What's your opinion of gun control? - page 70.

BADecker

legendary

Activity: 3906

Merit: 1373

Quote from: RedX on March 30, 2017, 06:33:07 PM

Gun control is useless as long as there are people who sell firearms illegally. The government conducts test to know if you are responsible of owning a gun but I think they should concentrate more on bringing down illegal firearm vendors because that is where most of violent, insane or criminally-minded people get theirs.

You forgot to mention all the unlicensed people who make and sell guns lawfully, even if Government says they do it illegally.

Cool

RedX

sr. member

Activity: 364

Merit: 250

Gun control is useless as long as there are people who sell firearms illegally. The government conducts test to know if you are responsible of owning a gun but I think they should concentrate more on bringing down illegal firearm vendors because that is where most of violent, insane or criminally-minded people get theirs.

BADecker

legendary

Activity: 3906

Merit: 1373

Quote from: basketcoin on March 27, 2017, 01:49:32 PM

i think anyone should be allowed to hold a gun if he passed sanity test and can be trusted..

Are you the one who devises the sanity test? Angry

Basmaty1212

newbie

Activity: 19

Merit: 0

Quote from: pearlmen on March 27, 2017, 01:58:02 PM

Quote from: basketcoin on March 27, 2017, 01:49:32 PM

i think anyone should be allowed to hold a gun if he passed sanity test and can be trusted..

And that's exactly what is being done because no government can just issue licence to hold gun to anybody without passing those tests you mentioned there but the issue is not about the test because someone who is trusted today can become untrusted tomorrow so in my own opinion, if government can perform its own responsibility of the protection of life and property, then there is no reason why I should have a gun in the first place because what will I use it for afterall.

Nobody is forced to have a weapon. It is everyone's right. If you have no desire to defend his life then that is your right. I believe that it is impossible to restrict gun rights to those who value his life and wants to protect her.

pearlmen

sr. member

Activity: 322

Merit: 250

Quote from: basketcoin on March 27, 2017, 01:49:32 PM

i think anyone should be allowed to hold a gun if he passed sanity test and can be trusted..

And that's exactly what is being done because no government can just issue licence to hold gun to anybody without passing those tests you mentioned there but the issue is not about the test because someone who is trusted today can become untrusted tomorrow so in my own opinion, if government can perform its own responsibility of the protection of life and property, then there is no reason why I should have a gun in the first place because what will I use it for afterall.

basketcoin

newbie

Activity: 27

Merit: 0

i think anyone should be allowed to hold a gun if he passed sanity test and can be trusted..

Forester618

member

Activity: 98

Merit: 10

Quote from: chixka000 on March 27, 2017, 02:39:36 AM

Quote from: darkseid1199 on March 26, 2017, 10:47:40 AM

Most guns used for illegal and murder are bought illegally. i know of the gun that uses the fingerprint of the owner to in order to even shoot it. I think gun manufacturers should mass produce this type of gun. It will help reduce gun violence in the entire world.

Even if there are manufacturers that can do the fingerprint thingy on their guns you have also said that there were illegal guns of course there could also be an illegal manufacturing of gun in which we cant still identify the owner that also negates on your statement

The fingerprint gives an advantage to the criminal. Such a weapon is not necessary. Nothing will stop the offender as the knowledge that he can get shot in the back. The more weapons will be in the hands of honest citizens the less crime.

chixka000

hero member

Activity: 910

Merit: 500

Quote from: darkseid1199 on March 26, 2017, 10:47:40 AM

Most guns used for illegal and murder are bought illegally. i know of the gun that uses the fingerprint of the owner to in order to even shoot it. I think gun manufacturers should mass produce this type of gun. It will help reduce gun violence in the entire world.

Even if there are manufacturers that can do the fingerprint thingy on their guns you have also said that there were illegal guns of course there could also be an illegal manufacturing of gun in which we cant still identify the owner that also negates on your statement

Lancusters

sr. member

Activity: 630

Merit: 263

Quote from: BADecker on March 26, 2017, 03:57:56 PM

Quote from: darkseid1199 on March 26, 2017, 10:47:40 AM

Most guns used for illegal and murder are bought illegally. i know of the gun that uses the fingerprint of the owner to in order to even shoot it. I think gun manufacturers should mass produce this type of gun. It will help reduce gun violence in the entire world.

Are you saying that gun manufacturers should sell guns that already have all kinds of fake fingerprints all over them?

Cool

In fact, the weapon that is activated by fingerprints is imperfect. It may fail and he needs time to identify. Are you sure that you will have time on these processes? I want the gun ready for use at any moment.

BADecker

legendary

Activity: 3906

Merit: 1373

Quote from: darkseid1199 on March 26, 2017, 10:47:40 AM

Most guns used for illegal and murder are bought illegally. i know of the gun that uses the fingerprint of the owner to in order to even shoot it. I think gun manufacturers should mass produce this type of gun. It will help reduce gun violence in the entire world.

Are you saying that gun manufacturers should sell guns that already have all kinds of fake fingerprints all over them?

Cool

darkseid1199

full member

Activity: 126

Merit: 100

Most guns used for illegal and murder are bought illegally. i know of the gun that uses the fingerprint of the owner to in order to even shoot it. I think gun manufacturers should mass produce this type of gun. It will help reduce gun violence in the entire world.

BADecker

legendary

Activity: 3906

Merit: 1373

Gun Owners of America: Paul Ryan's Obamacare 2.0 Still Contains Gun Control

Quote from: http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/03/22/gun-owners-of-america-paul-ryans-obamacare-2-0-still-contains-gun-control/

GOA points out that it opposed "the original Obamacare" because it threatened Second Amendment rights and they are concerned about Ryan's new healthcare push for the same reasons.

They stress three changes that are needed.

The first thing GOA points out is that Ryan's bill "needs to be amended to prohibit the ATF from trolling the national health database, or Medicaid, or any new entitlement program for persons with PTSD, Alzheimer's, ADHD, or merely 'anxiety.'" GOA says the recently repealed Social Security gun ban allowed such trolling, which opened the door to the ATF growing the list of the persons prohibited from gun ownership based on otherwise private information gathered from health records.

Secondly, GOA says Ryan's healthcare replacement "needs to be amended to prohibit insurance companies from asking about gun ownership." Such questions result in an increased insurance rates–"as a result of gun ownership"–or in the all-out denial of insurance to begin with.

Read more and check the links at http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/03/22/gun-owners-of-america-paul-ryans-obamacare-2-0-still-contains-gun-control/.

Cool

----------

Personal note: if you stand in contract or agreement with the U.S. Government, such gun laws might apply to you. If you stand as a simple man or woman, the gun laws don't apply. Google and Youtube search on "Karl Lentz common law."

BADecker

legendary

Activity: 3906

Merit: 1373

Quote from: Sithara007 on March 21, 2017, 09:04:54 PM

Quote from: TravelMug on March 20, 2017, 09:44:37 AM

I think we all have the right to protect ourselves, But I also believe that by making guns illegal or restricting access to them won’t end gun violence. By analogy, possession and use of many controlled substances is illegal, yet people possess and use them.

The rate of illegal possession of firearms is much higher in regions where they are banned altogether. In regions where gun ownership is permitted, the proliferation of illegal firearms is very low.

The law of self-defense and self-protection cannot be banned. Anybody who tries to make a law banning self-defense and self-protection is himself a law-breaker. Why? Because the right to self-protection is inherent in all people.

Cool

Sithara007

legendary

Activity: 3346

Merit: 1352

Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform

Quote from: TravelMug on March 20, 2017, 09:44:37 AM

I think we all have the right to protect ourselves, But I also believe that by making guns illegal or restricting access to them won’t end gun violence. By analogy, possession and use of many controlled substances is illegal, yet people possess and use them.

The rate of illegal possession of firearms is much higher in regions where they are banned altogether. In regions where gun ownership is permitted, the proliferation of illegal firearms is very low.

BADecker

legendary

Activity: 3906

Merit: 1373

Appeals Court Says Prior Restraint Is Perfectly Fine, Refuses To Rehear 3D-Printed Guns Case

Quote from: https://www.newsbud.com/2017/03/21/appeals-court-says-prior-restraint-is-perfectly-fine-refuses-to-rehear-3d-printed-guns-case/

Cody Wilson and his company, Defense Distributed, sued the State Department over its demands he cease distributing instructions for the creation of weapons and weapons parts.

The State Department came along too late to make much of a difference. It claimed Wilson's instructions violated international arms distribution laws, but by the time it noticed what Defense Distributed was doing, the instructions were all over the web. They still are, and no amount of litigation or government orders is going to change that.

What Defense Distributed is doing is perfectly legal in the United States. The State Department says it's illegal to put these instructions in the hands of foreign enemies. Since it can't control internet traffic, it's decided to take down the publisher.

Read more at https://www.newsbud.com/2017/03/21/appeals-court-says-prior-restraint-is-perfectly-fine-refuses-to-rehear-3d-printed-guns-case/.

Cool

BADecker

legendary

Activity: 3906

Merit: 1373

Quote from: Casanova18 on March 20, 2017, 02:06:15 PM

Quote from: StarCitizen999 on March 20, 2017, 09:05:17 AM

Quote from: bra4our on March 19, 2017, 08:59:58 AM

The first amendment clearly states that everyone should be able to own guns. But i think not everyone should own a gun, You cant give a gun to a mentally challenged person and not expect disaster. They should make laws that makes criminal for anyone who's gun is used for to cause harm to another to be sentenced. You cant just buy a gun and leave it anywhere so that your kids talks it to school and kill happen. I also think people who buys guns who be mentally checked to see if their head is in the right place.

All right. Weapons should have mentally adequate people for self-defense and protection of their family. Unfortunately, now everything is the other way around.

There is a big difference between legal and illegal weapons. Inadequate people rarely own a legal weapon. In addition, if a person wants to kill you he can do it with a knife, and you only have one legal weapon.

What is the one legal weapon? Don't most of us have two? Aren't they our two beared arms? The 2nd Amendment:

Quote from: https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/second_amendment

A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.

Casanova18

member

Activity: 83

Merit: 10

Quote from: StarCitizen999 on March 20, 2017, 09:05:17 AM

Quote from: bra4our on March 19, 2017, 08:59:58 AM

The first amendment clearly states that everyone should be able to own guns. But i think not everyone should own a gun, You cant give a gun to a mentally challenged person and not expect disaster. They should make laws that makes criminal for anyone who's gun is used for to cause harm to another to be sentenced. You cant just buy a gun and leave it anywhere so that your kids talks it to school and kill happen. I also think people who buys guns who be mentally checked to see if their head is in the right place.

All right. Weapons should have mentally adequate people for self-defense and protection of their family. Unfortunately, now everything is the other way around.

There is a big difference between legal and illegal weapons. Inadequate people rarely own a legal weapon. In addition, if a person wants to kill you he can do it with a knife, and you only have one legal weapon.

TravelMug

hero member

Activity: 2632

Merit: 833

I think we all have the right to protect ourselves, But I also believe that by making guns illegal or restricting access to them won’t end gun violence. By analogy, possession and use of many controlled substances is illegal, yet people possess and use them.

yellow1

full member

Activity: 182

Merit: 100

In my opinion it should have a gun control,because when it comes to safety of others ,and when someone is a having a gun it might be abuse it to use a gun,its better to control from now on for its not too late...It would be stop crimes against us and violence would be reduce.So we must be aware of this issue for the safe of others and for ourselves.

StarCitizen999

newbie

Activity: 36

Merit: 0

Quote from: bra4our on March 19, 2017, 08:59:58 AM

The first amendment clearly states that everyone should be able to own guns. But i think not everyone should own a gun, You cant give a gun to a mentally challenged person and not expect disaster. They should make laws that makes criminal for anyone who's gun is used for to cause harm to another to be sentenced. You cant just buy a gun and leave it anywhere so that your kids talks it to school and kill happen. I also think people who buys guns who be mentally checked to see if their head is in the right place.

All right. Weapons should have mentally adequate people for self-defense and protection of their family. Unfortunately, now everything is the other way around.

Topic: What's your opinion of gun control? - page 70. (Read 450482 times)