The news media is anti gun.
They never publicize stories where guns are used to prevent theft, rape or murder.
There are many cases where a rapist will break into someone's house and be shot or run away when they realize the woman is armed.
The news media never covers those stories.
Background checks and regulation never prevented complete idiots from driving on the roads.
Gun regulation won't be any better at preventing fools from owning guns.
Topic: What's your opinion of gun control? - page 78. (Read 450482 times)
For me, i vote for gun control. Political and local government of all the country must have a gun control on their own country. There's a lot of tragedy, crimes and other events that involve gun, we need to minimized the buying and making of guns. Also for our protection for our children, we need to decrease the production of guns. We need to control the making of guns for also our own safe and securities.
if guns are outlawed only outlaws will have them 
Venezuela and Honduras are the nations with the highest firearm-related death rate. And both of these nations have some of the toughest gun ownership restriction in the world. And more over, there are just 6.4 guns per 100 people in Honduras, compared to 31.6 per 100 in Sweden. But there are 67.18 firearm-related deaths per 100,000 in Honduras, while the rate for Sweden is just 1.47 per 100,000.
I think Honduras has minimal gun restrictions.
if guns are outlawed only outlaws will have them
Venezuela and Honduras are the nations with the highest firearm-related death rate. And both of these nations have some of the toughest gun ownership restriction in the world. And more over, there are just 6.4 guns per 100 people in Honduras, compared to 31.6 per 100 in Sweden. But there are 67.18 firearm-related deaths per 100,000 in Honduras, while the rate for Sweden is just 1.47 per 100,000.
Yeah but gun restriction laws must be supported by an actual legal system, an actual police and an actual economy behind.
Of course if your police is corrupted as fuck, that you're economy is completely destroyed, gun regulation won't change a thing.
In such countries, law don't apply.
if guns are outlawed only outlaws will have them
Venezuela and Honduras are the nations with the highest firearm-related death rate. And both of these nations have some of the toughest gun ownership restriction in the world. And more over, there are just 6.4 guns per 100 people in Honduras, compared to 31.6 per 100 in Sweden. But there are 67.18 firearm-related deaths per 100,000 in Honduras, while the rate for Sweden is just 1.47 per 100,000.
My guns are autonomous, like self-driving cars.
if guns are outlawed only outlaws will have them
Venezuela and Honduras are the nations with the highest firearm-related death rate. And both of these nations have some of the toughest gun ownership restriction in the world. And more over, there are just 6.4 guns per 100 people in Honduras, compared to 31.6 per 100 in Sweden. But there are 67.18 firearm-related deaths per 100,000 in Honduras, while the rate for Sweden is just 1.47 per 100,000.
if guns are outlawed only outlaws will have them
But, but, but...
What if the inlaws are the outlaws?
if guns are outlawed only outlaws will have them
Gun control. Of course, every country or nation needs gun control. If we dont care about this maybe one day you will be shot by others. Let the people who's entitled to have a gun, license for having it. We need to follow the rules to avoid bad things.
Most of those who argue in favor of gun rights, are the ones who support the removal of fire-arms from criminals and mental patients. They are in favor of granting more power to the cops, and in favor of strict implementation of the existing laws. The anti-gun campaigners, on the other hand are the ones who attack the cops and side with the criminals.
The one major reason why we have militaries is, because the common people have too much common sense to go armed. However, if they DID go armed, we wouldn't have militaries.
Gun control. Of course, every country or nation needs gun control. If we dont care about this maybe one day you will be shot by others. Let the people who's entitled to have a gun, license for having it. We need to follow the rules to avoid bad things.
Most of those who argue in favor of gun rights, are the ones who support the removal of fire-arms from criminals and mental patients. They are in favor of granting more power to the cops, and in favor of strict implementation of the existing laws. The anti-gun campaigners, on the other hand are the ones who attack the cops and side with the criminals.
Gun control. Of course, every country or nation needs gun control. If we dont care about this maybe one day you will be shot by others. Let the people who's entitled to have a gun, license for having it. We need to follow the rules to avoid bad things.
Most of those who argue in favor of gun rights, are the ones who support fire-arms for criminals and mental patients (i.e. private sale loophole). They are in favor of granting less power to the cops, and in favor of softening implementation of the existing laws. The anti-gun campaigners on the other hand are the ones who side with the cops and are against arming criminals with weapons that they buy without background checks (i.e. illegal mexican gangs buying weapons for the drug war in the USA and bringing them back to mexico).
Fixed it for you
Gun control. Of course, every country or nation needs gun control. If we dont care about this maybe one day you will be shot by others. Let the people who's entitled to have a gun, license for having it. We need to follow the rules to avoid bad things.
Most of those who argue in favor of gun rights, are the ones who support the removal of fire-arms from criminals and mental patients. They are in favor of granting more power to the cops, and in favor of strict implementation of the existing laws. The anti-gun campaigners, on the other hand are the ones who attack the cops and side with the criminals.
Well, long time I haven't come in this thread...
But glad to know opinions seem to have evolved a bit in the "good direction". "Good direction" here meaning "in the same direction than my personal opinion" of course ^^
I just don't see the point of free rights for everyone to hold a gun.
And I don't see how you can give right to everyone to own a gun but not to own a bomb.
So it goes rather quickly to the massive number of weapons for everyone and mass destructive power...
But glad to know opinions seem to have evolved a bit in the "good direction". "Good direction" here meaning "in the same direction than my personal opinion" of course ^^
I just don't see the point of free rights for everyone to hold a gun.
And I don't see how you can give right to everyone to own a gun but not to own a bomb.
So it goes rather quickly to the massive number of weapons for everyone and mass destructive power...
In the world we live in, countries need weapons to protect themselves. But it is too risky for civilians to have weapons. When I get angry at someone, I hurt that person with my fists. But if there is a weapon in my hand I can inadvertently end his life. According to the level of security of the country, it is necessary to decide whether or not individuals will have weapons. Because some people will have weapons from illegal ways. People in unsecured countries have to have arms.
Gun is of the weapon that will took a life. It's very dangerous knowing that anytime its just one click the you can kill someone even the animals. Having a gun in your hands is a big responsibility, for me, when you want to have it you should have a license that you are capable of having it. Not just, its your trip to have it. You should be responsible.
seeing american's situation, makes me thinking gun controll is so much important.
Protection issue is not the answer of having disagreement on this issue, increase your protection but also increase the insecurity.
it must be a full of waste.
Yes you're right, gun control in America is important. Because many cases of abuse of weapons are very harmful and even underage children can buy a gun there. But it can not be denied in some situations it is very important to have a gun. As in store holding a gun for shopkeeper very necessary at night, due to there are a lot of gangsters can steal and rob the store at any time so that the weapon should be prepared to protect themselves. So as to keep themselves in some of the things I think have a gun in the United States is necessary. Maybe the ownership rules should be tightened and circulation of a gun should be limited.Protection issue is not the answer of having disagreement on this issue, increase your protection but also increase the insecurity.
it must be a full of waste.
i just make example from the country that doesn't allow people to hold gun (police and military is an exception), i think it's SO MUCH SAFER than the country who allows it, not even by tightening the rules. rules may be tight .. but there are always peoples who stand up behind the rules, always.
According to me weapons are not very useful in our company because I find that they create more deaths than they do not protect people. Furthermore I think that it is the role of the police to assure our safety because if everybody has a weapon it creates some disorder and it is the anarchy.
seeing american's situation, makes me thinking gun controll is so much important.
Protection issue is not the answer of having disagreement on this issue, increase your protection but also increase the insecurity.
it must be a full of waste.
Yes you're right, gun control in America is important. Because many cases of abuse of weapons are very harmful and even underage children can buy a gun there. But it can not be denied in some situations it is very important to have a gun. As in store holding a gun for shopkeeper very necessary at night, due to there are a lot of gangsters can steal and rob the store at any time so that the weapon should be prepared to protect themselves. So as to keep themselves in some of the things I think have a gun in the United States is necessary. Maybe the ownership rules should be tightened and circulation of a gun should be limited.Protection issue is not the answer of having disagreement on this issue, increase your protection but also increase the insecurity.
it must be a full of waste.
i just make example from the country that doesn't allow people to hold gun (police and military is an exception), i think it's SO MUCH SAFER than the country who allows it, not even by tightening the rules. rules may be tight .. but there are always peoples who stand up behind the rules, always.
seeing american's situation, makes me thinking gun controll is so much important.
Protection issue is not the answer of having disagreement on this issue, increase your protection but also increase the insecurity.
it must be a full of waste.
Yes you're right, gun control in America is important. Because many cases of abuse of weapons are very harmful and even underage children can buy a gun there. But it can not be denied in some situations it is very important to have a gun. As in store holding a gun for shopkeeper very necessary at night, due to there are a lot of gangsters can steal and rob the store at any time so that the weapon should be prepared to protect themselves. So as to keep themselves in some of the things I think have a gun in the United States is necessary. Maybe the ownership rules should be tightened and circulation of a gun should be limited. Protection issue is not the answer of having disagreement on this issue, increase your protection but also increase the insecurity.
it must be a full of waste.
seeing american's situation, makes me thinking gun controll is so much important.
Protection issue is not the answer of having disagreement on this issue, increase your protection but also increase the insecurity.
it must be a full of waste.
Protection issue is not the answer of having disagreement on this issue, increase your protection but also increase the insecurity.
it must be a full of waste.
I believe there can really be a balanced arrangement between the two. US has experts to review these instances and i'm sure they can come up with a much better proposal on the way things work with them now. They really need to work on this asap. We don't want another instance of this.
Jump to: