Topic: Why are bounty hunters guilty? - page 13. (Read 24934 times)
I also think that the organizers should support the course of their project. It is possible not to immediately give a reward for a bounty campaign, while investors do not have the opportunity to sell a coin.
Firstly, investors get their coins of bounty hunters. Secondly, investors get from 40 to 80% of the total pool of released tokens, and bounty hunters - 1-2% of the sold. Are the above points not a proof of the fact that bounty hunters can not affect the exchange rate of the coin?
Why are bounty hunters guilty?
Why do they say that bounty hunters have lowered the rate, and investors can not even return the money they invested? I think that if the project is honest, this situation is unacceptable, since hunters get a percentage from ICO, and the project team must redeem their token or coin!
Why do they say that bounty hunters have lowered the rate, and investors can not even return the money they invested? I think that if the project is honest, this situation is unacceptable, since hunters get a percentage from ICO, and the project team must redeem their token or coin!
it is true that bounty hunters mostly, not always, just sell the tokens immediately when they get for no matter what price. They claim they need the money desperately, but if they managed to hold for some time, they could getter good profit and help the project short term.
Bounty hunters are use to this,and they know what they are doing so wheres the guilt there?
Sad to say maybe they ate just a noob bounty hunters thats why they are crying about this issue when they can find good ico project to gain what they really need o earn
Guilty for those bounty hunters who had multiple accounts in a certain ICO signature bounty campaign which I think is greedy to earn much profit than the others. I also agree that after the ICO campaign, instead of investing in such ICO, most of the hunters will just have to claim the token reward and change to fiat money but you cannot blame them for that because earning profit is what bounty hunters do for a living.
i understand why called bounties hunters are guilty because bounties hunters usually will sell their tokens immediatelly after get paid and automatically the price of those token will fall because most of them are more likely to dumped the price and that's why some of ICO project only alocated 10% or less from total tokens supply for bounties program to ensure the price at the exchange more stable and not fall to the deep
Why are bounty hunters guilty?
Why do they say that bounty hunters have lowered the rate, and investors can not even return the money they invested? I think that if the project is honest, this situation is unacceptable, since hunters get a percentage from ICO, and the project team must redeem their token or coin!
Why do they say that bounty hunters have lowered the rate, and investors can not even return the money they invested? I think that if the project is honest, this situation is unacceptable, since hunters get a percentage from ICO, and the project team must redeem their token or coin!
it is true that bounty hunters mostly, not always, just sell the tokens immediately when they get for no matter what price. They claim they need the money desperately, but if they managed to hold for some time, they could getter good profit and help the project short term.
Bounty hunters are use to this,and they know what they are doing so wheres the guilt there?
Sad to say maybe they ate just a noob bounty hunters thats why they are crying about this issue when they can find good ico project to gain what they really need o earn
I don't agree with your point. It's part of the marketing efforts of ICO's, gaining exposure and attracting more potential investors. What's being said about bounty hunters selling off their gains once the token hits the exchanges can also be implied to normal ICO investors. It's not an issue with the bounty hunters, just different people have different objectives with their investments. In the end it's a part of the game.
If the project is successful the remaining investors will still see gains eventually. If you're not out to keep the coins for longer terms I suggest you to invest in projects with a working product.
Here's a good topic for finding suggestions of such projects: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/top-icos-with-a-working-product-new-update-on-0623-2451482
If the project is successful the remaining investors will still see gains eventually. If you're not out to keep the coins for longer terms I suggest you to invest in projects with a working product.
Here's a good topic for finding suggestions of such projects: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/top-icos-with-a-working-product-new-update-on-0623-2451482
Why are bounty hunters guilty?
Why do they say that bounty hunters have lowered the rate, and investors can not even return the money they invested? I think that if the project is honest, this situation is unacceptable, since hunters get a percentage from ICO, and the project team must redeem their token or coin!
We can't avoid this situation because bounty hunters upon receiving their bounty they will sell that right away though not all but most the them will do. Usually if you are an investor, you will hold your investor for years before selling it. Why do they say that bounty hunters have lowered the rate, and investors can not even return the money they invested? I think that if the project is honest, this situation is unacceptable, since hunters get a percentage from ICO, and the project team must redeem their token or coin!
Bounty hunters guilty?
I won't believe or accept that how can you tell me that the people creating awareness, exposing it to the public are guilty only a fake team that doesn't want to pay would say such
I won't believe or accept that how can you tell me that the people creating awareness, exposing it to the public are guilty only a fake team that doesn't want to pay would say such
Without any problem, the bounty thread can get better publicity for the project.
So this is obviously a win-win situation.
So this is obviously a win-win situation.
guilty? no, they only get the most prize of 8% of total supplay, and they work to promote the project here not bounty the guilty, but because of demand and supply market. so this win- win solution for cheap marketing 
Although some bounty hunters are guilty of selling their tokens are a lower price, I think it will not affect much on the projects token price since what goes to bounty hunters are only a small portion of the whole investment that a project got during the ICO. Bounty hunters only get 1-2% and approximately 98-99% are ICO investors.
Why are bounty hunters guilty?
Why do they say that bounty hunters have lowered the rate, and investors can not even return the money they invested? I think that if the project is honest, this situation is unacceptable, since hunters get a percentage from ICO, and the project team must redeem their token or coin!
Why do they say that bounty hunters have lowered the rate, and investors can not even return the money they invested? I think that if the project is honest, this situation is unacceptable, since hunters get a percentage from ICO, and the project team must redeem their token or coin!
it is true that bounty hunters mostly, not always, just sell the tokens immediately when they get for no matter what price. They claim they need the money desperately, but if they managed to hold for some time, they could getter good profit and help the project short term.
The problem is not with some fantastic "lowering the rates" but with that kind of bounty hunters that came on thatforum for bounty rewards only and has no knowledges about that sphere. And they start spamming here giving a wrong ridiculous advice to investors just to hit the bounty score. That is the real problem.
We arent guilty,because it is a strategy to get more profits,dumping shit tokens after getting listed to exchanges isnt a crime which is why you shouldnt be saying that,hunters deserves and has the right to do whatever they want to their rewards,they arent the cause of the problem,the token itself do you think hunters will dump quality tokens ?no.
Why are bounty hunters guilty?
Why do they say that bounty hunters have lowered the rate, and investors can not even return the money they invested? I think that if the project is honest, this situation is unacceptable, since hunters get a percentage from ICO, and the project team must redeem their token or coin!
Why do they say that bounty hunters have lowered the rate, and investors can not even return the money they invested? I think that if the project is honest, this situation is unacceptable, since hunters get a percentage from ICO, and the project team must redeem their token or coin!
it is true that bounty hunters mostly, not always, just sell the tokens immediately when they get for no matter what price. They claim they need the money desperately, but if they managed to hold for some time, they could getter good profit and help the project short term.
Last two days to participate in our last airdrop. All participants who have bought at least 100 ZIG (0.015 ETH) will get
additional 100 tokens on 24.02.2018 (Estonia 100) https://ecex.exchange/
additional 100 tokens on 24.02.2018 (Estonia 100) https://ecex.exchange/
I suppоrting this оpiniоn, bеcаusе sеriоus prоjеct will buy thеir tоkеns аftеr ICо еnd аnd stаbil thеir currеncy, аnd it dоnt dеpеnd frоm huntеrs оr invеstоrs.. аlsо sеriоus prоjеct оf cоursе аlwаys in dеmаnd
I think bounty hunters are not guilty, they're working for the projects , make the marketing becoming effective and gain the tokens from that projects.
Bounty hunters only are guilty if they're using many accounts and it violated the forum's rules. Noone in this forum supports for using many accounts at all.
Bounty hunters only are guilty if they're using many accounts and it violated the forum's rules. Noone in this forum supports for using many accounts at all.
I do not have same idea. Rules are very clear. Bounty hunter is not guilty but multi participation is guilty!
I have one question, why do you think that we are guilty? I do not consider myself guilty of anything, I do a good deed, I inform people about the information, for this matter I get a small reward, so I'm not guilty, the decision is made by the person himself, nobody here imposes anything on him
Jump to: