The government can certainly make an important policy and can be accepted by everyone, for example by providing capital assistance to people who have the potential to become business people, then provide ease of payment methods so that they can help the people to advance and develop.
Essentially, individuals who possess business acumen typically have already been actively involved in entrepreneurship even before the government provides financial assistance. Many cases of misallocation have led to the government's ineffective utilization of its national budget.
A simple example of government misjudgment is providing capital to the impoverished without offering them proper business education. The allocated funds, intended to uplift the economy through entrepreneurial endeavors, instead contribute to consumptive behavior, resulting in the swift depletion of the aid.
Remember, not everyone has a business-oriented mindset; some individuals find comfort in salaried employment. Hence, it is crucial for the government to carefully select and identify individuals who are deserving of receiving such financial assistance.
Once you add in the costs (the fines, the smoke and mirrors, and the "ethics? A huge bank story that includes the "What ethics?" routine is as bleak as any cyberpunk dystopia. Who among us hasn't done a double-tap on our screens in shock at their antics?
Bitcoin, with its decentralised style, is like the new hipster alternative to the stuffy suits at banks. But let's hold off on tweeting our frustration at the world's banks for the next 280 characters. There are bad actors in the midst of the good, but the good people who make their communities tick are what really matter.
Here, the key term is regulation. More and more of our cash is finding its way into digital wallets, making it imperative that we establish some regulations for this crypto-jungle. We may have stars in our Bitcoin-loving eyes, but a healthy digital currency ecosystem is the real prize.