Pages:
Author

Topic: What Is A Social Justice Warrior (SJW)? - page 17. (Read 43317 times)

sr. member
Activity: 420
Merit: 250
Ever wanted to run your own casino? PM me for info
One word, you are pathetic beliathon. I am white myself and have not received any "special privilege" just because of my race. Prove 1 way that oculd happen. In fact, its the opposite. Affirmative action allows the other races to get accepted into universities a lot easier.

I'm going to second this, this whole SJW thing is a bunch of crap. 3 pages in and still no answer to your question - why?  Because he has none.
He is just attacking me personally, because thats what liberals do. They call you racist, bigoted, homophobic, stupid, retarded, anything they want, but they dodge the question.
Beliathon, if you want to have reasonable and intelligent debates, NEVER attack people personally, attack their ideas and that way you can maybe win the debate.
Still waiting on an answer.
sr. member
Activity: 269
Merit: 250
One word, you are pathetic beliathon. I am white myself and have not received any "special privilege" just because of my race. Prove 1 way that oculd happen. In fact, its the opposite. Affirmative action allows the other races to get accepted into universities a lot easier.

I'm going to second this, this whole SJW thing is a bunch of crap. 3 pages in and still no answer to your question - why?  Because he has none.
legendary
Activity: 3318
Merit: 2008
First Exclusion Ever
That was a nice copy and paste of some one elese's argument.
The truth cares nothing for the misguided notion that ideas can be owned, borrowed, or stolen. Your capitalist thought habits only hamper you in your search for truth. Information always seeks to be free, just as water seeks to reach sea level.

BTW, you do realize that even if he WAS "sealioning", that is not a logical fallacy
I never claimed sealioning was a logical fallacy, only linked a logical argument explaining clear why I wouldn't respond to sealioning (because doing so is fruitless).

And again:
https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/tu-quoque
https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/ad-hominem

This has nothing to do with ownership, and everything to do with your own inability to even regurgitate the ideas you support in your own words. You can make up any excuse you want to not reply to the arguments of others, unfortunately just because you believe things internally, doesn't mean it is a fact for anyone else. IMO you are simply creating an excuse to not to engage in debate and be required to defend your ideals because he does not agree with your position. That sounds familiar...
http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Confirmation_bias
hero member
Activity: 784
Merit: 1000
https://youtu.be/PZm8TTLR2NU
That was a nice copy and paste of some one elese's argument.
The truth cares nothing for the misguided notion that ideas can be owned, borrowed, or stolen. Your capitalist thought habits only hamper you in your search for truth. Information always seeks to be free, just as water seeks to reach sea level.

BTW, you do realize that even if he WAS "sealioning", that is not a logical fallacy
I never claimed sealioning was a logical fallacy, only linked a logical argument explaining clear why I wouldn't respond to sealioning (because doing so is fruitless).
legendary
Activity: 3318
Merit: 2008
First Exclusion Ever
So in short, he is sealionining because, he is sealioning? Do you even realize you are making your argument based on a premise you are already assuming?
https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/begging-the-question
It's not an assumption, his sealioning was both obvious and indisputable as the information he is requesting is readily available at his fingertips.

"The biggest reason why people hate sealioning is because responding to it is a complete waste of time.

It's an insidious trap. Responding to questions asked reasonably is, of course, a natural thing for people to do. I like to do it myself; educating others is generally pretty entertaining, especially if they are receptive to learning. Dismissing those questions can appear condescending or rude, especially if you actually are condescending or rude.

Of course, these questions are not asked because the person genuinely wants to know. If they did, they would do their own digging based on your statements, and only ask for obscure or difficult-to-discover information. This is the "debate principle"; when you go to a debate, you educate yourself on the topics at hand, and only request evidence when a claim is either quite outlandish or unflinchingly obscure.

No, these questions are asked to make you waste your time. It works, too; I've responded to sealions before, answering all their questions and claims for evidence, only to be greeted by even more willful ignorance. It's a way to force you into responding to questions phrased neutrally but asked in bad faith."

That was a nice copy and paste of some one elese's argument. Funny how you expect everyone else to make their own arguments but some how your viewpoints are just so righteous and universal you needn't waste your time with such petty things.

BTW, you do realize that even if he WAS "sealioning", that is not a logical fallacy, nor does it invalidate any of his questions/arguments just because you believe he intends to waste your time. Accusing people of "sealioning" is just a convenient excuse to not have to logically defend the world view you so willfully push upon others.

