Topic: www.lunamine.com - 0.0025 BTC/GHs mining contracts | On-demand withdrawals - page 4. (Read 41414 times)

There are very many posts with elaborate proof of PBMining being a ponzi, they simply can't have as much hashing power as they have sold to their customers. This is no problem though, as long as they keep paying out what they promise.

Just remember that during the first week they outright refused to provide proof that they even had a single mining rig because "they didn't need to".

Hi Dekodoge

Could I ask please : What makes you so certain of the link between the Lunamine domain and Host Lincoln / WebHostingBuzz ?

If you could possibly share a URL to highlight such a connection I'd be very grateful !

Or perhaps you've contacted them already ?

Cheers,
Odlal 

 

And with the same amount of evidence you just showed, I can as well say you're a shill paid by some of their competitors to dump heaps of garbage on public forums about them, in order to ruin their reputation and their business.

That IP from above mail headers

https://stat.ripe.net/37.221.169.128-37.221.169.159?sourceapp=ripedb#tabId=at-a-glance

VPN service in Germany.


The hosting company for the lunamine domain was host Lincoln

http://www.webhostingbuzz.com/contact.php


this is the UK arm

The parent is

http://www.webhostingbuzz.com/

He meant crash as in running away with the investments, their hardware
is not going to crash, most likely because they have none, it's a ponzi.

Don't be so negative, some of us are trying, and some amount of progress is actually being made while people are talking...

Actually, they could have actually had mining hardware, as far as I can tell.
The question here is rather, did they sell more than they own, and why did the operation end so abruptly.

Frankly, this is out of place.
And, I've got a hunch that PB Mining may have some very solid insurance mechanism against failure.

Did you notice ?
Who makes a typo in their own name ?

Never said I would do that, I don't have any skin in this game.    I'm just pointing out it has been done before.    Newbies telling people to give up or just stalling could even be aliases of lunamine.   

So you're going to to track the admin down? Good luck.

Wow another newbie with a worthless post!  Are you a lunamine alias?  You are also incorrect.   Just look at what happen in BTC-Arbs when the administrator of the plan was tracked down.  https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=474787.0;topicseen 

I for one did get my deposit back out of that HYIP.  It took time and refunds are still going on and probably will for another year.   For this operation I didn't invest because it was too strange for me from the beginning and I'm not saying people will get there money back, but tracking down people that ran lunamine.com would at least yield some satisfaction and might allow for them to be sued or prosecuted.

Could you say how you singled out "WebHostingBuzz" please ? I've found it listed as one of the companies at the "Landmark House" address via the name of "Host Lincoln Ltd" ...  but only as one of many.

Thanks !

Delivered-To: *****
Received: by 10.76.23.133 with SMTP id m5csp20256oaf;
        Sat, 12 Jul 2014 17:55:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 10.194.63.228 with SMTP id j4mr9402231wjs.7.1405212909881;
        Sat, 12 Jul 2014 17:55:09 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from s101.web-hosting.com (server101.web-hosting.com. [37.61.237.213])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id e4si4544618wij.16.2014.07.12.17.55.08
        for <*****>
        (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
        Sat, 12 Jul 2014 17:55:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: none (google.com: [email protected] does not designate permitted sender hosts) client-ip=37.61.237.213;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;
       spf=neutral (google.com: [email protected] does not designate permitted sender hosts) [email protected]
Received: from localhost ([::1]:35119 helo=server101.web-hosting.com)
   by server101.web-hosting.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.82)
   (envelope-from <[email protected]>)
   id 1X684I-001cNk-RN
   for *****; Sat, 12 Jul 2014 20:55:08 -0400
Received: from 37.221.169.149 ([37.221.169.149])
        (SquirrelMail authenticated user [email protected])
        by server101.web-hosting.com with HTTP;
        Sat, 12 Jul 2014 20:55:06 -0400
Message-ID: <5fa08d86e566e1fcdfce89dfe8a5af19.squirrel@server101.web-hosting.com>
Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2014 20:55:06 -0400
Subject: Your opinion of our service
From: "Christophe Verweihe" <[email protected]>
To: *****
User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.22
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Importance: Normal
X-OutGoing-Spam-Status: No, score=0.7
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - server101.web-hosting.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - gmail.com
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - lunamine.com
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: server101.web-hosting.com: authenticated_id: [email protected]
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:

Are you willing to give the information you have obtained so far over to us and we can help you vet it and provide everyone here with an update it is at least a real lead?

We've been trusted to break stories by the CEO of 1-800-Flowers etc so we have some experience dealing with this sort of thing and protecting all parties involved.

What a shame what they did. Hope you poor people realize that there is nothing that can be done, nothing will give you your money back. This is what happens when you invest in cloud mining while they have no proof they own any hardware at all.

Just waiting for PBMining to crash like this

i get as far as http://www.webhostingbuzz.com/ being the parent company of the hosting for lunamine.

Just a guess 

So as I'm saying no real information?

I'm pretty sure he'll come back here with information. Like "The guy behind Lunamine is a Chinese wo can not be found anymore"...

I am waiting with "bated breath", let me tell you ... but hold no false hopes of him providing any concrete verifiable information whatsoever !