-XC did not bring to itself anything the article was written by a third party company not by XC Pr Team.. off course they used Synech Informations who else will they use informations from. When they write an article about dark where da fuck they take the info from? from the Pr Guy of flappy coin?
-2- where is your point? it is true period.
3- as 1 GOFUKING COMPLAIN WITH BITCOIN MAGAZINE ORGANIZE A PUBLIC PROTEST AGAINST BITCOIN MAGAZINE ARTICLE SO YOU WILL BE RIDICULED BY ALL CRYPTO COMMUNITY
PLEASE GO AHEAD AND DO IT NOW GET TFO OF THIS THREAD
Woah fella, take your midal. Nothing can be proven at this time that XC's core privacy feature is better than coinjoin. It's not open source and it hasn't been vetted by anyone for that matter. At this point, it's your assumption that it is ("it's true"). Further, DRK doesn't even follow the structure behind your typical coinjoin. It doesn't mix at transfer, it mixes well in advance, and of similar denominations.
As for the article they wrote, they got their facts wrong, probably due to taking the content from the XC PR team. Looks sloppy. The article would have been fine and solid PR material if it didn't try to take a jab at the competition, yet it did and got it wrong. Sloppy.