Topic: Why do islam hates people? - page 107. (Read 437405 times)

Your last post you just said you didn't even read the through the page of stuff against the theory of evolution. If you don't even read the things you post as evidence to back your wrong opinions, your assertion that you have looked into evolution but find it doesn't have enough evidence to support it has no weight. Luckily, there are people much more thorough in their examination of the evidence (called scientists), so you not believing in evolution is pretty worthless to objective truth.

I do understand. "A scientific theory is a well-substantiated explanation of some aspect of the natural world that is acquired through the scientific method and repeatedly tested and confirmed through observation and experimentation."

No, I don't deny gravity. There is more than enough proof to believe gravity unlike Darwinism. I have looked more about Darwinism but I couldn't find valid evidences to believe it.

Just like the Christian science deniers, you don't understand what a scientific theory is. Theory does not mean "hypothesis." A scientific theory is a well-substantiated explanation of something in the natural world that is repeatedly tested and confirmed. Saying the theory of evolution is not a fact is just as ridiculous as saying the theory of gravity is not a fact. Unless you deny gravity too?

Typical 'fair and balanced' non sense

You have nothing to disprove a single point made in my post, and can only resort to pathetically hollow arguments such as 'straw man' LOL

Is this what passes for education these days? When I got my ph.D at least folks tried to think outside themselves haha

Blah blah blah.

And now to show the other side of the story,

Three Muslim leaders stand up against Imams inciting a massacre of Christians and prevent it.

http://www.christianpost.com/news/christian-massacre-prevented-in-pakistan-after-muslim-leaders-stand-up-to-islamic-imams-inciting-mass-attack-22-muslims-arrested-140223/

Gotta love you talking about 'straw man' and 'hate' when you don't even know what that means

World isn't quite as clever as you think maybe, but feel free to call spades hearts and diamonds clovers if that helps you from asking the necessary questions.

Personally I don't see farciful Straw Puppets of Hate being useful instruments of persuasion or of explanation, whether they be Anti-Muslim SPH or Anti-Jew SPH.

And why do the Straw Puppets always seem to emerge with a post count of 14?

Inquiring minds would like to know...

It's a fact that enslavement, exploitation, deep seated sense of racist attitude is prevalent among arabs and muslims in general. The religious support for all these makes the supposed 'christian oppression' look like half baked amateur play. They don't even recognize their faults - it's simply accepted as truth and fact unlike the west that has fully proven capable of change and improvement all on its own.

Such foundations seep into unweary populations in other countries like a plague. Many of the conflicts in africa for example, can be traced to arabized africans vs. real africans.

The key to understanding muslims and arabs in general is that slaver/slave dealer mindset and desperate sense of inferiority complex mixed with racist attitude IS the foundation of their identity. They were the first slavers of black africans; It is they who killed and kidnapped blacks en mass from ancient times, kidnapping and raping 'nubile black african women' especially, and even continued to do so openly until late 19th century and still do so today under the guise of domestic workers/foreign labor/essentially indentured servitude dictated strictly by racial reasons.

They must be exterminated down to the last seed, last woman and child, and their wives should be raped, violated and their children thrown into the pit, their screams being fitting retribution for the multiple millenia of crimes against humanity that arabs and mulsims have perpetrated. Their current 'oppression's is a lie - akin to a thief and rapist complaining the jailhouse doesn't have a 50 inch plasma TV, or complaining that their victims are not allowing themselves to be targeted. All the more reason to fk them to pieces.

Make no mistake - you must fight against rapists, thieves, murders, and slavers. Arabs and muslims are exactly that, and have been for several millenia, with lies of so called culture (that they stole from greeks, jews, indians, romans, europeans, asians, etc etc). There is no compromise to be had against racists or rapists and murders. This is a war of race, religion, and hatred being waged by muslims through lies, sniveling smiles, violence, and outright disrespect towards all others world wide.

There isn't a single border that is bloodless where significant muslim population meets a significant civilization. From the islands of philippines, western china, to borders of pakistan, chechnya, southern russia, balkans, middle east (where christians and jews and non muslims such as yazdhis have all but been exterminated), north africa, etc etc, it is a fact that muslims are rats and pigs who need to be raped to pieces to learn their place. The so called 'peace' instilled in majority muslim nations such as indonesia is only a disguise where minority non-muslims are more or less treated as subordinate to muslims at best - all pretty faces until some small matter inspires these muslims to oppress their 'brothers'.

Lies upon lies upon lies.   


The only real hate crimes are muslim crimes. As a minority, it's obvious when a minority is bullshitting and trying to manipulate people. Muslims world wide are doing exactly that, from the lowest gas station employee to the presidents of arab muslim nations. Lies are not only accepted - they are not thought of lies at all. They attempt to manipulate the guilt based social fabric of the west, the duty bound face saving culture of the east, and foolishly believe they are fooling anyone.


There is no such thing as 'islamophobia'. Phobia implies an irrational reaction against something that needs no such reaction. There is nothing irrational about hating and wanting to exterminate rapists, murderes, and  disrespectful whores who can't keep their mouths shut or open them without lying twice with one word.

It's high time arabs and muslims are fk'd to pieces for who they are. Despite the laughable lies and supine ignorance of the mainstream media, many people around the world from US to Europe to China and Russia, are quietly coming to form their own conclusion about these liars and cowards.

I guarantee that the day of reckoning is only a matter of time. No more justifiable war will be fought within our life time, and no greater duty will there be for all civilized and decent people than to put these muslims and arabs in their place.

I have listened to this nutcase Naik and agree, he is as radical as necessary to classify him as one of the Bad Guys.  There is no way to claim "out of context" with Naik, his context IS RADICAL.

http://www.haveeru.com.mv/news/30405

According to Zakir Naik, "In Islam, death penalty should not necessarily be evoked on every person who leaves Islam, but to those who propagate the non-Islamic faith and speak against Islam". Seems like I was slightly wrong. According to Zakir Naik, apostasy is "not necessarily" punishable by death, but criticism of Islam is.

Wrong. That was taken out of context from Zakir Naik's speech.


True and TBH, I don't believe it too because it is just not true. http://x-evolutionist.com/charles-darwin-described-the-problems-with-his-theory-in-his-book-origin-of-species't/ - I haven't read whole page though. Remember, this page is not the reason why I disagree with that *theory* of evolution. AFAIK Darwin's himself said it lacks evidences to support theory. Besides, this is just a theory not a fact.


He does said something about it. See https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-aVhAMFefx0


True but I can't comment on latter because I haven't researched more about it.


Sorry, I have found criticisms but not a video in which he says this. It would be helpful if someone can point me to it. Thank you!


Sorry, I have found criticisms but not a video in which he says this. It would be helpful if someone can point me to it. Thank you!


I don't know about Kafeel Ahmed and Rahil Sheikh but Najibullah Zazi's some of the terrorist act was may have been* inspired by Zakir Naik's word(which is in the YouTube video I posted above) but it was actually meant to be a different meaning, instead, people started quoting that one line which is out of context.

NB: I don't follow Zakir Naik but I do watch some of his videos to know what he is saying and he is certainly not my man. So I am in no way making biased statements here.

Edit: * I changed "was" to "may have been" because I haven't got enough proof and media mostly twist things. I am not telling it wasn't inspired rather I need more proof. By the way, if you have any proof because of which you believed, that maybe enough. Please give me link to it, if possible. Thank you!

I don't want to watch lengthy videos of this lunatic. Just tell me whether these facts are wrong or not:

1. Zakir Naik favors death sentence for apostates from Islam.
2. Zakir Naik does not believe in evolution.
3. Zakir Naik supports Osama bin Laden.
4. Zakir Naik demanded Shariah law in India, despite Muslims comprising only 15% of the population there.
5. Zakir Naik supports a ban on the construction of non-Muslim places of worship in Muslim lands.
6. Zakir Naik supported the destruction of the Bamiyan Buddhas.
7. Zakir Naik's disciples (such as Kafeel Ahmed, Najibullah Zazi, and Rahil Sheikh) have indulged in terrorist acts across the world, which resulted in the deaths of many innocent people.

If you are referring to guys like me, then I can surely tell that I don't own or follow what groups like ISIS doing, their new religion.


Are you telling all Jews hate people? I don't agree with this.

Yup thats what i mean,he said in the video, claiming then-president George W Bush was behind the attacks and you would understand that you have been played by the media

your claims have been proven bias. if you look up to the video that where he said that, you would understand you have been played by the media for cherrypicking incomplete quotes.

come on you know how the media works.

do some research and find the complete video on youtube then we can talk again.

You lost all your credibility, when you quoted that religious fanatic, Zakir Naik. This is the same guy who has said that those who leave Islam and then propagate the non-Islamic faith and speak against Islam should be put to death in an Islamic rule. And this same guy suported Osama bin Laden, claiming that Laden is fighting the enemies of Islam.

islam doesnt hates people! you should ask to jewish why they hates people? (muslim,christian,budhism,hiduism even atheis) jewsh assumed that people except their religion is not human.

iam not perfect,we are not perfect
but islam is perfect
so please dont judge islam buy the cover, you should learn about alquran and hadits to find  is that true what is islam hates people without one reason? ,dont judge islam by what they did.

in islam "your religion is yours, my religion is mine" we would not tolerant in religion activity but only for life activity like what we did in this forum.

if you have a question about both of your religion and islam and the history of islamophobia or something else ,please visit dr.zakir naik official channel (he is an expert,he has memorize alquran,hadits even your bible and hinduism to)

https://www.youtube.com/user/Drzakirchannel

The problem is that this can't go one for too long. The crude oil prices are going down, as a result of increased production in countries such as the United States, Russia and Iraq. And at the same time, the (native) population of Saudi Arabia is increasing at an astonishing rate of 3% per year. The per capita oil revenues are going to decline considerably in the next 10 or 20 years. After that, the Saudis can go back to their cave man style of living.

What will they do with such an army?  Well, they are not transporting it across the oceans to do combat, so I would imagine if they were expansionist, those close by would be the targets.

And what will warfare look like in 20 years?  It might be their huge mass of foot soldiers against a swarm of robots - a hopeless endeavor. 

Why compare Christian Terrorism to Islamic terrorism? Why can't we compare it to Buddhist terrorism and Hindu terrorism? The Hindus and Buddhists don't go to the Amazon jungle, and hunt down native tribal people with machine guns in order to convert them to those religions (just like the Christian terrorist organization New Tribes Mission did to various tribes such as the Ayoreo and Ache).

http://www.christianaggression.org/tactics_violence.php