i think that there could be some memory leak in Crypti client - very little, but stable.
Topic: [XCR] Crypti | Dapps | Sidechains | Dapp Store | OPEN SOURCE | 100% own code | DPoS - page 110. (Read 804676 times)
April 12, 2015, 06:47:01 AM
BTW, looking at this graph
i think that there could be some memory leak in Crypti client - very little, but stable.
i think that there could be some memory leak in Crypti client - very little, but stable.
April 12, 2015, 06:44:08 AM
Is there a way (API?) to see who voted for who? 
And today i see uptime numbers for some active delegates are not so good as it could be
And today i see uptime numbers for some active delegates are not so good as it could be
how starik69 expresses himself...
First of all english is not my native language. Second - i have (some odd?) sense of humor and can not write without sarcasm Olivier (karmacoma) and me reported to Boris that we need such a functionality. We will hopefully get it in the next version.
April 12, 2015, 06:37:15 AM
Is there a way (API?) to see who voted for who?
And today i see uptime numbers for some active delegates are not so good as it could be
And today i see uptime numbers for some active delegates are not so good as it could be
how starik69 expresses himself...
First of all english is not my native language. Second - i have (some odd?) sense of humor and can not write without sarcasm April 11, 2015, 11:26:52 PM
7. I personally believe the registration fee is too high. This will be an action item at our meeting on Sunday. I intend to propose lowering the registration fee to 1,000 XCR to register a delegate. I will also propose refunding the other 9,000 XCR already paid to those who registered prior to the change. After the meeting we will announce any changes. Like anything, it must come to a vote, so there is no guarantee.
I totally agree. Nurture and support those who would set up Crypti nodes out of their own pocket and do all you can to make it easy for them.
Another similar topic I hope you discuss in your Sunday meeting is lowering the "second passphrase" registration fee from 100 Crypti to 1 Crypti. DON'T MAKE BETTER SECURITY EXPENSIVE TO A CRYPTI USER. When I was in NXT during the early days, I ranted a lot for this feature to be added (I called it an "account freeze code"). To my knowledge it still isn't incorporated into NXT and would have prevented a lot of sadness. I am thrilled to see this option baselined early on in Crypti.
Believe me, sometime soon you WILL have your first user who loses all his Crypti from (a) using a weak first password and (b) not using a second password because "it was too expensive". Believe me, the bad publicity Crypti will get from this incident will not be worth the benefit you currently perceive from charging an extra 100 XCR fee for the second password.
April 11, 2015, 10:34:57 PM
My "unofficial" audit of the 0.2.0 genesis block continues.
The launch Delegates seem to be divided into two categories. Thirty of them appear to have received their initial funds from the genesis block; 71 did not....How can these 71 of the 0.2.0 launch Delegates have balances of 89-546 XCR yet be listed as not receiving anything from the Genesis block? I'm not saying there's a problem, I'm just curious.
The launch Delegates seem to be divided into two categories. Thirty of them appear to have received their initial funds from the genesis block; 71 did not....How can these 71 of the 0.2.0 launch Delegates have balances of 89-546 XCR yet be listed as not receiving anything from the Genesis block? I'm not saying there's a problem, I'm just curious.
It may be a good thing to point out as well, if it's not obvious that some of the accounts had funds in them before becoming delegates. Meaning the accounts where made and a few XCR sent to them while we where on 1.9g
I think the Foundation must eventually publish an official 0.2.0 genesis block listing that shows how Crypti got split among various accounts. With the existing blockchain tools, we can currently only see how 83M Crypti got split into 1030 accounts. See:
http://forum.crypti.me/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=14&p=29.
I thought this genesis block would trace the flow of all 100M original Crypti. Now you acknowledge that 71 accounts were sent a relatively small amount of Crypti during 0.1.9g, formed the initial DPoS network, and then the rest of the Crypti was allocated to everybody else via the 0.2.0 genesis block. This implies the 0.2.0 genesis block will not total up to exactly 100M Crypti, but will be short of that amount by the allocations to the 0.1.9g DPoS delegates. I understand the chicken-and-egg problem of doing a live changeover from random forger selection in 0.1.9g to DPoS in 0.2.0. All I'm saying that there eventually needs to be a public accounting of all original Crypti, listing how much went to 0.9.1g DPoS delegates and how much want to 0.2.0 genesis block account holders. This should equal 100M Crypti. Right?
I can't see how the numbers wouldn't equal 100 million?? As far as I know all accounts and balances were transferred 1 to 1.
Is there something showing otherwise?
No.
But to quote a famous Russian proverb:
(lyrically pronounced "doveryai, no proveryai" - in English, "trust, but verify")
April 11, 2015, 07:09:57 PM
My "unofficial" audit of the 0.2.0 genesis block continues.
The launch Delegates seem to be divided into two categories. Thirty of them appear to have received their initial funds from the genesis block; 71 did not.
Example of a launch Delegate (MatthewDC_D8) who DID receive funding from genesis block 5776140615420062008C :
http://cryptichain.me/address/14247409726405533857C
Example of a launch Delegate (Eden) who DID NOT receive funding from genesis block 5776140615420062008C :
http://cryptichain.me/address/9859538319768690939C
How can these 71 of the 0.2.0 launch Delegates have balances of 89-546 XCR yet be listed as not receiving anything from the Genesis block? I'm not saying there's a problem, I'm just curious.
The launch Delegates seem to be divided into two categories. Thirty of them appear to have received their initial funds from the genesis block; 71 did not.
Example of a launch Delegate (MatthewDC_D8) who DID receive funding from genesis block 5776140615420062008C :
http://cryptichain.me/address/14247409726405533857C
Example of a launch Delegate (Eden) who DID NOT receive funding from genesis block 5776140615420062008C :
http://cryptichain.me/address/9859538319768690939C
How can these 71 of the 0.2.0 launch Delegates have balances of 89-546 XCR yet be listed as not receiving anything from the Genesis block? I'm not saying there's a problem, I'm just curious.
Mal, we have been moving around our votes to help vote on Community members. Just to change votes made by the delegates themself, to votes for Community memebers cost a total of 202 XCR. 101 to remove each delegates vote then another 101 to vote for one of you. These accounts hold balances from fees they earn, Im not sure where your seeing a problem?
It may be a good thing to point out as well, if it's not obvious that some of the accounts had funds in them before becoming delegates. Meaning the accounts where made and a few XCR sent to them while we where on 1.9g
I think the Foundation must eventually publish an official 0.2.0 genesis block listing that shows how Crypti got split among various accounts. With the existing blockchain tools, we can currently only see how 83M Crypti got split into 1030 accounts. See:
http://forum.crypti.me/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=14&p=29.
I thought this genesis block would trace the flow of all 100M original Crypti. Now you acknowledge that 71 accounts were sent a relatively small amount of Crypti during 0.1.9g, formed the initial DPoS network, and then the rest of the Crypti was allocated to everybody else via the 0.2.0 genesis block. This implies the 0.2.0 genesis block will not total up to exactly 100M Crypti, but will be short of that amount by the allocations to the 0.1.9g DPoS delegates. I understand the chicken-and-egg problem of doing a live changeover from random forger selection in 0.1.9g to DPoS in 0.2.0. All I'm saying that there eventually needs to be a public accounting of all original Crypti, listing how much went to 0.9.1g DPoS delegates and how much want to 0.2.0 genesis block account holders. This should equal 100M Crypti. Right?
I can't see how the numbers wouldn't equal 100 million?? As far as I know all accounts and balances were transferred 1 to 1. Is there something showing otherwise?
April 11, 2015, 06:54:59 PM
My "unofficial" audit of the 0.2.0 genesis block continues.
The launch Delegates seem to be divided into two categories. Thirty of them appear to have received their initial funds from the genesis block; 71 did not.
Example of a launch Delegate (MatthewDC_D8) who DID receive funding from genesis block 5776140615420062008C :
http://cryptichain.me/address/14247409726405533857C
Example of a launch Delegate (Eden) who DID NOT receive funding from genesis block 5776140615420062008C :
http://cryptichain.me/address/9859538319768690939C
How can these 71 of the 0.2.0 launch Delegates have balances of 89-546 XCR yet be listed as not receiving anything from the Genesis block? I'm not saying there's a problem, I'm just curious.
The launch Delegates seem to be divided into two categories. Thirty of them appear to have received their initial funds from the genesis block; 71 did not.
Example of a launch Delegate (MatthewDC_D8) who DID receive funding from genesis block 5776140615420062008C :
http://cryptichain.me/address/14247409726405533857C
Example of a launch Delegate (Eden) who DID NOT receive funding from genesis block 5776140615420062008C :
http://cryptichain.me/address/9859538319768690939C
How can these 71 of the 0.2.0 launch Delegates have balances of 89-546 XCR yet be listed as not receiving anything from the Genesis block? I'm not saying there's a problem, I'm just curious.
Mal, we have been moving around our votes to help vote on Community members. Just to change votes made by the delegates themself, to votes for Community memebers cost a total of 202 XCR. 101 to remove each delegates vote then another 101 to vote for one of you. These accounts hold balances from fees they earn, Im not sure where your seeing a problem?
It may be a good thing to point out as well, if it's not obvious that some of the accounts had funds in them before becoming delegates. Meaning the accounts where made and a few XCR sent to them while we where on 1.9g
I think the Foundation must eventually publish an official 0.2.0 genesis block listing that shows how Crypti got split among various accounts. With the existing blockchain tools, we can currently only see how 83M Crypti got split into 1030 accounts. See:
http://forum.crypti.me/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=14&p=29.
I thought this genesis block would trace the flow of all 100M original Crypti. Now you acknowledge that 71 accounts were sent a relatively small amount of Crypti during 0.1.9g, formed the initial DPoS network, and then the rest of the Crypti was allocated to everybody else via the 0.2.0 genesis block. This implies the 0.2.0 genesis block will not total up to exactly 100M Crypti, but will be short of that amount by the allocations to the 0.1.9g DPoS delegates. I understand the chicken-and-egg problem of doing a live changeover from random forger selection in 0.1.9g to DPoS in 0.2.0. All I'm saying that there eventually needs to be a public accounting of all original Crypti, listing how much went to 0.9.1g DPoS delegates and how much want to 0.2.0 genesis block account holders. This should equal 100M Crypti. Right?
April 11, 2015, 06:50:44 PM
O! 
5 active delegates!
This is true success story of Crypti!
5 active delegates!
This is true success story of Crypti!
The forever troll. You always like to point out this and that..
Regards
April 11, 2015, 05:07:05 PM
Keep in mind the foundation delegates couldn't all be initiated / enabled at once in coordination with launch so that's part of why some show lower uptime. We were having an issue with a couple servers In certain countries but we had those downvoted. hopefully the 100% for our new delegates is a good sign!!
April 11, 2015, 04:52:48 PM
O!
5 active delegates!
This is true success story of Crypti!
5 active delegates!
This is true success story of Crypti!
And one truly dedicated troll - starik69
Reminds me about early days of Nxt 
April 11, 2015, 04:42:01 PM
O!
5 active delegates!
This is true success story of Crypti!
5 active delegates!
This is true success story of Crypti!
April 11, 2015, 04:23:00 PM
Great. More community delegates. 
April 11, 2015, 04:14:41 PM
When you guys form a delegate, you need to enable FORGING. so that when you are graduated to 101 status, you are forging.
right now we have 2 new delegates, with 0% uptime.
EDIT: this was fixed. Please enable forging as soon as you form a delegate.
right now we have 2 new delegates, with 0% uptime.
EDIT: this was fixed. Please enable forging as soon as you form a delegate.
April 11, 2015, 02:57:15 PM
First block forged already, thanks everyone for the vote's
now let's see how long the 100% uptime will last
Yea.
April 11, 2015, 02:56:27 PM
First block forged already, thanks everyone for the vote's
now let's see how long the 100% uptime will last
April 11, 2015, 02:54:25 PM
Congratz to Wulfcastle and Barie to be the first active community delegates!
April 11, 2015, 01:59:50 PM
The blockchain from (http://downloads.crypti.me/blockchains/blockchain.db.zip) still seems to be the old one? Even though you don't really need to download it seperately for now, it would be good if it atleast wasn't the wrong one
Btw, I just moved my node to DigitalOcean to make sure it will be up 100% of the time. Has always worked perfectecly running it from home before, but with the faster block generation etc I though I'd not risk it for now.
Btw, I just moved my node to DigitalOcean to make sure it will be up 100% of the time. Has always worked perfectecly running it from home before, but with the faster block generation etc I though I'd not risk it for now.
Thanks, reported it to Boris.
April 11, 2015, 01:51:57 PM
The blockchain from (http://downloads.crypti.me/blockchains/blockchain.db.zip) still seems to be the old one? Even though you don't really need to download it seperately for now, it would be good if it atleast wasn't the wrong one
Btw, I just moved my node to DigitalOcean to make sure it will be up 100% of the time. Has always worked perfectecly running it from home before, but with the faster block generation etc I though I'd not risk it for now.
Btw, I just moved my node to DigitalOcean to make sure it will be up 100% of the time. Has always worked perfectecly running it from home before, but with the faster block generation etc I though I'd not risk it for now.
April 11, 2015, 12:40:12 PM
Hello Crypti Community,
I would like to take this opportunity of introducing myself as the new creator of the Delegate Node "Carib.04.2015". It's been said that Crypti wants/needs reliable delegates to run the DPOS. I can assure you that I will keep my node running in the most efficient and reliable manner possible. "Carib.04.2015" is established in an Amazon EC2 T2 Micro Virtual Instance, they have a very reliable service with an uptime of aprox. 98-100%. The node will be kept running for as long as Crypti continues improving and innovating (be it 1 year, 5 years, or 50 years). I have created one node only as I am a believer of the voting system in which the 101 delegates should be filled by 101 different entities. Now, enough with the logistics of the node and a little about of myself. I am a full time student, currently enrolled and finishing a Master's in Marine Geology at the Caribbean (hence "Carib"), where we are helping distinguish depositional features between tsunami and storm deposits. To do this, we use third world technologies such as coring, XRD (X-Ray Diffraction) and grain sieving among others.
Even though my studies are concentrated on GeoSciences, I've always had a knack for technology. I've been in Crypto for more than two years and have learned so much. Be it pump and dump scams, be it fake clone copies, be it developers mining secret blocks before mining begins, I have seen and experienced quite a few of these events, even befalling to them every once in awhile. I've been in Crypti since the IPO and have been stocking up ever since. I truly believe in the team behind Crypti, they innovate, they achieve, they thrive. Let's make this happen, together.
Cheers!
- J. F.
I would like to take this opportunity of introducing myself as the new creator of the Delegate Node "Carib.04.2015". It's been said that Crypti wants/needs reliable delegates to run the DPOS. I can assure you that I will keep my node running in the most efficient and reliable manner possible. "Carib.04.2015" is established in an Amazon EC2 T2 Micro Virtual Instance, they have a very reliable service with an uptime of aprox. 98-100%. The node will be kept running for as long as Crypti continues improving and innovating (be it 1 year, 5 years, or 50 years). I have created one node only as I am a believer of the voting system in which the 101 delegates should be filled by 101 different entities. Now, enough with the logistics of the node and a little about of myself. I am a full time student, currently enrolled and finishing a Master's in Marine Geology at the Caribbean (hence "Carib"), where we are helping distinguish depositional features between tsunami and storm deposits. To do this, we use third world technologies such as coring, XRD (X-Ray Diffraction) and grain sieving among others.
Even though my studies are concentrated on GeoSciences, I've always had a knack for technology. I've been in Crypto for more than two years and have learned so much. Be it pump and dump scams, be it fake clone copies, be it developers mining secret blocks before mining begins, I have seen and experienced quite a few of these events, even befalling to them every once in awhile. I've been in Crypti since the IPO and have been stocking up ever since. I truly believe in the team behind Crypti, they innovate, they achieve, they thrive. Let's make this happen, together.
Cheers!
- J. F.
I have just voted for you:
April 11, 2015, 12:29:55 PM
Hello Crypti Community,
I would like to take this opportunity of introducing myself as the new creator of the Delegate Node "Carib.04.2015". It's been said that Crypti wants/needs reliable delegates to run the DPOS. I can assure you that I will keep my node running in the most efficient and reliable manner possible. "Carib.04.2015" is established in an Amazon EC2 T2 Micro Virtual Instance, they have a very reliable service with an uptime of aprox. 98-100%. The node will be kept running for as long as Crypti continues improving and innovating (be it 1 year, 5 years, or 50 years). I have created one node only as I am a believer of the voting system in which the 101 delegates should be filled by 101 different entities. Now, enough with the logistics of the node and a little about of myself. I am a full time student, currently enrolled and finishing a Master's in Marine Geology at the Caribbean (hence "Carib"), where we are helping distinguish depositional features between tsunami and storm deposits. To do this, we use third world technologies such as coring, XRD (X-Ray Diffraction) and grain sieving among others.
Even though my studies are concentrated on GeoSciences, I've always had a knack for technology. I've been in Crypto for more than two years and have learned so much. Be it pump and dump scams, be it fake clone copies, be it developers mining secret blocks before mining begins, I have seen and experienced quite a few of these events, even befalling to them every once in awhile. I've been in Crypti since the IPO and have been stocking up ever since. I truly believe in the team behind Crypti, they innovate, they achieve, they thrive. Let's make this happen, together.
Cheers!
- J. F.
I would like to take this opportunity of introducing myself as the new creator of the Delegate Node "Carib.04.2015". It's been said that Crypti wants/needs reliable delegates to run the DPOS. I can assure you that I will keep my node running in the most efficient and reliable manner possible. "Carib.04.2015" is established in an Amazon EC2 T2 Micro Virtual Instance, they have a very reliable service with an uptime of aprox. 98-100%. The node will be kept running for as long as Crypti continues improving and innovating (be it 1 year, 5 years, or 50 years). I have created one node only as I am a believer of the voting system in which the 101 delegates should be filled by 101 different entities. Now, enough with the logistics of the node and a little about of myself. I am a full time student, currently enrolled and finishing a Master's in Marine Geology at the Caribbean (hence "Carib"), where we are helping distinguish depositional features between tsunami and storm deposits. To do this, we use third world technologies such as coring, XRD (X-Ray Diffraction) and grain sieving among others.
Even though my studies are concentrated on GeoSciences, I've always had a knack for technology. I've been in Crypto for more than two years and have learned so much. Be it pump and dump scams, be it fake clone copies, be it developers mining secret blocks before mining begins, I have seen and experienced quite a few of these events, even befalling to them every once in awhile. I've been in Crypti since the IPO and have been stocking up ever since. I truly believe in the team behind Crypti, they innovate, they achieve, they thrive. Let's make this happen, together.
Cheers!
- J. F.
Jump to: