Topic: 🐺WOLF.BET - Advanced Dice Game 🎲 Sportsbook 🏟️ Slots 🎰 - page 53. (Read 50508 times)

I am not talking about a single bet instance, I was talking about a cumulative bet in a session using flashbet.  But, yes I agree that Wolf.bet should set the minimum bet the same both for manual, autobet and flashbet.

This is not the case, in btc mini bet amount is 10 sats. You can consider it as dust but people who use different strategy for their game and want to use flash bet, this mini bet amount will cost them much. It's not even helpful to run some strategy with small bankroll.

As example: You are playing at 2× payout with 100% increase on loss. If the mini bet become 1 sats you will be able to place 4 more bets (1sats, 2sats, 4sats and 8sats) before it reach over 10 sats. Which will allow you to avoid longer red streak with small bankroll. Think that your bankroll is 10,500 sats. When mini bet is 1 sats you can face upto 13 reds which will cost 8191 sats. As the mini base is 10 sats at the site you can face upto 10 reds which will cost 10,230 sats. So you are losing more amount with small red streak for the higher mini bet.

1 sats is obviously a dust amount, but if you notice the example correctly then you will realize the importance of it. Wolf.bet allowing to place 1 sats bet in manual and auto game mode. So they should also consider it for flash bet.

Everyone doesn't use flashbet for wagering. Wolf.bet have 1% house edge in dice game. By using the method, wagering 7,960$ will cost you around 80$. It make sense too. BTW they have increased the max limit to 25,000 in a single flash bet.

Cool update Wolf.bet didn't really know that you update your game I just found it out when I played awhile ago and I just saw your update here on the forum. I like how the Wolf.bet keeps improving their website from time to time.

I guess he is talking in a cumulative sense and using flashbet which gives 2000 bet per second which means 0.38 Doge * 2000 = 760  Doge wagered in just 1 sec.  and at the rate of Doge as $0.003, that is equal to $2.2 per second which mean playing nonstop for 1 hour will give a player a wagered amount of $7,960.  Well, that is quite huge for a small time player.

Whether I have tried it or not, it has nothing to do with my comment because I'm replying to your post which gives me the clue, so it does not make senses to say that I have no clue since you inform it previously on your post as quoted below:


In this case, I consider above min bet is dust amount since it is less than 1cent.
IMO it is something contradictive when you say that you wont bet dust amount but you complain that less than 1 cent is too high.
All in all, probably we have different understanding/opinion about how much is "dust amount". Case closed.

Glad to hear that! Keep me informed and let me know if it changes, and I will gladly take another look.
I like the new animations you introduced to your Dice game. Every time the mouse runs over the slider, we get a loud notification ever without clicking od adjusting anything. 

Obviously you never try flashbet on wofl.bet, so you don't have clue how much exactly what i've said their min flash bet is too high.  
Not only me, there are many people saying like that too (you can scroll many few pages back)

I've tried your updated dice game, but unfortunately i've found the betting speed is slower now than before. My connection was good anyway

IIRC, they don't have plans yet to add any games soon. But we will be the first to know it because they will announce it first on this thread.

Thanks for the added features for the sounds and animations.

And they won't stop improving and updating details for the best service to their players.

I'm not really into animations and the likes I more prefer the gameplay and fairness of the casino but I can tell that this was a nice animation and update.

The mini bet amount isn't too high but it will be more logical if they change it to 1 sats and equivalent in other coins. As example, if you are playing on 0.01% win chance there is high possibility to get longer red streak. 10 sats bet will cost much for pre-roll in flash bet. While you can place 10× more bet by losing same amount if they change mini bet to 1 sats.

Can't say surely but maybe it will effect on the server if a lot of bet placed together. I'm not afraid of losing my balance instantly. I like the flash bet as it allows to place a lot of bet together, gives instant result and save times. 1 sats mini bet amount will help to use strategy more effectively with same bankroll.

I like the new sound and animation, It's very cool.

Aside from having a good reputation between the user and gamblers, Wolfbet is still doing its best to improve its casino and making the experience to the gamblers as smooth as possible.

Having a large amount of balance in the account is a good preparation to initiate the martingale technique, We know that martingale can easily burn our balances if we cannot stand the red streak ahead of us.

Indeed it is as risky as it gets

Whether you are using flashbet or doing it manually, the "old way", running it mindlessly you are set to shoot yourself in the foot sooner or later (and rather sooner than later). That's why using martingale requires complete understanding what you are doing in terms of stats and probabilities. And that's also the reason why so many people have such a strong bias against it. They tried it, lost in the end, probably all, and now consider it a losing strategy, which is understandable

The risk is the same it's that, if we forgot to set the limit on flashbet, our bankroll may be eaten up before we know it.  


Very cool, I like the spin effect whenever we switch the rollover.


For sure the player who intended to use martingale  have a larger balance not dust bankroll since he needs to accommodate multipliers during losses.

That's great haven't visited it yet a little bit excited to test out that new animation on wolfbet. A change of topic are you in chance planning to add more games on your gambling site?

So it is obvious that there should be no reasons for you to say that the min bet for using the flash bet is too high.


Using martingale with the falshbet feature is very risky option to IMO, it is even risky using normal autobet if we do not set our limit.
IMO flashbet is better to be used when we hunt for a specific payout with flat bet amount, or to get faster wagered amount in order to rank up the VIP level.

We are currently looking at this situation!

If the name of France and Netherlands are mentioned in TOS. However, they should not allow gamblers from these countries to signup. If for any reason they are unable to block signup, they should be notified at least with a popup window that France and Netherlands are restricted. Hope WOLF.BET will take your test results seriously and will ensure the safety of their users.

Have fun and enjoy your stay with wolf.bet 

No. There are gamblers that would want to wipe it if they still have dust amount on their balance. That's me, when I see a dust amount, it isn't comfortable to me to see such balance. The tendency that I do is to use it as long as it's applicable until I win or the usual result, I lose all of it and makes it zero balance.

@WolfBet

Tonight I finished the 4th round of testing casinos to determine whether or not they have IP blocks for restricted countries. WolfBet was one of the randomly chosen casinos. You can check the results of the tests here.

Your TOS state that USA, France, and Netherlands are among the countries which are restricted. I used a VPN to try and access the site and I noticed that there is a restriction when doing so with a US IP. However, I had no problems accessing and opening new accounts with a French and Netherlands-based IP address. Why are IP restrictions also not enabled for players from France and Netherlands like they are for US residents?