[XC][XCurrency] Decentralised Trustless Privacy Platform / Encrypted XChat / Pos - page 329.

Dungor

full member

Activity: 178

Merit: 100

Quote from: wooder on September 18, 2014, 06:28:31 AM

Quote from: cryptico on September 18, 2014, 06:10:57 AM

WOW Darkcoin Shills Fudders all over the Bitcoin magazine Article... Wasn't there an agreement between the Devs of XC and Dark to stop the FUD yet they fail still To accomplish that once they see that they are behind the competition and do cry baby FUDS on the most established Bitcoin Magazine....

This is a confirmation of the Darkcoin community Ethics as we saw at the beginning with the Fedora clone FUD. I would like Synechist to approach directly Evan And get their trolls back on track and get back to their agreement if they still care about their reputation in the Crypto-world.. How they cannot see that their reputation is getting fucked up over and over again is behind reason...

Well I suppose when they see a better tech implementation then their own they have a childish protective mechanism of bullism against the other Coin...

Well done Darkcoin community!

Edit: I do not want to start another war but just defend XC from yet another attack guess from who? from the same community? I can cancel this comment from this thread if requiered but I am furious at the moment.

where is the fud from the drk people? any link?

http://bitcoinmagazine.com/16436/xcurrencys-new-trustless-ad-hoc-mesh-network/

Tbh, this was asking for FUD:

Quote

CoinJoin generally requires a mixing server or some form of semi-centralised supernode (cf. DarkCoin “masternodes”). XC’s mesh networks are entirely distributed, even with the recent addition of Xmixer.

This was referencing DRK as inferior to XC, and thou this is very true peoples feelings tend to follow where they are invested.

zetent

newbie

Activity: 21

Merit: 0

https://i.imgur.com/zWLdC75.png

Seems I got 2 mixed transactions during the night, but no earned fee, just payed?

I'm using the RC6...

dida

legendary

Activity: 1190

Merit: 1000

SoNiC BooM

Quote from: dida on September 15, 2014, 02:05:17 AM

Quote from: synechist on September 14, 2014, 05:58:40 PM

Quote from: tr8kr on September 14, 2014, 04:34:43 PM

We are testing a strong resistance builded from 4 july with many testing without breaking it.

https://cryptrader.com/c/wMHxewsn

If we break out this resitance tomorrow this is going to be another history.

Nice observation there.

It means that 0.002, perceived by many as some sort of ceiling, isn't one at all.

The ceiling on Mintpal is 0.00157 and XC is right on it already.

I can't wait to see what tomorrow's news does to the price.

This coin reminds me of one stock that I buy few years ago ....long story short...it didn't move for 3 years despite good news. I hope that same will not happen here Wink

....I told you Cheesy

sugarboy321

sr. member

Activity: 361

Merit: 250

Quote from: Artoodeetoo on September 18, 2014, 06:42:53 AM

The Dark Crowd just get scared stiff that something better is coming... And it is...

All they can do is make stupid comments and FUD though....

CoinzCoinzCoinz buying into XC is massive though, he is a huge DRK fanboy and has deep pockets....

We need more of these guys to start coming over here... And seeing the light... And the fact he is here says to me, its happening...

They can take their sweet time, I like cheap XC atm.

synechist

legendary

Activity: 1190

Merit: 1000

To commodify ethicality is to ethicise the market

Quote from: illodin on September 18, 2014, 06:41:49 AM

Before Synechist approaches anyone he should himself stop referring to DRK in his own PR materials.

EDIT: ok just realized it's his standard PR practice:

Quote from: synechist on September 17, 2014, 06:24:38 PM

Basically Bleep is like a giant trumpet blast that we can utilise for free. It's an easy marketing opportunity for us. When XChat mobile launches, we're gonna be all about trumping Bleep's privacy and security.

I'm not going to approach anyone. As far as I'm concerned the reaction to Bitcoin Magazine's article doesn't warrant it.

It's a bit of a non-issue.

synechist

legendary

Activity: 1190

Merit: 1000

To commodify ethicality is to ethicise the market

11

Coverage of XC's trustless multipath meshnet on Altcoin Speculation

Social media:

Twitter: https://twitter.com/XCurrency/status/512568327353679874

Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/XCurrency?fref=ts

Artoodeetoo

hero member

Activity: 518

Merit: 500

The Dark Crowd just get scared stiff that something better is coming... And it is...

All they can do is make stupid comments and FUD though....

CoinzCoinzCoinz buying into XC is massive though, he is a huge DRK fanboy and has deep pockets....

We need more of these guys to start coming over here... And seeing the light... And the fact he is here says to me, its happening...

illodin

hero member

Activity: 966

Merit: 1003

Quote from: cryptico on September 18, 2014, 06:10:57 AM

WOW Darkcoin Shills Fudders all over the Bitcoin magazine Article... Wasn't there an agreement between the Devs of XC and Dark to stop the FUD yet they fail still To accomplish that once they see that they are behind the competition and do cry baby FUDS on the most established Bitcoin Magazine....

This is a confirmation of the Darkcoin community Ethics as we saw at the beginning with the Fedora clone FUD. I would like Synechist to approach directly Evan And get their trolls back on track and get back to their agreement if they still care about their reputation in the Crypto-world.. How they cannot see that their reputation is getting fucked up over and over again is behind reason...

Well I suppose when they see a better tech implementation then their own they have a childish protective mechanism of bullism against the other Coin...

Well done Darkcoin community!

Edit: I do not want to start another war but just defend XC from yet another attack guess from who? from the same community? I can cancel this comment from this thread if requiered but I am furious at the moment.

Before Synechist approaches anyone he should himself stop referring to DRK in his own PR materials.

EDIT: ok just realized it's his standard PR practice:

Quote from: synechist on September 17, 2014, 06:24:38 PM

Basically Bleep is like a giant trumpet blast that we can utilise for free. It's an easy marketing opportunity for us. When XChat mobile launches, we're gonna be all about trumping Bleep's privacy and security.

synechist

legendary

Activity: 1190

Merit: 1000

To commodify ethicality is to ethicise the market

Quote from: ?!bennscammed!? on September 18, 2014, 06:33:06 AM

Quote from: sugarboy321 on September 18, 2014, 06:26:17 AM

Hello,

I had another Mixer exchange and I was charged for the transaction.

Status: 1/unconfirmed
Date: 9/18/2014 07:21
Debit: -532.020891 XC
Credit: 528.020881 XC
Credit: 1.00 XC
Credit: 1.00 XC
Credit: 1.00 XC
Credit: 1.00 XC
Net amount: -0.00001 XC
Transaction ID: c416ec449ec555486957cb7a4248ba3fb36040de112d76619b460dde47058245

I just checked port 32348 and it's closed, is this the reason for the Negative amount?

No, its a known bug and Dan fixes this. Maybe your next mix will bring you back to green.

Your port is closed? So the opened Port isnt necessary anymore?
Can someone confirm this? I would feel better to close it.

My mixer's working fine without that port too.

I guess you can close it if you want then... I'm unaware of what the backend implications of doing this might be though.

If you're still getting -0.00001 fees, expect them to go away pretty soon.

xtrembash

sr. member

Activity: 473

Merit: 250

XC seems to be a future winner ^^
i ll buy some while it's cheap

synechist

legendary

Activity: 1190

Merit: 1000

To commodify ethicality is to ethicise the market

Quote from: wooder on September 18, 2014, 06:24:07 AM

Quote from: cryptico on September 18, 2014, 05:41:58 AM

Quote from: wooder on September 18, 2014, 05:39:58 AM

Quote from: synechist on September 18, 2014, 05:38:20 AM

Quote from: cryptico on September 18, 2014, 04:41:28 AM

Quote from: wooder on September 18, 2014, 04:20:49 AM

will a linux client for rev2 be released?

Synechist can confirm this but Dan was talking about a probable release of mac and linux wallets on Sunday

Yes there will be a Linux version. XC will always be cross-platform.

any ETA for REV2?

REV2 is already out Do you mean Linux version?

yeah, the question is related to my first question. Wink

any ETA for the REV2 linux client?

I don't have an ETA for the Linux version yet. Sorry.

?!bennscammed!?

full member

Activity: 195

Merit: 100

Quote from: sugarboy321 on September 18, 2014, 06:26:17 AM

Hello,

I had another Mixer exchange and I was charged for the transaction.

Status: 1/unconfirmed
Date: 9/18/2014 07:21
Debit: -532.020891 XC
Credit: 528.020881 XC
Credit: 1.00 XC
Credit: 1.00 XC
Credit: 1.00 XC
Credit: 1.00 XC
Net amount: -0.00001 XC
Transaction ID: c416ec449ec555486957cb7a4248ba3fb36040de112d76619b460dde47058245

I just checked port 32348 and it's closed, is this the reason for the Negative amount?

No, its a known bug and Dan fixes this. Maybe your next mix will bring you back to green.

Your port is closed? So the opened Port isnt necessary anymore?
Can someone confirm this? I would feel better to close it.

wooder

sr. member

Activity: 324

Merit: 250

Quote from: cryptico on September 18, 2014, 06:10:57 AM

WOW Darkcoin Shills Fudders all over the Bitcoin magazine Article... Wasn't there an agreement between the Devs of XC and Dark to stop the FUD yet they fail still To accomplish that once they see that they are behind the competition and do cry baby FUDS on the most established Bitcoin Magazine....

This is a confirmation of the Darkcoin community Ethics as we saw at the beginning with the Fedora clone FUD. I would like Synechist to approach directly Evan And get their trolls back on track and get back to their agreement if they still care about their reputation in the Crypto-world.. How they cannot see that their reputation is getting fucked up over and over again is behind reason...

Well I suppose when they see a better tech implementation then their own they have a childish protective mechanism of bullism against the other Coin...

Well done Darkcoin community!

Edit: I do not want to start another war but just defend XC from yet another attack guess from who? from the same community? I can cancel this comment from this thread if requiered but I am furious at the moment.

where is the fud from the drk people? any link?

sugarboy321

sr. member

Activity: 361

Merit: 250

Hello,

I had another Mixer exchange and I was charged for the transaction.

Status: 1/unconfirmed
Date: 9/18/2014 07:21
Debit: -532.020891 XC
Credit: 528.020881 XC
Credit: 1.00 XC
Credit: 1.00 XC
Credit: 1.00 XC
Credit: 1.00 XC
Net amount: -0.00001 XC
Transaction ID: c416ec449ec555486957cb7a4248ba3fb36040de112d76619b460dde47058245

I just checked port 32348 and it's closed, is this the reason for the Negative amount?

wooder

sr. member

Activity: 324

Merit: 250

Quote from: cryptico on September 18, 2014, 05:41:58 AM

Quote from: wooder on September 18, 2014, 05:39:58 AM

Quote from: synechist on September 18, 2014, 05:38:20 AM

Quote from: cryptico on September 18, 2014, 04:41:28 AM

Quote from: wooder on September 18, 2014, 04:20:49 AM

will a linux client for rev2 be released?

Synechist can confirm this but Dan was talking about a probable release of mac and linux wallets on Sunday

Yes there will be a Linux version. XC will always be cross-platform.

any ETA for REV2?

REV2 is already out Do you mean Linux version?

yeah, the question is related to my first question. Wink

any ETA for the REV2 linux client?

cryptico

hero member

Activity: 700

Merit: 500

I know it just pisses me off.. they are going to mislead noobs into buying in their coin with their approach.. well I suppose they are pretty desperate anyway...pretty sad.

synechist

legendary

Activity: 1190

Merit: 1000

To commodify ethicality is to ethicise the market

Quote from: sugarboy321 on September 18, 2014, 06:15:48 AM

Quote from: cryptico on September 18, 2014, 06:10:57 AM

WOW Darkcoin Shills Fudders all over the Bitcoin magazine Article... Wasn't there an agreement between the Devs of XC and Dark to stop the FUD yet they fail still To accomplish that once they see that they are behind the competition and do cry baby FUDS on the most established Bitcoin Magazine....

This is a confirmation of the Darkcoin community Ethics as we saw at the beginning with the Fedora clone FUD. I would like Synechist to approach directly Evan And get their trolls back on track and get back to their agreement if they still care about their reputation in the Crypto-world.. How they cannot see that their reputation is getting fucked up over and over again is behind reason...

Well I suppose when they see a better tech implementation then their own they have a childish protective mechanism of bullism against the other Coin...

Well done Darkcoin community!

Edit: I do not want to start another war but just defend XC from yet another attack guess from who? from the same community? I can cancel this comment from this thread if requiered but I am furious at the moment.

Rats on a sinking ship have no concord.

I don't think they made themselves look good by trolling an article on XC. It wasn't about DRK and their reaction was more than a little hysterical.

But we shouldn't make a big thing out of this. It's nothing really.

Let's continue to be good to "enemies" as the Community Code suggests. They're no threat.

sugarboy321

sr. member

Activity: 361

Merit: 250

Quote from: cryptico on September 18, 2014, 06:10:57 AM

WOW Darkcoin Shills Fudders all over the Bitcoin magazine Article... Wasn't there an agreement between the Devs of XC and Dark to stop the FUD yet they fail still To accomplish that once they see that they are behind the competition and do cry baby FUDS on the most established Bitcoin Magazine....

This is a confirmation of the Darkcoin community Ethics as we saw at the beginning with the Fedora clone FUD. I would like Synechist to approach directly Evan And get their trolls back on track and get back to their agreement if they still care about their reputation in the Crypto-world.. How they cannot see that their reputation is getting fucked up over and over again is behind reason...

Well I suppose when they see a better tech implementation then their own they have a childish protective mechanism of bullism against the other Coin...

Well done Darkcoin community!

Edit: I do not want to start another war but just defend XC from yet another attack guess from who? from the same community? I can cancel this comment from this thread if requiered but I am furious at the moment.

Rats on a sinking ship have no concord.

cryptico

hero member

Activity: 700

Merit: 500

WOW Darkcoin Shills Fudders all over the Bitcoin magazine Article... Wasn't there an agreement between the Devs of XC and Dark to stop the FUD yet they fail still To accomplish that once they see that they are behind the competition and do cry baby FUDS on the most established Bitcoin Magazine....

This is a confirmation of the Darkcoin community Ethics as we saw at the beginning with the Fedora clone FUD. I would like Synechist to approach directly Evan And get their trolls back on track and get back to their agreement if they still care about their reputation in the Crypto-world.. How they cannot see that their reputation is getting fucked up over and over again is behind reason...

Well I suppose when they see a better tech implementation then their own they have a childish protective mechanism of bullism against the other Coin...

Well done Darkcoin community!

Edit: I do not want to start another war but just defend XC from yet another attack guess from who? from the same community? I can cancel this comment from this thread if requiered but I am furious at the moment.

holyprofit

full member

Activity: 196

Merit: 100

Quote from: synechist on September 18, 2014, 05:38:20 AM

Just read the bitcoinmagazine and the comments - jeez there are some pretty grumpy people out there. Plenty of
frothing at the mouth over that one !

Topic: [XC][XCurrency] Decentralised Trustless Privacy Platform / Encrypted XChat / Pos - page 329. (Read 1484248 times)