Here is another to add to your list: https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/the-fallacy-fallacy
hero member
Activity: 784
Merit: 1000
https://youtu.be/PZm8TTLR2NU
Incorrect, I engaged the criticism by refuting it with evidence on display in this very thread. He claimed to have read the article about sealioning, while continuing to sealion in that same post. Ergo, stupidity or lying or both.
So in short, he is sealionining because, he is sealioning? Do you even realize you are making your argument based on a premise you are already assuming?
https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/begging-the-question
It wasn't an assumption, his sealioning was both obvious and indisputable as the information he was requesting I provide is readily (and abundantly) available at his fingertips.

"The biggest reason why people hate sealioning is because responding to it is a complete waste of time.

It's an insidious trap. Responding to questions asked reasonably is, of course, a natural thing for people to do. I like to do it myself; educating others is generally pretty entertaining, especially if they are receptive to learning. Dismissing those questions can appear condescending or rude, especially if you actually are condescending or rude.

Of course, these questions are not asked because the person genuinely wants to know. If they did, they would do their own digging based on your statements, and only ask for obscure or difficult-to-discover information. This is the "debate principle"; when you go to a debate, you educate yourself on the topics at hand, and only request evidence when a claim is either quite outlandish or unflinchingly obscure.

No, these questions are asked to make you waste your time. It works, too; I've responded to sealions before, answering all their questions and claims for evidence, only to be greeted by even more willful ignorance. It's a way to force you into responding to questions phrased neutrally but asked in bad faith."
legendary
Activity: 3318
Merit: 2008
First Exclusion Ever
Incorrect, I engaged the criticism by refuting it with evidence on display in this very thread. He claimed to have read the article about sealioning, while continuing to sealion in that same post. Ergo, stupidity or lying or both.
So in short, he is sealionining because, he is sealioning? Do you even realize you are making your argument based on a premise you are already assuming?
https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/begging-the-question
legendary
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1001
minds.com/Wilikon
You have pasted the same article 5 times and yes I have read it, but still do not have an answer.
Either you didn't read it or you failed to comprehend it. In either case I must conclude that you are at best an idiot, at worst a liar.






Finally, Pigeons Get a Little Respect

http://healthypets.mercola.com/sites/healthypets/archive/2012/02/03/pigeons-get-a-little-respect.aspx




Pigeons have featured in numerous experiments in comparative psychology, including experiments concerned with animal cognition, and as a result there is considerable knowledge of pigeon intelligence.




Available data show, for example, that:

Pigeons have the capacity to share attention between different dimensions of a stimulus, but (like humans and other animals) their performance with multiple dimensions is worse than with a single stimulus dimension.
Pigeons can be taught relatively complex actions and response sequences, and can learn to make responses in different sequences.
Pigeons readily learn to respond in the presence of one simple stimulus and withhold responding in the presence of a different stimulus, or to make different responses in the presence of different stimuli.
Pigeons can discriminate between other individual pigeons, and can use the behaviour of another individual as a cue to tell them what response to make.
Pigeons readily learn to make discriminative responses to different categories of stimuli, defined either by arbitrary rules (e.g. green triangles) or by human concepts (e.g. pictures of human beings).
Pigeons do less well with categories defined by abstract logical relationships, e.g. "symmetrical" or "same", though some experimenters have successfully trained pigeons to discriminate such categories.
Pigeons seem to require more information than humans for constructing a three-dimensional image from a plane representation.
Pigeons seem to have difficulty in dealing with problems involving classes of classes. Thus they do not do very well with the isolation of a relationship among variables, as against a representation of a set of exemplars.
Pigeons can remember large numbers of individual images for a long time, e.g. hundreds of images for periods of several years.
All these are capacities that are likely to be found in most mammal and bird species. In addition pigeons have unusual, perhaps unique, abilities to learn routes back to their home from long distances. This homing behaviour is different from that of birds that learn migration routes, which usually occurs over a fixed route at fixed times of the year, whereas homing is more flexible; however similar mechanisms may be involved.

Additionally pigeons may be among the very few animals to pass the mirror test[1] — which tests whether an animal recognizes its reflection as an image of itself — along with common chimpanzees, bonobos, orangutans, dolphins, African grey parrots, crows, magpies, elephants, and humans.


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pigeon_intelligence




21 AMAZING FACTS YOU DIDN'T KNOW ABOUT PIGEONS

http://www.deterapigeon.com/articles/21-amazing-facts-you-didnt-know-about-pigeons/





17 Ways That Pigeons Are Cooler Than Humans

http://www.buzzfeed.com/meganm15/pigeons-are-cooler-than-people#.yfpdRykKQ




Pigeon Intelligence & Achievements

http://www.beautyofbirds.com/pigeonintelligence.html







hero member
Activity: 784
Merit: 1000
https://youtu.be/PZm8TTLR2NU
You have pasted the same article 5 times and yes I have read it, but still do not have an answer.
Either you didn't read it or you failed to comprehend it. In either case I must conclude that you are at best an idiot, at worst a liar.

https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/ad-hominem
It's only a logical fallacy if there is no observation involved, if said stupidity (or character flaw) is a baseless assumption rather than observed reality.
A personal attack is still a personal attack no matter how you justify it. You aren't arguing a point you are arguing a person. Also there is this...
https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/tu-quoque
Incorrect, I engaged the criticism by refuting it with evidence on display in this very thread. He claimed to have read the article about sealioning, while continuing to sealion in that same post. Ergo, stupidity or lying or both.
legendary
Activity: 3318
Merit: 2008
First Exclusion Ever
You have pasted the same article 5 times and yes I have read it, but still do not have an answer.
Either you didn't read it or you failed to comprehend it. In either case I must conclude that you are at best an idiot, at worst a liar.

https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/ad-hominem
It's only a logical fallacy if there is no observation involved, if said stupidity (or character flaw) is a baseless assumption rather than observed reality.
A personal attack is still a personal attack no matter how you justify it. You aren't arguing a point you are arguing a person. Also there is this...
https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/tu-quoque
hero member
Activity: 784
Merit: 1000
https://youtu.be/PZm8TTLR2NU
What "white privileged" is being experienced today? I certainty haven't been treated different than my minority friends by anyone!
How would you know this? Were you there for every moment of their lives? This is an absurd claim.
sr. member
Activity: 420
Merit: 250
Ever wanted to run your own casino? PM me for info
You have pasted the same article 5 times and yes I have read it, but still do not have an answer.
Either you didn't read it or you failed to comprehend it. In either case I must conclude that you are at best an idiot, at worst a liar.

You are being stubborn by not answering my god damn question.
What "white privileged" is being experienced today? I certainty haven't been treated different than my minority friends by anyone!
legendary
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1001
minds.com/Wilikon
I have replied to yours, why not reply to mine now? You have pasted the same article 5 times and yes I have read it, but still do not have an answer.

I'll answer for him "I don't have to read it because I KNOW I'm right! You fucking misgonystic racist asshole!" Cheesy


... Or...





hero member
Activity: 784
Merit: 1000
https://youtu.be/PZm8TTLR2NU
You have pasted the same article 5 times and yes I have read it, but still do not have an answer.
Either you didn't read it or you failed to comprehend it. In either case I must conclude that you are at best an idiot, at worst a liar.

https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/ad-hominem
It's only a logical fallacy if there is no observation involved, if said stupidity (or character flaw) is a baseless assumption rather than observed reality.
legendary
Activity: 3318
Merit: 2008
First Exclusion Ever
You have pasted the same article 5 times and yes I have read it, but still do not have an answer.
Either you didn't read it or you failed to comprehend it. In either case I must conclude that you are at best an idiot, at worst a liar.

https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/ad-hominem
hero member
Activity: 784
Merit: 1000
https://youtu.be/PZm8TTLR2NU
You have pasted the same article 5 times and yes I have read it, but still do not have an answer.
Either you didn't read it or you failed to comprehend it. In either case I must conclude that you are at best an idiot, at worst a liar.
legendary
Activity: 1540
Merit: 1000
I have replied to yours, why not reply to mine now? You have pasted the same article 5 times and yes I have read it, but still do not have an answer.

I'll answer for him "I don't have to read it because I KNOW I'm right! You fucking misgonystic racist asshole!" Cheesy
legendary
Activity: 3318
Merit: 2008
First Exclusion Ever
Here is a simple chart demonstrating the cycle of socialism, and why it always ends in bondage.
http://commonsensegovernment.com/the-tytler-cycle-revisited/

sr. member
Activity: 420
Merit: 250
Ever wanted to run your own casino? PM me for info
I have replied to yours, why not reply to mine now? You have pasted the same article 5 times and yes I have read it, but still do not have an answer.
hero member
Activity: 784
Merit: 1000
https://youtu.be/PZm8TTLR2NU
Pages:
Jump to: