[XC][XCurrency] Decentralised Trustless Privacy Platform / Encrypted XChat / Pos - page 1103.

Quote from: policymaker on June 27, 2014, 05:44:02 PM

I am getting this with 4 x 7950 using sgminer :XWKG9meceCbUdJhnwoWXBzksGqbY9ACRgc 5.37 MH 100%

I have never mined X11 before but I am liking that my GPUs are not burning up and that my wife is not yelling at me asking why the fuse blows when she uses the hair dryer.

Dam Scrypt kills GPUs eh ? X11 >

w8 half an hour for pool to detect ur true rate. I think your rate is super low for now, my 5850 does 1mh on x11. You need to tweak ur settings if this stays as it is

edit: w8, u mean u didnt mine xc with 4x7950? Oh my, Id be FURIOUS were it me!

says here for my card what I should expect... so I would say I am slightly above average.. http://wiki.darkcoin.eu/wiki/Mining_Darkcoin

well if pool made it to 6,8 then I guess ur OK

im so jealous of u guys, here in Greece its just unrealistic to mine around this time of year. 80c with 68%fan :/

bitcad4u

sr. member

Activity: 602

Merit: 255

I am getting this with 4 x 7950 using sgminer :XWKG9meceCbUdJhnwoWXBzksGqbY9ACRgc 5.37 MH 100%

I have never mined X11 before but I am liking that my GPUs are not burning up and that my wife is not yelling at me asking why the fuse blows when she uses the hair dryer.

Dam Scrypt kills GPUs eh ? X11 >

w8 half an hour for pool to detect ur true rate. I think your rate is super low for now, my 5850 does 1mh on x11. You need to tweak ur settings if this stays as it is

edit: w8, u mean u didnt mine xc with 4x7950? Oh my, Id be FURIOUS were it me!

says here for my card what I should expect... so I would say I am slightly above average.. http://wiki.darkcoin.eu/wiki/Mining_Darkcoin

wevus

member

Activity: 70

Merit: 10

Long Term Investor with Short Term Memory Loss

Quote from: conradjohnson on June 27, 2014, 05:41:38 PM

I am getting this with 4 x 7950 using sgminer :XWKG9meceCbUdJhnwoWXBzksGqbY9ACRgc 5.37 MH 100%

I have never mined X11 before but I am liking that my GPUs are not burning up and that my wife is not yelling at me asking why the fuse blows when she uses the hair dryer.

Dam Scrypt kills GPUs eh ? X11 >

27.35 MH 10 7870s gigabyte ghz edition x11

Grifftech2k4

full member

Activity: 210

Merit: 100

Quote from: conradjohnson on June 27, 2014, 05:32:59 PM

II am liking that my GPUs are not burning up and that my wife .....

^this. 20 minutes after switching from scrypt to x11 my room got cooler and my rig is just humming along low and cool.

my room runs about 15 degrees cooler

conradjohnson

full member

Activity: 158

Merit: 100

Quote from: ruleland on June 27, 2014, 10:56:34 AM

Quote from: conradjohnson on June 27, 2014, 10:08:00 AM

Never mined x11 before, but now's a good a time as any. 6 card 750 ti rig pointing to :5555 with new ccminer 3.5 - Anyone know what MH I should expect on x11 with this rig?

6 should get you around 13 MH/s with the latest ccminer (be sure to use the 3.5-5.0 with the 750ti)

Allright, getting 2.1 per card now. Pool reporting topping out at 12Mhs - (these are just the stock 750ti...no OC, no FTW, just 750ti). Trying the 5.0 version of ccminer, and I'll switch back to the 3.5 here in a bit. OC settings with precision at +125gpu/+500mem. Gonna let it run for a while to make sure it's stable, then I'll try out the 3.5 ccminer version to see if I get any better.

Also... just picked up another 0.5 BTC worth of XC and cracked my first beer of the weekend so... yay!

Quote from: policymaker on June 27, 2014, 10:55:47 AM

m8 dont get me wrong, but, buying 6 750ti to mine scrypt is like buying a mini cooper and going off road. Let the pool take its due, 5,5MH for 6 750ti seems low, my 660ti gets up to 2MHZ on latest CC miner alone, and I know for a fact that one 750ti can get better than that, while running cooler and not needing so much watt.

Were I you, I would definitely hit the cudaminer thread, you totally need to finetune your cards if u dont get more than 10MH.

TL:DR 750ti has the best MH/watt/investment ratio for x11, you need better settings

Pool now reporting north of 13 Mhs so cheers! Thanks everyone for the direction!

SushiChef

full member

Activity: 126

Merit: 100

Quote from: bitcad4u on June 27, 2014, 05:44:29 PM

Quote from: Teka on June 27, 2014, 04:57:10 PM

I am getting this with 4 x 7950 using sgminer :XWKG9meceCbUdJhnwoWXBzksGqbY9ACRgc 5.37 MH 100%

I have never mined X11 before but I am liking that my GPUs are not burning up and that my wife is not yelling at me asking why the fuse blows when she uses the hair dryer.

Dam Scrypt kills GPUs eh ? X11 >

oh man - even better now XWKG9meceCbUdJhnwoWXBzksGqbY9ACRgc 6.84 MH 100%

This calls for some fridaynight "celebration" with your wife. Roll Eyes

RW-Stott

sr. member

Activity: 308

Merit: 250

AMA TIME - WEEK 2

http://www.reddit.com/r/XCofficialreddit/comments/299ydq/ama_time_daniel_community_manager_week_2/

Some very interesting information there... from both Dev + community...

Especially noted was this comment:

"I know Dr. Zach Harris personally (http://www.wired.com/2012/10/dkim-vulnerability-widespread/). He is a PhD Mathematician + Experienced Secure Code Analyst. I will ask him to check XC's code when atcsecure feels it is ready. Analyzing custom cryptography for any/all issues is Dr. Harris' area of expertise. And yes, this will be huge for XC from both security & marketing perspectives."

Seems like a pretty huge deal...

bitcad4u

sr. member

Activity: 602

Merit: 255

I am getting this with 4 x 7950 using sgminer :XWKG9meceCbUdJhnwoWXBzksGqbY9ACRgc 5.37 MH 100%

I have never mined X11 before but I am liking that my GPUs are not burning up and that my wife is not yelling at me asking why the fuse blows when she uses the hair dryer.

Dam Scrypt kills GPUs eh ? X11 >

oh man - even better now XWKG9meceCbUdJhnwoWXBzksGqbY9ACRgc 6.84 MH 100%

policymaker

full member

Activity: 210

Merit: 100

Crypto Currency Supporter

I am getting this with 4 x 7950 using sgminer :XWKG9meceCbUdJhnwoWXBzksGqbY9ACRgc 5.37 MH 100%

I have never mined X11 before but I am liking that my GPUs are not burning up and that my wife is not yelling at me asking why the fuse blows when she uses the hair dryer.

Dam Scrypt kills GPUs eh ? X11 >

w8 half an hour for pool to detect ur true rate. I think your rate is super low for now, my 5850 does 1mh on x11. You need to tweak ur settings if this stays as it is

edit: w8, u mean u didnt mine xc with 4x7950? Oh my, Id be FURIOUS were it me!

conradjohnson

full member

Activity: 158

Merit: 100

Quote from: policymaker on June 27, 2014, 05:11:56 PM

II am liking that my GPUs are not burning up and that my wife .....

^this. 20 minutes after switching from scrypt to x11 my room got cooler and my rig is just humming along low and cool.

Grifftech2k4

full member

Activity: 210

Merit: 100

"To further break this down: 2 on Xnode, 2 on EMs/Ec and 1 on QT"

as replied by Teka in AMA, this is the amount of coders working on XC. More on other aspects(like multipool, etc).

I think it is pretty significant for people to know.

That is super important!!!! Good Lord Almighty!!!

bitcad4u

sr. member

Activity: 602

Merit: 255

I am getting this with 4 x 7950 using sgminer :XWKG9meceCbUdJhnwoWXBzksGqbY9ACRgc 5.37 MH 100%

I have never mined X11 before but I am liking that my GPUs are not burning up and that my wife is not yelling at me asking why the fuse blows when she uses the hair dryer.

Dam Scrypt kills GPUs eh ? X11 >

conradjohnson

full member

Activity: 158

Merit: 100

Quote from: ruleland on June 27, 2014, 10:56:34 AM

Quote from: conradjohnson on June 27, 2014, 10:08:00 AM

Never mined x11 before, but now's a good a time as any. 6 card 750 ti rig pointing to :5555 with new ccminer 3.5 - Anyone know what MH I should expect on x11 with this rig?

6 should get you around 13 MH/s with the latest ccminer (be sure to use the 3.5-5.0 with the 750ti)

Allright, getting 2.1 per card now. Pool reporting topping out at 12Mhs - (these are just the stock 750ti...no OC, no FTW, just 750ti). Trying the 5.0 version of ccminer, and I'll switch back to the 3.5 here in a bit. OC settings with precision at +125gpu/+500mem. Gonna let it run for a while to make sure it's stable, then I'll try out the 3.5 ccminer version to see if I get any better.

Also... just picked up another 0.5 BTC worth of XC and cracked my first beer of the weekend so... yay!

bitcad4u

sr. member

Activity: 602

Merit: 255

Quote from: tr8kr on June 27, 2014, 12:42:49 PM

Quote from: atcsecure on June 27, 2014, 12:27:20 PM

Quote from: tr8kr on June 27, 2014, 12:19:16 PM

I put 4x 280x on it about 12.5Mh/s

whats your config? the 7970's are the same as the 280x, I'm seeing about on average 8Mh/s

I use a optimized mod of sgminer with the last AMD driver

GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
sgminer -k x11mod -o stratum+tcp://stratum.hashevolved.com:5555 -u (XC adress) -p x -I 18 -g 2 --lookup-gap 2 -w 256 --thread-concurrency 8192

~~But right now i see accepted job in my miner with no reject but the frontend of the pool tell me 59233 rejected share and 0 accepted.~~

Quote

Unconfirmed shares aren't a bad thing. Everyone starts off with unconfirmed shares. When blocks are found for each coin, your unconfirmed shares turn into confirmed shares. At the end of each shift, you will receive a payout based on how many confirmed shares you have.

If you leave the pool and you still have unconfirmed shares in our system, they might still turn confirmed later, and guess what, you'll be paid for them.

So yeah unconfirmed shares are good thing to have, but ideally, confirmed shares are what you're looking for.

Sorry I guess this is my fault. I'll updated FAQs.

Ok i understand !

What mod of SGminer u using?

policymaker

full member

Activity: 210

Merit: 100

Crypto Currency Supporter

"To further break this down: 2 on Xnode, 2 on EMs/Ec and 1 on QT"

as replied by Teka in AMA, this is the amount of coders working on XC. More on other aspects(like multipool, etc).

I think it is pretty significant for people to know.

Teka

hero member

Activity: 840

Merit: 1000

AMA TIME - WEEK 2

http://www.reddit.com/r/XCofficialreddit/comments/299ydq/ama_time_daniel_community_manager_week_2/

RW-Stott

sr. member

Activity: 308

Merit: 250

Quote from: Artoodeetoo on June 27, 2014, 04:43:40 PM

Quote from: SushiChef on June 27, 2014, 04:40:39 PM

Quote from: Artoodeetoo on June 27, 2014, 04:35:17 PM

Quote from: SushiChef on June 27, 2014, 04:40:39 PM

When XC releases REV2, there really needs to be an audit performed so that people can see how XC's anon method is superior from other major competitor solutions.

Agreed. XC got ahead of itself during the original big run-up with talk of how we are better than DRK, etc. But we are getting close to the point where we will need to make that case again (and vs. Vericoin, other competitors). Except this time the code will exist rather than being in process.

You may have mussed but there was an open challenge and bounty for rev 1.5... Drk's best came and tried and failed... Where else has a bounty been offere to try and crack the anon?

Also the team stated they will get a bigger bounty out with rev2. This to attract experts that will make Cheaplin look like a 3 year old Wink

I should have said 'president' cheaplin Wink

after all he extensively tested the last failed drk update...

Expecting to see some vrc monies coming this way tonight, it looks done for now...

I was reading through the old thread earlier today, and to my "surprise," it was 'president' chaeplin (of DRK's team) that made the first FUD post claiming XC's code was a copy of fedora's code. To anyone who thinks chaeplin is ever trying to help XC, think again. Nothing this guy says can be trusted, as far as I'm concerned.

See: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.7005794

It was orchestrated by DRK the entire time... even leading up to the FUD tweet from DRK's official twitter account.

Artoodeetoo

hero member

Activity: 518

Merit: 500

Quote from: Artoodeetoo on June 27, 2014, 04:35:17 PM

Quote from: RW-Stott on June 27, 2014, 04:36:30 PM

When XC releases REV2, there really needs to be an audit performed so that people can see how XC's anon method is superior from other major competitor solutions.

Agreed. XC got ahead of itself during the original big run-up with talk of how we are better than DRK, etc. But we are getting close to the point where we will need to make that case again (and vs. Vericoin, other competitors). Except this time the code will exist rather than being in process.

You may have mussed but there was an open challenge and bounty for rev 1.5... Drk's best came and tried and failed... Where else has a bounty been offere to try and crack the anon?

Also the team stated they will get a bigger bounty out with rev2. This to attract experts that will make Cheaplin look like a 3 year old Wink

I should have said 'president' cheaplin Wink

after all he extensively tested the last failed drk update...

Expecting to see some vrc monies coming this way tonight, it looks done for now...

ssmc2

legendary

Activity: 2002

Merit: 1040

Quote from: Artoodeetoo on June 27, 2014, 04:35:17 PM

When XC releases REV2, there really needs to be an audit performed so that people can see how XC's anon method is superior from other major competitor solutions.

Agreed. XC got ahead of itself during the original big run-up with talk of how we are better than DRK, etc. But we are getting close to the point where we will need to make that case again (and vs. Vericoin, other competitors). Except this time the code will exist rather than being in process.

Well, in fairness of XC's dev team, it was only the community that was claiming to be "better than DRK." But still, and audit of XC's REV2 compared to competitor solutions would be appropriate.

Centralized solutions (such as VRC) do not need to be included in the audit. There is no point. It really only should include DRK, which is arguably the only competitor to XC.

Something tells me this will happen and something also tells me XC will pass with flying colors. Then we see the true reflection in this coin's value which will make the current price seem like a joke.

policymaker

full member

Activity: 210

Merit: 100

Crypto Currency Supporter