Here, I fixed that for you.
It's much better now.
There is no true reason that wealth should be held by those who hold it except that they earned it or were peacefully given it by someone who earned it, and in a free and equal society, no one else gets to impose their will on you or what you are allowed to own.
There is no true reason that private property should be owned by personal individuals except that private property is an inherent human right originating from mankind's dominion over the Earth.
There are obvious examples that show those born into poverty have far more hindrances to achieving their "true potential" than those born into wealth, which doesn't justify forcibly taking from people out of a misplaced sense of morality.
There is no true example of a socialist country, nor a capitalist country. They have all been corrupted, which is irrelevant to the question of the morality of the theft necessary to enforce socialism.
Corruption is real. Anyone who thinks that either pure socialism or pure capitalism can work by themselves is deluded.
All governments require the threat and use of force to maintain their status quo.
All people are born.
All people die.
There is no true reason that private property should be owned by personal individuals except that private property is an inherent human right originating from mankind's dominion over the Earth.
There are obvious examples that show those born into poverty have far more hindrances to achieving their "true potential" than those born into wealth, which doesn't justify forcibly taking from people out of a misplaced sense of morality.
There is no true example of a socialist country, nor a capitalist country. They have all been corrupted, which is irrelevant to the question of the morality of the theft necessary to enforce socialism.
Corruption is real. Anyone who thinks that either pure socialism or pure capitalism can work by themselves is deluded.
All governments require the threat and use of force to maintain their status quo.
All people are born.
All people die.
It's much better now.
private property stretches from toothbrushes to the entire earth. obviously they offer different scopes to dominion.
one fiinds it hard to consider that a human overlord owning vast tracts of wealth is meant by "an inherent human right", whilst many others are relegated to a dependent reality relying on the overlords good will to share their wealth.
instead a shared community based ownership seems more in line where all mankind can share in this apparent right.
there is no reason why wealth should be assigned by position of birth, or even by position of current wealth. if a situtation is unjust/unfair/broken that is a good reason to fix it.
your morality is misplaced if you think it's fine for some people to indulge in wealth while others starve because of the status quo. just because.
theft is not as obvious as you claim.
my inherent human right has been stolen from me by those who monopolise wealth/property.
What I meant that you didn't understand is that property is unique to the human species. Man is the first species that has had the capacity to understand the concept of property, therefore is the first species on Earth capable of owning property. The Earth was therefore man's for the taking the moment that mankind first asserted it.
Wealth is not assigned by position of birth in non-caste systems. In America, you have the ability to move up. More can be done to lessen the obstacles, but trying to create equality through the use of force is immoral. When socialism can achieve its ends without the use of force, it will be a morally acceptable system, but of course, it cannot by its very nature.
