[XC][XCurrency] Decentralised Trustless Privacy Platform / Encrypted XChat / Pos - page 31.

MKAxe11

full member

Activity: 165

Merit: 100

Quote from: UnicornFarts on November 16, 2014, 06:50:15 PM

Quote

It's actually illegal to do that with things like stocks on investment discussion forums.

So if GM spends all their money without accounting for it and I have invested in Ford (or I'm just a "troll") and I start bringing the subject up with an Internet account (and I have several) the SEC will be more concerned with me than GM not accounting for their funds?

Yeah no. Not how it works. Free speech and all ... law is concerned about people who take other people's money ... not "trolls" (I'm still waiting on evidence that I am one)

evidence?!?
so your a troll, not being concerned by law.

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=trolling&defid=4250942
goto: 'Signs that your trolling is unsuccesful'

EDIT: i don't need evidence you're a troll. prove that you're not by providing previous posts of you that imply that your not.

UnicornFarts

full member

Activity: 154

Merit: 100

*sigh *

With the rdnk accusations - the forum owner says he doesn't care about alt accounts & I really don't care who you think I am.

I'm NOT MAKING ACCUSATIONS.

I'm asking for someone to point me where the details were posted. I'm following up for MYSELF to see if my previous suspicions / accusations were proven wrong.

If they were it will help me understand what to ask for when digging into future coins. I'm not asking ANYONE to take my word for anything. Just link me to what the core team promised on accounting.

If you guys are still hodling the coin then I'm not going to dissuade you and I understand that. It was a question nothing more

Quote

typical troll, no offense.

Lol! None taken ...

MKAxe11

full member

Activity: 165

Merit: 100

Quote from: UnicornFarts on November 16, 2014, 06:19:23 PM

...
As to the moms basement thing. I can appreciate the humor of a neckbeard but I'm not one. I spent a week on the Rio Grande and plan on spending next year in Thailand. And have a house I can come home to if I feel like that I actually own.
...

Oh you...

typical troll, no offense.

EDIT: found proper picture

ProfX

newbie

Activity: 28

Merit: 0

Quote from: UnicornFarts on November 16, 2014, 06:50:15 PM

Quote

It's actually illegal to do that with things like stocks on investment discussion forums.

So if GM spends all their money without accounting for it and I have invested in Ford (or I'm just a "troll") and I start bringing the subject up with an Internet account (and I have several) the SEC will be more concerned with me than GM not accounting for their funds?

Yeah no. Not how it works. Free speech and all ... law is concerned about people who take other people's money ... not "trolls" (I'm still waiting on evidence that I am one)

you know no one here is going to take you seriously, based off everything you were saying during the BlockNET fudstorm of October. I literally skip past your's and McHammer's post instantly. You bring no substance to XC discussion and others should ignore you as well. You are not an investor, just someone still butthurt they lost out on Jasin's ASIC miner project.

PS. Im pretty sure you're banned from the XC thread, why are you still posting. Reported to forum mods.

Also reporting rdnjk this as is your double account on these forums.

UnicornFarts

full member

Activity: 154

Merit: 100

Quote

It's actually illegal to do that with things like stocks on investment discussion forums.

So if GM spends all their money without accounting for it and I have invested in Ford (or I'm just a "troll") and I start bringing the subject up with an Internet account (and I have several) the SEC will be more concerned with me than GM not accounting for their funds?

Yeah no. Not how it works. Free speech and all ... law is concerned about people who take other people's money ... not "trolls" (I'm still waiting on evidence that I am one)

mr_random

legendary

Activity: 1344

Merit: 1001

Quote from: MKAxe11 on November 16, 2014, 06:15:03 PM

Quote from: CryptoGretzky on November 16, 2014, 05:50:57 PM

Please all, just don't respond to the trolls. It just makes them feel like they are getting attention. That's what these trolls that live in their mom's basement strive for. Don't quote them and just ignore them.

You're right. I was just giving him the opportunity to prove he's not a troll, which he didn't.
Nothing worse than living in his mom's basement and being an unsuccessful troll! Roll Eyes

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=trolling&defid=4250942
goto: 'Signs that your trolling is unsuccessful'

In this case unicornfarts has been established as someone who created multiple accounts to trash talk Dan's projects.

It's actually illegal to do that with things like stocks on investment discussion forums. Too bad crypto isn't regulated yet. Although that said, the guy who ran the Bitcoin ponzi in 2012 ended up getting busted big time 2 years later so there's always hope.

UnicornFarts

full member

Activity: 154

Merit: 100

Quote from: MKAxe11 on November 16, 2014, 06:15:03 PM

Quote from: CryptoGretzky on November 16, 2014, 05:50:57 PM

Please all, just don't respond to the trolls. It just makes them feel like they are getting attention. That's what these trolls that live in their mom's basement strive for. Don't quote them and just ignore them.

You're right. I was just giving him the opportunity to prove he's not a troll, which he didn't.
Nothing worse than living in his mom's basement and being an unsuccessful troll! Roll Eyes

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=trolling&defid=4250942
goto: 'Signs that your trolling is unsuccessful'

Can someone point me to the expenditure breakdown if it happened? My digging didn't turn anything up.

As to the moms basement thing. I can appreciate the humor of a neckbeard but I'm not one. I spent a week on the Rio Grande and plan on spending next year in Thailand. And have a house I can come home to if I feel like that I actually own.

Can someone explain WHAT I have done in my posts today that is trollish behavior because I fail to see it?

MKAxe11

full member

Activity: 165

Merit: 100

Quote from: CryptoGretzky on November 16, 2014, 05:50:57 PM

Please all, just don't respond to the trolls. It just makes them feel like they are getting attention. That's what these trolls that live in their mom's basement strive for. Don't quote them and just ignore them.

You're right. I was just giving him the opportunity to prove he's not a troll, which he didn't.
Nothing worse than living in his mom's basement and being an unsuccessful troll! Roll Eyes

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=trolling&defid=4250942
goto: 'Signs that your trolling is unsuccessful'

CryptoGretzky

sr. member

Activity: 322

Merit: 250

Please all, just don't respond to the trolls. It just makes them feel like they are getting attention. That's what these trolls that live in their mom's basement strive for. Don't quote them and just ignore them.

MKAxe11

full member

Activity: 165

Merit: 100

Quote from: UnicornFarts on November 16, 2014, 04:01:39 PM

Quote

else you have no reason to ask

Not true ... There are many reasons to be curious about something you have no stake in.

I just remembered a resounding assurance from the core team that a list of expenses would be provided. However it looks like both they and the hodlers of the coin would prefer to not.

Which is fine ... it was just a question.

Objectivity folks ... put down the pompoms and get some

Ok well, let's say they haven't provided (btw, they did). If they would do now to your discretion, would you be a supporter? I doubt it, so why even ask? Your incentive is just too obvious my friend...

Dungor

full member

Activity: 178

Merit: 100

Quote from: UnicornFarts on November 16, 2014, 04:11:23 PM

Quote from: synechist on November 16, 2014, 04:04:15 PM

Quote from: UnicornFarts on November 16, 2014, 04:01:39 PM

Quote

else you have no reason to ask

Objectivity folks ... put down the pompoms and get some

Or, in your case, the pitchfork.

Witch-hunts are not known for their objectivity rdnkjdi.

Now please go away and do not post in this thread again. You're not welcome here.

I didn't take anyone's money. I didn't promise to talk about how it was spent and then refuse to do so.

In fact in this case I just asked a simple question.

You are honestly one sad little person, I hope you get well some day.

UnicornFarts

full member

Activity: 154

Merit: 100

Quote from: synechist on November 16, 2014, 04:04:15 PM

Quote from: UnicornFarts on November 16, 2014, 04:01:39 PM

Quote

else you have no reason to ask

Objectivity folks ... put down the pompoms and get some

Or, in your case, the pitchfork.

Witch-hunts are not known for their objectivity rdnkjdi.

Now please go away and do not post in this thread again. You're not welcome here.

I didn't take anyone's money. I didn't promise to talk about how it was spent and then refuse to do so.

In fact in this case I just asked a simple question.

synechist

legendary

Activity: 1190

Merit: 1000

To commodify ethicality is to ethicise the market

Quote from: UnicornFarts on November 16, 2014, 04:01:39 PM

Quote

else you have no reason to ask

Objectivity folks ... put down the pompoms and get some

Or, in your case, the pitchfork.

Witch-hunts are not known for their objectivity rdnkjdi.

Now please go away and do not post in this thread again. You're not welcome here.

UnicornFarts

full member

Activity: 154

Merit: 100

Quote

else you have no reason to ask

Not true ... There are many reasons to be curious about something you have no stake in.

I just remembered a resounding assurance from the core team that a list of expenses would be provided. However it looks like both they and the hodlers of the coin would prefer to not.

Which is fine ... it was just a question.

Objectivity folks ... put down the pompoms and get some

mr_random

legendary

Activity: 1344

Merit: 1001

Quote from: KimmyF on November 16, 2014, 03:26:30 PM

Quote from: ib88 on November 16, 2014, 02:04:24 PM

...

Trying to provide a detailed expense sheet is completely futile - it'll just be a list of work carried out and the amount of funds that were required/spent to carry out said work. All of which is impossible to verify anyway. All it serves to do is waste time just to appease trolls like you.

'''

Think they ask for a list so they can wine about every item on every related detail for weeks to come. All other issues are dead, they just need something else to complain about.
It would be a complete nightmare, why amount x for item y, how we know this contribute to the overall goal, why not do it yourself, who is that guy/company, did you know he also worked with someone else, ...... just endless shit
In the end we still get posts in 2015 about some traffic ticket some outside freelancer got in high school

Lets forget that list, none of the people that where around when XC started seems to mind, others got in when it was already spend. Its history, lets keep it there

Yup. It will just give them more ammunition and it will just lead to more questions and more FUD topics.

KimmyF

sr. member

Activity: 978

Merit: 250

Quote from: ib88 on November 16, 2014, 02:04:24 PM

...

Trying to provide a detailed expense sheet is completely futile - it'll just be a list of work carried out and the amount of funds that were required/spent to carry out said work. All of which is impossible to verify anyway. All it serves to do is waste time just to appease trolls like you.

'''

Think they ask for a list so they can wine about every item on every related detail for weeks to come. All other issues are dead, they just need something else to complain about.
It would be a complete nightmare, why amount x for item y, how we know this contribute to the overall goal, why not do it yourself, who is that guy/company, did you know he also worked with someone else, ...... just endless shit
In the end we still get posts in 2015 about some traffic ticket some outside freelancer got in high school

Lets forget that list, none of the people that where around when XC started seems to mind, others got in when it was already spend. Its history, lets keep it there

MKAxe11

full member

Activity: 165

Merit: 100

Quote from: UnicornFarts on November 16, 2014, 02:36:47 PM

Quote from: ib88 on November 16, 2014, 02:04:24 PM

Quote from: UnicornFarts on November 16, 2014, 01:23:32 PM

Quote from: synechist on November 16, 2014, 10:28:59 AM

Quote from: UnicornFarts on November 16, 2014, 09:32:02 AM

Can someone link me to the detailed expense sheet of the XC premine expenditures Dan & team promised a few weeks ago?

Get lost rdnkjdi.

Regardless of the source .. asking for something that was promised to be provided weeks ago is not FUD. Not even close ...

Trying to provide a detailed expense sheet is completely futile - it'll just be a list of work carried out and the amount of funds that were required/spent to carry out said work. All of which is impossible to verify anyway. All it serves to do is waste time just to appease trolls like you.

I've said it to you before - the amount of time you spend misdirecting your anger at XC for being scammed (as you believe) is completely irrational. Jasinlee had minimal input (if any!?) into XC and has subsequently moved on long long ago. His involvement in what you perceive to be a scam didn't even come to light until after he temporarily joined the XC team. If I knew you personally I would be genuinely worried for your mental well-being; spending hours upon hours each week fudding anything XC-related, a project that has nothing to do with you losing your own investment is not normal behaviour. This is the last time I respond to trolls like you btw. Just move on.

I was just curious on if they'd made good on their promise a few weeks ago.

why are you curious?
point me to one post you made in the past that shows you're a potential investor/supporter and why, else you have no reason to ask such questions besides the obvious once no one cares about.

MKAxe11

full member

Activity: 165

Merit: 100

Quote from: ib88 on November 16, 2014, 10:56:55 AM

Quote from: MKAxe11 on November 16, 2014, 10:38:42 AM

@UnicornFarts

going through your post history, I don't see much reasoning why you would invest in XC. instead a lot of comments that could be considered FUD (or at least uncertainty and doubt).
so i consider you are not invested in XC at all. except your one of the stupidest investors in the crypto world (an there's a lot of stupid crypto investors around not knowing the slightest thing about trading/investing), who buts money into something you don't believe in or trust.

but I give you the benefit of the doubt and say your not invested in XC, then stop lurking around here and also stop demanding stuff from the our dev - he has better things to do, really - and I can't remember anyone from the team saying "we promise to give you more details about ..." but give me a link if I missed it.

There is absolutely no point in wasting XC team's time by demanding accounts of expenses. Anybody who has remotely followed this thread will know it all went into development, hence the remarkable rate of development up until rev 2. ffs Dan has even invested his own funds in progressing XC's development.

The premine address has been available to the public at all times. Anyone who had concerns or questions regarding expenses had every opportunity to inquire throughout the project - why all these "concerns" now? Because of trolls trying to fuel a non-existent fire. A list detailing expenses doesn't prove anything now anyhow. I, myself, could come up with a list of what xc went where - it proves nothing!

The premine was also only 125k - the average price of XC has probably been about 50 cents so that's approx $62,500 in total funds over 5/6 months (give or take). That is a shoestring budget at best so the team should be commended on getting XC into the position it is now. Looking forward to seeing what XC accomplishes over the coming weeks and months.

+1 agree on all of what you just said.

the only point of answering such questions now would be, if someone new seems to be interested in the project and is a potential investor. and even then it could be done by the community - no need for the team or Dan to put a minute of effort in this. but I don't give a s*$% about UnicornFart since he is obviously here with different intentions...

infinitechaos

sr. member

Activity: 462

Merit: 250

Have any of you been watching the rich list lately?

The top 10 now has over 2.1 million coins. Last time onealfa posted his update a few weeks back I think the top 10 had 1.7 million coins.

The #1 address has added ~120k XC in the last week. This one has been holding for the most part since May.

https://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/address.dws?50852.htm

This one is #2 and has added all of its nearly 400k coins since the Halloween FUDstorm.

https://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/address.dws?72332.htm

It'd be really swell if #1 were Dan's personal address...holding like a boss since May and buying more at the bottom.

UnicornFarts

full member

Activity: 154

Merit: 100

Quote from: ib88 on November 16, 2014, 02:04:24 PM

Quote from: UnicornFarts on November 16, 2014, 01:23:32 PM

Quote from: synechist on November 16, 2014, 10:28:59 AM

Quote from: UnicornFarts on November 16, 2014, 09:32:02 AM

Can someone link me to the detailed expense sheet of the XC premine expenditures Dan & team promised a few weeks ago?

Get lost rdnkjdi.

Regardless of the source .. asking for something that was promised to be provided weeks ago is not FUD. Not even close ...

Trying to provide a detailed expense sheet is completely futile - it'll just be a list of work carried out and the amount of funds that were required/spent to carry out said work. All of which is impossible to verify anyway. All it serves to do is waste time just to appease trolls like you.

I've said it to you before - the amount of time you spend misdirecting your anger at XC for being scammed (as you believe) is completely irrational. Jasinlee had minimal input (if any!?) into XC and has subsequently moved on long long ago. His involvement in what you perceive to be a scam didn't even come to light until after he temporarily joined the XC team. If I knew you personally I would be genuinely worried for your mental well-being; spending hours upon hours each week fudding anything XC-related, a project that has nothing to do with you losing your own investment is not normal behaviour. This is the last time I respond to trolls like you btw. Just move on.

I was just curious on if they'd made good on their promise a few weeks ago.

Topic: [XC][XCurrency] Decentralised Trustless Privacy Platform / Encrypted XChat / Pos - page 31. (Read 1484219 times)