OK Devs I've read the material on Rootstock and it is certainly very interesting.
It seems to combine the advantages of both ethereum and bitcoin. The thing that I am still curious about and which there is not any significant information on is the DAO structure itself which you will be using.
I am assuming this is because that it is still to be finalised? Would I be correct in this assumption?
This will be explained both in our whitepaper and in the following blogposts dedicated to technical and governance workings of Wings.
Being a DAO investor there are certain problems that came up almost immediately with the DAO for example regarding governance and reaching quorum etc. One solution that had been suggested was the use of liquid democracy - I wonder if you have looked into this or are considering this?
An organisation called Backfeed was looking at liquid democracy and had a proposal on this which you may find of interest:
https://forum.daohub.org/t/backfeeds-governance-proposal-for-the-dao/2936We are well aware of the low participation issue, hence Wings will launch with delegate (liquid) democracy from the start, specifically to avoid the voting problems The DAO had. There will be also more democracy models in future, such as predictive markets democracy, reputation democracy / meritocracy, and perhaps futarchy.
Also, we will have something we call a Flexible Governance, meaning that the used democracy model could be changed to another one following a majority vote.
Also due to the governance structure and the way voting worked in the (slock.it) DAO - splits were made a part of the process both as a guard against 51% voting attacks and to allow people to avoid supporting unethical investments.
Yet splits and bugs/exploits related to the split process are what caused the eventual downfall of the system and crisis that exists now. Someone previously mentioned that splits will not be possible in the Wings DAO - is this correct?
If so is there any alternative to prevent the issue with misuse of voting power and/or unethical propositions?
Thanks and I look forward to hearing your answers.
This is correct, due to the nature of Wings being a platform for starting new DAOs, with each having it's own smart contracts and tokens (vs. The DAO decentralized VC model where there was a joint pool of funds), there won't be need of splits as the participants could just submit a proposal and vote to stop the project, refunding any remaining funds back to them. There will be naturally a protection against a "whale" holding over 50%, from proposing and voting for draining all the funds to his/her address.
We also are working on several additional mechanisms that will encourage people to participate in voting or at least to delegate their voting power to someone else, and discourage from creation of malicious proposals.