Topic: Who dump coins early; Bounty hunters or ICO investors? - page 11. (Read 2756 times)
And those and others,as among investors there is too cunning did Bautista,I think what he was going to merge quickly the rate will fall others will begin to drain,and he bought very well,these are the thoughts and porazhdaet the panic and low prices on the market,because of these people! just now such a market is still that others are also beginning to think received tokens and urgently drain them until other prices are lowered,and it does not what will not work
who really dumps the token is difficult to answer. it is either investors who may want to buy cheap coins through the dump or the ico operators themselves dump a part of the unsold token. there are also bounty hunters who also dump their tokens right away. there are many ways to be responsible for a dump. so it is hard to say who really does it.
I think both if the ICO investor already got a good bonus out of buying tokens at the ICO. When there is a chance to make easy profit people usually take it so if they like the project they can buy cheaper later.
Its so sad when we have been made to believe its bounty hunters who dump their bounty tokens immediately after ICO and so devalue the coins on the market. Because of this notion, project managers these days try to delay bounty rewards while some even go ahead to give small rewards so that the actions of bounty hunters will not affect the price of their coins. Now I participated in this bounty and we were paid late as usual. We went to the market and realized the price was already down, even below the ICO price. So who caused it ? I think we should have a second look at this issue. Don't you think its the investors who get bonuses during the ICO who try to dump their bonuses for profit and not the bounty hunters as we have been made to believe?. Let me hear your opinions guys
it doesn't matter who the cause is, but indeed ico is not able to compete with other coins in the market, let alone the market is currently very unfavorable for us, well, just advice, after following the bounty, you can hold it until the price of ico is equal or close to the rate during the campaignMore or less, this is case to case basis...
Its so sad when we have been made to believe its bounty hunters who dump their bounty tokens immediately after ICO and so devalue the coins on the market. Because of this notion, project managers these days try to delay bounty rewards while some even go ahead to give small rewards so that the actions of bounty hunters will not affect the price of their coins. Now I participated in this bounty and we were paid late as usual. We went to the market and realized the price was already down, even below the ICO price. So who caused it ? I think we should have a second look at this issue. Don't you think its the investors who get bonuses during the ICO who try to dump their bonuses for profit and not the bounty hunters as we have been made to believe?. Let me hear your opinions guys
it doesn't matter who the cause is, but indeed ico is not able to compete with other coins in the market, let alone the market is currently very unfavorable for us, well, just advice, after following the bounty, you can hold it until the price of ico is equal or close to the rate during the campaign 
It does not bring anything to the ICO investors, when the price drops. They are only losing their funds. But if the bounty hunters are selling their coins below the ICO price, they aren't making loses, they just earning not so much at the end.
Doesn't matter - there are stupid ICO investors just like there are stupid bounty-hunters dumping their coins/tokens below the ICO-price.
Bounty hunters also don't benefit from a dropping price or do you think they enjoy wasting their time just to dump ICOs?
But as far as I remember, the bounty hunters has a low overall percentage when in comes of collective funds on ICO? So they will not affect too much, unless the investors start to dump the real product itself.
I believe that this is bounty hunters, because they are afraid of scamming or price dumping. Usually, dev`s tokens are locked
It does not bring anything to the ICO investors, when the price drops. They are only losing their funds. But if the bounty hunters are selling their coins below the ICO price, they aren't making loses, they just earning not so much at the end.
Its so sad when we have been made to believe its bounty hunters who dump their bounty tokens immediately after ICO and so devalue the coins on the market. Because of this notion, project managers these days try to delay bounty rewards while some even go ahead to give small rewards so that the actions of bounty hunters will not affect the price of their coins. Now I participated in this bounty and we were paid late as usual. We went to the market and realized the price was already down, even below the ICO price. So who caused it ? I think we should have a second look at this issue. Don't you think its the investors who get bonuses during the ICO who try to dump their bonuses for profit and not the bounty hunters as we have been made to believe?. Let me hear your opinions guys
Investors buy new tokens during the ICO with bonuses of 40-50 percent. They have the opportunity to prepare for their sale when tokens first hit the market, and sell them, having up to 200 percent of the profits. When the bounty hunters receive their tokens, then, by that time, the tokens, as a rule, have already dropped in price and it becomes meaningless to sell them. I have already seen this more than once. Therefore, the accusation of bounty hunters that it is they who lead to a decrease in the price of new tokens is unfair. In addition, bounty hunters have only a few percent of all tokens, some of which hold their new tokens in the hope that they will grow in value. 
First persons to sell and dump coins are those who receive them first it's quite simple.
Bounty hunters receive coins secondly and investors and early investors at first.
So the price dip is mostly connected with investors dumping as they also have much more coins than bountyhunters do.
Bounty hunters receive coins secondly and investors and early investors at first.
So the price dip is mostly connected with investors dumping as they also have much more coins than bountyhunters do.
We cannot clearly say who from these group of people is causing the dump, but one thing I'm sure of, those who want fast money, those are the ones who dump the tokens early. Sometimes, those who are from the team cause the dump. So it's a hasty generalization to speculate who, because there are bounty hunters who believe in the benefit of hodling; same with the investors' group. It's safe to say that those non-believers of the project are the certified dumpers, those who are just after quick profit and don't see the real value of the token in the future. But yeah, it's disheartening for us, hunters, that they are always putting the blame of devaluation on us.
Its so sad when we have been made to believe its bounty hunters who dump their bounty tokens immediately after ICO and so devalue the coins on the market. Because of this notion, project managers these days try to delay bounty rewards while some even go ahead to give small rewards so that the actions of bounty hunters will not affect the price of their coins. Now I participated in this bounty and we were paid late as usual. We went to the market and realized the price was already down, even below the ICO price. So who caused it ? I think we should have a second look at this issue. Don't you think its the investors who get bonuses during the ICO who try to dump their bonuses for profit and not the bounty hunters as we have been made to believe?. Let me hear your opinions guys
You have a point there. Bounty hunters normally don't have that much, even combined, to affect the market by selling their coins/tokens. Nevertheless, I doubt any project would pay bounty hunters earlier because they want to show their investors, of whom they care the most, that they are privileged in many ways, including the time when they can sell some of their coins/tokens.
Its so sad when we have been made to believe its bounty hunters who dump their bounty tokens immediately after ICO and so devalue the coins on the market. Because of this notion, project managers these days try to delay bounty rewards while some even go ahead to give small rewards so that the actions of bounty hunters will not affect the price of their coins. Now I participated in this bounty and we were paid late as usual. We went to the market and realized the price was already down, even below the ICO price. So who caused it ? I think we should have a second look at this issue. Don't you think its the investors who get bonuses during the ICO who try to dump their bonuses for profit and not the bounty hunters as we have been made to believe?. Let me hear your opinions guys
In this situation that the coins is already listed in the exchange with a better price and the bounty hunters are being paid one to two months after the ICO then by the time that we were going to trade in the exchange , most of the coins have almost zero value , so it's very clear that the investors are the one dumping first their coins .
I agree with you, some ICO provide very large purchase bonuses in private sale and pre sale
so when they are listed in exchange and they sell it under ICO prices in my opinion they are still profitable
but the fact is that some ICO think that those who dump are bounty hunters - so sad
Its so sad when we have been made to believe its bounty hunters who dump their bounty tokens immediately after ICO and so devalue the coins on the market. Because of this notion, project managers these days try to delay bounty rewards while some even go ahead to give small rewards so that the actions of bounty hunters will not affect the price of their coins. Now I participated in this bounty and we were paid late as usual. We went to the market and realized the price was already down, even below the ICO price. So who caused it ? I think we should have a second look at this issue. Don't you think its the investors who get bonuses during the ICO who try to dump their bonuses for profit and not the bounty hunters as we have been made to believe?. Let me hear your opinions guys
It is obvious that early price dump is caused by bounty hunters. Why do you think that ICO investors sell their tokens? If they sell their coins cheaper, they will loose a lot and thats not the strategy of ICO investors 
.
what bounty hunters and ico investors dump the coin when it is listed initially later the price bounce back when the new developments release
I think thats the problem of Bounty hunters. At the moment, if the ICO has reached its soft cap, they are going live on exchanges and there is simply no other investors who want to get the tokens at the ICO price. Bounty hunters are dumping, but anyways, nobody buys at the ICO price.
Yeah i agree with you opinion. The blame will get on bounty hunter but sometimes its true. But i dont understand why it can impact the price for a long time. The reward of bounty hunter less rather than investor with bonus. Smart bounty hunter will never sell his reward cheap.
Some bounty dump it because they want a real money, not the specific altcoins reward. They dump it to earn a fast tangible money, so the possible thing to prevent this issue is to pay them bitcoin or real local money. What do you think?
I think, its not the investors... those dumpers are bounty hunter and a sort of theft. The investors will not dump the coins specially if they buy it on a high price, they invest to earn not to dump and lose the fight in this market. For example, I don't waste my time to throw my money on ICO and other thing that is related in cryptocurrencies.
Its so sad when we have been made to believe its bounty hunters who dump their bounty tokens immediately after ICO and so devalue the coins on the market. Because of this notion, project managers these days try to delay bounty rewards while some even go ahead to give small rewards so that the actions of bounty hunters will not affect the price of their coins. Now I participated in this bounty and we were paid late as usual. We went to the market and realized the price was already down, even below the ICO price. So who caused it ? I think we should have a second look at this issue. Don't you think its the investors who get bonuses during the ICO who try to dump their bonuses for profit and not the bounty hunters as we have been made to believe?. Let me hear your opinions guys
In this situation that the coins is already listed in the exchange with a better price and the bounty hunters are being paid one to two months after the ICO then by the time that we were going to trade in the exchange , most of the coins have almost zero value , so it's very clear that the investors are the one dumping first their coins .
Jump to: