It depends on the computer's accuracy. I'd be willing to give it a try and watch how well it does and then get an average out of 10 or more predictions. If the computer is betwen 40 and 60% that's completely normal, a human can do it. If it's above 60% I'll give it a try, but there's a thing to consider.
When it becomes really accurate people will not bet against it, meaning that the odds will get messed up. Who would want to bet $100 knowing the win is $110 just because so many people bet with the computer there's no way to make big money this way. You'll be putting a lot of money on the line for a small win, knowing the computer isn't always right.
Topic: Will you depend on game predictions by supercomputers? - page 6. (Read 1342 times)
AI or supercomputers cannot predict the human mood, fatigue, injuries, players stamina from time to time, red cards, etc.
That factors are important in every match and we only can see it directly when the game is running.
So this AI prediction is actually just ordinary but better than the animals that predicted the World Cup such as Paul the Octopus, Nelly the Elephant and many more.
And dont forget, AI also takes data from Google. Any clubs which have more positive news (whether true or false) than the other clubs in the Champions league, then that clubs will be recommended by AI.
That factors are important in every match and we only can see it directly when the game is running.
So this AI prediction is actually just ordinary but better than the animals that predicted the World Cup such as Paul the Octopus, Nelly the Elephant and many more.
And dont forget, AI also takes data from Google. Any clubs which have more positive news (whether true or false) than the other clubs in the Champions league, then that clubs will be recommended by AI.
I can’t say that I would depend on predictions from anyone or any thing, but I could see some value in taking in their opinion so that you can see if they have a different angle that you may not have considered. Maybe they know about last minute injuries or other things that regular people don’t take the time to analyze before betting.
Do you think these predictions are reliable?
Predictions are wild guesses that were backed up by some factors. It shouldn't be a question if those are reliable or not.
These predictions will just show the possible outcome of the match. The only advantage of these AI or sort of, about making predictions, they have the tools to access different sources making the analysis much more complete and well-detailed.
Rather than rely on these predictions, to the point we will stake a bet for it, why not just collect instead the data that they will provide and apply it to our analysis? The information provided by these AI is a big help and a good reference while we make our own analysis.
Super computers or what, predictions are simply guesses which means nothing is assured and to the same reason, I'd choose to just base on my own to avoid regrets afterwards given the fact that there's no other to blame if ever it would be a losing bet. It is like allowing some other people to use waste your money and I can do it on my own. If such thing really has high rate of winning tendency then many people should be rich by now or by that time it would be introduced. No gambling provider would also be encouraged to continue their operation because they would be prone from abuse and it will cost a huge amount of money from them. People are just so desperate of gaambling that we end up thinking of a way to save us from consistently losing however, we should at least accept this idea before engaging in gambling industry.
We are in an era where artificial intelligence and supercomputers can perform many tasks accurately. We have reports of some AI tools passing law school examinations and some of them have performed some complex surgeries in the medical field. With these technological tools, the word impossible is gradually becoming obsolete.
In the betting or gambling sector, there has been an increase in the use of technology to make the game more interesting and profitable. Recently there has been news of a SuperComputer that can carry out complex simulations and give game predictions. Based on the Opta supercomputer prediction, Liverpool is the favorite to win the EPL with 45%, Manchester City with 33.6% while Arsenal has a 21.4% chance.
While in the Champions League, the SuperComputer had predicted that Atletico Madrid has the slimmest chance of winning with just 5% chance while Manchester City has the biggest chance with 41.2%.
Do you think these predictions are reliable?
Further reading
Opta supercomputer predicts Man City and Arsenal's chances of winning the Champions League as Real Madrid leapfrog European giants in latest analysis
A supercomputer is tracking one of most exciting soccer title races for years. It keeps coming up with different predictions
Do you remember during ICO time how many companies were abusing words - blockchain, cryptocurrency, innovation, decentralization and etc...? In 2024 it's the word AI that's abused. How does the AI (supercomputer) predicts who will win the Champions League or Premier League? We enter old and recent statistics into it, we give a different coefficient to different values of statistics and then the computer mathematically calculates which team will more likely win the game according to given statistics. That's how it works, it can't magically predict anything.In the betting or gambling sector, there has been an increase in the use of technology to make the game more interesting and profitable. Recently there has been news of a SuperComputer that can carry out complex simulations and give game predictions. Based on the Opta supercomputer prediction, Liverpool is the favorite to win the EPL with 45%, Manchester City with 33.6% while Arsenal has a 21.4% chance.
While in the Champions League, the SuperComputer had predicted that Atletico Madrid has the slimmest chance of winning with just 5% chance while Manchester City has the biggest chance with 41.2%.
Do you think these predictions are reliable?
Further reading
Opta supercomputer predicts Man City and Arsenal's chances of winning the Champions League as Real Madrid leapfrog European giants in latest analysis
A supercomputer is tracking one of most exciting soccer title races for years. It keeps coming up with different predictions
I amn't gonna make myself dependant on predictions generated by supercomputer but they worth the check. They can process given data very well and save much time.
You know whatever operation that is being carried out by AI is a result of human configuration meaning most times they could predicts and fails why because it's humanly operated and configured in a programed device. It gives out information according to how the builder coded the information and stored them inside the machine, therefore for the case of winning a match or league is impossible because gambling is beyond just a human inputting a command on the system and expect to have it as programed. For example, if supercomputer can give out a result of gambling this shows that gambling has been defeated from being a luck based game to a game of certainty where any person can give prediction and expected it the way it was predicted.
Or we can say that if the developer is good, the AI is also good. The devs didn't put information inside the AI but the AI seeks them in the internet. You already said earlier that AI are able to predict and they can also fail, meaning, winning is definitely possibly in them. In gambling, we all know that luck can also matter, so even if the AI isn't really good enough, the bettors who depend on them can still get lucky and win. Gambling isn't beyond humans, when in fact it was also the humans who invented and organized them. They can do manipulations in order to secure a win, if they really wanted to. Super computers on one hand are so advanced and maybe it is really possible for them to crack an outdated casino software. If the last prediction where it says Liverpool will win and did happen then it might just be a coincidence but if the 2nd time Manchester City will win, I think there is got to be truth to this supercomputer you are saying. But why don't you try betting to see if it predicts right?
It's been talked about that AI in sports betting might just be useful for us but I didn't expect it to happen so soon. I am assuming the AIs will need to pull data from millions of bettors and pick the bettors who have been predicting winners all the time and that's what AIs will predict as the outcome as well.
It's been talked about that AI in sports betting might just be useful for us but I didn't expect it to happen so soon. I am assuming the AIs will need to pull data from millions of bettors and pick the bettors who have been predicting winners all the time and that's what AIs will predict as the outcome as well.
There has to be some sort of data gathering in which supercomputers will use as basis for their predictions.
Though this may be the case, I still think that relying solely on supercomputers for our bets in sportsbetting is still NOT recommended due to its nature. If supercomputers are indeed reliable, then everyone would have been using it which would render sportsbetting not profitable in any case.
At the end of the day, gambling is luck with an application of skill in some platforms and games. Sure, there may be times where we can increase the percentage of us winning but there will NEVER be a time where we would accurately predict 100% sportsbetting.
from what i heard, artificial intelligence will be able to collect various information from the internet and carry out in-depth analysis and provide predictions according to what they collect. this means that ai technology itself still relies heavily on the information it collects to be able to make predictions about a match.
i myself have no problem using ai technology to be able to analyze a match, but i would probably think twice about relying on it, because after all there are things that make me more confident in determining my own predictions, and ai technology is just that. supporting technology only.
i myself have no problem using ai technology to be able to analyze a match, but i would probably think twice about relying on it, because after all there are things that make me more confident in determining my own predictions, and ai technology is just that. supporting technology only.
We are in an era where artificial intelligence and supercomputers can perform many tasks accurately. We have reports of some AI tools passing law school examinations and some of them have performed some complex surgeries in the medical field. With these technological tools, the word impossible is gradually becoming obsolete.
In the betting or gambling sector, there has been an increase in the use of technology to make the game more interesting and profitable. Recently there has been news of a SuperComputer that can carry out complex simulations and give game predictions. Based on the Opta supercomputer prediction, Liverpool is the favorite to win the EPL with 45%, Manchester City with 33.6% while Arsenal has a 21.4% chance.
While in the Champions League, the SuperComputer had predicted that Atletico Madrid has the slimmest chance of winning with just 5% chance while Manchester City has the biggest chance with 41.2%.
Do you think these predictions are reliable?
Further reading
Opta supercomputer predicts Man City and Arsenal's chances of winning the Champions League as Real Madrid leapfrog European giants in latest analysis
A supercomputer is tracking one of most exciting soccer title races for years. It keeps coming up with different predictions
In the betting or gambling sector, there has been an increase in the use of technology to make the game more interesting and profitable. Recently there has been news of a SuperComputer that can carry out complex simulations and give game predictions. Based on the Opta supercomputer prediction, Liverpool is the favorite to win the EPL with 45%, Manchester City with 33.6% while Arsenal has a 21.4% chance.
While in the Champions League, the SuperComputer had predicted that Atletico Madrid has the slimmest chance of winning with just 5% chance while Manchester City has the biggest chance with 41.2%.
Do you think these predictions are reliable?
Further reading
Opta supercomputer predicts Man City and Arsenal's chances of winning the Champions League as Real Madrid leapfrog European giants in latest analysis
A supercomputer is tracking one of most exciting soccer title races for years. It keeps coming up with different predictions
It doesn't always happen that way, and it doesn't mean that once it happens, it will always happen to all gamblers who try that way; of course it's not like that. And there is no such thing;
I can still believe that it's just a coincidence. But not exactly like that always.
Because if that's the case, it will always happen for sure, and in the end, many casinos will probably close because of the tools that are mentioned in those articles, in my opinion.
Sometimes there are people got hype on the result shown by AI but they don't realized that the result show is not always accurate. Lots of things is needed to look after before they conclude that what AI suggested is true or it just releasing a generic result since this is what the AI accumulated on the data it gathered.
If there's a tool that can predict the out come of the game then provably there's a lot of gamblers would became so rich if they take advantage on the system. But we know its hard to make our conclusions or fantasy came true since not everything we want will happen. AI is helpful on other thing but for predicting on possible result I guess it didn't came to the point yet that it predict the result of the live matches and accurate to this.
We are in an era where artificial intelligence and supercomputers can perform many tasks accurately. We have reports of some AI tools passing law school examinations and some of them have performed some complex surgeries in the medical field. With these technological tools, the word impossible is gradually becoming obsolete.
In the betting or gambling sector, there has been an increase in the use of technology to make the game more interesting and profitable. Recently there has been news of a SuperComputer that can carry out complex simulations and give game predictions. Based on the Opta supercomputer prediction, Liverpool is the favorite to win the EPL with 45%, Manchester City with 33.6% while Arsenal has a 21.4% chance.
While in the Champions League, the SuperComputer had predicted that Atletico Madrid has the slimmest chance of winning with just 5% chance while Manchester City has the biggest chance with 41.2%.
Do you think these predictions are reliable?
Further reading
Opta supercomputer predicts Man City and Arsenal's chances of winning the Champions League as Real Madrid leapfrog European giants in latest analysis
A supercomputer is tracking one of most exciting soccer title races for years. It keeps coming up with different predictions
In the betting or gambling sector, there has been an increase in the use of technology to make the game more interesting and profitable. Recently there has been news of a SuperComputer that can carry out complex simulations and give game predictions. Based on the Opta supercomputer prediction, Liverpool is the favorite to win the EPL with 45%, Manchester City with 33.6% while Arsenal has a 21.4% chance.
While in the Champions League, the SuperComputer had predicted that Atletico Madrid has the slimmest chance of winning with just 5% chance while Manchester City has the biggest chance with 41.2%.
Do you think these predictions are reliable?
Further reading
Opta supercomputer predicts Man City and Arsenal's chances of winning the Champions League as Real Madrid leapfrog European giants in latest analysis
A supercomputer is tracking one of most exciting soccer title races for years. It keeps coming up with different predictions
It doesn't always happen that way, and it doesn't mean that once it happens, it will always happen to all gamblers who try that way; of course it's not like that. And there is no such thing;
I can still believe that it's just a coincidence. But not exactly like that always.
Because if that's the case, it will always happen for sure, and in the end, many casinos will probably close because of the tools that are mentioned in those articles, in my opinion.
I don't believe in AI's predictions and if I must count on the AI prediction, then I am equally counting on those who claims to be expertises in gambling after they must have logically analysed the formations and possibilities of the game.
As much as AI can not determine the future of Bitcoin, so also I have doubts that it can possibly determine the future of football games.
The only possibility that the AI can determine a correct a 100% assured football games is when the AI's programmer is connected to the elites of the football league which some of the matches are being fixed.
So the programmer installs the command to the AI and when the game played so correctly as the AI predicted then people gets convinced that the AI was possible of predicting a future game.
That is a big lie. Getting to the bottom of this the AI platform is being hyped and manipulated operating under operators commands just to pin and attract the audience to rely on the technology in believing that the AI is indeed possible or make the all time impossibilities of predicting the future of football.
As much as AI can not determine the future of Bitcoin, so also I have doubts that it can possibly determine the future of football games.
The only possibility that the AI can determine a correct a 100% assured football games is when the AI's programmer is connected to the elites of the football league which some of the matches are being fixed.
So the programmer installs the command to the AI and when the game played so correctly as the AI predicted then people gets convinced that the AI was possible of predicting a future game.
That is a big lie. Getting to the bottom of this the AI platform is being hyped and manipulated operating under operators commands just to pin and attract the audience to rely on the technology in believing that the AI is indeed possible or make the all time impossibilities of predicting the future of football.
Well said Mate.
Firstly we must that AI is created by a Human, meaning it runs based on the commands and instructions given by the programmer. In as much as the AI function it depends on those instructions which are the information the programmer made available.
This is similar to Bots used in Trading, it doesn't have 100% win rate, neither will it satisfy that you will keep winning, in essence you apply your logic in gambling because its an unpredictable game, but if you are using the AI ensure it correlates with your view on the bet.
Let us not get too attached with all this super blah blah blah it's someelse instructions.
I don't believe in AI's predictions and if I must count on the AI prediction, then I am equally counting on those who claims to be expertises in gambling after they must have logically analysed the formations and possibilities of the game.
As much as AI can not determine the future of Bitcoin, so also I have doubts that it can possibly determine the future of football games.
The only possibility that the AI can determine a correct a 100% assured football games is when the AI's programmer is connected to the elites of the football league which some of the matches are being fixed.
So the programmer installs the command to the AI and when the game played so correctly as the AI predicted then people gets convinced that the AI was possible of predicting a future game.
That is a big lie. Getting to the bottom of this the AI platform is being hyped and manipulated operating under operators commands just to pin and attract the audience to rely on the technology in believing that the AI is indeed possible or make the all time impossibilities of predicting the future of football.
As much as AI can not determine the future of Bitcoin, so also I have doubts that it can possibly determine the future of football games.
The only possibility that the AI can determine a correct a 100% assured football games is when the AI's programmer is connected to the elites of the football league which some of the matches are being fixed.
So the programmer installs the command to the AI and when the game played so correctly as the AI predicted then people gets convinced that the AI was possible of predicting a future game.
That is a big lie. Getting to the bottom of this the AI platform is being hyped and manipulated operating under operators commands just to pin and attract the audience to rely on the technology in believing that the AI is indeed possible or make the all time impossibilities of predicting the future of football.
[except football is scripted, this is total bullshit.
I don't think it is absolute nonsense like you stated because many gamblers depend on statistics such as head-to-head, team and player history to predict a game. Supercomputers only make the process faster and more accurate. In the betting or gambling sector, there has been an increase in the use of technology to make the game more interesting and profitable. Recently there has been news of a SuperComputer that can carry out complex simulations and give game predictions. Based on the Opta supercomputer prediction, Liverpool is the favorite to win the EPL with 45%, Manchester City with 33.6% while Arsenal has a 21.4% chance.
While in the Champions League, the SuperComputer had predicted that Atletico Madrid has the slimmest chance of winning with just 5% chance while Manchester City has the biggest chance with 41.2%.
Do you think these predictions are reliable?
except football is scripted, this is total bullshit.While in the Champions League, the SuperComputer had predicted that Atletico Madrid has the slimmest chance of winning with just 5% chance while Manchester City has the biggest chance with 41.2%.
Do you think these predictions are reliable?
Their is no computer or invention that can predict the outcome of humans thought and event that's totally dependent on humans control can't be predicted by a machine. No doubt, technology has advanced to a very
large extent and games that are computer controlled can easily be influenced with technology but humans stands as exception to this kind of shit. This is just like saying that a wrestling match can be influenced by the use of technology.
One of the problem the society will face is when they over depend on the use of technology for most of her activities. The introduction of VAR and and and other technology has made soccer become somehow Boring and less entertaining and you want to predetermine the outcome of the EPL and champions league before time? What then is the fun in watching those games. Maybe if this will work then it should start from giving accurate prediction of daily matches and from thier we will know that it's a realistic adventure.
Depend? it's not gonna happen, maybe it could help for some information but totally depending on it is a bad idea. Machine are made to make our job easy but it doesn't mean that there's no job to be done anymore and we keep winning. If we want to win, we need to grind, we need to be smart and beat the casino using a skilled based games as there's no other games that are possible in achieving success in gambling.
I will surely try out first and see the results of the predictions,if they are successful most likely not only me but many other people will try and benefit from this.Even bookies themselves will use this model to further lowering the odds of the game.There is only one problem until then and that is the time needed to get to such level from a supercomputer.I doubt it will be very soon judging from what the premium version of ChatGPT is offering right now.
This is interesting, if you don't mind, will you be able to make updates regarding the supercomputer's predictions? It would be interesting to see what their win/loss percentage would be in the long run.
I will consider your suggestion, maybe frequently visiting the websites of these supercomputers predicting firms and coming up with updates be an interesting activity. It will help us to ascertain how accurate and reliable they are. I think we should accumulate statistics of successful match predictions by supercomputers. Statistics are the best and most visible form of certainty. However, I do not believe that supercomputers will be able to predict match results with 100% accuracy. The fact is that the outcome of many matches depends on chance. For example, if two teams of equal strength are playing, then the victory of one of them can often be the result of such a chance that no supercomputer can predict. Again, let's not forget that there are fixed matches that may not end as the supercomputer predicted.
One of the benefits of these supercomputers is that they can gather and analyse statistical data faster and more accurately. Human mistakes might lead to wrong predictions but these computers are flawless. I accept that gambling is a game of luck but these computers might be helpful, especially for newbies and those people who don't have all the time to analyze games. 
You know whatever operation that is being carried out by AI is a result of human configuration meaning most times they could predicts and fails why because it's humanly operated and configured in a programed device. It gives out information according to how the builder coded the information and stored them inside the machine, therefore for the case of winning a match or league is impossible because gambling is beyond just a human inputting a command on the system and expect to have it as programed. For example, if supercomputer can give out a result of gambling this shows that gambling has been defeated from being a luck based game to a game of certainty where any person can give prediction and expected it the way it was predicted.
For this to make sense to me 
A supercomputer should not be made by humans, allow me to break this down.
Humans are going to play football on a field or stadium, remember, some will get weaker than the others faster and accidents or injuries do happen when no one sees it coming.
Sometimes, even the most strongly active team loses their match to a football team that are less active, it has happened so many time, and I believe we should leave this type of what will happen vs what should happen to the master of the universe.
Back to the supercomputer, they are created by humans, thats all the answers you will ever need.
If Supercomputers will be built by some superhumans from outer space or god-like beings then I can say that this is possible.
A supercomputer should not be made by humans, allow me to break this down.
Humans are going to play football on a field or stadium, remember, some will get weaker than the others faster and accidents or injuries do happen when no one sees it coming.
Sometimes, even the most strongly active team loses their match to a football team that are less active, it has happened so many time, and I believe we should leave this type of what will happen vs what should happen to the master of the universe.
Back to the supercomputer, they are created by humans, thats all the answers you will ever need.
If Supercomputers will be built by some superhumans from outer space or god-like beings then I can say that this is possible.
Jump to: