Topic: Why are bounty hunters guilty? - page 15. (Read 24934 times)
Some price drop always happens after the bounty coins has been accrued and when the coin is already being traded somewhere. Bountyhunters want to get immediate profit. Not all of them but the major part. But of course it's just a local "pit" on the price graph. And even if this tragically lowers the price at the moment, investors just should wait a bit if they truly believe in this project. Moreover, they can use this drop to buy more coins and treat it like a second chance to make a profitable investment
Bounty hunters, guilty of what? I don't know why people should ever think that way. Bounty hunters are the live wires of any ICO. For any ICO to succeed it needs promotional efforts and marketing. The problem is that many bounty managers would always device means to deprive bounty hunters their rewards at the end of the ICO. They will always look for one excuse or the other to withhold payment due bounty hunters. Without bounty hunters most ICOs won't succeed. Managers should have a rethink. Leave those craps about selling low,that is not the issue. Price is determine by market forces not by any individual except there is manipulation some where.
it could be that bounty hunters affect selling and marketing value if they are not committed and promised and give a negative image of the company and the project it follows, in other words it causes a negative image in the eyes of investors and other companies so that it will reduce the value of trust and the low purchasing power, but that is only a small possibility of the bounty hunters because they are clearly responsible and do not want to lose because the struggle is in vain.
What?
!
2 percent of the whole ICO?! Do you really think that it can shake the value of the coin?
That is why they are giving away that small amount for it not to affect the money invested by the investors. For the ROI to stay intact.
Look if they really sold a good amount or reached the hard cap then if there is anyone guilty, mostly it will be investors too. Buyers also.
Bounty hunters also buy tokens if they see a good service behind it.
If shit happens, then they will also be affected.
!2 percent of the whole ICO?! Do you really think that it can shake the value of the coin?
That is why they are giving away that small amount for it not to affect the money invested by the investors. For the ROI to stay intact.
Look if they really sold a good amount or reached the hard cap then if there is anyone guilty, mostly it will be investors too. Buyers also.
Bounty hunters also buy tokens if they see a good service behind it.
If shit happens, then they will also be affected.
Why are bounty hunters guilty?
Why do they say that bounty hunters have lowered the rate, and investors can not even return the money they invested? I think that if the project is honest, this situation is unacceptable, since hunters get a percentage from ICO, and the project team must redeem their token or coin!
Why do they say that bounty hunters have lowered the rate, and investors can not even return the money they invested? I think that if the project is honest, this situation is unacceptable, since hunters get a percentage from ICO, and the project team must redeem their token or coin!
Bounty hunters dump their tokens the soonest time possible and even on way cheaper price than the ICO. This makes the price low. But this should not be a concern since it is only temporary. If you invested on a good project, it should recover the price really quick. If it does not, then it is problem in the devs and the project not the bounty hunters.
Well i don't think that it's bounty hunters fault the blame is the investors/potential investors why? Because sometimes they don't see the potential of a coin so matter how hard the bounty hunters and advertising team do to advertise the companies' ICO on social media sites and biggest advertising sites they are still ignored that's why some ICO's didn't reach their quota and to compensate, the bounty rewards were reduced.
Why are bounty hunters guilty?
Why do they say that bounty hunters have lowered the rate, and investors can not even return the money they invested? I think that if the project is honest, this situation is unacceptable, since hunters get a percentage from ICO, and the project team must redeem their token or coin!
This is all because of the negligence of most teams.They just want to collect a lot of money. After the ICO, team forget their investors and their coin. Why do they say that bounty hunters have lowered the rate, and investors can not even return the money they invested? I think that if the project is honest, this situation is unacceptable, since hunters get a percentage from ICO, and the project team must redeem their token or coin!
Why are bounty hunters guilty?
Why do they say that bounty hunters have lowered the rate, and investors can not even return the money they invested? I think that if the project is honest, this situation is unacceptable, since hunters get a percentage from ICO, and the project team must redeem their token or coin!
Why do they say that bounty hunters have lowered the rate, and investors can not even return the money they invested? I think that if the project is honest, this situation is unacceptable, since hunters get a percentage from ICO, and the project team must redeem their token or coin!
The problem is most ICO creators don't know about rates so they can't spread reasonable amount of tokens for marketing purpose. If they get a professional help that would be win win for both part. Bounty users are not guilty here, ICO creators decide how much tokens will be given in bounty campaigns.
I think bountiers not guilty but some are just abusive that might making it low quality posts or advertising. However we are just following instructions from project and if ever we don't follow correctly we won't receive any stakes or rewards. it's up to the project team and campaign manager how to descipline the participants but if to sum it up, both project and the bouny hunter benefit if the campaign become successful!
Bounty hunters help promote a project and can increase the success rate of their presale and ICO's.
They get paid for that in exchange. Nothing wrong with that.
The issue here probably is that bounty hunters dump their bounties the moment they have the chance to sell.
They get paid for that in exchange. Nothing wrong with that.
The issue here probably is that bounty hunters dump their bounties the moment they have the chance to sell.
I supporting this opinion, because serious project will buy their tokens after ICO end and stabil their currency, and it dont depend from hunters or investors.. also serious project of course always in demand
Why they have to buy back their tokens? Where they have to find enough money for this strange deal?
I think this is right to some extent, not totally right. Some bounty hunters, not all believe in dumping their coin from bounty reward immediately they are given which will definitely have an effect on the price of the coin.
Why are bounty hunters guilty?
Why do they say that bounty hunters have lowered the rate, and investors can not even return the money they invested? I think that if the project is honest, this situation is unacceptable, since hunters get a percentage from ICO, and the project team must redeem their token or coin!
Not all the bounty hunters are dumb,but i couldnt disagree most of the bountry hunters are dumping their tokens as soon as these tokens were distributed and put into some exchanges,these people doesnt value the coin because if they trust the project they will hold it until the developer has fully developed the coin.Why do they say that bounty hunters have lowered the rate, and investors can not even return the money they invested? I think that if the project is honest, this situation is unacceptable, since hunters get a percentage from ICO, and the project team must redeem their token or coin!
I supporting this opinion, because serious project will buy their tokens after ICO end and stabil their currency, and it dont depend from hunters or investors.. also serious project of course always in demand
ICO's team can change rules, don't approve your account and cut the pool.
I think bounty hunters are not to blame, because they are walking on track, there is absolutely no effect or ability to lower interest rates especially that causes token distribution or coins to be inhibited, I think the change is due to a system change that can not be as easy as dominated by bounty hunters, they just wait and hope according to the promised part in gift giving, I think bounty hunters is a part that can help in the success of a marketing and sales project. different from the investors.n the bounty hunters willingly wait patiently for the distribution of tokens and coins from the company even they are many who until not get paid because the target is not a goal.
Why are bounty hunters guilty?
Why do they say that bounty hunters have lowered the rate, and investors can not even return the money they invested? I think that if the project is honest, this situation is unacceptable, since hunters get a percentage from ICO, and the project team must redeem their token or coin!
Not all the bounty hunters are dumb,but i couldnt disagree most of the bountry hunters are dumping their tokens as soon as these tokens were distributed and put into some exchanges,these people doesnt value the coin because if they trust the project they will hold it until the developer has fully developed the coin. Why do they say that bounty hunters have lowered the rate, and investors can not even return the money they invested? I think that if the project is honest, this situation is unacceptable, since hunters get a percentage from ICO, and the project team must redeem their token or coin!
Why are bounty hunters guilty?
Why do they say that bounty hunters have lowered the rate, and investors can not even return the money they invested? I think that if the project is honest, this situation is unacceptable, since hunters get a percentage from ICO, and the project team must redeem their token or coin!
Why do they say that bounty hunters have lowered the rate, and investors can not even return the money they invested? I think that if the project is honest, this situation is unacceptable, since hunters get a percentage from ICO, and the project team must redeem their token or coin!
please explain in more detail what you mean, you do not give any source to the assumption you are saying. so I can not judge or respond to what's going on, say your version
How can 1-2% of total tokens sold (not emitted) possibly influence the remaining 98-99%? What a nonsense!
Why are bounty hunters guilty?
Why do they say that bounty hunters have lowered the rate, and investors can not even return the money they invested? I think that if the project is honest, this situation is unacceptable, since hunters get a percentage from ICO, and the project team must redeem their token or coin!
LOL,its not the fault of these bounty hunters,its with investors because if they really trust the project they will wait until the value of the coin has reached decent amount,why would they invest and then dump it as soon as they get the tokens?for me bounty hunting needs a lot of waiting because it will take time for these developers to finish their job. Why do they say that bounty hunters have lowered the rate, and investors can not even return the money they invested? I think that if the project is honest, this situation is unacceptable, since hunters get a percentage from ICO, and the project team must redeem their token or coin!
Jump to: