Topic: Who dump coins early; Bounty hunters or ICO investors? - page 12. (Read 2756 times)
Yeah i agree with you opinion. The blame will get on bounty hunter but sometimes its true. But i dont understand why it can impact the price for a long time. The reward of bounty hunter less rather than investor with bonus. Smart bounty hunter will never sell his reward cheap.
people will still say bounty hunter who dump coin earlier. We cannot deny this fact, it is indeed the case. But if the reward bounty in the key, it turns out that the dump is still happening I think there will be no blame because that does dump is an investor. logically investors holding more than token bounty hunter, possible investors did dump gets bigger.
The problem is that there are really no safeguards that has been established to protect the bounty participants. I think that there is always some kind of price manipulation so that once the bounty hunters get their bounties the market has already been manipulated so that the price will go down then the bounty participants will have a choice of selling their coins or tokens cheap or be an investor like them.
I participated in the bounty campaign of a certain project and its been two months after the ICO ended yet this team has still not paid bounty hunters because they think bounty hunters would dump their coins and cause a fall in the coin price. Surprisingly, the coin is still going down even though it is only the investors who hold the coins.
I think it's both bounty hunters and early investors are dumping their coins as soon as a token or coin got into an exchange. Some people just want quick cash as soon as possible or some are dumping because they know that a lot of people will dump too and reinvest in the lowest price. But I think investors play a huge part in the lose of price of a token more than bounty hunters.
Because bounty hunters are only small part of every ICO token holders, normally they get only around 3% of the pool, I believe price dump early stage investors. They have bought tokens in pre-sale phase with big discount and then sell it for profit until tokens get listed in the exchange.
I am with you in that. The blame is put on the bounty hunters for the fall of the price and looking at the statistics the bounty hunters only hold 5% of the project at times. I mean the 5% can't affect the 95%. Can it ? its the 95% that controls the price.
Its so sad when we have been made to believe its bounty hunters who dump their bounty tokens immediately after ICO and so devalue the coins on the market. Because of this notion, project managers these days try to delay bounty rewards while some even go ahead to give small rewards so that the actions of bounty hunters will not affect the price of their coins. Now I participated in this bounty and we were paid late as usual. We went to the market and realized the price was already down, even below the ICO price. So who caused it ? I think we should have a second look at this issue. Don't you think its the investors who get bonuses during the ICO who try to dump their bonuses for profit and not the bounty hunters as we have been made to believe?. Let me hear your opinions guys
I quite agree with you because we have seen cases where bounty rewards are withheld for sometimes after which investors would have received theirs and still there was still dumping of the coin which was off course caused by investors. Investment bonuses to investors are seen as free gift which can be disposed off as they want. But one thing I have observed is that the rate at which investors will dump coins cannot be as high as that of bounty hunters.
Both , the bounty hunters and the ICO investors with high bonuses can dump their coins when they enter the exchanges.
If the project has potential and big demand for the coins the price should not drop even on the declining market.
Smart investors and hunters will never dump their coins if it has rising potential.
If the project has potential and big demand for the coins the price should not drop even on the declining market.
Smart investors and hunters will never dump their coins if it has rising potential.
According to me except Translation , Signature of Sr. Member or higher rank , Bloggers all the social bounty hunters get very less coins for hard work. They surely dont want to dump those but a few sales early due to need. But I think the greater dumping comes from private sale investors when they receive huge ( more than 60% discounts) compared to ICO price.
I will say bounty hunters are the one's that dump coins why because some bounty hunters alway's like to sell off there coin why because they are afraid it might go low on price but i think that investors are the real holders. In cryptocurrency.
Sure, because no investor wants to lose money when investing in any ICO. Only bounty hunters will be dumping because they do not invest in those ICOs. They make bounty and receive it a free way and they will sell it all without interest to the project
I will say bounty hunters are the one's that dump coins why because some bounty hunters alway's like to sell off there coin why because they are afraid it might go low on price but i think that investors are the real holders. In cryptocurrency.
My opinion is investors, because they start selling their bought coins at ICO prices and sometimes lower, because they have bonuses from buying, it's very sad, but then they start blaming bounty hunters, it's clearly not normal.
Both of it can be affect because not gonna resist it, bounty hunter sell coins when they need money. And only a few that hold their coins to wait ICO price. But if me as investor, as long i get profit i usually sell my coins to join other project.
My opinion is investors, because they start selling their bought coins at ICO prices and sometimes lower, because they have bonuses from buying, it's very sad, but then they start blaming bounty hunters, it's clearly not normal.
Both of it can be affect because not gonna resist it, bounty hunter sell coins when they need money. And only a few that hold their coins to wait ICO price. But if me as investor, as long i get profit i usually sell my coins to join other project.
My opinion is investors, because they start selling their bought coins at ICO prices and sometimes lower, because they have bonuses from buying, it's very sad, but then they start blaming bounty hunters, it's clearly not normal.
Hunters receive 2-3% of the total number of tokens sold. Is this ridiculous figure can strongly affect the price reduction. Quite often we had to watch the price fall, and hunters have not received their awards yet. My opinion is this. This is done by early investors who close profitable positions. The exchange can also play an important role in the fall of the price. Do not forget that the exchanges take a fee for the listing in the project tokens.
In my opinion, the cause of dumping tokens is investors have already bought the coin. Indeed, bounty hunters get paid more slowly than the time of listing coins in exchange, but strangely why after the bounty hunter gets the tokens they have the coin prices on the market can go down even further. I can't guess for sure why this happened.
Yes, you are right, bounty hunters cannot be blamed with the drop in token prices when listing on the market. Bounty hunters only get 1-3% of their supply tokens. And that will not affect or even play a price in the market. And investors who get bonuses of up to 50% cause a drop in the price of the token. Most investors sell their bonuses first when new tokens are listed on the market.
Yes, it could very well be. Not only among the bounty hunters, there are people who immediately drop their tokens in order to make a profit. Among investors, too, there are such people. But there's probably less, I think. It is possible that you saw the price decline was not because investors were selling their coins, but because the project itself was not successful. After all, the fall in prices can be accompanied by different reasons.
Its so sad when we have been made to believe its bounty hunters who dump their bounty tokens immediately after ICO and so devalue the coins on the market. Because of this notion, project managers these days try to delay bounty rewards while some even go ahead to give small rewards so that the actions of bounty hunters will not affect the price of their coins. Now I participated in this bounty and we were paid late as usual. We went to the market and realized the price was already down, even below the ICO price. So who caused it ? I think we should have a second look at this issue. Don't you think its the investors who get bonuses during the ICO who try to dump their bonuses for profit and not the bounty hunters as we have been made to believe?. Let me hear your opinions guys
Yes, I believe so and you are right. It is the investors most of the time who are dumping the coins they invested because they are the first one who received the tokens plus the bonuses. Bounty hunters are not all the time dumping but when they dump, they dump almost simultaneously that's why they were blamed for the dumping.
Jump to: