Here, I have 100 skittles, take a handful. 1% are poisoned though and will push you off a roof if you're gay.
BUT NOT ALL SKITTLES BAD! MOST GOOD PEACEFUL SKITTLE!
Topic: Why do people hate islam? - page 34. (Read 221077 times)
BUT NOT ALL SKITTLES BAD! MOST GOOD PEACEFUL SKITTLE!
Well In My opinion there are several reasons why some people hate Islam. One of the reason why some hate Muslim is that because the media is brainwashing everyone to think that Islam is trying to oppress women. Another reason that some people hate Islam because some people believe that islam = terrorist and the latter is what I think the most common reason why some people hate Islam.
Isn't that the reality? Islam do really oppress women and dictating what women should wore. It's not media being biased because that's the real thing that's happening. 
Personally, I do not hate specifically Islam.
I'm more of an atheist, so I am not fond of religion in general and especially religion that tries to make its way - forcefully - into daily lives.
You can attribute that to my misanthropic traits, but I also do not like very much apes barking in religious zealotry.
Rico
I'm more of an atheist, so I am not fond of religion in general and especially religion that tries to make its way - forcefully - into daily lives.
You can attribute that to my misanthropic traits, but I also do not like very much apes barking in religious zealotry.
Rico
In My opinion there are several reasons why some people hate Islam. One of the reason why some hate Muslim is that because the media is brainwashing everyone to think that Islam is trying to oppress women. Another reason that some people hate Islam because some people believe that islam = terrorist and the latter is what I think the most common reason why some people hate Islam.
i don't hate it. i hate what people do in its name and i'm sure the truly religious feel the same way. for some people it's a shield for their own depravity. and as i'm sure has been stated elsewhere on here muslims suffer the most violence from other muslim sects.
yes that is for sure. i think every one should keep such mentality about any religion. i think there will be a few number of people who think wrongly about islam. but the fact is that islam is a peaceful religion.www.THERELIGIONOFPEACE.com
You don't suppose maybe it's "religion of pieces" instead of "religion of peace"
Like body pieces flying everywhere?
i don't hate it. i hate what people do in its name and i'm sure the truly religious feel the same way. for some people it's a shield for their own depravity. and as i'm sure has been stated elsewhere on here muslims suffer the most violence from other muslim sects.
yes that is for sure. i think every one should keep such mentality about any religion. i think there will be a few number of people who think wrongly about islam. but the fact is that islam is a peaceful religion.than you..
PEACEFUL RELIGION
..Bullshit 
Now give up your shitty religion and become a good human being
If i was in power in the uk i would ban Islam.. And if you don't like it pack your bags and BUZZ OFF..
And if you kicked off your whole family would get booted out and all your money taken off you
for compensation for the troubles you caused..
i don't hate it. i hate what people do in its name and i'm sure the truly religious feel the same way. for some people it's a shield for their own depravity. and as i'm sure has been stated elsewhere on here muslims suffer the most violence from other muslim sects.
yes that is for sure. i think every one should keep such mentality about any religion. i think there will be a few number of people who think wrongly about islam. but the fact is that islam is a peaceful religion. 
A Muslim man's split-second decision
saved hundreds of lives in his home country.
Read more at http://www.trueactivist.com/muslim-man-hugs-isis-suicide-bomber-saves-hundreds-of-lives-in-iraq.
Could of been one of his friends and he had not seen him in a while..saved hundreds of lives in his home country.
Quote from: http://www.trueactivist.com/muslim-man-hugs-isis-suicide-bomber-saves-hundreds-of-lives-in-iraq
A Muslim man's split-second decision saved hundreds of lives in his home country.
Credit: Twitter
Fear-mongering in the U.S. has culled a large percentage of citizens into believing that ISIS is synonymous with all Muslim believers. Nothing could be further from the truth, and a man's recent actions are a testament to that.
IndiaTimes reports that when a suicide bomber from the Islamic State of Iraq and Al-Sham (ISIS) attempted to blow up the Sayyed Mohammad Shrine in Balad, Iraq, a man named Najih Shaker Al-Baldwai did something most people couldn't. He ran up to the suicide bomber and hugged him to physically dampen the explosion.
Al-Baldwai's split-second decision saved hundreds of lives, according to a Joint Operations spokesman in Iraq. 70 injuries resulted from the explosion and 37 were killed. However, because of the man's heroic actions, the death toll was much less than what it could have been.
Reportedly, Daesh aimed for the Shrine's explosion to match the death count of the recent Karrada attack in Iraq which claimed 300 lives. To date, that is the deadliest single attack in Iraq since the war began to oust Saddam Hussein 13 years ago.
ISIS bombers disguised themselves as the local militia in an attempt to storm and destroy what is considered to be one of the country's most important Shia shrines. The last time such a monument was destroyed, a civil war was sparked.
Al-Baldwai had but a second to decide to put his life on the line, and because he did, many more people are still alive today. The honorable man's activism is also helping to deconstruct Islamophobia in the U.S. and elsewhere.
Shortly after the story broke, it went viral on countless media outlets around the world. The U.K.'s Metro and a post about his sacrifice even became the most popular submission on Reddit.
Credit: Twitter
Fear-mongering in the U.S. has culled a large percentage of citizens into believing that ISIS is synonymous with all Muslim believers. Nothing could be further from the truth, and a man's recent actions are a testament to that.
IndiaTimes reports that when a suicide bomber from the Islamic State of Iraq and Al-Sham (ISIS) attempted to blow up the Sayyed Mohammad Shrine in Balad, Iraq, a man named Najih Shaker Al-Baldwai did something most people couldn't. He ran up to the suicide bomber and hugged him to physically dampen the explosion.
Al-Baldwai's split-second decision saved hundreds of lives, according to a Joint Operations spokesman in Iraq. 70 injuries resulted from the explosion and 37 were killed. However, because of the man's heroic actions, the death toll was much less than what it could have been.
Reportedly, Daesh aimed for the Shrine's explosion to match the death count of the recent Karrada attack in Iraq which claimed 300 lives. To date, that is the deadliest single attack in Iraq since the war began to oust Saddam Hussein 13 years ago.
ISIS bombers disguised themselves as the local militia in an attempt to storm and destroy what is considered to be one of the country's most important Shia shrines. The last time such a monument was destroyed, a civil war was sparked.
Al-Baldwai had but a second to decide to put his life on the line, and because he did, many more people are still alive today. The honorable man's activism is also helping to deconstruct Islamophobia in the U.S. and elsewhere.
Shortly after the story broke, it went viral on countless media outlets around the world. The U.K.'s Metro and a post about his sacrifice even became the most popular submission on Reddit.
Read more at http://www.trueactivist.com/muslim-man-hugs-isis-suicide-bomber-saves-hundreds-of-lives-in-iraq.
All right abu babu next thing BANG
A Muslim man's split-second decision
saved hundreds of lives in his home country.
Read more at http://www.trueactivist.com/muslim-man-hugs-isis-suicide-bomber-saves-hundreds-of-lives-in-iraq.
Could of been one of his friends and he had not seen him in a while..saved hundreds of lives in his home country.
Quote from: http://www.trueactivist.com/muslim-man-hugs-isis-suicide-bomber-saves-hundreds-of-lives-in-iraq
A Muslim man's split-second decision saved hundreds of lives in his home country.
Credit: Twitter
Fear-mongering in the U.S. has culled a large percentage of citizens into believing that ISIS is synonymous with all Muslim believers. Nothing could be further from the truth, and a man's recent actions are a testament to that.
IndiaTimes reports that when a suicide bomber from the Islamic State of Iraq and Al-Sham (ISIS) attempted to blow up the Sayyed Mohammad Shrine in Balad, Iraq, a man named Najih Shaker Al-Baldwai did something most people couldn't. He ran up to the suicide bomber and hugged him to physically dampen the explosion.
Al-Baldwai's split-second decision saved hundreds of lives, according to a Joint Operations spokesman in Iraq. 70 injuries resulted from the explosion and 37 were killed. However, because of the man's heroic actions, the death toll was much less than what it could have been.
Reportedly, Daesh aimed for the Shrine's explosion to match the death count of the recent Karrada attack in Iraq which claimed 300 lives. To date, that is the deadliest single attack in Iraq since the war began to oust Saddam Hussein 13 years ago.
ISIS bombers disguised themselves as the local militia in an attempt to storm and destroy what is considered to be one of the country's most important Shia shrines. The last time such a monument was destroyed, a civil war was sparked.
Al-Baldwai had but a second to decide to put his life on the line, and because he did, many more people are still alive today. The honorable man's activism is also helping to deconstruct Islamophobia in the U.S. and elsewhere.
Shortly after the story broke, it went viral on countless media outlets around the world. The U.K.'s Metro and a post about his sacrifice even became the most popular submission on Reddit.
Credit: Twitter
Fear-mongering in the U.S. has culled a large percentage of citizens into believing that ISIS is synonymous with all Muslim believers. Nothing could be further from the truth, and a man's recent actions are a testament to that.
IndiaTimes reports that when a suicide bomber from the Islamic State of Iraq and Al-Sham (ISIS) attempted to blow up the Sayyed Mohammad Shrine in Balad, Iraq, a man named Najih Shaker Al-Baldwai did something most people couldn't. He ran up to the suicide bomber and hugged him to physically dampen the explosion.
Al-Baldwai's split-second decision saved hundreds of lives, according to a Joint Operations spokesman in Iraq. 70 injuries resulted from the explosion and 37 were killed. However, because of the man's heroic actions, the death toll was much less than what it could have been.
Reportedly, Daesh aimed for the Shrine's explosion to match the death count of the recent Karrada attack in Iraq which claimed 300 lives. To date, that is the deadliest single attack in Iraq since the war began to oust Saddam Hussein 13 years ago.
ISIS bombers disguised themselves as the local militia in an attempt to storm and destroy what is considered to be one of the country's most important Shia shrines. The last time such a monument was destroyed, a civil war was sparked.
Al-Baldwai had but a second to decide to put his life on the line, and because he did, many more people are still alive today. The honorable man's activism is also helping to deconstruct Islamophobia in the U.S. and elsewhere.
Shortly after the story broke, it went viral on countless media outlets around the world. The U.K.'s Metro and a post about his sacrifice even became the most popular submission on Reddit.
Read more at http://www.trueactivist.com/muslim-man-hugs-isis-suicide-bomber-saves-hundreds-of-lives-in-iraq.
All right abu babu next thing BANG
A Muslim man's split-second decision
saved hundreds of lives in his home country.
Read more at http://www.trueactivist.com/muslim-man-hugs-isis-suicide-bomber-saves-hundreds-of-lives-in-iraq.
saved hundreds of lives in his home country.
Quote from: http://www.trueactivist.com/muslim-man-hugs-isis-suicide-bomber-saves-hundreds-of-lives-in-iraq
A Muslim man's split-second decision saved hundreds of lives in his home country.
Credit: Twitter
Fear-mongering in the U.S. has culled a large percentage of citizens into believing that ISIS is synonymous with all Muslim believers. Nothing could be further from the truth, and a man's recent actions are a testament to that.
IndiaTimes reports that when a suicide bomber from the Islamic State of Iraq and Al-Sham (ISIS) attempted to blow up the Sayyed Mohammad Shrine in Balad, Iraq, a man named Najih Shaker Al-Baldwai did something most people couldn't. He ran up to the suicide bomber and hugged him to physically dampen the explosion.
Al-Baldwai's split-second decision saved hundreds of lives, according to a Joint Operations spokesman in Iraq. 70 injuries resulted from the explosion and 37 were killed. However, because of the man's heroic actions, the death toll was much less than what it could have been.
Reportedly, Daesh aimed for the Shrine's explosion to match the death count of the recent Karrada attack in Iraq which claimed 300 lives. To date, that is the deadliest single attack in Iraq since the war began to oust Saddam Hussein 13 years ago.
ISIS bombers disguised themselves as the local militia in an attempt to storm and destroy what is considered to be one of the country's most important Shia shrines. The last time such a monument was destroyed, a civil war was sparked.
Al-Baldwai had but a second to decide to put his life on the line, and because he did, many more people are still alive today. The honorable man's activism is also helping to deconstruct Islamophobia in the U.S. and elsewhere.
Shortly after the story broke, it went viral on countless media outlets around the world. The U.K.'s Metro and a post about his sacrifice even became the most popular submission on Reddit.
Credit: Twitter
Fear-mongering in the U.S. has culled a large percentage of citizens into believing that ISIS is synonymous with all Muslim believers. Nothing could be further from the truth, and a man's recent actions are a testament to that.
IndiaTimes reports that when a suicide bomber from the Islamic State of Iraq and Al-Sham (ISIS) attempted to blow up the Sayyed Mohammad Shrine in Balad, Iraq, a man named Najih Shaker Al-Baldwai did something most people couldn't. He ran up to the suicide bomber and hugged him to physically dampen the explosion.
Al-Baldwai's split-second decision saved hundreds of lives, according to a Joint Operations spokesman in Iraq. 70 injuries resulted from the explosion and 37 were killed. However, because of the man's heroic actions, the death toll was much less than what it could have been.
Reportedly, Daesh aimed for the Shrine's explosion to match the death count of the recent Karrada attack in Iraq which claimed 300 lives. To date, that is the deadliest single attack in Iraq since the war began to oust Saddam Hussein 13 years ago.
ISIS bombers disguised themselves as the local militia in an attempt to storm and destroy what is considered to be one of the country's most important Shia shrines. The last time such a monument was destroyed, a civil war was sparked.
Al-Baldwai had but a second to decide to put his life on the line, and because he did, many more people are still alive today. The honorable man's activism is also helping to deconstruct Islamophobia in the U.S. and elsewhere.
Shortly after the story broke, it went viral on countless media outlets around the world. The U.K.'s Metro and a post about his sacrifice even became the most popular submission on Reddit.
Read more at http://www.trueactivist.com/muslim-man-hugs-isis-suicide-bomber-saves-hundreds-of-lives-in-iraq.
That is so not true, there is a big difference between muslims and islam like christians and christianity because a christian is bad doest mean that the religion is bad the same way with muslims just because all these extremists who call themselves muslims have done horrible things doesnt mean that Islam is full of horrible things.
They are not generalizing the people who are indoctrinated with this religion, they are just pointing out a specific things why islam is harmful and cause danger.
That is so not true, there is a big difference between muslims and islam like christians and christianity because a christian is bad doest mean that the religion is bad the same way with muslims just because all these extremists who call themselves muslims have done horrible things doesnt mean that Islam is full of horrible things.
Sharia Law is oppression
Sharia Law is evil
Those who practice / condone are terrorists and should be treated as such
If you want to come to Western Society you must integrate.
The West was founded on Christianity. Never forget that.
Poke a bee nest and you will get stung.
Sharia Law is evil
Those who practice / condone are terrorists and should be treated as such
If you want to come to Western Society you must integrate.
The West was founded on Christianity. Never forget that.
Poke a bee nest and you will get stung.
Sorry if this may sound like a dumb question, but do you know how "sodomy" is defined in these Middle Eastern nations (or in Sharia). Does it include oral sex, anal sex regardless of same or different sex partner?
My suspicion is that the prohibition would be designed to maximize production of babies, thus maximizing fodder for war.
Sharia Law is oppression
Sharia Law is evil
Those who practice / condone are terrorists and should be treated as such
If you want to come to Western Society you must integrate.
The West was founded on Christianity. Never forget that.
Poke a bee nest and you will get stung.
Sharia Law is evil
Those who practice / condone are terrorists and should be treated as such
If you want to come to Western Society you must integrate.
The West was founded on Christianity. Never forget that.
Poke a bee nest and you will get stung.
all the extremists come from saudi arabia and all the harsh Islamic rules are enforced there, they are the ones training terrorists to go in all over the world and blow themselves up. Now guess who is the ally and sells weapons to them? BOOOM United States Of America.
Who supported the opposition groups to remove Asad from the power in syria and donated hundreds of millions of dollars also significant
Numbers of advance weapons to those groups? BOOOM USA and her arab allies and Israel, NATO, then after 2 years of fighting and gaining
Power they turned around and attacked their masters which by now we know them as ISIS. those f**kers have more than 2.5 trillion dollars
wealth and so many talk as they are a big country. this is simply just KARMA don't tell me you don't believe in it.
Who supported the opposition groups to remove Asad from the power in syria and donated hundreds of millions of dollars also significant
Numbers of advance weapons to those groups? BOOOM USA and her arab allies and Israel, NATO, then after 2 years of fighting and gaining
Power they turned around and attacked their masters which by now we know them as ISIS. those f**kers have more than 2.5 trillion dollars
wealth and so many talk as they are a big country. this is simply just KARMA don't tell me you don't believe in it.
I understand where you are coming from with these ideas. It is true the US and Saudi have a long "friendship." It's also true that there are many extremist sects in Saudi that want to take over. It's not helpful to distort these realities.
Anyway, NO, the extremists don't come from Saudi Arabia.
Look at where they come from.
www.thereligionofpeace.com
They come from anywhere there are Muslims. As far as I can tell.
all the extremists come from saudi arabia and all the harsh Islamic rules are enforced there, they are the ones training terrorists to go in all over the world and blow themselves up. Now guess who is the ally and sells weapons to them? BOOOM United States Of America.
Who supported the opposition groups to remove Asad from the power in syria and donated hundreds of millions of dollars also significant
Numbers of advance weapons to those groups? BOOOM USA and her arab allies and Israel, NATO, then after 2 years of fighting and gaining
Power they turned around and attacked their masters which by now we know them as ISIS. those f**kers have more than 2.5 trillion dollars
wealth and so many talk as they are a big country. this is simply just KARMA don't tell me you don't believe in it.
Who supported the opposition groups to remove Asad from the power in syria and donated hundreds of millions of dollars also significant
Numbers of advance weapons to those groups? BOOOM USA and her arab allies and Israel, NATO, then after 2 years of fighting and gaining
Power they turned around and attacked their masters which by now we know them as ISIS. those f**kers have more than 2.5 trillion dollars
wealth and so many talk as they are a big country. this is simply just KARMA don't tell me you don't believe in it.
One way to approach this question is to look at what are some of the absolute worst places in the world to live, and then ask what religions predominate there.
Much of the middle east: Islam. Much of South America and Central Africa: Catholicism.
Taking it a bit further, look at the best places to live, and I think it likely you will find that NO religion holds all that much sway in the culture.
I will betcha that holds true for "the best places to live."
I think Islam is big in South Africa, but I never saw much anyone care about or show any interest in religion down there. I am certain the churches were all packed on Sundays, of course. Maybe that's a social thing.
So you are correct. It's not the PRESENCE of religion/religions, but the degree of SERIOUSNESS that they are taken. One of the more glaring examples of this is when the Muslim objects to being told he's in a violent belief set, he says "But your old Testament says kill, kill, kill" and we answer "Yeah, but we don't pay any attention to that, dude."
Some things like that are hard to comprehend. Why and how can something be believed, but not that seriously.
Yeah, that's a more comprehensive way to state it, and looking at my own life, I would have to agree. I was raised very Christian, and even though the religion overtly speaks of tolerance, they simultaneously taught us to be aloof, superior, distrustful of all people (especially successful people and other sects of christianity), and generally rotten 'values'. Yet the culture in the US is rather secular. There are no serious penalties, in the sense that there are in places ruled by religious law, to questioning the unquestionable answers presented by religion. Personal, yes. It's not easy to wake up from a dream that was forced upon you since birth. It's not easy to deal with the fallout when you do, up to and including family members who will no longer speak to you.
But the culture allows it to happen, and in places that are increasingly irreligious, the quality of life seems to be improving across the board. Sweden comes to mind. I can't speak to that one directly, having never been there, but I have lived in more secular AND more religious areas of the United States, and the places with a heavy religious influence, the quality of life is very good for the well connected, and not so great for anyone else. But again, the consequences are more personal than not, and can be overcome. When a religion actually rules a culture, all the bad parts of their scripture come quickly to the fore.
This seems to be a serious argument for never allowing religion to rule over culture, for more or less letting it be whatever it wants. But never allowing The Guys With The Guns (Lol, Law Enforcement) to be enforcers of a set of religious doctrines. Once you start thinking this way, though, there's no way you can let some bunch of religious zombies get away with killing anyone who makes a cartoon of their prophet. Neither can you have LEO enforce their little rule. Therefore, if the Muslim Zombies require these killings, they are incompatible with our Western thinking. Period. There is no compromise.
That does seem to be the case. And yet, I know a number of nominal Muslims who are very peaceful people. But they are NOT middle eastern. In most cases, not even indirectly, they've converted or were from someplace other than that area to begin with. The culture needs serious revision.
I'm an anarchist, so I'm a bit more radical in my thinking than most. I actually think that everyone should be the guys with the guns, and law, to the extent it's tolerated, should only deal with things done to someone. This would put most nations out of the business that they are best at: Powermongering. It also would be anathema to most religions. Maybe all of them. For reasons that even as a formerly religious man I cannot wrap my brain around, there's something in the religious mindset that requires that all must conform to your ideation.
Religious men have accused me of not having strong beliefs in the things I do believe in because I am not willing to kill over it. I find this curious as well as fallacious. It says more about them than me. No, I won't kill because you think something different than I do. I would kill without hesitation or remorse if my life or that of my family were threatened, but not because I disagree with you. And they see that as weak.
One way to approach this question is to look at what are some of the absolute worst places in the world to live, and then ask what religions predominate there.
Much of the middle east: Islam. Much of South America and Central Africa: Catholicism.
Taking it a bit further, look at the best places to live, and I think it likely you will find that NO religion holds all that much sway in the culture.
I will betcha that holds true for "the best places to live."
I think Islam is big in South Africa, but I never saw much anyone care about or show any interest in religion down there. I am certain the churches were all packed on Sundays, of course. Maybe that's a social thing.
So you are correct. It's not the PRESENCE of religion/religions, but the degree of SERIOUSNESS that they are taken. One of the more glaring examples of this is when the Muslim objects to being told he's in a violent belief set, he says "But your old Testament says kill, kill, kill" and we answer "Yeah, but we don't pay any attention to that, dude."
Some things like that are hard to comprehend. Why and how can something be believed, but not that seriously.
Yeah, that's a more comprehensive way to state it, and looking at my own life, I would have to agree. I was raised very Christian, and even though the religion overtly speaks of tolerance, they simultaneously taught us to be aloof, superior, distrustful of all people (especially successful people and other sects of christianity), and generally rotten 'values'. Yet the culture in the US is rather secular. There are no serious penalties, in the sense that there are in places ruled by religious law, to questioning the unquestionable answers presented by religion. Personal, yes. It's not easy to wake up from a dream that was forced upon you since birth. It's not easy to deal with the fallout when you do, up to and including family members who will no longer speak to you.
But the culture allows it to happen, and in places that are increasingly irreligious, the quality of life seems to be improving across the board. Sweden comes to mind. I can't speak to that one directly, having never been there, but I have lived in more secular AND more religious areas of the United States, and the places with a heavy religious influence, the quality of life is very good for the well connected, and not so great for anyone else. But again, the consequences are more personal than not, and can be overcome. When a religion actually rules a culture, all the bad parts of their scripture come quickly to the fore.
This seems to be a serious argument for never allowing religion to rule over culture, for more or less letting it be whatever it wants. But never allowing The Guys With The Guns (Lol, Law Enforcement) to be enforcers of a set of religious doctrines. Once you start thinking this way, though, there's no way you can let some bunch of religious zombies get away with killing anyone who makes a cartoon of their prophet. Neither can you have LEO enforce their little rule. Therefore, if the Muslim Zombies require these killings, they are incompatible with our Western thinking. Period. There is no compromise.
i don't hate it. i hate what people do in its name and i'm sure the truly religious feel the same way. for some people it's a shield for their own depravity. and as i'm sure has been stated elsewhere on here muslims suffer the most violence from other muslim sects.
For some reason I'm reminded of the adage, "He who lives by the sword dies by the sword."
Is that just coincidence, or is it a flaw in the philosophical underpinnings of the Muslim faith?
i don't hate it. i hate what people do in its name and i'm sure the truly religious feel the same way. for some people it's a shield for their own depravity. and as i'm sure has been stated elsewhere on here muslims suffer the most violence from other muslim sects.
Jump to: