Pages:
Author

Topic: What's your opinion of gun control? - page 31. (Read 450471 times)

member
Activity: 179
Merit: 10
January 26, 2018, 03:41:15 AM
For me it's all about freedom. The 2nd Amendment gives us the right to keep and bear arms. That right has been infringed upon enough. Gun control is a joke. How would you like to live in a society where only the police and criminals had guns ? Not me.

You are right!!
legendary
Activity: 4690
Merit: 1276
January 25, 2018, 06:16:25 AM

Only slaves are not allowed to have guns

God made goyim as a sort of cattle-like creatures to serve the Jews, and pressure for gun control in the United States is one of those things which seems to be strongly pushed by Jewish lawmakers in particular.

  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SLLckyRpwr0

  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-zy227hN5B0

Don't believe me about the relationship between God's chosen and the goyim?  Look into the Talmud (aka, 'oral torah') and/or listen to the spiels of some of the Hasidim and Rabbis when they don't figure there will be any goyim paying attention.

legendary
Activity: 2982
Merit: 1506
Pie Baking Contest: https://tinyurl.com/2s3z6dee
January 25, 2018, 04:36:43 AM
He's been around at least fairly recently as 'Robby Love' or something like that.  He claims that the mods kicked him out as Wilikon.  This does not align real well with _most_ of my experience with _most_ of the mods here...at least the ones who held onto their moderator bit, but I won't rule his story out.  He did seem to have a knack for starting never-ending threads, and on topics which I could imagine pissing people with particular political leanings off.  OTOH, I cannot remember anything by him being nearly as offensive as from certain others (such as myself.)
Ah I see, yeah I just found that name and seems he is not active since October. I remember in the past some people here wanted him to be moderator for this board because of his high activity opening new threads lol.


Anybody needs a gun in our society, only policeman must have it. People make our environment more dangerous than ever with guns.
Everyone needs to protect his life and family, and policemen cant handle all of criminal case in a city. Who will protect us then? As long as we dont have mental illness and never do something bad before, its reasonable for us to get a gun, especially with so many criminals out there who have illegal guns.
member
Activity: 179
Merit: 10
January 25, 2018, 03:50:59 AM
Only slaves are not allowed to have guns
legendary
Activity: 4690
Merit: 1276
January 23, 2018, 07:25:34 PM

I have leaved this thread for years but it's still alive lol. Too bad seems Wilikon is not online here anymore.

He's been around at least fairly recently as 'Robby Love' or something like that.  He claims that the mods kicked him out as Wilikon.  This does not align real well with _most_ of my experience with _most_ of the mods here...at least the ones who held onto their moderator bit, but I won't rule his story out.  He did seem to have a knack for starting never-ending threads, and on topics which I could imagine pissing people with particular political leanings off.  OTOH, I cannot remember anything by him being nearly as offensive as from certain others (such as myself.)

newbie
Activity: 12
Merit: 0
January 23, 2018, 06:43:08 PM
For me it's all about freedom. The 2nd Amendment gives us the right to keep and bear arms. That right has been infringed upon enough. Gun control is a joke. How would you like to live in a society where only the police and criminals had guns ? Not me.
legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
January 23, 2018, 04:37:58 PM
Anybody needs a gun in our society, only policeman must have it. People make our environment more dangerous than ever with guns.

Everybody needs many guns to protect themselves from the police.

Unarmed High School Sports Star Killed by Police as He Backed Out of His Own Driveway






Johnson County, KS — A family grieving and a town left in shock after police responded to a welfare check of a beloved high school student Saturday afternoon—and killed him. Blue Valley Northwest High School junior John Albers was unarmed and backing out of his garage when an Overland Park Police Officer opened fire on him, killing him on the spot.

The incident happened on Saturday but the dispatch recordings were released Monday night which paint a picture of what happened. The most crucial part of the picture, however, is missing, and that is why the officer felt the need to kill the 17-year-old wrestling and track star.

Naturally, the officer is claiming that he feared for his life as the teen backed out of the garage, so he had no other choice but to kill him. Apparently, stepping sideways was not an option.

Police said that "as the responding officers approached the residence to make contact, the garage door opened and a vehicle exited the garage, moving rapidly toward one of the responding officers. The officer discharged his service weapon striking the male driver," the statement said. "The driver died at the scene."

...

Indeed, while many people think police killings are reserved for a certain section of society, as Albers’ case illustrates, it can happen anywhere.


Read more and watch the videos at http://thefreethoughtproject.com/welfare-check-police-kill-unarmed-teen/.


Cool
newbie
Activity: 106
Merit: 0
January 23, 2018, 01:28:16 PM
Anybody needs a gun in our society, only policeman must have it. People make our environment more dangerous than ever with guns.
legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
January 23, 2018, 10:22:28 AM
This is the one we needed the most to be discussed for. Gun control, I think is the one that we can debate on. We need to think twice or thrice to know what are will be the pros and cons of it. Understanding what will happen on the next day, if gun control will be implemented. Gun is one of the most dangerous thing that we can buy or we can have.

Gun control is shooting the bad guy... not your buddy who happens to be standing next to him.

A 250 pound muscleman can easily overpower and kill a 90 pound granny. But if Granny has a gun, she has a chance. A sword won't work for Granny. Nor a spear. Nor karate, except if she is very lucky. Only a gun will give her a chance.

Cool
legendary
Activity: 2982
Merit: 1506
Pie Baking Contest: https://tinyurl.com/2s3z6dee
January 23, 2018, 10:03:47 AM
This is the one we needed the most to be discussed for. Gun control, I think is the one that we can debate on. We need to think twice or thrice to know what are will be the pros and cons of it. Understanding what will happen on the next day, if gun control will be implemented. Gun is one of the most dangerous thing that we can buy or we can have.

The most dangerous thing in the world is not gun, but human. The main reason why people has a gun is for protecting his life from other people. That simple. Even a bad people can turn an ordinary thing to be dangerous weapon, right?
sr. member
Activity: 490
Merit: 250
January 23, 2018, 09:37:05 AM
This is the one we needed the most to be discussed for. Gun control, I think is the one that we can debate on. We need to think twice or thrice to know what are will be the pros and cons of it. Understanding what will happen on the next day, if gun control will be implemented. Gun is one of the most dangerous thing that we can buy or we can have.
legendary
Activity: 2982
Merit: 1506
Pie Baking Contest: https://tinyurl.com/2s3z6dee
January 23, 2018, 09:30:50 AM
I have leaved this thread for years but it's still alive lol. Too bad seems Wilikon is not online here anymore.
newbie
Activity: 70
Merit: 0
January 23, 2018, 08:46:29 AM
This is a good topic. People will have different perspectives on this one. My take is that we try to dispose guns but starting with the suppliers and manufacturers of bullets. Once production of these bullets are stopped, then guns would be useless. Many people die because of gun shots either intentionally, suicides or accidents.
newbie
Activity: 63
Merit: 0
January 19, 2018, 05:28:00 PM
Protecting gun rights is important because an armed populace is capable of securing its liberties, whereas an unarmed populace ruled by a government with a monopoly on force only has the rights the government lets them have.
legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
January 19, 2018, 05:24:32 PM

As an American, I sometimes get demoralized at the degree of brainwashing in our public schools, media, etc.  It has a very detrimental impact on the ability of our population to think flexibly and critically.

I do want to thank many/most of the English-as-a-2nd-lang posters here for cheering me up about the sad state of _our_ systems and reminding me that things could be much worse.  OTOH, it also means that we've got a lot further to sink yet which is a bit depressing.



People are seldom united when there is nothing to unite over. Unity comes from a big threat that threatens them all.

At the time of the formation of the U.S., the bigger threat was England and King George. Even when France united with the new USA to fight her age-old foe, England, she did it because of a common threat. Not because she truly believed in freedom the way it was being set in place in America.

France wasn't really an ally. It was only a temporary thing to put England in its place. In a similar (though smaller) way, the colonies in America were not united. This was proven out in the Civil War.

Regarding world freedom, it is gun freedom in America that is keeping the world free. How? Governments of the world realize how dangerous their people would be if they had guns. So, they don't antagonize their people too hard If they did, their people might go and get guns from America and depose their government. And, actually, this has happened over and over with countries around the world... the people get guns from America and fight their government to get American-type freedom.

The problem in America isn't the guns. The problem is the respect we all have for each other... even if we are of different races. This will change as more and more Muslims come over here and get guns. Why will it change? Because Islam doesn't allow Muslims to respect other people in the ways that other people might respect them and each other.

Cool
newbie
Activity: 30
Merit: 0
January 19, 2018, 04:29:46 PM
I think the intention of controlling and regulating guns is good initiative. The problem is the market that can not be controlled, always existed and will always exist, there will always be people selling arms and buying them even if there is control.
legendary
Activity: 4690
Merit: 1276
January 19, 2018, 12:40:14 PM

As an American, I sometimes get demoralized at the degree of brainwashing in our public schools, media, etc.  It has a very detrimental impact on the ability of our population to think flexibly and critically.

I do want to thank many/most of the English-as-a-2nd-lang posters here for cheering me up about the sad state of _our_ systems and reminding me that things could be much worse.  OTOH, it also means that we've got a lot further to sink yet which is a bit depressing.

legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
January 19, 2018, 12:35:27 PM


Guns are made for one purpose, and that purpose is to kill.
I believe that guns are not weapons, they are tools. How they are used is up to the person holding it.
Guns are especially dangerous in the hands of people who don't know how to use them (i.e., kids and teenagers) as well as those who are mentally ill and/or have a temper problem.
Gun control will not stop violence because a violent person doesn’t need a gun to be violent.
After the Sandy Hook Elementary shooting in Newtown, Connecticut, support for gun control increased dramatically.

Generally in America, the support for gun control has outweighed the support for gun rights.
Are gun control laws constitutional?
What would be your ideal set of laws regarding firearms?




It seems to me the ideal solution is to prohibit any sale of weapons. let's dismantle all of them on pieces and build one huge monument dedicated to the peace.

This will only happen in one of two ways:
1. The people who own guns voluntarily give them up;
2. The people who are making the peace by doing this have more and bigger guns so that they can force it... which defeats the whole idea right there.

Violence and fighting have always happened, long before guns were invented.

A 250 pound muscle-man can easily overpower and kill a 90 pound granny. But if Granny has a gun, she has a chance.

Having peace is best. But it will never happen in a big way. This means that having guns is better. Individual gun control is the best idea.

Cool
newbie
Activity: 18
Merit: 0
January 19, 2018, 11:02:53 AM
https://i.imgur.com/q6sJpTH.jpg

Guns are made for one purpose, and that purpose is to kill.
I believe that guns are not weapons, they are tools. How they are used is up to the person holding it.
Guns are especially dangerous in the hands of people who don't know how to use them (i.e., kids and teenagers) as well as those who are mentally ill and/or have a temper problem.
Gun control will not stop violence because a violent person doesn’t need a gun to be violent.
After the Sandy Hook Elementary shooting in Newtown, Connecticut, support for gun control increased dramatically.

Generally in America, the support for gun control has outweighed the support for gun rights.
Are gun control laws constitutional?
What would be your ideal set of laws regarding firearms?




It seems to me the ideal solution is to prohibit any sale of weapons. let's dismantle all of them on pieces and build one huge monument dedicated to the peace.
sr. member
Activity: 672
Merit: 250
January 19, 2018, 10:37:36 AM
I do not give people guns. Because of the gun it is very dangerous. Guns can hurt you. In the United States there are many cases where guns have killed many people. American students used guns to kill their friends. So I advise people not to use a gun.
Pages:
Jump to: