i don't think they should be linked like cryptico suggested. that means everytime you spend xc you losse shares in the company which would put a full break stop on adoption of xc in merchants and turn xc into a share too rather then a currency that is meant to be spend at some point.
Not all Xcs just the one you want to buy shares with ..Hence you will need to decide how much to Invest in the company at the time of the ICO..that makes sense to me.
Edit: just the ones you will use to have your shares Gifted to you...Remember that you r not paying anything for the shares with those XCS so why shuold you be allowed to sell them withouth selling your Share too?
you don't quite get it, the moment they get linked those XCs become a share too essentially. its the worst idea ever to link them. this way you will have too type of XC on the market, the "free" ones and those tide to the shares. people will ask which ones they buy and you will have a third hybrid type of asset the " share tide XC" trading at a different price than the normal XC. nobody wants that.
they should just work out a model to prevent "double claim" during the ito period and then it should be up to those getting the shares what they do with them or the XC they been holding at the time. don't be so afraid of the dump. its supply and demand. if this company comes to live like planned and uses XC for all types of fee payments it will still be attractive to hold XC after the ito.
Yea thanks I did not look it in that way..still might be a wise Idea to do not be able to sell them straight after the ICO maybe... as Synechist was saying before
.
breaking down boarders