Topic: $XAI Sapience AIFX - Decentralized AI | 11% PoS | PlumeDB,IBTP on Testnet - page 6. (Read 150247 times)

all I can say is Joe is a piece of shit because I personally gave him hundreds of coins when Crave was pumping that he no doubt dumped and out of fear of all the fud that was killing the price, I messaged him and he assured me personally I should hold onto my coins because he had a "trap" set for the "SDC fudders" and would deliver the decentralized markets by April 19th. Here we are almost 4 months later.

Looking back it all makes sense, he promised everyone and their mother in private messages and cocktease postings good things were coming so hold onto your coins, burn them, lock them away in masternodes, just whatever you do don't sell before me! I don't care if the guy comes back tomorrow and launches an update worthy of the gods, he is still a serial liar.

Is that why he extended the crowdsale and cut the price in half?  So he could fake buy the coin himself? 

And then he couldn't afford enough fake buys to buy all the coins?

We deal with imperfect information all the time.  Of course we can't know his intentions.  We can however look at the available evidence and proceed as if the most logical conclusion of that evidence is true, because we can't do any better than that.  Or we can give a serial coin creator who abandons all his projects the benefit of the doubt that this time it's different.  What is more reasonable?


You are blatantly taking my response out of context.  I was responding to your claim this coin was created as a "cross-blockchain" coin and then telling me I was wrong because of the ANN when I said it was created to be a neural network.  There is nothing wrong with adding new features to the coin, but the original purpose of the coin that he raised the BTC for was never developed.  Not even close.


I've said this already.  He creates a coin, does some legit development, it pumps, and he abandons it.  You don't think he made more BTC during XAIs big pump and dump?  You don't think thats where he makes nearly all of his BTC?  How many of those ICO BTCs were him self buying?  All of his coins follow the same pattern.  Cover your eyes and pretend you don't see what is right in front of your face.

oh...he did something

I can't read minds, so I don't know his intentions.  We could see if he ever did anything after he got the money.





So you're saying work was done, things were added and improved. 




He added things after he got the money?  So he did things, but he didn't get any more money from his work.  Why did he do that?  What was his intention?

Holy shit, I can't tell if you are consciously shilling and grasping at straws or legitimately this much of a failure at basic logic and reasoning.


The ICO coins were purchased to fund the development of a neural network on a blockchain.  I am calling it thievery because if Joe ran the ICO and collected the funds but never intended on seeing the project to completion, it is a scam and it is thievery.  The project could fall behind and could have simply failed for technical reasons that he did not foresee before hand, but the logical conclusion based on what we now know about his history with other coins and how this one is following a similar pattern is that he never intended to ever finish it in the first place.


Have you been here since the ICO?  That isn't the original ANN.  It was completely revised at one point.  The ICO was sold solely with the goal of creating a neural network.  Literally all the other stuff was added long after the ICO was over.


It doesn't matter when it was supposed to be finished.  You keep mentioned ETH as if it is relevant but it isn't.  Again, I am saying that you are deluded or a shill if you think it ever will be finished or if you think Joe ever intended for it to be finished.

This shitstorm is going down and Joe can't even pop in for 2 minutes to say he is still here?  You can't seriously believe he is ever coming back.

So you're saying the dev is currently posting in this thread, and taking an active interest in the future of the coin?

Then what are you whining about?

Yeah...those two examples are completely unequivalent.

And your lack of logical argument extends to:  Ethereum supporters fudded Crave because they new it would consequently lead to the collapse of XAI....try Occam's razor. (ETH is dumping BTW) Bye Joe, nice try you're not fooling anyone. 

So...if someone browses someone else's history...you're saying that person is a complete wacko?

Like, for example, if you dug up someone's YouTube video from 3 years ago and posted it?

Not as hardcore as calling it thievery when actually it was a transparent and straightforward ICO.




Do you realize there's a link RIGHT THERE to page 1?

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/xai-sapience-aifx-decentralized-ai-11-pos-plumedbibtp-on-testnet-864895

It's bad enough that you would say that, when Smart Contracts were the first thing mentioned in the Executive Summary in the very first post in this topic.

But then you accuse me of revisionism, when you're the one ignoring reality.

 


How soon was it supposed to be fully finished?  Quicker than it took Ethereum with all their employees?  Good then, it's still on schedule.

You obviously have a penchant for fallacious argument: I gave the reason in the quote.  And as far the 2 quotes being related: they are not because Carboncoin was not on Cryptsy and Bittrex, and the developer had not just been outed as one the most prolific scammers in crypto history.

BTW: the fact you are reviewing my history convinces me further that you are either a complete wacko or Joe, or both.

But you said getting listed on C-Cex was good, earlier this year.  

Is this year behind the times too?





What were you implying?  That people say a coin is bad to make the price go down?  Who's ever heard of such a preposterous notiong?

ETH is scared of XAI apparently  


That is some pretty hardcore revisionism of XAI's history.  XAI was supposed to be a neural network on a blockchain to run AI algorithms on.  This cross blockchain and smart contract stuff came after the fact.  No one asked for it, they were just happy to see development and features added.

You are behind with the times.  I was scammed by the uro dev and I am the person who confirmed the developer as being a dishonest cunt. I can confirm URO was also a scam.

Why did you say that getting listed on C-Cex would be good for Carboncoin, but not good for Sapience?

So you don't think other people should buy XAI, and that's your motivation for posting?

Since you spoke out against the people calling URO a scam, could you please explain how X11 mining creates urea?

If 150,000 URO are generated every year, where do you get the extra 150,000 metric tons of urea to match the supply?

URO was sold as a coin that can be exchanged for 1 metric ton of urea.  The coin cannot be exchanged for 1 metric ton of urea.

XAI was sold as a coin that can connect different blockchains.  Sapience can connect different blockchains.

Why do you support a coin that doesn't function as promised, but you say another coin is a scam even though it does function as promised?

So what exactly are you implying? 

And isn't it amazing that you discovered this secret information at the same time the price dropped off?  And then by posting here, you caused the price to drop even more.  Crazy how that works.   

OK...you are either Joe, in on it, or completely deluded and in denial.  SockpuppetAccount summarized the situation perfectly. And this has nothing to do with Ethereum.

I'm defending XAI.  Do you actually have anything bad to say about XAI?  Isn't it true that XAI is capable of connecting two different blockchains, and has been since 6 months ago?

I'm mining Fractalcoin right now, and its devs quit about a year ago after working for 2 months.  There are no devs, but the coin still works exactly as intended.  You can say whatever you want about the devs, but it doesn't matter as long as the coin network still functions.




I remember you saying that you knew he had worked on other coins, and you said you liked that about him. 

He posted his real name and linkedin profile on this thread, last November, before the crowdsale was complete.  He wasn't pretending to be a guy named Cedric, he told us his name was Joe Mozelesky.  So it's not exactly a shock for someone to post all these links saying "He's busted!  He's the same guy who posts as JoeMoz!"  



Okay grandpa, remember when you said "Who the hell needs the email when I can send a letter for just one stamp?"



It's been established long before Ethereum.  Today Ethereum's devs were recommending a full 24 hours worth of confirmations, in case they have to reset the blockchain and erase all of today's transactions.  I think I'd rather put my contract on Sapience AIFX.


 
And the winner remains to be seen.  Maybe it's a coincidence that all this FUD comes to XAI the same day Ethereum is launching.  Or maybe these people are Concern Trolls, pretending that they're super worried about how XAI is doing, when they don't even use it or hold any coins.  Like you said, people will use the biggest network, and therefore the holders of other coins have a financial incentive to smear Sapience.