Pages:
Author

Topic: 🐺WOLF.BET - Advanced Dice Game 🎲 Sportsbook 🏟️ Slots 🎰 - page 56. (Read 51530 times)

legendary
Activity: 3514
Merit: 1280
English ⬄ Russian Translation Services
I guess he is talking in a cumulative sense and using flashbet which gives 2000 bet per second which means 0.38 Doge * 2000 = 760  Doge wagered in just 1 sec.  and at the rate of Doge as $0.003, that is equal to $2.2 per second which mean playing nonstop for 1 hour will give a player a wagered amount of $7,960.  Well, that is quite huge for a small time player

I have to admit I never thought about this use of flashbet

We could easily build a very safe martingale strategy (like losing balance on a streak of 100 losses at 50% chance), so as not to win something but just overcome the house edge and simply stay where we are. Then we could notch up our wagered amount by running flashbet non-stop. Indeed, there's the limit of 20k bets per session (if I remember correctly), but I'm curious how quickly we would rise to the top in the Wolf race if the limit was removed and we were the only ones using flashbet for that purpose

25k bets per session!

Okay, I stand corrected

But with 25k bets my approach should work even better. The point with extremely long losing streaks is that you are very, very unlikely to hit them in your lifetime, or even the entire lifetime of the universe. Put differently, you will be accumulating wins, not losses, albeit very slowly (and beating the house edge in the meanwhile). But since you will be looking for wagered amounts, not profits as such, it doesn't really matter as long as you don't lose
hero member
Activity: 2170
Merit: 575

 Flash bet is literally the enemy of a gambler if they are in it for the money. Normally we say stuff like "if you long enough, house edge will make sure you lose your money" and mathematically that is correct, but with flash bet you do not need long period of time, no matter how much money you have, you could lose all of it under 1 hour if you wager carelessly enough. It is really something huge and we are talking about just doge here, think about gambling flash bet with stuff like ethereum or even bitcoin and you will realize that you end up with countless amount of money in just few hours!

 Hence I wouldn't suggest it to anyone, there is no strategy or method that could make you win with flash bet, you are gambling tons of money and you are gambling it against the house. My suggestion would be highly manual per bet and just try to have fun and get entertainment value out of this, wolf.bet is a marvlous place to have fun, it is one of the most fun places I have gambled, just focus on that part.
legendary
Activity: 3346
Merit: 1191
I guess he is talking in a cumulative sense and using flashbet which gives 2000 bet per second which means 0.38 Doge * 2000 = 760  Doge wagered in just 1 sec.  and at the rate of Doge as $0.003, that is equal to $2.2 per second which mean playing nonstop for 1 hour will give a player a wagered amount of $7,960.  Well, that is quite huge for a small time player

I have to admit I never thought about this use of flashbet

We could easily build a very safe martingale strategy (like losing balance on a streak of 100 losses at 50% chance), so as not to win something but just overcome the house edge and simply stay where we are. Then we could notch up our wagered amount by running flashbet non-stop. Indeed, there's the limit of 20k bets per session (if I remember correctly), but I'm curious how quickly we would rise to the top in the Wolf race if the limit was removed and we were the only ones using flashbet for that purpose

25k bets per session! Wink
I tried many strategies using flash bet, and I played maximum bets, 25k! You need a really good strategy to wager a lot and not lose much (and if you are in profit even better), and I have good sessions, but sooner or later magic losing streaks appears in your 25k rolls and your amount get melted! For example if you bet 1 cent at x2 without any increasing you can win or lose some little amount, but once you will lose like more than 50% of your bankroll, because in that 25k rolls were many many reds!
If min bet for flash is lower than this everyone would play it like crazy even with 100 coins (doge, xrp, trx), like this you are limited to add more money, or to risk a lot! When you think about it flash is a big risk in any way, but in the end it's what makes it so damn interesting! Smiley
legendary
Activity: 3514
Merit: 1280
English ⬄ Russian Translation Services
I guess he is talking in a cumulative sense and using flashbet which gives 2000 bet per second which means 0.38 Doge * 2000 = 760  Doge wagered in just 1 sec.  and at the rate of Doge as $0.003, that is equal to $2.2 per second which mean playing nonstop for 1 hour will give a player a wagered amount of $7,960.  Well, that is quite huge for a small time player

I have to admit I never thought about this use of flashbet

We could easily build a very safe martingale strategy (like losing balance on a streak of 100 losses at 50% chance), so as not to win something but just overcome the house edge and simply stay where we are. Then we could notch up our wagered amount by running flashbet non-stop. Indeed, there's the limit of 20k bets per session (if I remember correctly), but I'm curious how quickly we would rise to the top in the Wolf race if the limit was removed and we were the only ones using flashbet for that purpose
legendary
Activity: 3052
Merit: 1281
Get $2100 deposit bonuses & 60 FS
~snip~
In this case, I consider above min bet is dust amount since it is less than 1cent.
IMO it is something contradictive when you say that you wont bet dust amount but you complain that less than 1 cent is too high.
All in all, probably we have different understanding/opinion about how much is "dust amount". Case closed.
will give a player a wagered amount of $7,960.  Well, that is quite huge for a small time player.
This is not the case, in btc mini bet amount is 10 sats. You can consider it as dust but people who use different strategy for their game and want to use flash bet, this mini bet amount will cost them much. It's not even helpful to run some strategy with small bankroll.

As example: You are playing at 2× payout with 100% increase on loss. If the mini bet become 1 sats you will be able to place 4 more bets (1sats, 2sats, 4sats and 8sats) before it reach over 10 sats. Which will allow you to avoid longer red streak with small bankroll. Think that your bankroll is 10,500 sats. When mini bet is 1 sats you can face upto 13 reds which will cost 8191 sats. As the mini base is 10 sats at the site you can face upto 10 reds which will cost 10,230 sats. So you are losing more amount with small red streak for the higher mini bet.

1 sats is obviously a dust amount, but if you notice the example correctly then you will realize the importance of it. Wolf.bet allowing to place 1 sats bet in manual and auto game mode. So they should also consider it for flash bet.

Everyone doesn't use flashbet for wagering. Wolf.bet have 1% house edge in dice game. By using the method, wagering 7,960$ will cost you around 8$. It make sense too. BTW they have increased the max limit to 25,000 in a single flash bet.

I am not talking about a single bet instance, I was talking about a cumulative bet in a session using flashbet.  But, yes I agree that Wolf.bet should set the minimum bet the same both for manual, autobet and flashbet.
legendary
Activity: 1946
Merit: 1026
In Search of Incredible
~snip~
In this case, I consider above min bet is dust amount since it is less than 1cent.
IMO it is something contradictive when you say that you wont bet dust amount but you complain that less than 1 cent is too high.
All in all, probably we have different understanding/opinion about how much is "dust amount". Case closed.
will give a player a wagered amount of $7,960.  Well, that is quite huge for a small time player.
This is not the case, in btc mini bet amount is 10 sats. You can consider it as dust but people who use different strategy for their game and want to use flash bet, this mini bet amount will cost them much. It's not even helpful to run some strategy with small bankroll.

As example: You are playing at 2× payout with 100% increase on loss. If the mini bet become 1 sats you will be able to place 4 more bets (1sats, 2sats, 4sats and 8sats) before it reach over 10 sats. Which will allow you to avoid longer red streak with small bankroll. Think that your bankroll is 10,500 sats. When mini bet is 1 sats you can face upto 13 reds which will cost 8191 sats. As the mini base is 10 sats at the site you can face upto 10 reds which will cost 10,230 sats. So you are losing more amount with small red streak for the higher mini bet.

1 sats is obviously a dust amount, but if you notice the example correctly then you will realize the importance of it. Wolf.bet allowing to place 1 sats bet in manual and auto game mode. So they should also consider it for flash bet.

Everyone doesn't use flashbet for wagering. Wolf.bet have 1% house edge in dice game. By using the method, wagering 7,960$ will cost you around 80$. It make sense too. BTW they have increased the max limit to 25,000 in a single flash bet.
hero member
Activity: 1722
Merit: 508
Cool update Wolf.bet didn't really know that you update your game I just found it out when I played awhile ago and I just saw your update here on the forum. I like how the Wolf.bet keeps improving their website from time to time.
legendary
Activity: 3052
Merit: 1281
Get $2100 deposit bonuses & 60 FS
So it is obvious that there should be no reasons for you to say that the min bet for using the flash bet is too high.
Obviously you never try flashbet on wofl.bet, so you don't have clue how much exactly what i've said their min flash bet is too high.   Grin
Not only me, there are many people saying like that too (you can scroll many few pages back)

Whether I have tried it or not, it has nothing to do with my comment because I'm replying to your post which gives me the clue, so it does not make senses to say that I have no clue since you inform it previously on your post as quoted below:

Quote
basebet is 0.38 Doge and TRX is 0.058 TRX which really high

In this case, I consider above min bet is dust amount since it is less than 1cent.
IMO it is something contradictive when you say that you wont bet dust amount but you complain that less than 1 cent is too high.
All in all, probably we have different understanding/opinion about how much is "dust amount". Case closed.


I guess he is talking in a cumulative sense and using flashbet which gives 2000 bet per second which means 0.38 Doge * 2000 = 760  Doge wagered in just 1 sec.  and at the rate of Doge as $0.003, that is equal to $2.2 per second which mean playing nonstop for 1 hour will give a player a wagered amount of $7,960.  Well, that is quite huge for a small time player.
legendary
Activity: 3500
Merit: 1354
So it is obvious that there should be no reasons for you to say that the min bet for using the flash bet is too high.
Obviously you never try flashbet on wofl.bet, so you don't have clue how much exactly what i've said their min flash bet is too high.   Grin
Not only me, there are many people saying like that too (you can scroll many few pages back)

Whether I have tried it or not, it has nothing to do with my comment because I'm replying to your post which gives me the clue, so it does not make senses to say that I have no clue since you inform it previously on your post as quoted below:

Quote
basebet is 0.38 Doge and TRX is 0.058 TRX which really high

In this case, I consider above min bet is dust amount since it is less than 1cent.
IMO it is something contradictive when you say that you wont bet dust amount but you complain that less than 1 cent is too high.
All in all, probably we have different understanding/opinion about how much is "dust amount". Case closed.
legendary
Activity: 2730
Merit: 7065
We are currently looking at this situation!
Glad to hear that! Keep me informed and let me know if it changes, and I will gladly take another look.
I like the new animations you introduced to your Dice game. Every time the mouse runs over the slider, we get a loud notification ever without clicking od adjusting anything. 
legendary
Activity: 2394
Merit: 1131
So it is obvious that there should be no reasons for you to say that the min bet for using the flash bet is too high.
Obviously you never try flashbet on wofl.bet, so you don't have clue how much exactly what i've said their min flash bet is too high.   Grin
Not only me, there are many people saying like that too (you can scroll many few pages back)

Our dice game has been updated! New sounds & animations implemented, enjoy!

I've tried your updated dice game, but unfortunately i've found the betting speed is slower now than before. My connection was good anyway
hero member
Activity: 3080
Merit: 603
That's great haven't visited it yet a little bit excited to test out that new animation on wolfbet. A change of topic are you in chance planning to add more games on your gambling site?
IIRC, they don't have plans yet to add any games soon. But we will be the first to know it because they will announce it first on this thread.

Our dice game has been updated! New sounds & animations implemented, enjoy!
Thanks for the added features for the sounds and animations.

Aside from having a good reputation between the user and gamblers, Wolfbet is still doing its best to improve its casino and making the experience to the gamblers as smooth as possible.
And they won't stop improving and updating details for the best service to their players.
full member
Activity: 648
Merit: 114
I'm not really into animations and the likes I more prefer the gameplay and fairness of the casino but I can tell that this was a nice animation and update.
legendary
Activity: 1946
Merit: 1026
In Search of Incredible
There is always at least one reason why there is a minimum bet for such betting feature. I cant say that it is too high, it is normal or I can even say it is low amount only.
Imagine if it is getting lowered and all players use it with dust bet at the same time, dont you guys think that it will affect the server?
If you are all in the position as an owner of a casino and you have this feature, I believe you will have minimum bet for similar feature.
Simply use the normal autobet or play manually if you are afraid of getting wiped out instantly with the flash bet feature.
The mini bet amount isn't too high but it will be more logical if they change it to 1 sats and equivalent in other coins. As example, if you are playing on 0.01% win chance there is high possibility to get longer red streak. 10 sats bet will cost much for pre-roll in flash bet. While you can place 10× more bet by losing same amount if they change mini bet to 1 sats.

Can't say surely but maybe it will effect on the server if a lot of bet placed together. I'm not afraid of losing my balance instantly. I like the flash bet as it allows to place a lot of bet together, gives instant result and save times. 1 sats mini bet amount will help to use strategy more effectively with same bankroll.
legendary
Activity: 2492
Merit: 1145
Enterapp Pre-Sale Live - bit.ly/3UrMCWI
Our dice game has been updated! New sounds & animations implemented, enjoy!

I like the new sound and animation, It's very cool.

Aside from having a good reputation between the user and gamblers, Wolfbet is still doing its best to improve its casino and making the experience to the gamblers as smooth as possible.

We obviously won't gamble with dust because we are trying our luck too by gambling

I would say that depends

If you are using martingale or some variety of it, to keep things well in hand, you need to start small. So even if it looks like dust at the few first rolls in the martingale sequence, things quickly escalate as you continue to double (give or take) at each roll until you score a win (or bust)

For sure the player who intended to use martingale  have a larger balance not dust bankroll since he needs to accommodate multipliers during losses.
Having a large amount of balance in the account is a good preparation to initiate the martingale technique, We know that martingale can easily burn our balances if we cannot stand the red streak ahead of us.
legendary
Activity: 3514
Merit: 1280
English ⬄ Russian Translation Services
If you are using martingale or some variety of it, to keep things well in hand, you need to start small. So even if it looks like dust at the few first rolls in the martingale sequence, things quickly escalate as you continue to double (give or take) at each roll until you score a win (or bust)

Using martingale with the falshbet feature is very risky option to IMO, it is even risky using normal autobet if we do not set our limit

Indeed it is as risky as it gets

Whether you are using flashbet or doing it manually, the "old way", running it mindlessly you are set to shoot yourself in the foot sooner or later (and rather sooner than later). That's why using martingale requires complete understanding what you are doing in terms of stats and probabilities. And that's also the reason why so many people have such a strong bias against it. They tried it, lost in the end, probably all, and now consider it a losing strategy, which is understandable
legendary
Activity: 3052
Merit: 1281
Get $2100 deposit bonuses & 60 FS

Using martingale with the falshbet feature is very risky option to IMO, it is even risky using normal autobet if we do not set our limit.
IMO flashbet is better to be used when we hunt for a specific payout with flat bet amount, or to get faster wagered amount in order to rank up the VIP level.


The risk is the same it's that, if we forgot to set the limit on flashbet, our bankroll may be eaten up before we know it.  


Our dice game has been updated! New sounds & animations implemented, enjoy!

Very cool, I like the spin effect whenever we switch the rollover.

We obviously won't gamble with dust because we are trying our luck too by gambling

I would say that depends

If you are using martingale or some variety of it, to keep things well in hand, you need to start small. So even if it looks like dust at the few first rolls in the martingale sequence, things quickly escalate as you continue to double (give or take) at each roll until you score a win (or bust)

For sure the player who intended to use martingale  have a larger balance not dust bankroll since he needs to accommodate multipliers during losses.
full member
Activity: 966
Merit: 102
Our dice game has been updated! New sounds & animations implemented, enjoy!

That's great haven't visited it yet a little bit excited to test out that new animation on wolfbet. A change of topic are you in chance planning to add more games on your gambling site?
legendary
Activity: 3500
Merit: 1354
We obviously won't gamble with dust because we are trying our luck too by gambling. It doesn't make any sense for us, as player, only bet with dust while we want to earn more money through gambling.

So it is obvious that there should be no reasons for you to say that the min bet for using the flash bet is too high.

I would say that depends

If you are using martingale or some variety of it, to keep things well in hand, you need to start small. So even if it looks like dust at the few first rolls in the martingale sequence, things quickly escalate as you continue to double (give or take) at each roll until you score a win (or bust)

Using martingale with the falshbet feature is very risky option to IMO, it is even risky using normal autobet if we do not set our limit.
IMO flashbet is better to be used when we hunt for a specific payout with flat bet amount, or to get faster wagered amount in order to rank up the VIP level.
copper member
Activity: 244
Merit: 29
Our dice game has been updated! New sounds & animations implemented, enjoy!

Pages:
Jump to: