Pages:
Author

Topic: [XCR] Crypti | Dapps | Sidechains | Dapp Store | OPEN SOURCE | 100% own code | DPoS - page 15. (Read 804672 times)

sr. member
Activity: 432
Merit: 250
XCR withdrawal from Poloniex pending for 2 hrs+

I guess that's not too surprising.  Are my coins stuck there for good?

I have the same problem pending for 12 hours , maybe its the delegate switch couse of votes removing when xcr transfer.



No change in delegates for last 24 hours. I am monitoring the Crypti delegates to watch for any problems. We are adding the voting to the Lisk XCR receiving account to replace the non-performing delegates with new ones which will run for at least the next 6 months while keeping the current reliably forging delegates.
legendary
Activity: 1204
Merit: 1000
XCR withdrawal from Poloniex pending for 2 hrs+

I guess that's not too surprising.  Are my coins stuck there for good?

I have the same problem pending for 12 hours , maybe its the delegate switch couse of votes removing when xcr transfer.

hero member
Activity: 658
Merit: 500
XCR withdrawal from Poloniex pending for 2 hrs+

I guess that's not too surprising.  Are my coins stuck there for good?
hero member
Activity: 546
Merit: 509
Decentralized Application Platform
After i stopped my delegate Roll Eyes



From this I think something is very wrong with Crypti (and Lisk) Angry

I have similar experience, the load on the system from running Crypti is too high, I stopped running it. A bad design?


I don't see anything wrong. The load on the system is not high, it can even run on a 9$ computer called C.H.I.P., check this out:

sr. member
Activity: 406
Merit: 250
After i stopped my delegate Roll Eyes



From this I think something is very wrong with Crypti (and Lisk) Angry

I have similar experience, the load on the system from running Crypti is too high, I stopped running it. A bad design?
hero member
Activity: 627
Merit: 500
Passphrase = key to wallet = any typo will send to NEW wallet.

You have a small typo somewhere which is causing you to "appear" inside another wallet (which is generated by that typo in the first place).

Re-try a few times and you will find the "right" wallet. If not, your password was written down incorrectly.




I have a crypti account with 6693 XCR and I put passprase today and now it's opened with new address with O XCR! It means that new address have old passprase and I cannot get into 6693 XCR. Did somebody have the same problem? Thanks for help

It means that you typed in a different passphrase this time than last time.  Did you try multiple times / cut-and-paste?


yes, But passphase works only for new wallet with 0 XCR...
newbie
Activity: 58
Merit: 0
I have a crypti account with 6693 XCR and I put passprase today and now it's opened with new address with O XCR! It means that new address have old passprase and I cannot get into 6693 XCR. Did somebody have the same problem? Thanks for help

It means that you typed in a different passphrase this time than last time.  Did you try multiple times / cut-and-paste?


yes, But passphase works only for new wallet with 0 XCR...
legendary
Activity: 938
Merit: 1000
I have a crypti account with 6693 XCR and I put passprase today and now it's opened with new address with O XCR! It means that new address have old passprase and I cannot get into 6693 XCR. Did somebody have the same problem? Thanks for help

It means that you typed in a different passphrase this time than last time.  Did you try multiple times / cut-and-paste?
newbie
Activity: 58
Merit: 0
I have a crypti account with 6693 XCR and I put passprase today and now it's opened with new address with O XCR! It means that new address have old passprase and I cannot get into 6693 XCR. Did somebody have the same problem? Thanks for help
legendary
Activity: 1281
Merit: 1046
The developers love to keep you all in confusion because they either stack on Crypti hard while you are selling them for a shitcoin fork called Lisk or they are just buying Lisk like maniacs while you are disregarding it, and moving entirely to it if, of course, they manage to get a large percentage.

It´s very hard to know in which project they are investing, but trust me on this one, everything is premeditated. The official developer only has to respond with "Yes" or "No", but he doesn't want to, because it would only make people inflate the price of that particular project he's choosing to stay in. (the dev and his crew wouldn't have the chance to own the majority)

This experiment just turned into a flop. It would've been nice to have some marketing activity in the past so you wouldn't have to screw the community up now. Marketing brings you more interest, more investors, potential partnerships and more developers. I guess that this mess was a result from the greed of farming the coins of your own project in silence.
hero member
Activity: 627
Merit: 500
XCR MAC client still working as before?

EDIT:

just found and ran crypti.lisk... seems to work well.
legendary
Activity: 1045
Merit: 1000
So, a few idiots burned all the money they got from XCR ICO and are now moving to yet another ICO to get more money to burn. Then they will move to yet another ICO and so on, very pathetic.

Actually, we completed all core features promised, over a 2 year period, on an initial fundraiser that lost 70% of it's value in the BTC crash. We initially raised the BTC equivalent of about $487,000, but BTC crashed about a month or two after and lowered our operating budget to about $150,000. By not being greedy (looking at you Eth devs) and accepting salaries of $250 a month or less for many on the team (despite having engineers and team members who were worth much more), we were able to continue development with a team numbering up to I think 12 or 15 at one time for the entire initial outlined time period and complete feature development on everything outlined in our initial goals and then some. We can also now say that we have built, open sourced, and launched to the community one of the most advanced core decentralized technologies in the market place and done it on a fraction of the budget of the other major players.

The core team members are not moving on to the new ICO or company and feel we have accomplished the goals we set for Crypti, the technology. At this point it's up to the people to use it. It just so happens that 2 of our initial community members who we brought on to help with the development cycle have some really strong ideas on where to go with the technology and want to pursue it on their own terms, which is totally legal and why open source software exists. Just as they have done, so can anyone else in the world who has an idea. We built the core technology that can make so many industries and ideas a reality, all you have to do is try.

For those upset about the core network, or forks taking away its potential, I have this to say. Crypti can't be shut down or turned off if you don't let it. If you believe in the network, your investment, and the potential that it has, then fight for it. Tell your friends, tell developers, tell people what it can do. Bitcoin became bitcoin because the core enthusiasts made it happen. Because a few nerdy guys geeked out on what it was and what it was capable of doing and kept spreading the word until they found the right people who pushed it to the next level.

Bitcoin still runs because the people run it. No project like Crypti can ever exist without the support of the people, especially those who truly believe in it. It could never run forever off the backs of 5 people, that's just fact.

But that's just my 2 cents....

Sorry if I seem a bit offended or emotional, but I think anyone who's been with me here since the beginning can understand. It's been a long road to this point.

NO.

its having bugs inside and a software development is always a progress, so it cant 'just' be used a piece of paper or a desk.
 
its more realistic and fair to say: we burned the money, we delivered, see, we are good. now we split and continue to develop.

and yes, you developed something there is no need to, because there is already eth doing the same, but need more work to be done.

if you had invested your time in eth development, the world could have one working product, so the world has now two not ready products, so dont say, you did something for the world, you did it for yourself. period.


i support lisk, but invest in Eth, because i never did in clone coins since start of ALTs
sr. member
Activity: 432
Merit: 250
More likely it's a typo in the passphrase. First thing to look for is spaces at the beginning or end of the passphrase if it was copied and pasted. Copying from formatted text can also do strange and unusual things to the text string. I paste into notepad or other plaintext editor to check for spaces. also check at least the first few and last few characters to make sure the entire passphrase was copied.

The pass phrase is exactly 100 chars. So no room for blank spaces.
The text has always been stored in plain text. So no room for strange formatting issues either
A typo is highly unlikely. 2 out of 3 pass phrases stored in the same document are working perfectly, only the one with most exotic chars in it doesn't work.
The entire pass phrase has been copied. If i add 1 char it tells me to put 100 chars max...


edit1:
Using the desktop wallet 0.5.2 the public key is created correctly and my balance shows up.
Unfortunately the desktop wallet is stuck 12 days ago!
I guess someone screwed up with the latest web version...

edit2:
Guess this could be worth a bug bounty ?! Given I provide my private key and you can fix the issue. Public keys not matching within versions is very dangerous!

edit3:
I downloaded the crypti-win-lite-0.5.2 version, yet the wallet tells me "Crypti Client v0.5.4" Which one am I using ?

edit4:
Opening the wallet With the exact same private Key under Ubuntu generates a different public key than opening the wallet with Windows. Weird! But Problem solved. If you generated your key under Windows, stick with Windows...

Here are suggestions from Crypti/Lisk dev,

Quote
Download lite wallet, click cmd+i+0 (on mac os)
On windows cntrl+i+0 (but test it first, please, before putting funds into account)
And then it must be ok

Opening the wallet With the exact same private Key under Ubuntu generates a different public key than opening the wallet with Windows. Weird! But Problem solved. If you generated your key under Windows, stick with Windows...

The private key generates from the passphrase
There is no difference
On windows cntrl+i+0 (but, again, test it first, please, before putting funds into account)

Please let us know if there are any more problems.
sr. member
Activity: 360
Merit: 250
I guess dev should rescale the xcr rewards from 1300 satoshi. It seems that the market values XCR over Lisk.
member
Activity: 110
Merit: 10
More likely it's a typo in the passphrase. First thing to look for is spaces at the beginning or end of the passphrase if it was copied and pasted. Copying from formatted text can also do strange and unusual things to the text string. I paste into notepad or other plaintext editor to check for spaces. also check at least the first few and last few characters to make sure the entire passphrase was copied.

The pass phrase is exactly 100 chars. So no room for blank spaces.
The text has always been stored in plain text. So no room for strange formatting issues either
A typo is highly unlikely. 2 out of 3 pass phrases stored in the same document are working perfectly, only the one with most exotic chars in it doesn't work.
The entire pass phrase has been copied. If i add 1 char it tells me to put 100 chars max...


edit1:
Using the desktop wallet 0.5.2 the public key is created correctly and my balance shows up.
Unfortunately the desktop wallet is stuck 12 days ago!
I guess someone screwed up with the latest web version...

edit2:
Guess this could be worth a bug bounty ?! Given I provide my private key and you can fix the issue. Public keys not matching within versions is very dangerous!

edit3:
I downloaded the crypti-win-lite-0.5.2 version, yet the wallet tells me "Crypti Client v0.5.4" Which one am I using ?

edit4:
Opening the wallet With the exact same private Key under Ubuntu generates a different public key than opening the wallet with Windows. Weird! But Problem solved. If you generated your key under Windows, stick with Windows...
sr. member
Activity: 432
Merit: 250
More likely it's a typo in the passphrase. First thing to look for is spaces at the beginning or end of the passphrase if it was copied and pasted. Copying from formatted text can also do strange and unusual things to the text string. I paste into notepad or other plaintext editor to check for spaces. also check at least the first few and last few characters to make sure the entire passphrase was copied.
member
Activity: 110
Merit: 10
The balance shows 0, since it isn't the same address anymore...
I will try ro reopen with the old client to see if it's working
 But it somehow takes ages to start... Is that normal behaviour? Is 0.2.0 desktop client still working?
sr. member
Activity: 432
Merit: 250
I just tried to open my account with the online wallet v0.5.4 . But the public key is different than expected !
I created the account with the desktop wallet  v0.2.0, and the online wallet doesn't give the same public key.

Is it possible the algo to derive the public key from private key has changed ? It's quite an important amount of crypti concerned...
For an other account there was no problem at all. So I suppose it is a very rare case, because I really used some special chars ;-)

Does it give the same balance but a different public key. A given passphrase should always show the same address and public key. The algo hasn't changed.
member
Activity: 110
Merit: 10
I just tried to open my account with the online wallet v0.5.4 . But the public key is different than expected !
I created the account with the desktop wallet  v0.2.0, and the online wallet doesn't give the same public key.

Is it possible the algo to derive the public key from private key has changed ? It's quite an important amount of crypti concerned...
For an other account there was no problem at all. So I suppose it is a very rare case, because I really used some special chars ;-)
newbie
Activity: 44
Merit: 0
Cross posted from the Lisk thread:

This is a Public service announcement about the Lisk Initial Coin Offering (ICO).  There is still some confusion about how this is going to work.

Main points:

85 million AND ONLY 85 MILLION Lisk are going to be distributed to donors. 

The more and more donors that show up, the smaller and smaller your share of this fixed block of Lisk will be. 

However, the more donors that show up, the more valuable each Lisk becomes, so its satoshi price will go up. 

SO AS THE LISK ICO PROGRESSES:

(1) THE NUMBER OF LISK YOU ARE ALLOCATED WILL DECREASE
(2) THE WORTH OF EACH INDIVIDUAL LISK YOU HOLD WILL INCREASE
(3) THE TOTAL NET VALUE OF LISK YOU RECEIVE FOR YOUR DONATION WILL STAY CONSTANT


I have been working on some spreadsheets for use during the Lisk ICO.  Hopefully these are THE FINAL VERSIONS of the spreadsheets.  These show how many Lisk you will get for one Bitcoin BTC or one Crypti XCR, and how much in satoshi the Lisk will be worth.  The spreadsheets start off with donations of 5 BTC and 5M Crypti (equivalent value of 65 BTC at a fixed 1300 satoshi per Crypti exchange rate) just to get some initial numbers to look at.   THESE ARE TEST NUMBERS - THE ICO DOES NOT START UNTIL FEB 22.  Here they are, feedback welcome:

How Many Lisk You Will Receive For One Bitcoin (BTC)

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1iOEdaRnBmSAO5miW7xYheeYUgo5wL9l9BONw6x21nQg/edit?usp=sharing

How Many Lisk You Will Receive For One Crypti (XCR)

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1GwWKK7bpjYTxtQRIq_l2xiKI9rEOpTU1oTt0q3C6Mc8/edit?usp=sharing

The Satoshi Price For One Lisk

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Q2MJ25_bK5Yi60FYohYCUEkujUtL5c0P1dOdlDMPMBI/edit?usp=sharing

I have provided Max / LiskHQ password access to these if he wishes to use them officially during the ICO....his choice.  If he doesn't update these during the ICO, I will.   Grin
Pages:
Jump to: