ok guys I just got a transactions trough the mixer.... but it seems I got just debited
Status: 1/unconfirmed
Date: 20/09/2014 23:06
Debit: -138.99695 XC
Credit: 5.00 XC
Credit: 118.99694 XC
Credit: 5.00 XC
Credit: 5.00 XC
Credit: 5.00 XC
Net amount: -0.00001 XC
Transaction ID: 18267d506df278852ea5a35c3d1c7b1dbf3e1a147fc5f6ef7b6136da8e263637
Topic: [XC][XCurrency] Decentralised Trustless Privacy Platform / Encrypted XChat / Pos - page 311. (Read 1484189 times)
September 20, 2014, 06:09:22 PM
September 20, 2014, 06:03:57 PM
September 20, 2014, 05:54:09 PM
To be able to send private transactions/collect fees you will need to set up your router opening port tcp 32348 and be sure you firewall allows xc app trough port 32348. If one of those is set up wrongly your private transactions/mixer fee will not work there is a readme file as well where it explains it in ver 2.49.02
According to portcheckers.com, port 32348 is open and my Windows Firewall allows the XC app. Not sure if there is anything else I should be checking....
netstat -an | find "32348"
It will show all in & out connections your wallet has.
example from my own setup: (192.168.0.49 is my local ip)
TCP 192.168.0.49:32348 178.221.54.98:62146 ESTABLISHED
this is a connection to my wallet from the outside
and this are some outgoing connections to other Xnode/Xmixers
TCP 192.168.0.49:50000 81.82.165.203:32348 ESTABLISHED
TCP 192.168.0.49:50079 78.108.54.193:32348 ESTABLISHED
if you see no connections and only a line like this:
TCP 0.0.0.0:32348 0.0.0.0:0 LISTENING
then you still have a firewall or nat problem
Hi kimmy hope you are still here..
I see the connections that you said in many lines that are between two lines the first one is like your:
TCP 0.0.0.0:32348 0.0.0.0:0 LISTENING
the last one is
TCP [::]:32348 [::]:0 LISTENING
Is that ok?
if you have at least one connection with
Ok thank you .. so I see on the left I have all the column of my Internal Ip address with :32348 and :519717 and other 5thousands on the right I have all other bunches of IP addresses but non of them is my local ip
Then as well in the firewall rule I made for xc
In Edge Traversal Settings I have "allow edge traversl" is that ok?
September 20, 2014, 05:48:05 PM
To be able to send private transactions/collect fees you will need to set up your router opening port tcp 32348 and be sure you firewall allows xc app trough port 32348. If one of those is set up wrongly your private transactions/mixer fee will not work there is a readme file as well where it explains it in ver 2.49.02
According to portcheckers.com, port 32348 is open and my Windows Firewall allows the XC app. Not sure if there is anything else I should be checking....
netstat -an | find "32348"
It will show all in & out connections your wallet has.
example from my own setup: (192.168.0.49 is my local ip)
TCP 192.168.0.49:32348 178.221.54.98:62146 ESTABLISHED
this is a connection to my wallet from the outside
and this are some outgoing connections to other Xnode/Xmixers
TCP 192.168.0.49:50000 81.82.165.203:32348 ESTABLISHED
TCP 192.168.0.49:50079 78.108.54.193:32348 ESTABLISHED
if you see no connections and only a line like this:
TCP 0.0.0.0:32348 0.0.0.0:0 LISTENING
then you still have a firewall or nat problem
Hi kimmy hope you are still here..
I see the connections that you said in many lines that are between two lines the first one is like your:
TCP 0.0.0.0:32348 0.0.0.0:0 LISTENING
the last one is
TCP [::]:32348 [::]:0 LISTENING
Is that ok?
if you have at least one connection with
September 20, 2014, 05:42:37 PM
To be able to send private transactions/collect fees you will need to set up your router opening port tcp 32348 and be sure you firewall allows xc app trough port 32348. If one of those is set up wrongly your private transactions/mixer fee will not work there is a readme file as well where it explains it in ver 2.49.02
According to portcheckers.com, port 32348 is open and my Windows Firewall allows the XC app. Not sure if there is anything else I should be checking....
netstat -an | find "32348"
It will show all in & out connections your wallet has.
example from my own setup: (192.168.0.49 is my local ip)
TCP 192.168.0.49:32348 178.221.54.98:62146 ESTABLISHED
this is a connection to my wallet from the outside
and this are some outgoing connections to other Xnode/Xmixers
TCP 192.168.0.49:50000 81.82.165.203:32348 ESTABLISHED
TCP 192.168.0.49:50079 78.108.54.193:32348 ESTABLISHED
if you see no connections and only a line like this:
TCP 0.0.0.0:32348 0.0.0.0:0 LISTENING
then you still have a firewall or nat problem
Hi kimmy hope you are still here..
I see the connections that you said in many lines that are between two lines the first one is like your:
TCP 0.0.0.0:32348 0.0.0.0:0 LISTENING
the last one is
TCP [::]:32348 [::]:0 LISTENING
Is that ok?
In Edge Traversal Settings I have "allow edge traversl" is that ok?
September 20, 2014, 05:38:34 PM
September 20, 2014, 05:27:16 PM
Guys, look on what page we are on. :3
September 20, 2014, 05:15:54 PM
Do you really believe, guys, that you can rely on TA in this shallow market, with these tiny small volumes??? (MINTPALL)
Even I'm a big fan of TA myself, & used a lot of it in FOREX - I dont count much on it here.
One "baby-whale" comes with 100 BTC - and all your TA "clouds" becomes just a plain joke.
Even I'm a big fan of TA myself, & used a lot of it in FOREX - I dont count much on it here.
One "baby-whale" comes with 100 BTC - and all your TA "clouds" becomes just a plain joke.
Hasnt failed yet, for any coins I have been trading
... BTW if ur using Bitcoinwisdom for charts... the magic EMA Parameters are 21 50 100 200 use that with the 4hr chart..... thats a winning combo for any security in the world September 20, 2014, 05:13:00 PM
So nobody wants to give their opinion about this concept?
I like the in/out icons.
Agreed, the In and Out icons.
I would like to see the Decentralized XC/Altcoin Exchange icons, Decentralized Marketplace exchange icons, Decentralized Internet icons, Encrypted cloud File storage icons,
September 20, 2014, 05:11:24 PM
Do you really believe, guys, that you can rely on TA in this shallow market, with these tiny small volumes??? (MINTPALL)
Even I'm a big fan of TA myself, & used a lot of it in FOREX - I dont count much on it here.
One "baby-whale" comes with 100 BTC - and all your TA "clouds" becomes just a plain joke.
Even I'm a big fan of TA myself, & used a lot of it in FOREX - I dont count much on it here.
One "baby-whale" comes with 100 BTC - and all your TA "clouds" becomes just a plain joke.
September 20, 2014, 05:06:05 PM
On a better note we should target MONERO and BYTE people now that this lethal exploit is a reality.. Show them our annon since their annon is flawwed..https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.8902631
This idiot troll may have a point ^^^
Edit: Its not exactly a reality...yet
September 20, 2014, 04:56:16 PM
Like I said before we would either break down in the cloud or up....we broke down... Now we have a cloud forming above us after the kumo twist(THE WHITE LINE OF THE CLOUD TURNING DOWN)... Which means we have to fight the cloud to start and uptrend again... this is ugly situation 
.....
..... September 20, 2014, 04:53:45 PM
So nobody wants to give their opinion about this concept?
I like the in/out icons.
September 20, 2014, 04:42:16 PM
I know quite a bit, very interested in it and believe it will see massive market cap increases once it is actually released. But no not based on blockchain, the coins will act almost like real money, you can see who the previous owner was before you, and that's about it
Exactly...I edited my comment above to reflect that it sounds similar from a layman's explanation...the technical details are completely different.
That said, I am excited for what Tuesday has to bring....
Question - Has the final Rev 2.0 release been completed or is it still going through some fine tuning?
September 20, 2014, 04:05:20 PM
Once we have a generalised content service based purely on Xnodes, I don't think we'd need to centralise voice chat to any extent.
Cool. I wonder if Dan will want to look into any of the tech that MAIDsafe will be using. They seem to have a fair amount of stuff on their wiki - https://github.com/maidsafe/MaidSafe/wiki
I know what we're doing is from a different angle since we focus on privacy. And we're also building directly upon the Bitcoin blockchain technology. But it might save some time and give Dan ideas.
Actually, I was thinking a few days ago how the fragmenting of transactions is very similar to how Maidsafe is fragmenting files for their decentralized internet.
I agree that the two are awesome projects and could compliment each other...
Maidsafe is a fascinating project. Wildly ambitious. Bitcoin devs should be cheering Dan on that he is advancing the Bitcoin tech to compete with them.
When you look at Web 3.0 and blockchain 2.0 concepts that have been hinted at by the XC team there are definitely parallels between what maidsafe want to do and what we are doing. Except we are doing it in the here and now.
Is made safe not based on the blockchain? I don't know anything about that project..
I know quite a bit, very interested in it and believe it will see massive market cap increases once it is actually released. But no not based on blockchain, the coins will act almost like real money, you can see who the previous owner was before you, and that's about it
September 20, 2014, 04:03:40 PM
Once we have a generalised content service based purely on Xnodes, I don't think we'd need to centralise voice chat to any extent.
Cool. I wonder if Dan will want to look into any of the tech that MAIDsafe will be using. They seem to have a fair amount of stuff on their wiki - https://github.com/maidsafe/MaidSafe/wiki
I know what we're doing is from a different angle since we focus on privacy. And we're also building directly upon the Bitcoin blockchain technology. But it might save some time and give Dan ideas.
Actually, I was thinking a few days ago how the fragmenting of transactions is very similar to how Maidsafe is fragmenting files for their decentralized internet.
I agree that the two are awesome projects and could compliment each other...
Maidsafe is a fascinating project. Wildly ambitious. Bitcoin devs should be cheering Dan on that he is advancing the Bitcoin tech to compete with them.
When you look at Web 3.0 and blockchain 2.0 concepts that have been hinted at by the XC team there are definitely parallels between what maidsafe want to do and what we are doing. Except we are doing it in the here and now.
Is made safe not based on the blockchain? I don't know anything about that project..
September 20, 2014, 03:56:13 PM
So nobody wants to give their opinion about this concept?
[snip]
[snip]
All honesty.... dosent look so hot
September 20, 2014, 03:51:58 PM
Once we have a generalised content service based purely on Xnodes, I don't think we'd need to centralise voice chat to any extent.
Cool. I wonder if Dan will want to look into any of the tech that MAIDsafe will be using. They seem to have a fair amount of stuff on their wiki - https://github.com/maidsafe/MaidSafe/wiki
I know what we're doing is from a different angle since we focus on privacy. And we're also building directly upon the Bitcoin blockchain technology. But it might save some time and give Dan ideas.
Actually, I was thinking a few days ago how the fragmenting of transactions is very similar to how Maidsafe is fragmenting files for their decentralized internet.
I agree that the two are awesome projects and could compliment each other...
Maidsafe is a fascinating project. Wildly ambitious. Bitcoin devs should be cheering Dan on that he is advancing the Bitcoin tech to compete with them.
When you look at Web 3.0 and blockchain 2.0 concepts that have been hinted at by the XC team there are definitely parallels between what maidsafe want to do and what we are doing. Except we are doing it in the here and now.
September 20, 2014, 03:51:38 PM
So nobody wants to give their opinion about this concept?
All honesty.... dosent look so hot
September 20, 2014, 03:49:47 PM
So nobody wants to give their opinion about this concept?
Jump to: