Topic: Why Socialism is the key - page 12. (Read 33160 times)

Lol, for fucks sake that why I explicitly said " If you take MY PROPERTY...".  Taking back something that was originally yours is not theft. Now go ahead and answer my questions.

Depends on if he has a legal basis for doing so. This can be had if he's lent you some money and you won't/can't pay him back, if you've caused damage and refuse to compensate or repair what's damaged, or if you haven't paid your taxes.

Socialism nowadays is very important in many ways. It affects people on how to have a positive approach to each other. This is very helpful for interaction that will undergo all aspects of communication. I believe that this will also bring positive and negative outcome when dealing with different types of people.

Umm... initiating force against somebody is a completely different thing from self defense. Why on earth would you think people aren't allowed to defend themselves?




Re-read what I said. You literally aren't making any sense.




You haven't even read my previous posts apparently, so why am I wasting my time?


If you take my property from me it's called theft and it's morally wrong. Agree? Yes or No?

If we add two more people two this scenario and the three of you vote to take away my property is that now somehow morally acceptable? Yes or No?

Political rituals called voting to impose taxes on people does not change the facts of morality.

Could we just settle on the fact that you're probably one of the dumbest person of this forum? Even more than BADECKER!!!

Ok so how do you make sure nobody uses force without using force? You ask kindly?
So duuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuumb ><

You're actually saying that customers would chose to buy products taking into account the power of the company and that they would actually chose to balance the market by themselves???

Do you even understand how impossible this is?

Again you're talking about a government when I'm talking about the people. I'll try to say it again but it seems you don't listen: in direct democracy government = people

You mean like the three articles about wealth concentration we posted or the multiple proofs of power concentration of an elite when the market is free?

Huh?

No, you've misunderstood.


The extreme types of socialism (except anarchism) will even corrupt angels.

Socialism is a wonderful thing when its construction and operation are angels otherwise this is not the most effective and clumsy thing

So he's offering money in exchange for votes.

But of course you won't tell it like it is, socialism can never win honestly.

You can ask.

Even if he doesn't get elected?

He doesn't, you'll get your share even if you didn't vote for him.

Why he's promising stuff he'll never get through congress is a different matter. But that sort of goes for all the candidates.

Bernie Sanders should be arrested for offering money in exchange for votes.

I like your scam site. Perfect for right wing nutters.

He probably sold his account, too ashamed to post here again himself

Picking on people for spelling errors. You're a hero.

I could have said I was thinking of the game Populous, but that might have been too esoteric.

Anyhew, are you saying I am wrong?

So, we've pointed out several problems with the ways we govern our societies within the framework of our current financial systems.  I am truly on the isle with much of what has been discussed here.  However, what I am pondering now is: How do technologies, such as bitcoin, change the financial landscape within the framework of our geo-socio-economic structure.  Could bitcoin change how we govern?  Seriously?

What problems within our several systems could these new technologies reconcile?

Now now, don't get all scared and start implying chaos. I am not saying freedom in the sense that anything goes. I did explain previously that initiating force against others was morally wrong. You are choosing to ignore half of what I said and start ranting about oppression. That being said, freedom is scary thing to most people. It means admitting that you are 100% accountable for your own life!



Very simple, competitive markets limit power. Giant corporations don't just appear out of nowhere. I understand it's hard to strip away the layers of complexity, when we were all born into the present situation. Businesses grow because they are providing a valuable service to their customers, who (in a free market) CHOOSE to do business with them. Does Apple hold a gun to your head when you buy an iPhone? Nope. On the other hand I will have a gun held to my head if I choose to not do business with the local or federal governments when they provide me service that I don't ask for.

Taxation = Coercion
Buying a product from a business out of your own free will = Freedom.




It doesn't imply anything of the sort. I recognize that some people are bad and hence why I'd prefer that we didn't grant them a vehicle (government and coercive taxation), in which to take over and use for to further their sociopathic agendas.

The belief in government is the same as belief in Gods. They are both comforting, in that people can shrug off responsibility for their lives, but they are both fundamentally destructive. If people stopped believing in this thing called "authority" then nobody (corporations, or warlords) would be able to rule. Why do you think it is that Bill Gates does not have the ability to tax people? Because nobody BELIEVES that he has the authority! It's that simple.