Wonder who this solominer is? 88.6.216.9 - page 22.

cablepair

hero member

Activity: 896

Merit: 1000

Buy this account on March-2019. New Owner here!!

Quote from: P4man on March 20, 2012, 10:04:21 AM

I really dont understand what you guys are reading in to those IPs?
The IPS are of whoever is relaying the blocks, you could be looking at the IP of deepbit, or any other pool or random bitcoin user.

So your saying its what? A hacked linux box some place? My senile mothers zombie laptop?

we could still start an investigation that could point in the direction of the botnet

we could still get lucky

it certainly cant hurt Tongue

P4man

hero member

Activity: 518

Merit: 500

I really dont understand what you guys are reading in to those IPs?
The IPS are of whoever is relaying the blocks, you could be looking at the IP of deepbit, or any other pool or random bitcoin user.

cablepair

hero member

Activity: 896

Merit: 1000

Buy this account on March-2019. New Owner here!!

PulsedMedia

sr. member

Activity: 402

Merit: 250

Quote from: cablepair on March 20, 2012, 09:15:56 AM

http://blockchain.info/blocks/95.172.9.82 <--- currently mining 0 tx blocks
http://blockchain.info/blocks/85.214.124.168 <---- mined 0 tx blocks from 03/17 - 03/19

Same ISP for both IPs

Ehrm, i got to be using different whois database then (different internet), as i see 95.172.9.82 being Tagadab's at London.
85.214.124.168 is Strato's at Berlin.

Tagadab however does use Clara for transit at the very least.
But there is no commonalities in traceroutes between the IPs for me. Origin from Elisa network in Finland.

Same thing when tracing from france.

P4man

hero member

Activity: 518

Merit: 500

Quote from: jamesg on March 20, 2012, 09:20:52 AM

Now we need ineededausername and his blockchain code.....

What for? To find the relaying IPs? Not too sure what that would tell you. But I could write a little script to feed those hashes to blockchain.info and get whatever data you want, but Im not sure what it is you want.

BadBear

legendary

Activity: 1652

Merit: 1128

Quote from: pcexpress4less on March 20, 2012, 09:20:32 AM

I guess I see this as a big problem and many don't. It's crazy how people have sigs that say Deepbit the enemy of Bitcoin. When it is a official pool and right in our face
as open as can be with thousands of honest miners making up the hash rate. Yet we have a unknown miner with massive amounts of hash power that really can't be explained
not raising any real concern. I guess because he is unknown we have not right to question? Yet we will bash any legitimate pool that get to big.OK I'm lost someone who has been
here longer tell me why Deepbit is untrusted yet solo miner deserves all this respect for his operation?

Your problem is you seem to equate defending a persons rights, with supporting and respecting them and everything they do. They are nowhere near the same thing. Sure he's probably a douchebag stealing from grandmas via electricity bills, but probably isn't a good enough reason to violate his privacy or call for a lynch mob.

Quote from: cablepair on March 20, 2012, 09:15:56 AM

Quote from: jamesg on March 20, 2012, 08:31:52 AM

On another note, looks like we have a new ip doing no transaction blocks.

http://blockchain.info/blocks/95.172.9.82

http://blockchain.info/blocks/95.172.9.82 <--- currently mining 0 tx blocks
http://blockchain.info/blocks/85.214.124.168 <---- mined 0 tx blocks from 03/17 - 03/19

Same ISP for both IPs

Company Website:
http://www.clara.net
Company Looking Glass:
http://noc.eu.clara.net/lg.php

Country of Origin:
United Kingdom

Someone interested the taking the time to draft a letter to report abuse? We can all copy it and send it in to them reporting that one of their users (or employees) is using their resources to abuse the Bitcoin network?

http://www.claranet.co.uk/about/contact-us.html <---- Contact page

it may do nothing it all, but it may slow them down or disable them for awhile and it will certainly send the message that we as a community are watching and do not support what they are doing.

This on the other hand, is a reasonable course of action.

pieppiep

hero member

Activity: 1596

Merit: 502

Quote from: jamesg on March 20, 2012, 09:20:52 AM

Quote from: P4man on March 20, 2012, 09:19:21 AM

I just generated a list of all 1 tx blocks since beginning of this year:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0Apbj91OWg5HvdElMV0FQVWlGa1lsTThNWVVSenJXeWc

If you need anything else, just ask.

I'm glad to see someone is willing to put in a little effort rather than crying for their mommy.

Now we need ineededausername and his blockchain code.....

What blockchain code is that?

rjk

sr. member

Activity: 448

Merit: 250

1ngldh

Quote from: conspirosphere.tk on March 20, 2012, 09:15:00 AM

OK. Now anyone can think about how to avoid that the BTC network get plagued by swarms of botnets any time from now? Then we should rename "proofs of work" in "proofs of crimes". Funny way to back an e-currency.

Plagued? Mining blocks increases network security, it does not decrease it. If the liquidity of the exchanges are not high enough to absorb a large miner dumping his coins, that is our fault for not having faith in it and packing it full of money. While the idea of botnets are abhorrent to me, I sure as fuck would rather see them mining bitcoins instead of sending me spam and phish emails.

jamesg

vip

Activity: 1358

Merit: 1000

AKA: gigavps

Quote from: P4man on March 20, 2012, 09:19:21 AM

I just generated a list of all 1 tx blocks since beginning of this year:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0Apbj91OWg5HvdElMV0FQVWlGa1lsTThNWVVSenJXeWc

If you need anything else, just ask.

I'm glad to see someone is willing to put in a little effort rather than crying for their mommy.

Now we need ineededausername and his blockchain code.....

pcexpress4less

member

Activity: 87

Merit: 10

I guess I see this as a big problem and many don't. It's crazy how people have sigs that say Deepbit the enemy of Bitcoin. When it is a official pool and right in our face
as open as can be with thousands of honest miners making up the hash rate. Yet we have a unknown miner with massive amounts of hash power that really can't be explained
not raising any real concern. I guess because he is unknown we have not right to question? Yet we will bash any legitimate pool that get to big.OK I'm lost someone who has been
here longer tell me why Deepbit is untrusted yet solo miner deserves all this respect for his operation?

P4man

hero member

Activity: 518

Merit: 500

Quote from: jamesg on March 20, 2012, 08:03:38 AM

Maybe someone can put together a list of 1 tx blocks mined by our new buddy?

I just generated a list of all 1 tx blocks since beginning of this year:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0Apbj91OWg5HvdElMV0FQVWlGa1lsTThNWVVSenJXeWc

If you need anything else, just ask.

muyuu

donator

Activity: 980

Merit: 1000

Quote from: cablepair on March 20, 2012, 09:15:56 AM

Someone interested the taking the time to draft a letter to report abuse? We can all copy it and send it in to them reporting that one of their users (or employees) is using their resources to abuse the Bitcoin network?

Wait. What's the abuse and why would the ISP police that?

cablepair

hero member

Activity: 896

Merit: 1000

Buy this account on March-2019. New Owner here!!

Quote from: jamesg on March 20, 2012, 08:31:52 AM

On another note, looks like we have a new ip doing no transaction blocks.

http://blockchain.info/blocks/95.172.9.82

http://blockchain.info/blocks/95.172.9.82 <--- currently mining 0 tx blocks
http://blockchain.info/blocks/85.214.124.168 <---- mined 0 tx blocks from 03/17 - 03/19

Same ISP for both IPs

Company Website:
http://www.clara.net
Company Looking Glass:
http://noc.eu.clara.net/lg.php

Country of Origin:
United Kingdom

Someone interested the taking the time to draft a letter to report abuse? We can all copy it and send it in to them reporting that one of their users (or employees) is using their resources to abuse the Bitcoin network?

http://www.claranet.co.uk/about/contact-us.html <---- Contact page

it may do nothing it all, but it may slow them down or disable them for awhile and it will certainly send the message that we as a community are watching and do not support what they are doing.

conspirosphere.tk

legendary

Activity: 2352

Merit: 1064

Bitcoin is antisemitic

OK. Now anyone can think about how to avoid that the BTC network get plagued by swarms of botnets any time from now? Then we should rename "proofs of work" in "proofs of crimes". Funny way to back an e-currency.

rjk

sr. member

Activity: 448

Merit: 250

1ngldh

Quote from: BadBear on March 20, 2012, 08:34:59 AM

Last I heard people are innocent until proven guilty,

+1

Quote from: conspirosphere.tk on March 20, 2012, 08:38:02 AM

No, apart a confession on the bitminter irc channel and some other thingies.

What if I told you that that "confession" was me, exercising my right to free speech? I could lie if I want to, I'm not under oath. Anyone could have shown up and said all kinds of shit. As for the hardware manifest, well it might surprise you but I have access to things like that. Kind of normal in most large enterprises to keep a list of your hardware.

pieppiep

hero member

Activity: 1596

Merit: 502

Quote from: kjj on March 20, 2012, 08:52:53 AM

Quote from: wiretapped on March 20, 2012, 12:48:11 AM

Quote from: kjj on March 20, 2012, 12:20:50 AM

Quote from: wiretapped on March 20, 2012, 12:00:03 AM

Also, to repeat my earlier question, could there be any significance to the out-of-order timestamps in blocks 171759 and 171760 other than indicating that the empty-block miner's nodes don't have synchronized clocks?

If it were an ordinary pool, it would indicate that there were too pools.

Why? Is there any reason pool members should be expected to have well-synchronized clocks?

Pool members just hash the data. The timestamp comes from the pool operator's software, not the members.

It is possible big pools run on multiple servers that aren't exactly sync to the same time.

pcexpress4less

member

Activity: 87

Merit: 10

I agree that Mt.Gox should not give out any info. I also think that no type of police or law enforcement should be involved with BTC ever.This is probably the biggest community of
educated computer people in the world and we need to provide security for own interest and not invite government in our circle. Do you really think they are smarter than
all the educated minds we have here?

kjj

legendary

Activity: 1302

Merit: 1026

Quote from: wiretapped on March 20, 2012, 12:48:11 AM

Quote from: kjj on March 20, 2012, 12:20:50 AM

Quote from: wiretapped on March 20, 2012, 12:00:03 AM

Also, to repeat my earlier question, could there be any significance to the out-of-order timestamps in blocks 171759 and 171760 other than indicating that the empty-block miner's nodes don't have synchronized clocks?

If it were an ordinary pool, it would indicate that there were too pools.

Why? Is there any reason pool members should be expected to have well-synchronized clocks?

Pool members just hash the data. The timestamp comes from the pool operator's software, not the members.

DeathAndTaxes

donator

Activity: 1218

Merit: 1079

Gerald Davis

Quote from: conspirosphere.tk on March 20, 2012, 08:27:39 AM

Quote from: BadBear on March 20, 2012, 08:19:26 AM

How is it not personal information to know what he is doing with his money/bitcoins? He's broken no laws (at least none I'm concerned with) and has just as much expectation to privacy as much as anyone else. I can understand wondering, but going so far as to think you deserve to know?

Hijacking others' hardware and stealing their electricity is fine for you? And doing that in order to steal boatloads of blocks from legit miners?
The guy is a fucking criminal that should be lynched a.s.a.p.

First of all he likely is using a botnet but there is no proof of that. He could be for example testing a massive ASIC cluster. Second he hasn't been given any due process. Are you really advocating lynching based on suspicion? Still even if he IS a CONFIRMED CRIMINAL and he has had his day in court Mt.Gox STILL has no right to just hand out personal information. Period.

If the Police want the information they will provide a warrant. If some nervous nellies on the internet want it well they can pack sand.

conspirosphere.tk

legendary

Activity: 2352

Merit: 1064

Bitcoin is antisemitic

Quote from: rjk on March 20, 2012, 08:32:16 AM

We have NO evidence that any botnet is operating, and most certainly no evidence that would be admissible in a court of law.

No, apart a confession on the bitminter irc channel and some other thingies.

edit: anyway, I am not so much interested about who the botter is, but in how to prevent similar endeavors, which are to go VIRAL in any sense, and soon, unless someone find a fix.

Topic: Wonder who this solominer is? 88.6.216.9 - page 22. (Read 60498 times)