I fell that gun control needs for the peace of country. If we allow all the people to have gun, for simple reasons they will use it. So, there comes violence and there should not be any tolerance among the people. But the governments has response to safe guard its people from violence.
Do you know any legal weapon leaves traces which can be traced to the owner? Who will use legal weapons for criminal purposes? Therefore, law-abiding citizens should have the opportunity to defend himself. To every person the police will not put. 
Topic: What's your opinion of gun control? - page 75. (Read 450558 times)
I fell that gun control needs for the peace of country. If we allow all the people to have gun, for simple reasons they will use it. So, there comes violence and there should not be any tolerance among the people. But the governments has response to safe guard its people from violence.
Migrants fleeing from war, and would have to defend their country. I have no respect. They are traitors. Why should they even allowed into the country? Unless we have given permission to the government to risk the country's economy for the sake of the cowards?
100% agreed. Look at the so called "rapefugees" in Germany. Somewhere around 80% and 90% of them are adult males. IMO, Germany should have given preference to the women and children.
I don't think that can be discussed about the use of weapons against migrants. Only when they commit crimes. The weapon is almost every citizen of Switzerland because they are all reservists in case of war are bound to come to the Assembly point.
Why not? Guns are for hunting. But they are also for protection.
With the low birth rate in Switzerland, soon most of the people will be foreigners. They will want to take guns away from the Swiss people who remain. There will be too many of them for the Swiss people to fight, even with the guns.
That is what gun control is all about... taking the guns away. Usually governments do it to their citizens. In the case of Switzerland, it will be the foreigners. Some Swiss will fight, but they will lose.
Protection means aggression.
Migrants aren't aggressing you. They're fleeing the war you started that's all.
Technically they're the one in need of protection... From you --'
I don't think that can be discussed about the use of weapons against migrants. Only when they commit crimes. The weapon is almost every citizen of Switzerland because they are all reservists in case of war are bound to come to the Assembly point.
Why not? Guns are for hunting. But they are also for protection.
With the low birth rate in Switzerland, soon most of the people will be foreigners. They will want to take guns away from the Swiss people who remain. There will be too many of them for the Swiss people to fight, even with the guns.
That is what gun control is all about... taking the guns away. Usually governments do it to their citizens. In the case of Switzerland, it will be the foreigners. Some Swiss will fight, but they will lose.
Protection means aggression.
Migrants aren't aggressing you. They're fleeing the war you started that's all.
Technically they're the one in need of protection... From you --'
When they get used to their new freedom, they will try to adapt yours to theirs. You will fight.
I don't think that can be discussed about the use of weapons against migrants. Only when they commit crimes. The weapon is almost every citizen of Switzerland because they are all reservists in case of war are bound to come to the Assembly point.
Why not? Guns are for hunting. But they are also for protection.
With the low birth rate in Switzerland, soon most of the people will be foreigners. They will want to take guns away from the Swiss people who remain. There will be too many of them for the Swiss people to fight, even with the guns.
That is what gun control is all about... taking the guns away. Usually governments do it to their citizens. In the case of Switzerland, it will be the foreigners. Some Swiss will fight, but they will lose.
Protection means aggression.
Migrants aren't aggressing you. They're fleeing the war you started that's all.
Technically they're the one in need of protection... From you --'
Did you notice that almost every mass shooting occurs in a "Gun Free Zone"?
In addition to that, the majority of the shooting attacks occur in states which are dominated by the Democrats (such as California and Washington). Why there are no mass shootings occurring in Oklahoma or West Virginia?
The birth rate isn't high in Switzerland either. When there are only a few Swiss left, their guns won't stop the Muslim immigrants, and the population will grow again... with Muslims. Then there will be lots of gun control in Switzerland.
Why not? Guns are for hunting. But they are also for protection.
With the low birth rate in Switzerland, soon most of the people will be foreigners. They will want to take guns away from the Swiss people who remain. There will be too many of them for the Swiss people to fight, even with the guns.
That is what gun control is all about... taking the guns away. Usually governments do it to their citizens. In the case of Switzerland, it will be the foreigners. Some Swiss will fight, but they will lose.
Did you notice that almost every mass shooting occurs in a "Gun Free Zone"?
In addition to that, the majority of the shooting attacks occur in states which are dominated by the Democrats (such as California and Washington). Why there are no mass shootings occurring in Oklahoma or West Virginia?
The birth rate isn't high in Switzerland either. When there are only a few Swiss left, their guns won't stop the Muslim immigrants, and the population will grow again... with Muslims. Then there will be lots of gun control in Switzerland.
Did you notice that almost every mass shooting occurs in a "Gun Free Zone"?
In addition to that, the majority of the shooting attacks occur in states which are dominated by the Democrats (such as California and Washington). Why there are no mass shootings occurring in Oklahoma or West Virginia?
The birth rate isn't high in Switzerland either. When there are only a few Swiss left, their guns won't stop the Muslim immigrants, and the population will grow again... with Muslims. Then there will be lots of gun control in Switzerland.
Did you notice that almost every mass shooting occurs in a "Gun Free Zone"?
In addition to that, the majority of the shooting attacks occur in states which are dominated by the Democrats (such as California and Washington). Why there are no mass shootings occurring in Oklahoma or West Virginia?
Did you notice that almost every mass shooting occurs in a "Gun Free Zone"?
In addition to that, the majority of the shooting attacks occur in states which are dominated by the Democrats (such as California and Washington). Why there are no mass shootings occurring in Oklahoma or West Virginia?
Did you notice that almost every mass shooting occurs in a "Gun Free Zone"?
In addition to that, the majority of the shooting attacks occur in states which are dominated by the Democrats (such as California and Washington). Why there are no mass shootings occurring in Oklahoma or West Virginia?
Did you notice that almost every mass shooting occurs in a "Gun Free Zone"?
In addition to that, the majority of the shooting attacks occur in states which are dominated by the Democrats (such as California and Washington). Why there are no mass shootings occurring in Oklahoma or West Virginia?
Did you notice that almost every mass shooting occurs in a "Gun Free Zone"?
In addition to that, the majority of the shooting attacks occur in states which are dominated by the Democrats (such as California and Washington). Why there are no mass shootings occurring in Oklahoma or West Virginia?
I can not understand all this fuss around with a gun problem. You look at the statistics of car accidents because there are so many victims as if there is a war on the roads. So we have to worry about other problems and not weapons.
I have a house hunting rifles and I can use them to protect themselves, their families and their possessions. So I think it can and should have the right to do each. But laws prohibiting direction completely to another. They want to deprive people of weapons.
Did you notice that almost every mass shooting occurs in a "Gun Free Zone"?
In addition to that, the majority of the shooting attacks occur in states which are dominated by the Democrats (such as California and Washington). Why there are no mass shootings occurring in Oklahoma or West Virginia?
...the US deserves every single mass shootings they had and will have.
Did you notice that almost every mass shooting occurs in a "Gun Free Zone"?
Those who want to shoot others don't really want their intended victims to shoot back.
And you think it would help that every crazy person can get a weapon without problems?
And if you are white and dont look like a wannabe crip member you will get a weapon without ID too....
Atleast do some checks and centralize the laws about gun ownership.
Yes. It would help. Here's how and why.
If the crazy people got guns and started hurting other people, the rest of the people would get guns and get rid of the crazy people. Then there wouldn't be any expense for the rest of us, because the asylums would be empty.
If a family had members who were crazy, and they loved their crazy members, they would make sure their crazies didn't get a hold of guns.
The problem with everyone walking around with guns is, we aren't used to it... like in the days of the old West. We would have to get used to it again. Widespread guns, carried in the open, would breed respect among everyone. Things like racism would disappear. The gun would make everyone equal. Why? The expense would be too great to pick on someone with a gun, without thinking about what you were doing ahead of time.
In a society of people, certain rules regarding public activity are necessary.
If you are in your own house, on your own land, you can do anything you want. You can shoot your guns like crazy, if you want... as long as the bullets do not go beyond your property line.
When you are in public, keep that gun holstered, unless there is dire need to unholster it, or unless you are making a trade or showing it off.
There are those who will not follow the rules regarding carrying a gun in public. That is why everyone needs to have a gun in public... to protect himself/herself (and their kids) from the crooks who don't willingly obey the gun rules in public. And crooks there will be.
As has been said, when seconds count, police are minutes away.
...the US deserves every single mass shootings they had and will have.
Did you notice that almost every mass shooting occurs in a "Gun Free Zone"?
Those who want to shoot others don't really want their intended victims to shoot back.
And you think it would help that every crazy person can get a weapon without problems?
And if you are white and dont look like a wannabe crip member you will get a weapon without ID too....
Atleast do some checks and centralize the laws about gun ownership.
Yes. It would help. Here's how and why.
If the crazy people got guns and started hurting other people, the rest of the people would get guns and get rid of the crazy people. Then there wouldn't be any expense for the rest of us, because the asylums would be empty.
If a family had members who were crazy, and they loved their crazy members, they would make sure their crazies didn't get a hold of guns.
The problem with everyone walking around with guns is, we aren't used to it... like in the days of the old West. We would have to get used to it again. Widespread guns, carried in the open, would breed respect among everyone. Things like racism would disappear. The gun would make everyone equal. Why? The expense would be too great to pick on someone with a gun, without thinking about what you were doing ahead of time.
...the US deserves every single mass shootings they had and will have.
Did you notice that almost every mass shooting occurs in a "Gun Free Zone"?
Those who want to shoot others don't really want their intended victims to shoot back.
And you think it would help that every crazy person can get a weapon without problems?
And if you are white and dont look like a wannabe crip member you will get a weapon without ID too....
Atleast do some checks and centralize the laws about gun ownership.
Yes. It would help. Here's how and why.
If the crazy people got guns and started hurting other people, the rest of the people would get guns and get rid of the crazy people. Then there wouldn't be any expense for the rest of us, because the asylums would be empty.
If a family had members who were crazy, and they loved their crazy members, they would make sure their crazies didn't get a hold of guns.
The problem with everyone walking around with guns is, we aren't used to it... like in the days of the old West. We would have to get used to it again. Widespread guns, carried in the open, would breed respect among everyone. Things like racism would disappear. The gun would make everyone equal. Why? The expense would be too great to pick on someone with a gun, without thinking about what you were doing ahead of time.
Jump to: