Topic: We are all Hodlonaut - page 4. (Read 2402 times)

watch Kurt for examples of lying scum comedy entertainment

but look at
twitter.com/bitnorbert for more of a play by play of whats happening in the court room as it happens

Lol - I’ll presume he’ll be doing YouTube shit every day and I’ll try to catch it when I get a chance , but I’ll definitely be following as many Twitter threads as poss as well as this thread 

kurt spent more time talking about the layout of the court room and how well groomed and dressed they were.
then spent 5 minutes talking about how hodlonauts team were mentioning the CSW past (but he worded it as if hodlonauts team were describing CSW as if csw was involved in bitcoin in 2008)

he then said "for all those not up to date with everything.."
and then went on a rhetoric of how in his bias view he feels how the history plays out where he began with the silly stuff of pretending CSW was involved/thinking up bitcoin as far back as 2005(facepalm) .. i stopped watching at this point.

its was basically a publicity video of fake biography creation.. not a court room drama play by play of what was actually being said in the court room

Yep - he’s a BSVer , paid by Calvin. But, I wanted to see how CSW and team would be spinning the trial blow by blow. I was waiting to see how they would absurdly twist the facts to spin it . The tweets are very much factual though - read them - admittedly I haven’t seen the YouTube vids .
Faketoshi and team will be spinning this for a win, even if they lose. This court case is just one of many I’ve been following and in every case , wether he loses, they’ll shill it as a win.
Faketoshi is unfortunately a full blown narcissist and will never accept he is wrong/unfactual or Satoshi.

^
Yea I' m not going to be following that, I was thinking It would be interesting to see what the
'other side' are reporting....
....but then again, I couldnt be bothered.

So yea I'll stick with bitnorbert. Its great to get the running commentry.

kurt is 100% sniffing the bvs coke
full on bsv addict and not ready to go clean
even if its harming his health and wealth to stick with bsv

he just done a youtube about today. and didnot talk about the details of the stuff said in court as a play-by-play. instead he just wanted to talk about the csw story of how he believes csw invented bitcoin

i gave up watching the video after the second time he wanted to mention the story according to csw

He is following the case right there in Norway but, he's a paid shill for CSW working for coingeek
Why does CSW need 9 lawyers to defend him, if he is Satoshi ? a lot of reporters are shilling for CSW, hodlonaut has 2 lawyers lets see how it goes down.

Anybody wants to bet 0.01BTC that the judge will rule in CSWs favor?* [Naturally, I will bet on the opposite outcome.]

*The final verdict, after all hearings and arguments and counter-arguments over the possibly many days have been concluded.

the judge wanted to make it clear that CSW was not to use the trial verdict as "proof of satoshi" if the verdict was to give CSW a win

its not a case of getting to prove he is..
its about hodlonaut having an opportunity to prove that hodlonauts comments are fair description of CSW (scammer and fraud)

eg
imagine i seen someone with obviously dyed ginger hair. and i insulted them
its not for them to prove they are naturally/born ginger.
nor does a verdict in their favour mean they are now biologically in their genes ginger. nor is it even about them being temporarily ginger

basically. if i know they dyed(faked) their hair to be ginger. and i called them a "fake plastic orange" .. thats fair i win

if while ginger. i said "eww your a dirty blonde" where it some how lost them their job or lost them money. then i lose.

its not about getting the person i insulted to prove they are a real ginger
nor does any verdict win/lose/draw mean it proves that person is a real born ginger

its about was my insult a fair representation of what i can see and based on available evidence what i can believe to be a informed opinion about the person i see as being a fake ginger where its evident that many already thought and know he is a fake ginger, and that calling him one is just matter of fact freedom of speach

How many times will the Faketoshi team mention GA and his support when he was convinced that CW was Satoshi? I will never stop being amazed at how a (for the most part) brilliant mind like Gavin Andresen turned out to be a big fool for supporting him at one time, although I will always find it very strange that Satoshi collaborated with him at all and left him with too much influence.

---

Let the judge take this into account and compensate the mental pain of our doctor Faketoshi with, say, 1 satoshi for each disputed tweet - that is more than fair considering the past verdict - in 10 years, Faketoshi will collect enough for a whole box of chocolates

I'm not sure I follow why this is? Surely whether or not CSW is Satoshi (he isn't) is core to determining whether or not Hodlonaut's statements were libelous? If the judge rightly finds that CSW is not Satoshi, then any statements saying he is not Satoshi are not libel are simply become a statement of fact (legally speaking of course, since such statements are already factual).

This individual is employed by CoinGeek (which is a BSV shill site owned and operated by Calvin Ayre) and lists himself as the founder of a BSV based company in Florida, so expect a very biased interpretation from these tweets.

Lol. We are still on Hodlonaut's opening statement and already CSW has started his shenanigans.

Here’s another good guy/thread to follow - very up to date

https://twitter.com/kurtwuckertjr?s=21&t=63pDIpCVQPHja8ieZdQwPQ

https://twitter.com/bitnorbert/status/1569219672754757632

https://twitter.com/bitnorbert/status/1569220917644955649

first shot aimed at CSW. perfect hit
hope it hurts CSW

The value of this post, according to the manager that pays for this signature, goes straight to Hodlonaut's Lightning wallet! 

He probably meant the real Satoshi wins in the end as he, along with lots of others, presumes Hal was Satoshi. It makes a little sense if you think about it. Satoshi disappeared when Hal was diagnosed. Hal was the first person to make a Bitcoin transaction. Hal had been working on Proof-of-Work. A person named "Satoshi Nakamoto" was living near his area. Still though, not even close to evidence.

YES - here we go, hodlonaut's team have come out ALL GUNS BLAZING and bringing the
judge up to speed with Bitcoin and some history regarding Satoshi and then on the shady
history surrounding CSW's previous deceptions.

The memory stick from a BBC reporter is interesting and the KPMG report is a great strike.

Following > https://nitter.it/bitnorbert

Thank you o_e_l_e_o

I read that apparently Bitcoin Magazine were given permission to film the trial, but I see no mention of that on their website or Twitter, which is a shame. Would have been great to be able to watch for ourselves rather than relying on Tweets.

From bitnorbert, it seems Hodlonaut's team are bringing up many of CSW's previous lies - the fake Sartre signature, the KPMG analysis, now his falsified blog posts. And perhaps this tweet explains why CSW has an enormous legal team with him: https://nitter.it/Pat_McCat/status/1569273798352052225

Never stopped him before:

Quite the interesting balance. As someone pointed out in the comment, the more the lawyers, the more wrong you are.
Facts are immutable, and CSW has none of them on his side here.

- Jay -

Well here we go, this is going to be like a football match but in slow-motion...

Referee (judge) slight screwups that have a decisive impact on the outcome are always possible.

At least this judge knows not to ask CSW for an oath (under penalty of prejury).

So the trial has begun.

Here are a couple of Norwegian bitcoin users who are in attendance and will be tweeting some updates as the trial progresses:
https://nitter.it/kristiandoble/
https://nitter.it/bitnorbert

According to bitnorbert, so far we have just had the opening statement from Hodlonaut's team. His latest tweet so far is interesting - an analysis from KPMG stating that some of CSW's documents (not yet clear which ones) are fraudulent. Will be interesting to see what comes of that, especially give the outcome of CSW's last trial where the judge found CSW "not to be a witness of truth" and made a "deliberately false case".

Even Braiins joined. Time to put Wright in his place...