Whattomine - profitability website with basic json. - page 19.

pbfarmer

member

Activity: 340

Merit: 29

Quote from: fredeq on March 02, 2018, 05:32:34 AM

Quote from: pbfarmer on March 01, 2018, 05:38:47 PM

Btw, I've also noticed that network hashrates/difficulty changes don't always affect the reward/revenue/profit estimates the way it seems they should... Is this just because you're using a 24hr avg?

Thanks for the updates.

Sounds about right. You can always use current values if needed.

Thanks again for the fix... Estimates are much more in-line now.

I generally do check rewards/earnings based on current difficulty for coins in the main list, but it doesn't seem to be an option for coins like LUX which require navigating to it's own page. Any chance you plan on porting that feature over? A window between 1hr and 24hr would be useful too - 1 can be too short w/ the massive swings caused by NH and large hashrate profit chasers, and 24 can be excruciatingly long when trying to validate first time setups... Maybe something like 3 or 6hrs?

Cheers!

fredeq

legendary

Activity: 1537

Merit: 1005

Quote from: tedyx on March 02, 2018, 07:40:03 AM

Hi fredeq,

First I'd like to congratulate you for the most accurate mining profit calculator there is Cool

The ability to adjust settings like block reward, difficulty and exchange rate is great!
However, sometimes when i adjust them for a coin not listed there, i get completely wrong results, meaning there is more to the equation.
I guess it is block time; is it possible to adjust that when calculating as well?
Thanks!

Thanks

Actually block_time takes no part in the equation, difficulty is all that matters.
If you try to calculate for a coin with the same algo then the results should be ok.

Unless you try to simulate low-hashrate coin on big-hashrate coin.
Would recommend to simluate always on low-hashrate for better results.

tedyx

member

Activity: 108

Merit: 12

Hi fredeq,

First I'd like to congratulate you for the most accurate mining profit calculator there is Cool

The ability to adjust settings like block reward, difficulty and exchange rate is great!
However, sometimes when i adjust them for a coin not listed there, i get completely wrong results, meaning there is more to the equation.
I guess it is block time; is it possible to adjust that when calculating as well?
Thanks!

fredeq

legendary

Activity: 1537

Merit: 1005

Quote from: pbfarmer on March 01, 2018, 05:38:47 PM

Btw, I've also noticed that network hashrates/difficulty changes don't always affect the reward/revenue/profit estimates the way it seems they should... Is this just because you're using a 24hr avg?

Thanks for the updates.

Sounds about right. You can always use current values if needed.

pbfarmer

member

Activity: 340

Merit: 29

Quote from: fredeq on March 01, 2018, 07:49:31 AM

Quote from: pbfarmer on March 01, 2018, 07:11:43 AM

Any idea if LUX rewards reflect the 20% reduction (20% of mining rewards going to masternodes) yet? My earnings seem to be at least 20% off of WTM estimates.

Will paste my email response to the same question:
Honestly I cant find any mention of 20% reduction.
Also blocks on chainz explorer list full 10 reward being generated by a single address.

Devs of the coin confirmed with me the estimated results few days after the coin was added.
Will have to test this coin myself.

EDIT:
Found a problem with stat storing that would result in lowered averages.
Estimates should be better soon.

After digging around a bit more, I don't think they've actually implemented the 20% share to MNs yet. But it is in the works, so you might want to keep an eye out for it.

Btw, I've also noticed that network hashrates/difficulty changes don't always affect the reward/revenue/profit estimates the way it seems they should... Is this just because you're using a 24hr avg?

Thanks for the updates.

fredeq

legendary

Activity: 1537

Merit: 1005

Quote from: pbfarmer on March 01, 2018, 07:11:43 AM

Any idea if LUX rewards reflect the 20% reduction (20% of mining rewards going to masternodes) yet? My earnings seem to be at least 20% off of WTM estimates.

Will paste my email response to the same question:
Honestly I cant find any mention of 20% reduction.
Also blocks on chainz explorer list full 10 reward being generated by a single address.

Devs of the coin confirmed with me the estimated results few days after the coin was added.
Will have to test this coin myself.

EDIT:
Found a problem with stat storing that would result in lowered averages.
Estimates should be better soon.

pbfarmer

member

Activity: 340

Merit: 29

Any idea if LUX rewards reflect the 20% reduction (20% of mining rewards going to masternodes) yet? My earnings seem to be at least 20% off of WTM estimates.

CryptAtomeTrader44

full member

Activity: 340

Merit: 103

It is easier to break an atom than partialities AE

Quote from: fredeq on February 27, 2018, 06:28:06 AM

@CryptAtomeTrader44
Good that you are doing your research, but as long as there is volume on the exchanges then mining any coin should be safe.

I'm really not sure that volume is sufficient parameter for saying if it's sure or not. Especially on an exchange like cryptopia. In fact i think the volume drop down drastically since 2 weeks from 9-10 BTC/Day to 2-4 BTC/day
I just disabled them on my Rig because they drop down so much. I leave them to others

In addition to that the teams do not communicate, the websites look like tasteless empty shells at the chest to ask if I did not lose too many hashes in all these neoscrypt coins.Even FTC that seemed to me better.

Quote from: fredeq on February 27, 2018, 06:28:06 AM

Not willing to add an algo which only active coin is multi-algo.

However you have added it in many tabs and menus on your site or also for nicehash.

Never mind

fredeq

legendary

Activity: 1537

Merit: 1005

@CryptAtomeTrader44
Good that you are doing your research, but as long as there is volume on the exchanges then mining any coin should be safe.

Not willing to add an algo which only active coin is multi-algo.

@MrTK90
Cheers!
That wont be coming in the near future. Personall I prefer to stay in $, even though thats not my currency.

MrTK90

newbie

Activity: 7

Merit: 0

This site is really great and in fact pretty accurate.
It would be great if there is any option to convert it in other currencys like EUR € or GBP £ (maybe with the current exchange DOLLAR->EURO).

CryptAtomeTrader44

full member

Activity: 340

Merit: 103

It is easier to break an atom than partialities AE

I see you have added XVG B2S on COINS tab at WTM site.
Verge-Blake (2s)(XVG)

Do you plan to add it to the profitability list for minning against ETH?

I also noticed that you have added it to the ETH +, ETC + and EXP + tabs since Claymore submitted a big update.

It seems that mining XVG in blake2s is more profitable than in Lyra2
I chose the unimining pool that seems to indicate 38 000+ connected miners. I think they're taking advantage of the Claymore update ... Maybe they would be useful for getting the blake2s difficulty numbers.

CryptAtomeTrader44

full member

Activity: 340

Merit: 103

It is easier to break an atom than partialities AE

Quote from: fredeq on February 23, 2018, 03:11:15 AM

@CryptAtomeTrader44
I think someone is trying to find connections where there might be none Wink

Any coin can go dev-abandonded. Research, check and react.

I made my research and i think Vivo and Innova were abandonned and some people make some pump to innova recently.

GBX and TZC btctalk thread seems to be active and the team responds quickly but for CRC, INNOVA and VIVO nobody seems behind their project.
DeV code have no commits since month.

Thei website are not updated.

So i think these three last i quote are not real project and they are not sustained by real DEV behind them.

fredeq

legendary

Activity: 1537

Merit: 1005

Quote from: johncroc1 on February 18, 2018, 10:13:17 AM

I'm only seeing 3.3% rejection, but that's over time. It's possible that there have been periods of 100% rejection but I wasn't monitoring.

Getting disconnects or orphans on nlpool now as well.
The calcs are good, its just network is in a shitty state of orphans or pools going down.
Will think about including default fee to reflect orphan rate.

@CryptAtomeTrader44
I think someone is trying to find connections where there might be none Wink

Any coin can go dev-abandonded. Research, check and react.

@Tofu91
Not listing CPU coins.

Tofu91

newbie

Activity: 11

Merit: 0

I want to get Zoin (ZOI) added to whattomine but I have not heard back from my email request yet after a few weeks. Is there anything else I need to do?

CryptAtomeTrader44

full member

Activity: 340

Merit: 103

It is easier to break an atom than partialities AE

@Fredeq

What do you think about this alert i read and quote on CRC, INN, VIVO and some other like GBX and TZC ?

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.30706443

johncroc1

newbie

Activity: 12

Merit: 0

Quote from: fredeq on February 17, 2018, 11:35:48 AM

Quote from: johncroc1 on February 17, 2018, 10:59:19 AM

Apparently, I spoke too soon. After 122 hrs of mining, my average gross yield is 138 XVG-scrypt per day on mastermining. Better than the 121 I was getting on MPH, but still nowhere near the 220 predicted by your algo on WTM.

JC

Getting all shares rejected now on mastermining.
Testing nlpool.

I'm only seeing 3.3% rejection, but that's over time. It's possible that there have been periods of 100% rejection but I wasn't monitoring.

fredeq

legendary

Activity: 1537

Merit: 1005

Quote from: johncroc1 on February 17, 2018, 10:59:19 AM

Apparently, I spoke too soon. After 122 hrs of mining, my average gross yield is 138 XVG-scrypt per day on mastermining. Better than the 121 I was getting on MPH, but still nowhere near the 220 predicted by your algo on WTM.

JC

Getting all shares rejected now on mastermining.
Testing nlpool.

johncroc1

newbie

Activity: 12

Merit: 0

Quote from: fredeq on February 13, 2018, 02:42:31 AM

Quote from: johncroc1 on February 12, 2018, 10:39:17 PM

After 9 hours on MasterMining, I'm on track to be at 206/day. Almost exactly as WhatToMine predicts. Thank you for helping me to find the problem!

Cheers, thats really strange though, never had this kind of problem on mph.
Maybe drop the admin an email explaining the problem.

Apparently, I spoke too soon. After 122 hrs of mining, my average gross yield is 138 XVG-scrypt per day on mastermining. Better than the 121 I was getting on MPH, but still nowhere near the 220 predicted by your algo on WTM.

JC

fredeq

legendary

Activity: 1537

Merit: 1005

Quote from: rocketrunner442 on February 13, 2018, 03:31:38 PM

Is there no information for Verge (blake algo) in the http://whattomine.com/coins.json file content?

As of this moment blake2s is not added to coins list, you can only calculate solo or dual.

rocketrunner442

newbie

Activity: 11

Merit: 0

Is there no information for Verge (blake algo) in the http://whattomine.com/coins.json file content?

Topic: Whattomine - profitability website with basic json. - page 19. (Read 95019 times)