privacy Policy
Please refer to our Privacy Policy to get an understanding of our confidentiality obligations. You consent to the collection and use of information as described in the Privacy Policy.
2.2 Suspension or termination of services
Mixtum reserves the right to suspend or terminate access to services at any time at its own discretion, with or without reasons, with or without notification assuming no responsibility whatsoever.
For example, services may be suspended or terminated due to the following reasons:
an actual or suspected violation of these Terms and Conditions;
use of the service in such a manner that is conducive to the legal liability of Mixtum or Service malfunction;
planned or unplanned maintenance, etc.
2.3 Unacceptable use
You agree that you personally will not commit, encourage or support the committal of:
use of any unauthorized means to access the Mixtum service or use of any automated process or service (for example, spider, crawler or periodic caching of information stored or generated by Mixtum) except for the functions described in our API, as well as distribution of instructions, software or tools with this aim in view;
modification, change, distortion or any other interference in work of the Mixtum service;
disturbing or interference in operation of servers or networks used by Mixtum to deliver the Services;
disabling, overload or degradation of Mixtum performance (or any other network connected to the service);
use of the Mixtum service or website for any other purposes other than those specifically provided by these Terms and Privacy Policy;
any illegal or fraudulent activity, as well as use of this Service in order to legalize illegal income, financing of terrorism, participation in schemes of phishing, forgery or other such falsification or manipulation;
unauthorized spamming, pyramid schemes or any other activity duplicating unwanted messages should they be commercially oriented or of other nature.
2.4 Service updates
At any time and at its absolute discretion Mixtum can carry out unscheduled works related to the service modification, update and enhancement. We are liable to add or remove functions and cease activities of the service and website.
2.5 License and restrictions
Mixtum provides you with a personal nontransferable nonexclusive license to use the Service as it is stipulated for you by Mixtum. This license is provided under conditions and restricted to the provisions, stipulations and constraints stated in these Terms. Therewith, such license is intended for personal, noncommercial use. You may not copy, modify, create a derivative work of, decompile or otherwise attempt to extract the source code of the service or any part thereof, exclusive of data permitted by law, or expressly allowed by the Mixtum platform (use of templates, API, etc.). You may not reassign (or grant a sublicense of) your rights to use the service, or otherwise transfer any part of your rights in accordance with these Terms. These Rules do not provide you with any license or permission to copy, distribute, change or otherwise use any applications programming interface despite any provisions to the contrary. No property rights or ownership rights related to the Service are not granted to you according to these Terms. Mixtum reserves all rights that have not been expressly granted.
We run a thorough background check of incoming funds through a proprietary algorithm.
2.1. Privacy Policy
Please refer to our Privacy Policy to get an understanding of our confidentiality obligations. You consent to the collection and use of information as described in the Privacy Policy.
2.2 Suspension or termination of services
Mixtum reserves the right to suspend or terminate access to services at any time at its own discretion, with or without reasons, with or without notification assuming no responsibility whatsoever.
For example, services may be suspended or terminated due to the following reasons:
an actual or suspected violation of these Terms and Conditions;
use of the service in such a manner that is conducive to the legal liability of Mixtum or Service malfunction;
planned or unplanned maintenance, etc.
2.3 Unacceptable use
You agree that you personally will not commit, encourage or support the committal of:
use of any unauthorized means to access the Mixtum service or use of any automated process or service (for example, spider, crawler or periodic caching of information stored or generated by Mixtum) except for the functions described in our API, as well as distribution of instructions, software or tools with this aim in view;
modification, change, distortion or any other interference in work of the Mixtum service;
disturbing or interference in operation of servers or networks used by Mixtum to deliver the Services;
disabling, overload or degradation of Mixtum performance (or any other network connected to the service);
use of the Mixtum service or website for any other purposes other than those specifically provided by these Terms and Privacy Policy;
any illegal or fraudulent activity, as well as use of this Service in order to legalize illegal income, financing of terrorism, participation in schemes of phishing, forgery or other such falsification or manipulation;
unauthorized spamming, pyramid schemes or any other activity duplicating unwanted messages should they be commercially oriented or of other nature.
2.4 Service updates
At any time and at its absolute discretion Mixtum can carry out unscheduled works related to the service modification, update and enhancement. We are liable to add or remove functions and cease activities of the service and website.
2.5 License and restrictions
Mixtum provides you with a personal nontransferable nonexclusive license to use the Service as it is stipulated for you by Mixtum. This license is provided under conditions and restricted to the provisions, stipulations and constraints stated in these Terms. Therewith, such license is intended for personal, noncommercial use. You may not copy, modify, create a derivative work of, decompile or otherwise attempt to extract the source code of the service or any part thereof, exclusive of data permitted by law, or expressly allowed by the Mixtum platform (use of templates, API, etc.). You may not reassign (or grant a sublicense of) your rights to use the service, or otherwise transfer any part of your rights in accordance with these Terms. These Rules do not provide you with any license or permission to copy, distribute, change or otherwise use any applications programming interface despite any provisions to the contrary. No property rights or ownership rights related to the Service are not granted to you according to these Terms. Mixtum reserves all rights that have not been expressly granted.
Prove o_e_l_e_o stole Money and data of innocent people.
I proved it here: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/re-farewell-5482198By the way. Disgraceful Thread to make in response to somebody dying, but Kruw does Kruw things I suppose.
Prove o_e_l_e_o stole Money and data of innocent people.
I proved it here: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/re-farewell-5482198
o_e_l_e_o's acts were inhumane, did you forget that he joined satoshi's forum to steal money and data of innocent people?
Prove o_e_l_e_o stole Money and data of innocent people. Threatening Wind Fury with contacting his Campaign Manager to 'report his Spam' and then immediately writing text in this size and color is hilariously ironic.
How is that ironic?
While we are at it. Prove theymos said Wind_FURY and Pmalek are not to be Trusted.
Theymos said not to trust ANYONE: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/reminder-do-not-keep-your-money-in-online-accounts-5421039
theymos even specifically said not to use "mixers" and to use Wasabi instead:
Congratulations to the Wasabi and JoinMarket developers! JoinMarket pioneered a lot of CoinJoin science (and BTW, belcher wrote an excellent & comprehensive wiki article on privacy), while Wasabi is the first wallet that implements CoinJoin in both a highly-usable and sound way. As both a signer and a donor to the CoinJoin bounty fund, I'm thrilled that these two pieces of software exist!
For everyone looking to improve their privacy, I highly recommend checking out Wasabi, especially over centralized "mixers".
For everyone looking to improve their privacy, I highly recommend checking out Wasabi, especially over centralized "mixers".
No matter how excellent or crap the Podcast was, I can not show or even contemplate showing any respect to somebody who deceives like Kruw and pisses on the grave of a deceased person while knowing very well that they can not fight back the claims Kruw makes any more. Kruw is doing acts I can only describe as inhumane. Even if he ever provides what people think is the best Cryptocurrency Podcast in the world, I would still have zero respect for him because of his acts.
o_e_l_e_o's acts were inhumane, did you forget that he joined satoshi's forum to steal money and data of innocent people? o_e_l_e_o partnered with a blockchain analysis company and you are calling him a "top fighter of privacy". Pathetic:
namely Leo who was among the top fighters if not the top fighter of Privacy that we had on Bitcoin Talk.
How can you say o_e_l_e_o was a "Top fighter if not the top fighter of privacy" when he was promoting Mixtum? If o_e_l_e_o was interested in privacy, he wouldn't be telling people to deposit their coins into a chain analysis service that runs a thorough background check on coins to determine whether or not they want to confiscate them:
Quote from: Mixtum
3. Quality scoring of incoming transactions
We run a thorough background check of incoming funds through a proprietary algorithm.
2.1. Privacy Policy
Please refer to our Privacy Policy to get an understanding of our confidentiality obligations. You consent to the collection and use of information as described in the Privacy Policy.
2.2 Suspension or termination of services
Mixtum reserves the right to suspend or terminate access to services at any time at its own discretion, with or without reasons, with or without notification assuming no responsibility whatsoever.
For example, services may be suspended or terminated due to the following reasons:
an actual or suspected violation of these Terms and Conditions;
use of the service in such a manner that is conducive to the legal liability of Mixtum or Service malfunction;
planned or unplanned maintenance, etc.
2.3 Unacceptable use
You agree that you personally will not commit, encourage or support the committal of:
use of any unauthorized means to access the Mixtum service or use of any automated process or service (for example, spider, crawler or periodic caching of information stored or generated by Mixtum) except for the functions described in our API, as well as distribution of instructions, software or tools with this aim in view;
modification, change, distortion or any other interference in work of the Mixtum service;
disturbing or interference in operation of servers or networks used by Mixtum to deliver the Services;
disabling, overload or degradation of Mixtum performance (or any other network connected to the service);
use of the Mixtum service or website for any other purposes other than those specifically provided by these Terms and Privacy Policy;
any illegal or fraudulent activity, as well as use of this Service in order to legalize illegal income, financing of terrorism, participation in schemes of phishing, forgery or other such falsification or manipulation;
unauthorized spamming, pyramid schemes or any other activity duplicating unwanted messages should they be commercially oriented or of other nature.
2.4 Service updates
At any time and at its absolute discretion Mixtum can carry out unscheduled works related to the service modification, update and enhancement. We are liable to add or remove functions and cease activities of the service and website.
2.5 License and restrictions
Mixtum provides you with a personal nontransferable nonexclusive license to use the Service as it is stipulated for you by Mixtum. This license is provided under conditions and restricted to the provisions, stipulations and constraints stated in these Terms. Therewith, such license is intended for personal, noncommercial use. You may not copy, modify, create a derivative work of, decompile or otherwise attempt to extract the source code of the service or any part thereof, exclusive of data permitted by law, or expressly allowed by the Mixtum platform (use of templates, API, etc.). You may not reassign (or grant a sublicense of) your rights to use the service, or otherwise transfer any part of your rights in accordance with these Terms. These Rules do not provide you with any license or permission to copy, distribute, change or otherwise use any applications programming interface despite any provisions to the contrary. No property rights or ownership rights related to the Service are not granted to you according to these Terms. Mixtum reserves all rights that have not been expressly granted.
We run a thorough background check of incoming funds through a proprietary algorithm.
2.1. Privacy Policy
Please refer to our Privacy Policy to get an understanding of our confidentiality obligations. You consent to the collection and use of information as described in the Privacy Policy.
2.2 Suspension or termination of services
Mixtum reserves the right to suspend or terminate access to services at any time at its own discretion, with or without reasons, with or without notification assuming no responsibility whatsoever.
For example, services may be suspended or terminated due to the following reasons:
an actual or suspected violation of these Terms and Conditions;
use of the service in such a manner that is conducive to the legal liability of Mixtum or Service malfunction;
planned or unplanned maintenance, etc.
2.3 Unacceptable use
You agree that you personally will not commit, encourage or support the committal of:
use of any unauthorized means to access the Mixtum service or use of any automated process or service (for example, spider, crawler or periodic caching of information stored or generated by Mixtum) except for the functions described in our API, as well as distribution of instructions, software or tools with this aim in view;
modification, change, distortion or any other interference in work of the Mixtum service;
disturbing or interference in operation of servers or networks used by Mixtum to deliver the Services;
disabling, overload or degradation of Mixtum performance (or any other network connected to the service);
use of the Mixtum service or website for any other purposes other than those specifically provided by these Terms and Privacy Policy;
any illegal or fraudulent activity, as well as use of this Service in order to legalize illegal income, financing of terrorism, participation in schemes of phishing, forgery or other such falsification or manipulation;
unauthorized spamming, pyramid schemes or any other activity duplicating unwanted messages should they be commercially oriented or of other nature.
2.4 Service updates
At any time and at its absolute discretion Mixtum can carry out unscheduled works related to the service modification, update and enhancement. We are liable to add or remove functions and cease activities of the service and website.
2.5 License and restrictions
Mixtum provides you with a personal nontransferable nonexclusive license to use the Service as it is stipulated for you by Mixtum. This license is provided under conditions and restricted to the provisions, stipulations and constraints stated in these Terms. Therewith, such license is intended for personal, noncommercial use. You may not copy, modify, create a derivative work of, decompile or otherwise attempt to extract the source code of the service or any part thereof, exclusive of data permitted by law, or expressly allowed by the Mixtum platform (use of templates, API, etc.). You may not reassign (or grant a sublicense of) your rights to use the service, or otherwise transfer any part of your rights in accordance with these Terms. These Rules do not provide you with any license or permission to copy, distribute, change or otherwise use any applications programming interface despite any provisions to the contrary. No property rights or ownership rights related to the Service are not granted to you according to these Terms. Mixtum reserves all rights that have not been expressly granted.
Jump to: