Team members joining another coins team looks bad no matter how you spin it.
That's precisely what I'm trying to suggest is a misperception.
The basic fact is that joining another team is an act of community. People join because their friends have a project that they're keen to help with. The perception that there is competition, scarce time-resources, and thus a "betrayal" in joining another team, is just the wrong paradigm. This is community. It's intertwined. It's close-nit. And it's superabundant in resources. There is no scarcity. There are only plentiful networks. When XC needs something, what do you know? Many people come forward to provide it. This will not change.
So I suppose the shareholders of Apple or Microsoft would cheer if Tim Cook or Satya Nadella were to "co-join" another company under the guise of "community."
Good point. The shareholders would be outraged.
So yes, the situations are not analogous:
- Crypto is fluid, communal, and not held together by legal contracts.
- This makes it vastly more innovative and flexible than corporations.
- It also makes it vastly less small-minded than the corporate scarcity-dominated mentality.
- Community fosters superabundance. Anything that does this is beautiful and should not be replaced by a dynamic that creates scarcity.
Big up for community!
The situations are analogous to a degree. Are you telling me that if Dan (atcsecure) were to officially announce that he was coding (as an official dev) for another coin, that XC 's price would not crash? And that XC holders would not be outraged?
They'd dump if they adopted a scarcity-dominated paradigm.
If they adopted a communality-and-thus-superabundance paradigm, they'd see it as a sign of a healthy ecosystem that's benefitting them as much as others.
As an interesting aside here, it's still commonly thought that the biological realm is dominated by competition and evolutionary natural selection. Funnily enough this hasn't been the consensus since the 1980s, when biosemiotics took off as a field and people realised that symbiosis was both more fundamental and more prevalent than competition.
As well as the concept of Evolution is a complete and utter bullshit, that science is disproving day after day more and more. Scientists are afraid to speak against Evolution as they are afraid to loose their grants given to them by the state that with this Ideology wants to open us to full competition and full materialism for the New world order.. Natural selection is not evolution and works just for speciation, hence(micro-evolution)..Macro evolution is the religion that our modern and corrupted world found his world dominance from and it will dye soon. Symbiosis in nature is evident as design is
( all reviews afterwards executed perfectly)
