Author

Topic: What's your opinion of gun control? - page 157. (Read 450482 times)

legendary
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1001
minds.com/Wilikon
January 09, 2016, 12:03:19 PM



Donald J Trump slams gun free zones in Vermont speech | Donald Trump latest news


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m9FXuzubsfI&feature=youtu.be


"Bait"


legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
January 08, 2016, 05:18:27 PM
People need to understand. Talking about gun rights isn't gun rights. It is freedom of speech.

Freedom of speech is great. Go ahead and speak freely. But what will you do when government agents get after you for the things you say?

Smiley
legendary
Activity: 3038
Merit: 1032
RIP Mommy
January 08, 2016, 05:10:58 PM
every person has right to defend himself. for that reason, it cant be restricted but we can limit rights to have a gun .

You can only illegally limit rights and turn them into privileges, because the right is to EFFECTIVE self-defense, guns, the current pinnacle of human self-defense invention, not ineffective, "bring knives, bats, fists, whistles, harsh language to a genocide" effective suicide.
legendary
Activity: 2310
Merit: 1028
January 08, 2016, 05:06:30 PM
every person has right to defend himself. for that reason, it cant be restricted but we can limit rights to have a gun .
legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
January 08, 2016, 04:57:50 PM
If you don't have any gun control, the best thing you can do is get a drum fed Uzi.

 Grin

I was just kidding. Rather, use a drum fed automatic shotgun with bird shot.

 Grin Grin
legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
January 08, 2016, 04:44:51 PM
If you don't have any gun control, the best thing you can do is get a drum fed Uzi.

 Grin
xht
sr. member
Activity: 462
Merit: 250
hey you, yeah you, fuck you!!!
January 08, 2016, 02:46:19 PM
Obama brings up these terrible shootings as a reason for the new laws, but then admits that they wouldn't have prevented any of them anyway. Using executive orders to push this is the action of a dictator not a president.
legendary
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1001
minds.com/Wilikon
January 08, 2016, 01:52:43 PM



Obama gets away with some whoppers on guns at town hall event | Fox News



President Obama’s appearance at a town hall meeting Thursday night on “Guns in America” was an orchestrated performance by invitation only. But event, hosted by CNN at George Mason University, saw anchor Anderson Cooper continually surprise the president.

Cooper demonstrated a deft command of the facts related to the gun issue and that came through with his guests and in his questions—though, as the evening unfolded, he continually let the president get away with untruths about his past positions.

Surprisingly, both sides of the issue were present in the small room—though, judging by audience applause, most were anti-gun-freedom.

Some of the moments were unintentionally revealing.

Cooper began by asking President Obama if he’d ever owned a gun. Mr. Obama sat up in surprise and said “no.” But, after a search for words, the president said he shoots skeet sometimes at Camp David before adding that he’s not much “of a marksman.” When he said that anyone who enjoys the shotgun sports knew he must not have shot skeet much, as “marksmanship” is a term used for target shooting, not by those who shoot skeet, trap or sporting clays.

When Cooper shifted the discussion to why the president chose to use executive actions on the gun issue, instead of working with Congress, Cooper asked the president if he would meet with the NRA. The president said, “I’m happy to meet with the NRA,” but as he said it he had this snarky smile on his face that would have been more fitting on one of his late show appearances.

Now, CNN says they invited President Obama to this live “town hall” on guns at George Mason University and that they later invited the NRA. The NRA, however, said they’d rather not play along with a “public relations spectacle orchestrated by the White House.”

The National Shooting Sports Foundation (NSSF), the trade association for firearms manufacturers, also declined an invitation. Larry Keane, senior vice president and general counsel to the NSSF, told me, “We declined the invitation because it is a White House-orchestrated made-for-TV event and not an opportunity for a genuine dialogue or an effort to find common ground. We remain disappointed that the president has chosen to demagogue the issue for political purposes instead of providing real leadership like working to advance Rep. Tim Murphy’s bipartisan legislation to address the issue of mental health, which is the common denominator in mass shootings.”   

Given Obama’s—and CNN’s—attacks on the NRA and gun manufacturers in general, it is hard to blame them for passing on the invitation, but in retrospect Cooper might have made them wish they were there to help keep President Obama squirming.

As squirm he did—with the facts and in his seat.

Taya Kyle, the wife of the late “American Sniper” Chris Kyle, was the first person Cooper called on. Kyle recently won a gun competition using the latest in sniper technology. She is a confident straight shooter. She pointed out that while the murder rate is at an all-time low, gun ownership is at an all time high. And then she asked, “Why not celebrate who we are?”

President Obama began shifting on his stool and searching for words to lawyer his way out of these basic facts. He finally pointed out that national trends don’t necessarily hold true in all locales, but he never had to answer why the areas with the strictest gun controls tend to have the highest murder rates.

There was also a rape survivor, Kimberly Corban, who, when called on said, “I have been unspeakably vandalized once already” before asking why she shouldn’t be able to carry a gun to protect herself.

President Obama was really uncomfortable then. He began back peddling and said his current executive actions won’t interfere with her right to carry a gun. But he never had to explain that he has supported bans on concealed-carry permits.

President Obama also repeatedly said that people can “just go on the Internet and buy whatever weapon they want.” But he was never forced to explain that any gun bought from a dealer over the Internet has to be sent to a local dealer that by law has to perform a background check before they can transfer the gun.

Later, Cooper actually did challenge President Obama by breaking in and asking “is it fair to call it a conspiracy” that people think he wants to take their guns away. “Yes, it is fair to call it a conspiracy,” said President Obama, who then claimed that he isn’t plotting take peoples’ guns away.

But Cooper didn’t force the president to address his advocacy for a renewed “assault weapons” ban, or for his administration’s public desire to use black lists, such as the no-fly list, to take away citizens’ Second Amendment rights without giving them even the basics of due process.

There were other questions that took President Obama aback, such as when Sheriff Paul Babue pushed Obama on how his proposals wouldn’t solve recent mass shootings. Cooper even broke in to say that “none of the guns used in recent mass shootings, I should point out, were purchased from legal dealers.”

President Obama didn’t have a clear answer to say why he isn’t swayed by these facts. He meandered before saying, “The young man who killed those children in Newtown didn’t have a criminal record but he had access to an arsenal.” He referred to an attack in China where a person attacked people with a knife and said “the vast majority survived because he wasn’t wielding a semiautomatic.”

Again, Cooper allowed President Obama to escape an obvious allusion to the fact that he would like to ban semiautomatic firearms.

The president was also allowed to get away with a big lie on “smart-guns.”

President Obama said, “[Smart Gun technology] has not been developed primarily because it has been blocked by the NRA” and firearms manufacturers.

Cooper didn’t challenge this point and instead called on a person in the audience, which changed the topic.

Nevertheless, this is a clear and provable fabrication by President Obama. As I detail, with interviews with many gun makers, law makers and gun experts in my book “The Future of the Gun,” the NRA and the NSSF, to name two pro-Second Amendment groups, have statements on their websites saying they are not opposed to “smart-gun” technology. All the manufacturers, the NRA leadership and more, point to laws that seek to mandate smart-gun technology—regulations previously backed by the Obama administration—that are what is impeding smart-gun development. Even “60 Minutes” noted this, and pointed out a New Jersey law on the books that would do this, in a recent report.

President Obama said early on in the town hall event that “people occupy different realities.”

Anyone who watched CNN’s “Guns in America” was certainly left with the conclusion that in Obama’s chosen reality he wishes he could, with a stroke of his pen, pass European-style gun controls in America.


http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2016/01/07/obama-gets-away-with-some-whoppers-on-guns-at-town-hall-event.html?intcmp=hpbt2


legendary
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1001
minds.com/Wilikon
January 08, 2016, 01:35:37 PM



Rape Survivor Asks Obama: Why Can’t You See Gun Restrictions Make My Kids and I Less Safe?


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=caBzcSYLnEI


-------------------------------------------
Telling her, in her face, that owning a gun is more dangerous that getting rapped...

legendary
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1001
minds.com/Wilikon
January 08, 2016, 12:28:04 PM
From a natural evolution viewpoint, the likelihood of one of your ancestor using a weapon to save his life or the life of your great great grandma, contributed greatly for you to have a philosophy right now.

Agree with you, that's why we need to learn about when to use it, as i said, an evolution..., hunt or have some fun, nothing more...in the end is not about gun control, is about education.


Education. I agree. That is why the NRA is such a vital organization.











legendary
Activity: 1401
Merit: 1008
northern exposure
January 08, 2016, 11:52:37 AM
From a natural evolution viewpoint, the likelihood of one of your ancestor using a weapon to save his life or the life of your great great grandma, contributed greatly for you to have a philosophy right now.

Agree with you, that's why we need to learn about when to use it, as i said, an evolution..., hunt or have some fun, nothing more...in the end is not about gun control, is about education.
member
Activity: 74
Merit: 10
The origin of "brave" evolved from "savage".
January 08, 2016, 11:35:12 AM
My definition of "gun control" is the ability to hit a target downrange. Smiley
hero member
Activity: 616
Merit: 500
January 08, 2016, 11:04:57 AM
The guns are necessary to all of us, to defend ourselves and kill the Zionists.
sr. member
Activity: 518
Merit: 250
January 08, 2016, 10:47:14 AM
I like living in peace and calm. So yeah, i support gun control

Gun control only creates peace and calm for the lives of violent criminals.
Agree on this. Criminals always have access to guns. The police can't be at all places at once. Guns can save your life  Smiley
legendary
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1001
minds.com/Wilikon
January 08, 2016, 10:31:40 AM
What would be your ideal set of laws regarding firearms?

i have a philosophy, ask yourself, for a natural evolution, guns are really needed?, people should stop thinking about what governments want and start to think about how to make this world a better place to live.

From my point of view, guns should be just for getting some fun, nothing more.


From a natural evolution viewpoint, the likelihood of one of your ancestor using a weapon to save his life or the life of your great great grandma, contributed greatly for you to have a philosophy right now.


legendary
Activity: 1401
Merit: 1008
northern exposure
January 08, 2016, 10:12:50 AM
What would be your ideal set of laws regarding firearms?

i have a philosophy, ask yourself, for a natural evolution, guns are really needed?, people should stop thinking about what governments want and start to think about how to make this world a better place to live.

From my point of view, guns should be just for getting some fun, nothing more.
legendary
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1001
minds.com/Wilikon
January 08, 2016, 09:52:32 AM



Obama on "Conspiracy" To Take Away Guns: "The United States Was Born Suspicious Of Some Distant Authority"


MARK KELLY: Often what you hear in the debate of expanding background checks to more gun sales, and, as you know, Gabby and I are 100% behind the concept of somebody getting a background check before buying a gun.

But, when we testified in front of the Senate Judiciary Committee, we heard not only from the gun lobby, but from United States Senators that expanding background checks will, not may, will lead to a registry, which will lead to confiscation, which will lead to a tyrannical government.

So, I would like you to explain with 350 million guns in 65 million places, households, from Key West, to Alaska, 350 million objects in 65 million places, if the Federal government wanted to confiscate those objects, how would they do that? (APPLAUSE)

OBAMA: Well, look, first of all, everytime I see Gabby I'm just so thrilled because I visited her in the hospital, and, as I mentioned, I think, in the speech in the White House, as we left the hospital then to go to a memorial service, we got word that Gabby had opened her eyes for the first time.

And, we did not think she was going to be here, and she is, and Mark's just been extraordinary.

And, by the way, Mark's twin brothers up in space right now, and is breaking the record for the longest continuous orbiting of the planet, which is pretty impressive stuff.

What I think Mark is alluding to is what I said earlier, this notion of a conspiracy out there, and it gets wrapped up in concerns about the Federal government.

Now, there's a long history of that, that's in our DNA, you know? The United States was born suspicious of some distant authority...

ANDERSON COOPER, CNN: ... now, let me just jump in here, is it fair to call it a conspiracy...

PRESIDENT OBAMA: ... well, yeah...

COOPER: ... because a lot of people really believe this deeply, that they just don't...

OBAMA: ... no...

COOPER: ... they just don't trust you.

OBAMA: I'm sorry, Cooper, yes. It is fair to call the conspiracy, what are you saying? Are you suggesting that the notion that we are creating a plot to take everybody's guns away so that we can impose martial law...

COOPER: ... not everybody, but there's certainly a lot of...

OBAMA: ... but a conspiracy? Yes, that is a conspiracy! I would hope that would agree with that.

(APPLAUSE)

OBAMA: Is that controversial? Except on some website...

COOPER: There are -- there are certainly a lot of people who just have a fundamental distrust that you do not want to get -- go further and further and further down this road.

OBAMA: Well, look, I mean, I'm only going to be here for another year. I don't know -- when -- when would I have started on this enterprise, right? I come from the state of Illinois, which we've been talking about

Chicago, but downstate Illinois is closer to Kentucky than it is to Chicago. And everybody hunts down there. And a lot of folks own guns. And so this is not, like, alien territory to me. I've got a lot of friends, like Mark, who are hunters. I just came back from Alaska where I ate a moose that had just been shot, and it was pretty good.

So, yes, it is -- it is a false notion that I believe is circulated for either political reasons or commercial reasons in order to prevent a coming-together among people of goodwill to develop commonsense rules that will make us safer while preserving the Second Amendment.

And the notion that we can't agree on some things while not agreeing on others, and the reason for that is because, "Well, the president secretly wants to do X," would mean that we'd be paralyzed about doing everything. I mean, maybe when I propose to make sure that, you know, unsafe drugs are taken off the market that secretly I'm trying to control the entire drug industry or take people's drugs away, but probably not. What's more likely is I just want to make sure that people are not dying by taking bad drugs.


http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2016/01/07/obama_on_conspiracy_to_take_away_guns_the_united_states_was_born_suspicious_of_some_distant_authority.html



----------------------------------------------
There is one constant element with 0bama since day one as a US president: he is a liar.


legendary
Activity: 3038
Merit: 1032
RIP Mommy
January 06, 2016, 09:24:58 PM
I like living in peace and calm. So yeah, i support gun control

Gun control only creates peace and calm for the lives of violent criminals.
legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
January 06, 2016, 08:18:14 PM
Some other statistics that weren't in this study: Criminals are more likely to steal guns from people who own guns than they are from people who don't own guns And people who own guns are more afraid of criminals stealing their guns than people who don't own guns And people who own guns are more likely to carry guns and shoot stuff. And criminals attacking and stealing and shooting and raping and doing bad stuff makes gun owners very very angry and right and protective and heroic.

That's why all the people that own guns should never use or carry them. Rather, they should carry and use guns belonging to others, under contract. This way the rightful owner can demand his property returned when the thieves steal his guns, even if the thieves are governmental agencies or agents.

Smiley
xht
sr. member
Activity: 462
Merit: 250
hey you, yeah you, fuck you!!!
January 06, 2016, 05:20:50 PM
Some other statistics that weren't in this study: Criminals are more likely to steal guns from people who own guns than they are from people who don't own guns And people who own guns are more afraid of criminals stealing their guns than people who don't own guns And people who own guns are more likely to carry guns and shoot stuff. And criminals attacking and stealing and shooting and raping and doing bad stuff makes gun owners very very angry and right and protective and heroic.
Jump to: