I don't want to justify or blame your argument, bro, but the parable you convey is too sharp. In another post you provide relevant evidence, starting from the comparison of company owners and managers dominated by men, but in another post you say that women are more reliable in managing finances. household. So it's true isn't it, every woman or man has skills that can be said to be balanced, depending on which side you look at and place them on.
If we compare specifically, each comparison result regarding more economical management will be very different depending on the perspective or assessment of each individual, but I am sure that the best economic management choice in the business world is handled by men, because men are wiser to the best decision in the company, but the strategic position of women will be placed in the position of treasurer because women can be trusted to hold the company's money, but financial management procedures must be based on the CEO of the company. However, regarding the management of household finances, I agree with the woman's choice of being more economical for family needs, she has distributed finances for daily needs and set aside some for savings for children in the future.
Yes, that's right, I mean like that. Why are entrepreneurs dominated by men, because men are smarter at making decisions than women, men's logic is sharper and they rarely bring feelings into making decisions, so men's decisions can be considered good for the company. When women make decisions for a company, they often involve their feelings, which may ultimately make decisions based on their own ego rather than looking at the benefits for the company.
The most ideal position is as you said, namely the man becomes CEO and the woman becomes treasurer. This makes for a good mix of good decision makers with good spending management.
But not all women are always wrong when it comes to making decisions, no. This is just my assumption.