Topic: Why do Christians hate Atheists? - page 8. (Read 7362 times)

Wtf are you even talking about?

That's totally wrong! DNA is deeply shared between species! We even have 45% of DNA of common with a banana ><

Problem is that they cannot reconcile evolution with Bible because according to it, God created man in his own image.

Well, if we share common ancestor with chimpanzees than that ancestor must have been God.  And he is the one who created universe.
Straight out of Africa :-) Even that will not make sense, because they say God created, not descended.  But then again what can you expect
from a bronze age God.

Those Christians who accept evolution are not really Christians, more like Pantheists, they are on the road to Atheism.

I was brought up in Roman Catholic religion, never payed attention to religion dogma, just went along for the sake of family and friends.
I suspect most religious people follow religion for similar reasons.  

What really opened my eyes was not the Bible but Quran.  Because of the problems in Middle East, I started reading Quran just out of curiosity.
What a bunch of poetic nonsense? Then I turned to Bible.  It was worse, especially the Old Testament.

How can religious people follow this nonsense?  Fear.  Fear of being rejected by their family and friends.  In case of Islam, fear of being killed.  For those super
delusional, fear of going to hell, fear of not going to heaven etc.  

Emotional center of their brain is shutting down the logical part.  It is a survival instinct.  We avoid what we perceive to be a dangerous situation.  That mechanism helped us be who we are today:  Home Sapiens. The great African Ape that rules the world.

The things of science that talk about evolution are scientific theory. Cause and effect is basic scientific law. Scientific law trumps scientific theory. Cause and effect show that evolution is simply pre-programmed changes... pre-programmed to happen, by God, Who has been proven by science to exist.

Again, the proof is found in combining these 3 scientific laws:
1. Cause and effect;
2. Complex universe;
3. Universal entropy.

I have explained these in reasonable detail in this and other threads. If you would like to peruse my posts, go here - https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/badecker-149737.

Well, this isn't entirely correct. First of all, all life on earth has about 97% of the same DNA just to be alive. Perhaps we have 3-6% of the remainder that we match Neanderthals in. But probably it is only 3-6% of the remainder that we are different in. In other words, we are virtually very like neanderthals.

Some people suggest that neanderthals are simply very aged humans. Since our understanding of the age of the earth is really only theoretical, we don't really know when neanderthals walked the earth. Since evolution flow is entirely theoretical, there is really no clarity that we had a common ancestry with either neanderthals or chimpanzees. More than likely neanderthals were a form of early human before some of the genetics died out of people.

See http://www.jackcuozzo.com/.

We carry between 3-6% of Neanderthal DNA.  Case closed.

If you really interested in learning about human history,  I strongly recommend this book:

http://www.amazon.com/Sapiens-Humankind-Yuval-Noah-Harari/dp/0062316095/ref=asap_bc?ie=UTF8

BADecker already stated:
- chaos does not exist, chaos theory does exist, but chaos does not
- God does not need a cause, everything thing else in this and other universes need a cause
- theory of gravity is a law, but other scientific theories are just hypothesis
- more complex life forms cannot evolve from simpler ones because entropy in the universe does not decrease
- evolution is just a theory not a fact, despite of an overwhelming physical evidence
- big bang did not happen, instead God created universe in 6 days
- he is not sure if we are mammals, I guess he did not suck on his mother breasts
- he is sure we did not evolve from a common ancestor as chimpanzees, despite the fact we share 98% of DNA

these are just at the top of my head.  I'm sure there are more.  The more he posts the more nonsense he spouts.

And his proof that God exists is that the world is just too complex for it to happen by chance.

"We are considered mammalian by many."

"Nobody has scientific proof that we have common ancestry with chimpanzees."

Have you payed any attention at your biology class? did you even bother to go to school? No one can be this dense, this stupid and blind. Maybe if you're in some cult and brainwashed, but if that's not the case.... then boy, you have some problems.

AHAAHHAHAHHAAH I just love this guy's posts. He's eathera master troll or a complete idiot, anyways I just love his posts that are that stupid, they are actually funny. Also, whenever someone puts " " a tthe end of the stupid argument, I'd burn them on the city square.

"Since God has been scientifically proven to exist, atheism is the fairytale."

"God has been scientifically proven to exist"

"has been scientifically proven"

"scientifically proven" 

lol wat? where's the proof?

When you look at the fossil record, there are even more, that are extinct today. Yet none of them is a crossover. Each of them are distinct in their DNA, with no DNA showing both of them. In fact, when you try adding DNA from one group to another, the added DNA is gradually "weeded out" of their system in their descendents. This is another great evidence for the fact that God made all the various kinds of plants and animals to be their own distinct species.

Virtually all life is in the range of 97% or less.

Just because cars have wheels, and most cars have 4 wheels, and even motorcycles and bicycles have 2 wheels, doesn't mean that they all evolved from the same inorganic round rock.

I think you screw up the quotes.  Reversed the order

The worst part is probably after the end of Eden when they all fuck with each other in an infamous incest story cause you know Eve is the only woman and she gives birth to boys only sooooooooo...

LOL!

Ok how do you interprete the fact that we got all those similarities with Chimpanze?

You should be nominated for a Nobel Prize then 

The evidence can be interpreted in other ways. Because of this, it is not really evidence.

That is why you should not even try to understand science.  

Do you even know how science knowledge is being developed?

You proved you are ignorant of your own Bible, you ignore scientific facts, you misunderstand scientific terminology.  

And on top of that, you see God everywhere.  

 

Yeah, it was rhetorical. But I'm sure our religious friends will ignore the link whatsoever. Because it might just prove them wrong.

You can start here
http://infidels.org/library/modern/jim_meritt/bible-contradictions.html

Really?  Who proved it?